Follow us on social

51970055141_cf99aff01b_o-scaled

Die for Dubai? Senators in dark about reported UAE security pact

This kind of agreement would likely require formal consult with Congress, which apparently has not been in the loop.

Analysis | Middle East

The Biden administration has reportedly offered the United Arab Emirates a guarantee of military protection — one that could commit the United States to another war in the Middle East — as part of a push to keep the oil-rich monarchy in the U.S. orbit.

The UAE and its close ally Saudi Arabia have been pressuring the Biden administration to step up its support for the Arab monarchies, which are waging a cold war against Iran and intervening in the Yemeni civil war with U.S. assistance. Brett McGurk, the White House’s point-man for Middle Eastern affairs, traveled to Abu Dhabi last week to discuss a “strategic framework agreement” between the two countries. The American offer included “U.S. security guarantees,” Axios has reported.

That offer was apparently a step down from the UAE’s original ask. Saudi Arabia and the UAE had been pushing for a treaty alliance with the United States, and asking Israel to help lobby for it, Bloomberg News reported in March.

Under the U.S. Constitution, only Congress has the power to declare war, and all treaties must be approved by two-thirds of the Senate.

But it’s unclear whether the Biden administration has informed any senators of its current offer.

The White House declined to speak on the record. Responsible Statecraft reached out to all 100 U.S. senators, but only one office offered comment.

“Any security guarantees made on behalf of the American people would obviously require a discussion with Congress, and possibly a Senate vote,” said Matt Duss, foreign policy adviser to Sen. Bernie Sanders (I–Vt.). “The administration will need to explain how offering guarantees to a repressive authoritarian government like the UAE promotes America's interests and values.”

A spokesman for Sen. Patrick Leahy (D–Vt.) said that he did not have enough information to comment. A spokeswoman for Sen. Chris Murphy (D–Conn.) said she would not be able to comment by publication time.

Bruce Fein, a constitutional lawyer and former associate deputy attorney general under the Reagan administration, insists that the Biden administration cannot offer anything beyond its “good faith” without a Senate-approved treaty.

“The president has no constitutional authority to give a security pledge to anyone,” he said. “A treaty is what you need.”

Fein pointed out that even the North Atlantic Treaty, the agreement that created the NATO alliance, required members to go through their own “constitutional process” for military action before jumping to each other’s defense.

The only U.S. treaty ally in the Middle East is fellow NATO member Turkey.

Several other Middle Eastern states — Egypt, Israel, Bahrain, Kuwait, and Qatar — are listed as “major non-NATO allies,” which unlocks certain forms of military cooperation but does not include security guarantees. Biden added Qatar to the list earlier this year.

There are thousands of U.S. troops stationed in Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, and the UAE.

The UAE has been pushing for more U.S. backing since a wave of Yemeni rebel attacks earlier this year. The Houthi rebels attacked Abu Dhabi with missiles in mid-January, killing three immigrant workers at an industrial park, and have launched several failed raids since then.

The U.S. military responded to the January attacks by rushing a squadron of F-22 fighter jets and the guided missile cruiser USS Cole to the area. Less than a month later, U.S. forces in the UAE sheltered in bunkers and fired back during a Houthi missile raid.

All that additional support was not enough for the UAE, which cozied up to Russia and refused to take Biden’s calls as oil prices rose after the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Political pundits supported by the UAE also turned up their messaging against the Biden administration.

Professor Abdulkhaleq Abdulla, a former adviser to the UAE’s leadership, issued a thinly-veiled threat in a March op-ed, writing that the United States is “at risk of losing a regional partner” and “the task of repairing the misunderstanding falls on the shoulders of the Biden administration.”

“The UAE has invested much in its relationship with Washington over the past thirty years,” Abdulkhaleq warned.

Abu Dhabi is now calling in the favor it believes to be owed: a pledge for Americans to fight and die for the kingdom. Depending on how far Congress pushes back, it may get its way.


Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken meets with UAE Crown Prince Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan in Rabat, Morocco, on March 29, 2022. [State Department photo by Freddie Everett]
Analysis | Middle East
Russia train derailment
Top photo credit: Specialists of emergency services work at the scene, after a road bridge collapsed onto railway tracks due to an explosion in the Bryansk region, Russia, June 1, 2025. REUTERS/Stringer

What the giddy reaction to Ukraine's surprise attacks says about us

Europe

A little over forty years ago, while preparing for a weekly radio address, President Ronald Reagan famously cracked wise about the possibility of attacking the Soviet Union. “I have signed legislation that outlaws Russia forever,” he said. “We begin bombing in five minutes.”

Reagan had not realized that the studio microphone was recording his joke and that technical personnel preparing for the broadcast in stations across the country were already listening. His facetious remarks were leaked. The public reaction was immediate, strong, and negative. Democratic candidate Walter Mondale admonished his election opponent for ill-considered humor, and Reagan’s polling numbers took a temporary hit.

keep readingShow less
Is Trump's ambassador to Israel going off-script?
Top photo credit: U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee visits the Western Wall, Judaism's holiest prayer site, in Jerusalem's Old City, April 18, 2025. REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun

Is Trump's ambassador to Israel going off-script?

Washington Politics

As the Trump administration continues to try to broker a nuclear deal with Iran, Israel’s president Benjamin Netanyahu has not been a willing partner in those efforts.

The two spoke Monday evening, but Israel’s government has threatened strikes on Iran that could upend a deal. When Trump bypassed Israel on his Middle East trip last month, many saw it as a snub to Netanyahu.

keep readingShow less
Boeing
Top image credit: EVERETT (WA), USA – JANUARY 30 2015: Unidentified Boeing employees continue work building its latest Boeing 777 jets at its Everett factory (First Class Photography / Shutterstock.com)

A nuclear deal with Iran could generate billions for US economy

Middle East

As the U.S. and Iran engage in fraught rounds of nuclear talks, deep distrust, past failures, and mounting pressure from opponents continue to hinder progress. Washington has reverted to its old zero-enrichment stance, a policy that, in 2010, led Iran to increase uranium enrichment from under 5% to 20%. Tehran remains equally entrenched, insisting, “No enrichment, no deal, No nuclear weapons, we have a deal.”

In Washington, the instinct is to tighten the screws on Tehran, make military threats credible, and explore strike options to force capitulation. Yet history shows that these coercive tactics often fail. Sanctions have not secured compliance and have proven costly to U.S. interests. Military strikes are unlikely to dismantle Iran’s nuclear capabilities; instead, they risk convincing Tehran to pursue the development of nuclear weapons.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.