Follow us on social

google cta
Screen-shot-2022-05-13-at-7.04.04-am

Rand Paul 'single handedly' holds up $40 billion Ukraine aid bill

The US can no longer afford to be the "Uncle Sam, the policeman who saves the world," no matter how good it feels.

Europe
google cta
google cta

Kentucky Senator Rand Paul “single handedly” held up the $40 billion Ukraine aid bill last night by introducing a modification that would require a special inspector general to monitor the aid.

Moving the spending bill towards passage would have required unanimous consent of the chamber.

Lawmakers, who have shuttled billions of dollars through Congress in seeming record time over the last two months, are predictably annoyed. 

“If every member held every bill in exchange for every last little demand, it would mean total and permanent paralysis for this chamber,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer exclaimed on the Senate floor. “When you have a proposal to change a bill, you have to convince members to support it. The junior senator from Kentucky has not done that.”

Paul, for his part, had warned he would be making this move in a local podcast earlier this week, and reminded that he was first obligated “to the national security of the United States of America,” not to Ukraine, no matter how good giving the weapons and humanitarian aid felt. He pointed to the deficit and current inflation, up to a 40-year high

“We can’t save Ukraine by dooming the U.S. economy,” he said in his floor remarks. “Americans are feeling the pain and Congress seems content on adding to that pain by shuffling money out the door as fast as they can.”

He noted that adding to the billions the U.S. has given to Ukraine since 2014, Congress will have authorized some $60 billion in total spending to the country. Let's put $60 billion into perspective, he said. "Ukraine would become the largest annual recipient of U.S. military aid in the past two decades.” 

He noted that international partners and allies were stepping up, sending unprecedented amounts of weapons and aid to Ukraine at this time. “It’s not all about us, it isn't that we always have to be the Uncle Sam, the policeman who saves the world, particularly when it's on borrowed money,” he added. “America can’t afford to be world’s policeman.” 

Schumer said he would not modify the bill, which would have to go back to the House, which already passed the bill.

“It’s clear from the junior senator from Kentucky’s remarks that he does not want to aid Ukraine, that is not the case for the overwhelming majority here.”


google cta
Europe
United Nations
Monitors at the United Nations General Assembly hall display the results of a vote on a resolution condemning the annexation of parts of Ukraine by Russia, amid Russia's invasion of Ukraine, at the United Nations Headquarters in New York City, New York, U.S., October 12, 2022. REUTERS/David 'Dee' Delgado||

We're burying the rules based order. But what's next?

Global Crises

In a Davos speech widely praised for its intellectual rigor and willingness to confront established truths, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney finally laid the fiction of the “rules-based international order” to rest.

The “rules-based order” — or RBIO — was never a neutral description of the post-World War II system of international law and multilateral institutions. Rather, it was a discourse born out of insecurity over the West’s decline and unwillingness to share power. Aimed at preserving the power structures of the past by shaping the norms and standards of the future, the RBIO was invariably something that needed to be “defended” against those who were accused of opposing it, rather than an inclusive system that governed relations between all states.

keep readingShow less
china trump
President Donald Trump announces the creation of a critical minerals reserve during an event in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, DC on Monday, February 2, 2026. Trump announced the creation of “Project Vault,” a rare earth stockpile to lower reliance on China for rare earths and other resources. Photo by Bonnie Cash/Pool/Sipa USA

Trump vs. his China hawks

Asia-Pacific

In the year since President Donald Trump returned to the White House, China hawks have started to panic. Leading lights on U.S. policy toward Beijing now warn that Trump is “barreling toward a bad bargain” with the Chinese Communist Party. Matthew Pottinger, a key architect of Trump’s China policy in his first term, argues that the president has put Beijing in a “sweet spot” through his “baffling” policy decisions.

Even some congressional Republicans have criticized Trump’s approach, particularly following his decision in December to allow the sale of powerful Nvidia AI chips to China. “The CCP will use these highly advanced chips to strengthen its military capabilities and totalitarian surveillance,” argued Rep. John Moolenaar (R-Mich.), who chairs the influential Select Committee on Competition with China.

keep readingShow less
Is America still considered part of the 'Americas'?
Top image credit: bluestork/shutterstock.com

Is America still considered part of the 'Americas'?

Latin America

On January 7, the White House announced its plans to withdraw from 66 international bodies whose work it had deemed inconsistent with U.S. national interests.

While many of these organizations were international in nature, three of them were specific to the Americas — the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research, the Pan American Institute of Geography and History, and the U.N.’s Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. The decision came on the heels of the Dominican Republic postponing the X Summit of the Americas last year following disagreements over who would be invited and ensuing boycotts.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.