Follow us on social

google cta
Shutterstock_2133065873-scaled

Ukraine war is causing a commodities 'super cycle' and likely global food crisis

Wheat, corn, and sunflower oil have already hit record high prices. Here is what happens if Russia decides to weaponize them.

Analysis | Europe
google cta
google cta

Energy prices are soaring to levels not seen in a decade. Media attention has rightly focused on the price that consumers are paying at the gas pump, but there has been less of a spotlight on the price of “soft” commodities such as wheat, corn, and sunflower oil, all of which hit record highs since the Russian invasion of Ukraine

These commodities are essential to human consumption from everything to bread that we eat and the food that animals such as cows, chickens, and pigs consume, and are sources of protein for many in the world.

Already reeling from a supply chain that has been wrecked by the COVID-19 pandemic and runaway inflation, consumers are about to face a commodities super cycle that will see the price of essential “kitchen table” items — like a box of cereal or a loaf of bread — soar. Here is why: Russia and Ukraine are so called “breadbasket” countries. Russia is the top exporter of wheat worldwide; it accounts for 20 percent of global supply. 

Meanwhile, Ukraine is the sixth top exporter of wheat and produces about 8 percent of global supply. Ukraine is blessed with black soil known as “chernozem” and is the world’s leader in sunflower oil and a top 10 exporter of corn, rapeseed, and barley. Europe, the Middle East, and China are leading destinations for Russia and Ukraine agri-commodities.  

The commodities markets are pricing in this conflict and the signs point to prices we have never seen for food that is necessary for global consumption. The benchmark UN food price index has hit a record high, rising by 40 percent since the pandemic began. Meanwhile, wheat prices closed at record highs on the Chicago Board of Trade last week. Corn, Soybean, and Sunflower oil are not too far behind. 

The populations that will suffer the most are those in poorer countries such as Pakistan, Bangladesh, Egypt, Lebanon, and Morocco, which get over 40 percent of their corn and wheat from the Black Sea region. As the UN report states, “These countries are already grappling with hunger issues and where further food shortages and price increases could stoke social unrest.” As for the consequences of this situation, one only needs to look at the role the rise in food prices from 2007-2010 played in stoking the Arab Uprising. 

As Russia’s war machine continues to press its campaign in Ukraine, and the United States and Europe continue to pile on sanctions, it is very likely that the Kremlin will weaponize the food chain to pressure its adversaries and remind them of the sway Moscow holds over the commodities market. Even though there are no EU or U.S. sanctions on Russian commodities exports, the West has shut down Russia’s access to banking and technology. Therefore the Kremlin will become more protectionist and make it difficult for the private sector to export goods like wheat, corn, and fertilizer (of which Russia is a top 5 producer). Already Moscow has announced an embargo on wheat to its poor neighbors in the Eurasian Economic Union and put an export ban on potash and phosphates-essential ingredients in fertilizer to the outside world. 

While the United States and its allies can take comfort in “un-plugging” Russia from the global economy for its aggression in Ukraine, the risks of pulling the world into a global recession, a food crisis, and social unrest are rising. Sanctions of this scale have been used on countries such as Iran, Venezuela, and North Korea in the past, but they are small players in the global economy.

The world can adjust quickly to life without Iranian and Venezuelan oil, but an economy of the size and scale of Russia which produces many of the commodities that we use and consume in everyday life is unprecedented. We are truly in uncharted waters and seemingly unprepared for the consequences.

Because Europe lacks alternative energy sources, Western sanctions have so far left the lifeblood of the Russian economy mostly untouched — its ability to export oil and gas to Europe and for  Russian banks that process those payments. But it doesn’t appear that similar consideration has been given to the consequences of Russia no longer being part of the global food supply chain. 

Americans and Europeans aren’t accustomed to the after effects of sanctions against rogue states because they are in distant lands and have no direct impact on their everyday lives. Iran and North Korea’s ability to rattle the global economy is a nuisance. Russia can and has clapped back, and soon families in the United States and Europe will be having discussions  about the high  prices of corn flakes, bread, and meat. For many of us, it will be a crash course on the impact of sanctions  


Dear RS readers: It has been an extraordinary year and our editing team has been working overtime to make sure that we are covering the current conflicts with quality, fresh analysis that doesn’t cleave to the mainstream orthodoxy or take official Washington and the commentariat at face value. Our staff reporters, experts, and outside writers offer top-notch, independent work, daily. Please consider making a tax-exempt, year-end contribution to Responsible Statecraftso that we can continue this quality coverage — which you will find nowhere else — into 2026. Happy Holidays!

Image: Volodymyr Burdiak via shutterstock.com
google cta
Analysis | Europe
Gaza tent city
Top photo credit: Palestinian Mohammed Abu Halima, 43, sits in front of his tent with his children in a camp for displaced Palestinians in Gaza City, Gaza, on December 11, 2025. Matrix Images / Mohammed Qita

Four major dynamics in Gaza War that will impact 2026

Middle East

Just ahead of the New Year, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is set to visit President Donald Trump in Florida today, no doubt with a wish list for 2026. Already there have been reports that he will ask Trump to help attack Iran’s nuclear program, again.

Meanwhile, despite the media narrative, the war in Gaza is not over, and more specifically, it has not ended in a clear victory for Netanyahu’s IDF forces. Nor has the New Year brought solace to the Palestinians — at least 71,000 have been killed since October 2023. But there have been a number of important dynamics and developments in 2025 that will affect not only Netanyahu’s “asks” but the future of security in Israel and the region.

keep readingShow less
Sokoto Nigeria
Top photo credit: Map of Nigeria (Shutterstock/Juan Alejandro Bernal)

Trump's Christmas Day strikes on Nigeria beg question: Why Sokoto?

Africa

For the first time since President Trump publicly excoriated Nigeria’s government for allegedly condoning a Christian genocide, Washington made good on its threat of military action on Christmas Day when U.S. forces conducted airstrikes against two alleged major positions of the Islamic State (IS-Sahel) in northwestern Sokoto state.

According to several sources familiar with the operation, the airstrike involved at least 16 GPS-guided munitions launched from the Navy destroyer, USS Paul Ignatius, stationed in the Gulf of Guinea. Debris from unexpended munition consistent with Tomahawk cruise missile components have been recovered in the village of Jabo, Sokoto state, as well nearly 600 miles away in Offa in Kwara state.

keep readingShow less
What use is a mine ban treaty if signers at war change their minds?
Top image credit: Voodison328 via shutterstock.com

What use is a mine ban treaty if signers at war change their minds?

Global Crises

Earlier this month in Geneva, delegates to the Antipersonnel Mine Ban Treaty’s 22nd Meeting of States Parties confronted the most severe crisis in the convention’s nearly three-decade history. That crisis was driven by an unprecedented convergence of coordinated withdrawals by five European states and Ukraine’s attempt to “suspend” its treaty obligations amid an ongoing armed conflict.

What unfolded was not only a test of the resilience of one of the world’s most successful humanitarian disarmament treaties, but also a critical moment for the broader system of international norms designed to protect civilians during and after war. Against a background of heightened tensions resulting from the war in Ukraine and unusual divisions among the traditional convention champions, the countries involved made decisions that will have long-term implications.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.