Follow us on social

google cta
I'm part of the shameful landmine legacy in Laos. When is Biden going to fix it?

I'm part of the shameful landmine legacy in Laos. When is Biden going to fix it?

The president promised to reverse his predecessor's embrace of these indiscriminate weapons of war but has so far yet to act.

Analysis | Global Crises
google cta
google cta

The American Secret War is not over for me, though it’s been nearly five decades since the last bombs were dropped on Laos.

Veterans like me know that war is never over when we return home. Instead, it is often the beginning of more suffering and a long, nonlinear path to healing and closure from trauma — if we ever get there.

It’s been a year since President Biden took office and I am disappointed at his inability to act on his promise while on the campaign trail to “promptly roll back” his predecessor’s antipersonnel landmine policy. The president should confirm our stance as a leader in human rights by immediately prohibiting our military from acquiring and using landmines and destroying all stockpiles of these weapons. We as a country need to move far away from this reckless and archaic policy.

Antipersonnel landmines and other indiscriminate weapons are designed to do one thing: Kill now or kill later. I know this from experience.

From 1964 to 1973, the United States dropped over 2.5 million tons of ordnance over Laos during 580,000 bombing missions — equal to a planeload of bombs every 8 minutes, 24 hours a day for 9 straight years. This earned Laos the unwanted title of being the most bombed country per capita in history.

I was a part of the problem.

As a United States Air Force Veteran who served this great country for 38 years, I know firsthand the enduring impacts that these indiscriminate weapons have on their executors and on their human targets.

From December 1966 until December 1968, I was assigned to air bases in Thailand. The primary mission of the units to which I was assigned was to stop the flow of personnel and materials coming from North Vietnam through the “Ho Chi Minh Trail” to South Vietnam. The trail was located almost entirely in Laos.

At this time, I was a 26-year-old newly promoted captain who knew little more about the war in Vietnam than the majority of Americans at that time. I bought into the notion that there was a need to hold the line against the possible domino effect of a communist takeover across all of Asia if the United States didn’t stop them in Vietnam.

My naivete went back to my youth, growing up with a John Wayne view of America. We were the good guys, always on the right side and exercising our power only to ensure democracy and peace.

Within a few months, I was disabused of those notions.

Picture1

In the wake of the U.S. bombings, 25 percent of the population of Laos became refugees. Countless historical and religious sites were destroyed, and innocent civilian blood was spilled on the soil of Laos. Families were displaced, separated, and forced to start a new life in a new culture, land, and language.

Those who escaped the constant pummeling of bombs have to deal with the emotional trauma and guilt of leaving their countrymen behind, knowing that there’s still a threat from unexploded ordnance and landmines.

The worst part for me is that an estimated one-third of the bombs dropped did not explode, leaving Laos contaminated with vast quantities of unexploded ordnance. To date, one percent has been cleared and over 25,000 people have been killed or injured since the bombing ceased. Other gifts left behind during this period include landmines and Agent Orange.

I spent 35 years of my life grappling with the guilt, horror, and trauma from the war and my only escape was to turn to alcohol and opioids. I worked with a therapist and found a way to live in solitude with the past and focus my energies on ways that can help resolve some of the legacies of war.

When I moved to Oregon, I became involved through the city in efforts to ease the resettlement of Laotians and met someone who looked familiar. On one of my visits to General Vang Pao’s headquarters, I was introduced to a 14-year-old interpreter for Vang Pao named Bruce. Here in Portland, Bruce was now Dr. Bruce Bliatout, the head of the county refugee and health administration.

Bruce and I, along with other members of the Hmong community, started the Immigrant and Refugee Committee Organization, which today serves a diverse group of immigrants and refugees from countries all over the world. It was through this organization that I became aware of the work of Legacies of War.

As Board Chair of Legacies, I’m proud of our team’s efforts to support bomb clearance and survivor and victims’ assistance. I’m also thankful that we are a member of the Steering Committee of the U.S. Campaign to Ban Landmine and Cluster Munition Coalition.

I urge President Biden to show American leadership and set the United States on a swift path to boldly join the 164 other countries who have made the humane decision to sign the international Mine Ban Treaty and the 123 countries who have pledged their support to the Convention on Cluster Munitions by the end of this year.

There are many NGOs and victims and survivor advocates like Legacies who stand ready to help consult the president and his team.

Mr. President, how many more lives must be unjustly taken from these weapons before you take action?


Photo: Neale Cousland / shutterstock.com|
google cta
Analysis | Global Crises
Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi
Top photo credit: Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi 首相官邸 (Cabinet Public Affairs Office)

Takaichi 101: How to torpedo relations with China in a month

Asia-Pacific

On November 7, Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi stated that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could undoubtedly be “a situation that threatens Japan’s survival,” thereby implying that Tokyo could respond by dispatching Self-Defense Forces.

This statement triggered the worst crisis in Sino-Japanese relations in over a decade because it reflected a transformation in Japan’s security policy discourse, defense posture, and U.S.-Japan defense cooperation in recent years. Understanding this transformation requires dissecting the context as well as content of Takaichi’s parliamentary remarks.

keep readingShow less
Starmer, Macron, Merz G7
Top photo credit: Prime Minister Keir Starmer meets Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and António Costa, President of the European Council at the G7 world leaders summit in Kananaskis, June 15, 2025. Picture by Simon Dawson / No 10 Downing Street

The Europeans pushing the NATO poison pill

Europe

The recent flurry of diplomatic activity surrounding Ukraine has revealed a stark transatlantic divide. While high level American and Ukrainian officials have been negotiating the U.S. peace plan in Geneva, European powers have been scrambling to influence a process from which they risk being sidelined.

While Europe has to be eventually involved in a settlement of the biggest war on its territory after World War II, so far it’s been acting more like a spoiler than a constructive player.

keep readingShow less
Sudan
Top image credit: A Sudanese army soldier stands next to a destroyed combat vehicle as Sudan's army retakes ground and some displaced residents return to ravaged capital in the state of Khartoum Sudan March 26, 2025. REUTERS/El Tayeb Siddig
Will Sudan attack the UAE?

Saudi leans in hard to get UAE out of Sudan civil war

Middle East

As Saudi Arabia’s powerful crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman (MBS), swept through Washington last week, the agenda was predictably packed with deals: a trillion-dollar investment pledge, access to advanced F-35 fighter jets, and coveted American AI technology dominated the headlines. Yet tucked within these transactions was a significant development for the civil war in Sudan.

Speaking at the U.S.-Saudi Investment Forum President Donald Trump said that Sudan “was not on my charts,” viewing the conflict as “just something that was crazy and out of control” until the Saudi leader pressed the issue. “His majesty would like me to do something very powerful having to do with Sudan,” Trump recounted, adding that MBS framed it as an opportunity for greatness.

The crown prince’s intervention highlights a crucial new reality that the path to peace, or continued war, in Sudan now runs even more directly through the escalating rivalry between Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The fate of Sudan is being forged in the Gulf, and its future will be decided by which side has more sway in Trump’s White House.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.