Follow us on social

Police-gear

Biden's clamp-down on military gear to local police has giant loophole

On its face, the president's new executive order looks like a step forward, but a closer looks reveals more of the same.

Analysis | Reporting | Military Industrial Complex

After more than a year in office, Joe Biden may finally take action on police militarization. A leaked draft of an executive order obtained by The Federalist contains a provision that would place restrictions on the federal government’s provision of military equipment to state and local police. Some powerful police interest groups have already publicly expressed opposition to the prospective measure.

Police unions successfully compelled the Biden White House to retract a similar measure a year ago. During the president’s first days in office, the White House announced that he  would sign an executive order that would recall a range of military equipment acquired by police through federal channels. But after a successful lobbying effort by law enforcement interest groups, the order was never issued.

A similar lobbying effort appears to be in the works this time around, too, so there is a chance that Biden will once again cave to the whims of police interest groups. However, there is more pressure for Biden to act now than there was last January. Biden’s signature police reform bill, the Justice in Policing Act, passed the House in March but stalled out in the Senate. By September, negotiations over the bill had collapsed entirely.

With no prospect for legislative action, the bill’s lead negotiators, Sen. Cory Booker and Rep. Karen Bass, have called on Biden to resort to executive orders to ensure that key parts of the Act take effect — among them, a provision that would place strict restrictions on the Pentagon’s 1033 program. Local police forces have acquired at least $1.8 billion worth of excess military equipment through the 1033 program since its inception during the War on Drugs. This influx of combat gear to local communities has contributed to increased police violence and inflated law enforcement budgets.

On its surface, the leaked draft of the executive order suggests Biden is ready to strike a major blow to this harmful program. The section related to police militarization lists about a dozen types of weapons that would be prohibited. The problem, however, is that the list of military gear is largely redundant. Most of the combat gear the executive order prohibits is prohibited already. Several items on the list have been transferred to police relatively rarely, while others haven't been leased to police through the 1033 program at all.

If the executive order is issued as is, its biggest contribution would be its prohibition on the transfer of military vehicles. Nearly 5,000 military-grade vehicles worth over $1 billion are currently leased out to police through the 1033 program. Banning this class of armament would initiate a country-wide recall, a significant step toward demilitarizing local communities.

However, the draft executive order includes a key loophole. Police could retain the military vehicles if they claim that they will be used “exclusively for disaster-related emergency preparedness or relief.” The executive order does not include any provisions that would ensure that this condition can actually be enforced, and the Pentagon, which runs the 1033 program, lacks the oversight capacity to effectively monitor the uses to which these vehicles may actually be put. Enforcing this restriction would require a transfer of oversight responsibility from the Pentagon to an agency more capable of monitoring state and local police, like the Department of Justice, which is far better positioned to monitor and evaluate the use and impact of military-grade equipment by police. By contrast, the Department of Defense is an inappropriate institution to liaise with local police. It is also ill-equipped to determine what is and isn’t suitable behavior by law enforcement.

Even if the vehicular restriction could be fully enforced, the Pentagon-to-police pipeline would still be chock-full of combat gear. Biden’s executive order omits the most popular matériel — particularly weapons — transferred from the Pentagon to police under the 1033 program. Close to 70,000 firearms, including 57,494 assault rifles, are on loan to police from the Pentagon according to Department of Defense data. In addition, high-value military equipment, such as airplanes and helicopters, would still be eligible for transfer. The Pentagon has already loaned more than $200 million worth of aircraft to the police.

Biden should amend the executive order so it offers a comprehensive ban on the federal government’s role in militarizing state and local police. Polling suggests doing so would be popular among the public, and empirical evidence suggests it would make communities safer. Since Congress failed to address the issue of police militarization in 2021, it is incumbent on Biden to do so as soon as possible.


HOLLYWOOD, CA / USA - JUNE 2, 2020: National Guard personnel outside the El Capitan theater on Hollywood Blvd. (Shutterstock/Black Pebble)
Analysis | Reporting | Military Industrial Complex
Daniel Noboa, Xi Jinping
Top photo credit: Beijing, China.- In the photos, Chinese President Xi Jinping (right) and his Ecuadorian counterpart, Daniel Noboa (left), during a meeting in the Great Hall of the People, the venue for the main protocol events of the Chinese government on June 26, 2025 (Isaac Castillo/Pool / Latin America News Agency via Reuters Connect)

Why Ecuador went straight to China for relief

Latin America

Marco Rubio is visiting Mexico and Ecuador this week, his third visit as Secretary of State to Latin America.

While his sojourn in Mexico is likely to grab the most headlines given all the attention the Trump administration has devoted to immigration and Mexican drug cartels, the one to Ecuador is primarily designed to “counter malign extra continental actors,” according to a State Department press release.The reference appears to be China, an increasingly important trading and investment partner for Ecuador.

keep readingShow less
US Capitol
Top image credit: Lucky-photographer via shutterstock.com

Why does peace cost a trillion dollars?

Washington Politics

As Congress returns from its summer recess, Washington’s attention is turning towards a possible government shutdown.

While much of the focus will be on a showdown between Senate Democrats and Donald Trump, a subplot is brewing as the House and Senate, led by Republicans but supported by far too many Democrats, fight over how big the Pentagon’s budget should be. The House voted to give Trump his requested trillion dollar budget, while the Senate is demanding $22 billion more.

keep readingShow less
Yemen Ahmed al-Rahawi
Top image credit: Funeral in Sana a for senior Houthi officials killed in Israeli strikes Honor guard hold up a portraits of Houthi government s the Prime Minister Ahmed al-Rahawi and other officials killed in Israeli airstrikes on Thursday, during a funeral ceremony at the Shaab Mosque in Sanaa, Yemen, 01 September 2025. IMAGO/ via REUTERS

Israel playing with fire in Yemen

Middle East

“The war has entered a new phase,” declared Mohammed al-Bukhaiti, a senior official in Yemen’s Ansar Allah movement, after Israeli jets streaked across the Arabian Peninsula to kill the group’s prime minister and a swathe of his cabinet in Yemen’s capital, Sana’a.

The senior official from Ansar Allah, the movement commonly known as the Houthis, was not wrong. The strike, which Israel’s Defense Minister Israel Katz promised was “just the beginning,” signaled a fundamental shift in the cartography of a two-year war of attrition between the region’s most technologically advanced military and its most resilient guerrilla force.

The retaliation was swift, if militarily ineffective: missiles launched towards Israel disintegrated over Saudi Arabia. Internally, a paranoid crackdown ensued on perceived spies. Houthi security forces stormed the offices of the World Food Programme and UNICEF, detaining at least 11 U.N. personnel in a sweep immediately condemned by the U.N. Secretary General.

The catalyst for this confrontation was the war in Gaza, unleashed by Hamas’s October 7 attacks on Israel, which provided the Houthis with the ideological fuel and political opportunity to transform themselves. Seizing the mantle of Palestinian solidarity — a cause their leader, Abdul-Malik al-Houthi, frames as a “sacrifice in the cause of God Almighty ” — they graduated from a menacing regional actor into a global disruptor, launching missiles toward Israel just weeks after Hamas’s attacks and holding one of the world’s most vital shipping lanes hostage.

The chessboard was dangerously rearranged in May, when the Trump administration, eager for an off-ramp from a costly and ineffective air campaign, brokered a surprise truce with the Houthis. Mediated by Oman, the deal was simple: the U.S. would stop bombing Houthi targets, and the Houthis would stop attacking American ships. President Trump, in his characteristic style, claimed the Houthis had “capitulated” while also praising their “bravery.”

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.