The controversial leader of Haiti was shot and killed, his wife wounded, in his home on Wednesday, according to multiple reports this morning.
Interim prime minister Claude Joseph said president Jovenel Moïse was killed by gunmen overnight. He called the attack “odious, inhuman and barbaric” and called for calm.
Haiti has been on a slow boil for the last several months as Moïse was accused of violating the constitution and election law by extending his term as president when he was supposed to step down on Feb. 7, spurring protests. This followed, according to writer-activist Brian Concannon, years of corruption, gang violence and brutal crackdowns on dissent. He wrote in Responsible Statecraft in March that just before Feb. 7, Moïse's police arrested a Supreme Court justice and several dissidents in what he believed was an attempted coup plot, and later fired the justice and two of the judge's colleagues, as police violently cracked down on ensuing protests.
To say the climate was tense before today, and that Haiti has never recovered from not only its devastating natural disasters, but the systematic corruption, autocratic rule, and poverty dominating the island, is an understatement. More details will follow in Moïse's assassination, but unfortunately the script was written long ago, making the plot ring all too familiar.
Kelley Beaucar Vlahos is the Editorial Director of Responsible Statecraft.
Haitian President Jovenel Moïse on stage at the Miramar Cultural Center. He spoke to a capacity audience about Haiti's progress during his first year in office. (shutterstock/gregory reed)
Top photo credit: A doctor checks Jana Ayad, a malnourished Palestinian girl, as she receives treatment at the International Medical Corps field hospital, amid the Israel-Hamas conflict, in Deir Al-Balah in the southern Gaza Strip, June 22, 2024. REUTERS/Mohammed Salem /File Photo
“Child Dies of Malnutrition as Starvation in Gaza Grows” (CNN, 7/21/25)
“More Than 100 Aid Groups Warn of Starvation in Gaza as Israeli Strikes Kill 29, Officials Say” (AP, 7/23/25)
“No Formula, No Food: Mothers and Babies Starve Together in Gaza” (NBC, 7/25/25)
“Five-Month-Old Baby Dies in Mother’s Arms in Gaza, a New Victim of Escalating Starvation Crisis” (CNN, 7/26/25)
“Gaza’s Children Are Looking Through Trash to Avoid Starving” (New York, 7/28/25)
This media coverage is urgent and necessary—and criminally late.
Devastatingly late to care
Since the October 7 attacks, Israel has severely restricted humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip, using starvation of civilians as a tool of war, a war crime for which Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Foreign Minister Yoav Gallant have been charged by the International Criminal Court. Gallant proclaimed a “complete siege” of Gaza on October 9, 2023: “There will be no electricity, no food, no fuel, everything is closed.”
Aid groups warned of famine conditions in parts of Gaza as early as December 2023. By April 2024, USAID administrator Samantha Power (CNN, 4/11/24) found it “likely that parts of Gaza, and particularly northern Gaza, are already experiencing famine.”
A modest increase in food aid was allowed into the Strip during a ceasefire in early 2025. But on March 2, 2025, Netanyahu announced a complete blockade on the occupied territory. Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir declared that there was “no reason for a gram of food or aid to enter Gaza.”
After more than two months of a total blockade, Israel on May 19 began allowing in a trickle of aid through US/Israeli “Gaza Humanitarian Foundation” (GHF) centers (FAIR.org, 6/6/25)—while targeting with snipers those who came for it—but it is not anywhere near enough, and the population in Gaza is now on the brink of mass death, experts warn. According to UNICEF (7/27/25):
The entire population of over 2 million people in Gaza is severely food insecure. One out of every three people has not eaten for days, and 80% of all reported deaths by starvation are children.
According to the Gaza Health Ministry, at least 147 Gazans have died from malnutrition since the start of Israel’s post–October 7 assault. Most have been in the past few weeks.
Mainstream politicians are finally starting to speak out—even Donald Trump has acknowledged “real starvation” in Gaza—but as critical observers have pointed out, it is devastatingly late to begin to profess concern. Jack Mirkinson’s Discourse Blog (7/28/25) quoted Refugees International president Jeremy Konyndyk:
I fear that starvation in Gaza has now passed the tipping point and we are going to see mass-scale starvation mortality…. Once a famine gathers momentum, the effort required to contain it increases exponentially. It would now take an overwhelmingly large aid operation to reverse the coming wave of mortality, and it would take months.
And there are long-term, permanent health consequences to famine, even when lives are saved (NPR, 7/29/25). Mirkinson lambasted leaders like Cory Booker and Hillary Clinton for failing to speak up before now: “It is too late for them to wash the blood from their hands.”
Barely newsworthy
Major US media, likewise, bear a share of responsibility for the hunger-related deaths in Gaza. The conditions of famine have been out in the open for well over a year, and yet it was considered barely newsworthy in US news media.
A MediaCloud search of online US news reports mentioning “Gaza” and either “famine” or “starvation” shows that since Netanyahu’s March 2 announcement of a total blockade—which could only mean rapidly increasing famine conditions—there was a brief blip of media attention, and then even less news coverage than usual for the rest of March and April. Media attention rose modestly in May, at a time when the world body that classifies famines announced in May that one in five people in Gaza were “likely to face starvation between May 11 and September 30″—in other words, that flooding Gaza with aid was of the highest urgency.
But as aid continued to be held up, and Gazans were shot by Israeli snipers when attempting to retrieve the little offered them, that coverage eventually dwindled, until the current spike that began on July 21.
FAIR (e.g., 3/22/24, 4/25/25, 5/16/25, 5/16/25) has repeatedly criticized US media for coverage that largely absolves Israel of responsibility for its policy of forced starvation—what Human Rights Watch (5/15/25) called “a tool of extermination”—implemented with the backing of the US government.
The current headlines reveal that the coverage still largely diverts attention from Israeli (let alone US) responsibility, but it’s a positive development that major US news media are beginning to devote serious coverage to the issue. Imagine how different this all could have looked had they given it the attention it has warranted, and the accountability it has demanded, when alarms were first raised.
When Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu lands in Buenos Aires this September, he’ll test more than Argentina’s hospitality — he’ll force a reckoning with the President Javier Milei’s gamble: Is Argentina’s fervent alignment with Israel a strategic masterstroke or a geopolitical liability?
This alignment stems from Milei’s ideologically Manichean worldview, framing global conflicts as a battle between absolute good (Israel/West) and evil (Iran/leftists). Determined to be on the "right side of history," he has visited Israel twice since taking office, including a trip in June 2025 just days before Israel's strike on Iran.
Moreover, Milei’s devotion to Israel borders on the mystical — a Catholic who studies Kabbalah and offers tearful prayers at the Western Wall with rabbis, treating Zionism as both political ideology and personal spiritual awakening.
It remains to be seen whether such devotion will deliver Argentina tangible returns beside Israel’s rhetorical nods, such as the foreign minister Gideon Saar’s repurposing of Milei’s slogan “Viva la libertad, carajo” (Long Live Freedom, Damn It) for the airstrike on Tehran's Evin prison which killed 79 people.
Meanwhile, Netanyahu’s planned visit has sparked growing concerns among political observers and security experts in Argentina about possible repercussions.
For one, Netanyahu's visit would immediately test Argentina's commitment to international law, as the arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC) against him last November obligates Buenos Aires — a Rome Statute signatory — to arrest him on arrival. Milei's likely refusal would confirm critics' claims that his alliance with Israel trumps international obligations. The irony is particularly sharp given Argentina's exemplary prosecution of its own officials for crimes against humanity during the 1976-1983 military dictatorship.
Second, Milei’s invitation for Netanyahu to visit Argentina, even as he faces the ICC indictment and Israel growing international isolation over its war in Gaza, marks a radical break from Argentina's tradition of maintaining neutrality in the Israel-Palestine conflict. In his 18 months in office, Milei has so far announced plans to move Argentina's embassy to West Jerusalem by 2026, and Argentina’s vote at the UN General Assembly against a resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza (joined by only 11 other nations) risked alienating many of the 149 countries that supported it, including traditional partners in the Arab world, Latin America (including Argentina’s biggest neighbor and trading partner, Brazil), the Global South more generally, and some key European countries.
Argentine security analysts warn these moves could make the country a target for retaliation by Iran or its allies. A recent detailed report on the June’s 12-day war between Israel and Iran submitted by Iran’s mission to the UN, listed Argentina among nations that supported the Israeli/U.S. attacks. Critics fear that Milei may have compounded the risks of retaliation by explicitly declaring Iran an “enemy” of Argentina. That stance is shared by many Argentines who regard Iran’s support for Hamas as amounting to complicity in the latter’s October 7, 2023, attack on Israel in which 21 Argentines were killed or taken hostage.
Critics don’t fear direct Iranian retaliation so much as action by Tehran’s allies, such as Lebanese Hezbollah, or domestic groups opposed to Milei's Israel policy.
Argentina's traumatic history lends credence to these concerns: the 1992 Israeli embassy bombing and the 1994 AMIA Jewish community center attack, in which 85 people were killed, were linked to Iran and Hezbollah. Despite the conclusion by Israel’s own Mossad intelligence, that Hezbollah (with no “operational involvement” by Iran) was behind the bombings, no one has ever been convicted for the crimes, and Argentina's own numerous investigations have been plagued by alleged cover-ups, incompetence and political interference.
The 2015 death of prosecutor Alberto Nisman, just hours before he intended to formally charge then-President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner with shielding Iranian suspects in the AMIA bombing, remains a major source of speculation and controversy in Argentina. While the official cause of his death was suicide, one court ruled in 2018 that he was murdered, although the judge in the case failed to establish who was the perpetrator or what was the motive.
A visit by Netanyahu risks reviving these deep emotional wounds and still-unresolved controversies. Argentina’s Jewish community (the largest in Latin America) is divided on the subject. Jorge Knoblovits, head of the Delegation of Argentine Jewish Associations (DAIA), dismissed concerns that closer ties with Israel could lead to new attacks on Argentine soil. "The whole world is exposed to terrorism. It has struck under all types of governments, left and right," he said.
In contrast, Pablo Gorodneff of the Jewish group Llamamiento Argentino Judío, noted that a key principle of foreign policy is "don't get involved in conflicts that aren't yours," adding that Milei "in some ways sincerely... believes this fabricated narrative, which I find quite dangerous." He is backed by Héctor Shalom, director of the Anna Frank Center Argentina, who warned that if extremists seek "to strike Jews," Argentina's history of impunity for the two major attacks – emblematic of its vulnerability – makes it a prime target.
Moreover, security vulnerabilities intersect with potential economic risks, diplomatic backlash and reputational costs. Alienating Arab and Muslim-majority markets could damage Argentina's critical commodities and agricultural exports.
It could also limit the potential for new partnerships with the Persian Gulf states: in late 2024, the National Congress hosted a meeting with representatives of Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Kuwait to discuss prospects for investments of their sovereign wealth funds in Argentina. Milei’s predecessor government negotiated an inventive formula with Qatar to secure a $775 million loan to help Buenos Aires repay its debt to the International Monetary Fund.
On the diplomatic front, Netanyahu’s visit to Buenos Aires also risks undermining Argentina’s appeals to international law as the basis for its claims against Britain in a long-running dispute over the Malvinas (Falklands) islands. The two countries fought a brief but deadly war over the islands in 1982. While most countries of the Global South supported Argentina’s claims precisely on the basis of international law, Milei’s vocal support for Israel in its current war in Gaza capped by a Netanyahu visit will not be well received by those same capitals.
Milei's Israel infatuation appears driven more by his personal convictions than a prudent national interest calculus. While it may curry favor in Washington, the security and diplomatic risks are tangible. Netanyahu's potential visit will reveal whether this policy delivers strategic benefits or exposes Argentina to dangerous consequences for years to come.
keep readingShow less
Top photo credit: Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) (Shutterstock/Philip Yabut)
This week, Republican Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor-Greene became the first in her party to call the Gaza crisis a “genocide.”
“It’s the most truthful and easiest thing to say that Oct. 7 in Israel was horrific and all hostages must be returned, but so is the genocide, humanitarian crisis, and starvation happening in Gaza,” the Georgia Congresswoman said on X Monday evening.
That language is newsworthy. Her stance, even more so.
As the bloodshed and chaos continues in Gaza — as does U.S. aid to Israel — the Republican Party has been primarily split into two camps. The first represents the majority of GOP lawmakers who contend that Israel’s government and military maintain the right to retaliate, virtually unconditionally, after the October 7, 2023, terrorist attack by Hamas. It also supports continued and unfettered U.S. diplomatic support and military aid for that effort.
The other camp, much smaller in number in Congress but I believe is becoming more influential online and outside Washington, particularly among conservatives under 30, also condemns the Hamas attack in which 1,195 people were killed in Israel, including 736 Israeli civilians and 79 foreign nationals. But it also questions whether Israel’s government has gone too far, creating a humanitarian crisis that looks more like collective punishment of the entire Gaza population.
Voices in this camp reacted fiercely to the bombing of Gaza’s only Catholic church on July 17, killing three and wounding several others, including the priest. They also question if the U.S. should continue to fund Israeli’s war which has already caused more than 60,000 deaths, mostly civilians, including more than 18,000 children, and has destroyed or damaged 70% of civilian structures including homes, hospitals, schools and shelters.
Rep. Greene or “MTG,” has served as the tip of the spear in defining MAGA. Brash and controversial, she has been the embodiment of President Donald Trump’s movement on Capitol Hill and has had the president’s back at almost every turn.
Except, seemingly, where she perceives Trump might stray from MAGA principles. In June, Greene initially supported but then turned against the heavily Trump-promoted “Big Beautiful” spending bill. Earlier this month, she also opposed the president’s decision to continue sending aid and weapons to Ukraine.
She’s now come out swinging against Israel’s war in Gaza and U.S. support for it.
“I can unequivocally say that what happened to innocent people in Israel on Oct 7th was horrific,” Greene posted on X on July 27. "Just as I can unequivocally say that what has been happening to innocent people and children in Gaza is horrific.”
“This war and humanitarian crisis must end!” she added.
"AOC, the darling of the progressive left, the one that claims to be against all the wars and wants to lead...did not vote for my amendment. She would not do it and she got called out hard.” (Progressive Democratic Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib did vote with Greene in support of this legislation, as did her colleague Rep. Ilhan Omar). Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, the only other Republican on the Hill who has been as vocal a critic of Israel in Gaza as Greene, also voted with her. He was the only Republican to do so.
Harshly criticizing AOC, whether the Congresswoman is essentially right or wrong, is a typical thing for MAGA to do. But what Greene did next was even more interesting.
Florida Republican Rep. Randy Fine may be the most extreme version of that camp of Republicans who believe Israel can do no wrong. He actually encouraged Palestinian children to "starve away" in an X post.
On Monday, Greene took to X to express how she felt about Fine (it was the same post in which she called out "genocide"). “I can only imagine how Florida’s 6th district feels now that their Representative, that they were told to vote for, openly calls for starving innocent people and children."
On Thursday, MTG, who is an evangelical Christian, continued her appeal to American Christians in particular:
Yesterday I spoke to a Christian pastor from Gaza. There are children starving.
And Christians have been killed and injured, as well as many innocent people.
If you are an American Christian, this should be absolutely unacceptable to you.
Just as we said that Hamas killing and kidnapping innocent people on Oct 7th is absolutely unacceptable.
Are innocent Israeli lives more valuable than innocent Palestinian and Christian lives? And why should America continue funding this?
The secular government of nuclear armed Israel has proven that they are beyond capable of dealing with their enemies and are capable of and are in the process of systematically cleansing them from the land.
Most Americans that I know don’t hate Israel and we are not antisemitic at all.
We are beyond fed up with being told that we have to fix the world’s problems, pay for the world’s problems, and fight all the world’s wars while Americans are struggling to survive even though they work everyday.
This line in the sand on Gaza that Greene continues to draw is important in terms of not only what MAGA and the Trump coalition are, but what they become. The president as of late has seemed to favor the foreign policy preferences of extreme pro-Israel hawks, like South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham and talk host Mark Levin, over those of Tucker Carlson or Steve Bannon, both of whom have become highly critical of Israel.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says there is no starvation in Gaza. Greene says otherwise. Late Tuesday, Trump agreed, telling reporters that anyone could tell that there was “real starvation” in Gaza “unless they're pretty cold-hearted or, worse than that, nuts,” and promised aid on that front.
You can feel any way you like about Greene, who Trump once called (if negatively) the “Queen of MAGA.” But her full-throated posts about the carnage in Gaza and her being the first to call what is happening “a genocide," may be a significant watershed moment, allowing the MAGA faithful to see what is happening in a new light, and maybe, just maybe, Donald Trump might, too.
Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.