Follow us on social

google cta
2021-03-10t194555z_662688153_mt1sipa000jhnrw7_rtrmadp_3_sipa-usa-scaled

Congressman: NYT's coverage of dead Palestinian children is a 'smear against Israel'

While Rep. Joe Wilson accused the media of ignoring Hamas's role in the violence, other Republicans today called for a halt in aid to Gaza.

Middle East
google cta
google cta

A Republican congressman called news coverage of Palestinian and Israeli children killed by violence a “sickening” libel against Israel at a congressional hearing Monday.

During the hearing, Republican members not only criticized the Palestinian militant group Hamas, but also attacked the idea of sending humanitarian aid to the Palestinians of Gaza.

Last month, fighting between Israeli forces and Hamas killed 13 people in Israel and 256 people in Gaza. After the fighting ended, the New York Times ran a cover story featuring the photos and life stories of children killed by both Israeli airstrikes and Palestinian rocket fire.

Rep. Joe Wilson (R–S.C.) called the front page photo display “a disgusting smear of Israel and the people of Israel.”

“American media of the left have become a propaganda arm of Hamas,” he told the House Foreign Affairs Committee. “The sickening proof is the front page of the New York Times…picturing 64 dead children of Gaza and Israel, ignoring total Hamas responsibility.”

Wilson argued that no children would be dead but for Hamas’s rocket attacks and use of civilians as “human shields.”

Hamas has long fired rockets indiscriminately into Israel, a clear war crime. Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar recently told Vice News that he would not do so “if we had the capability to launch precision missiles.”

The Israeli military says that it only targets military infrastructure in Gaza, but United Nations human rights chief Michele Bachelet said last month that Israel had struck civilian targets and may have committed war crimes.

The Biden administration is now promoting international reconstruction aid as a way to undermine Hamas rule and build peace. The administration has already released tens of millions of dollars in immediate humanitarian aid.

However, several Republican congressmen objected.

Rep. Brian Mast (R–Mich.) noted that Palestinian elections had been recently cancelled over fears of a Hamas victory.

“If Hamas would do well in the elections, then we’re talking about the people fundamentally supporting Hamas,” he said. “We’re going to give them hundreds of millions of dollars, or invest millions of dollars into their infrastructure.”

He claimed that it is “impossible not to benefit Hamas” by funding reconstruction projects in Gaza.

Rep. Greg Steube (R–Fla.) even proposed a bill that would divert U.S. aid money from Gaza to Israel’s Iron Dome air defense system. Israel is now asking for $1 billion in emergency aid to replenish the system.

“If Hamas controls Gaza, how are you going to be sure that U.S. taxpayer dollars are not going to be diverted to Hamas?” he asked.

Secretary of State Antony Blinken portrayed U.S. aid to Gaza as a way to benefit Israel as well as the Palestinians.

“Hamas has fed off of misery, fed off a lack of hope. If that is perpetuated, it’s unfortunately likely to get stronger, despite the fact that it is itself has been responsible for bringing much of that misery onto the Palestinian people,” he said. “If you look at what is happening, it is on a human level — and our Israeli counterparts agree with this — unacceptable.”


Representative Joe Wilson, a Republican from South Carolina in March 2021. (reuters/Ting Shen/Pool/Sipa)
google cta
Middle East
nuclear weapons
Top image credit: rawf8 via shutterstock.com

What will happen when there are no guardrails on nuclear weapons?

Global Crises

The New START Treaty — the last arms control agreement between the U.S. and Russia — is set to expire next week, unless President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin make a last minute decision to renew it. Letting the treaty expire would increase the risk of nuclear conflict and open the door to an accelerated nuclear arms race. A coalition of arms control and disarmament groups is pushing Congress and the president to pledge to continue to observe the New START limits on deployed, strategic nuclear weapons by the US and Russia.

New START matters. The treaty, which entered into force on February 5, 2011 after a successful effort by the Obama administration to win over enough Republican senators to achieve the required two-thirds majority to ratify the deal, capped deployed warheads to 1,550 for each side, and established verification procedures to ensure that both sides abided by the pact. New START was far from perfect, but it did put much needed guardrails on nuclear development that reduced the prospect of an all-out arms race.

keep readingShow less
Trump Hegseth Rubio
Top image credit: President Donald Trump, joined by Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Secretary of the Navy John Phelan, announces plans for a “Golden Fleet” of new U.S. Navy battleships, Monday, December 22, 2025, at the Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Trump's realist defense strategy with interventionist asterisks

Washington Politics

The Trump administration has released its National Defense Strategy, a document that in many ways marks a sharp break from the interventionist orthodoxies of the past 35 years, but possesses clear militaristic impulses in its own right.

Rhetorically quite compatible with realism and restraint, the report envisages a more focused U.S. grand strategy, shedding force posture dominance in all major theaters for a more concentrated role in the Western Hemisphere and Indo-Pacific. At the same time however, it retains a rather status quo Republican view of the Middle East, painting Iran as an intransigent aggressor and Israel as a model ally. Its muscular approach to the Western Hemisphere also may lend itself to the very interventionism that the report ostensibly opposes.

keep readingShow less
Alternative vs. legacy media
Top photo credit: Gemini AI

Ding dong the legacy media and its slavish war reporting is dead

Media

In a major development that must be frustrating to an establishment trying to sell their policies to an increasingly skeptical public, the rising popularity of independent media has made it impossible to create broad consensus for corporate-compliant narratives, and to casually denigrate, or even censor, those who disagree.

It’s been a long road.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.