Follow us on social

Shutterstock_1671568468-scaled-e1610328475261

I was diagnosed with cancer during the pandemic and can't stop thinking about sanctions against Iran

International media has been riddled with horror stories about Iranians dying preventable deaths. Is Biden listening?

Analysis | Middle East

Around a month ago, a television producer informed me that Iranian nuclear scientist Mohsen Fakhrizadeh had been assassinated and asked to have me on their program to discuss it. As someone who has been working on issues related to the Iranian nuclear program for the last few years, my anxiety naturally shot through the roof. There was no question that this would cause the risk for conflict in the region — even by way of miscommunication or miscalculation — to dramatically increase.

Despite my alarm over Fakhrizadeh’s assassination, I could not take the interview because I was in the hospital about to receive my last dose of bleomycin, a chemotherapy drug. As an American diagnosed with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic, I have felt exceptionally grateful to currently live in a country, the United Kingdom, with a national healthcare system that has been able to swiftly deal with my diagnosis without a single question over cost or access to medicine.

After studying how U.S. sanctions have wreaked havoc on the Iranian people and working with diplomats in Europe, rather unsuccessfully, to lessen the damage, I can attest to the fact that Iran’s public health emergency began long before the pandemic. It is no secret, as international media has been riddled with horrific stories about cancer patients and others in Iran dying preventable deaths over the last few years because the healthcare system has been strangled by onerous U.S. sanctions. It is also no secret that these sanctions have wholly failed to get any concessions from the Iranian government since President Trump left the 2015 nuclear deal.

While sanctions purportedly never intend to cause damage to the Iranian people, the U.S. government has not given the proper guidance needed for companies to feel comfortable trading even legal, humanitarian goods with Iran. The ensuing fear to do business under any circumstances has narrowed the Iranian people’s access to food, medicine, and more, causing inflation to reach new heights. On top of it, when COVID-19 began to emerge into a full, global crisis earlier this year, it was clear that low and middle-income countries would be hit the first and worst. Unsurprisingly, given the aforesaid pre-existing pressures, Iran was amongst the list of countries that were witnessing large initial caseloads, causing many former and current senior figures to call for an easing of sanctions on humanitarian trade to help flatten the curve.

Despite continued recent pleas from America’s closest European allies in particular, the United States has continued its policy of “maximum pressure” without any regard for alleviating the humanitarian consequences it has created. Recent reports even allege that the United States is making it difficult for Iran to purchase vaccines, which human rights groups have called for action on. While new waves and strains of the virus are surfacing across the world, Joe Biden’s election is a hopeful sign that American leadership and multilateral cooperation may be possible to help finally end the pandemic in 2021.

If the President-elect is serious about "restoring the soul of the nation," this must also include extending empathy abroad, including countries like Iran who are suffering because U.S. sanctions are holding back the healthcare response on the virus and other health issues. There are a number of ways that the Biden-Harris team could make early, good-faith gestures to ease the suffering of the Iranian people, namely by giving Iran access to its foreign reserves to be able to purchase humanitarian goods, including vaccines.

According to the Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education, there is also a lengthy list of items that Iran desperately needs to buy to treat cancers such as Lymphoma, Crohn's disease, or even keep premature babies fed and alive. While European companies often used to sell these critical items to Iran, they have now become hesitant without assurances that they will not face punishment from U.S. sanctions. The incoming Biden administration can help alleviate this issue by creating a worldwide temporary general license that would cover testing kits, respirators, and personal protective equipment needed to combat the pandemic, as well as issue more specific guidance and comfort letters for the trade of other items.

The Biden-Harris team should also find ways to mobilize the lending capabilities of institutions such as the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. To date, the IMF has only lent out around a quarter of the $1 trillion it committed to help support countries during the pandemic, namely because the current U.S. administration has slowed these funds being disbursed. For example, the IMF's technical assessment is that Iran is qualified to receive the $5 billion loan it has requested but a green-light from the United States remains to be seen.

With trust at an incredibly low point between the United States and Iran, theories of how sanctions-related leverage could be used to get "more" out of negotiations are short-sighted. There has been real human suffering, and death, because of these sanctions. This has eroded the trust needed to engage in talks on other issues — trust that can’t return until the United States lives up to its outstanding commitments on the 2015 nuclear deal. For this to happen, the United States needs to actively alleviate the pressure it has placed on the Iranian economy, starting with the humanitarian trade sector which needs urgent attention and should not be held hostage to progress in diplomacy.

As an American who has been able to be quickly and effectively treated for cancer during this pandemic, I cannot bear to watch my government be complicit in the preventable deaths of children, adults, and the elderly in the name of a sanctions policy that has so clearly failed to deliver progress on any of the current U.S. administration’s demands.


Photo: Amir Mardani via shutterstock.com
Analysis | Middle East
Friedrich Merz
Top photo credit: German Prime Minister-in-waiting Friedrich Merz (Shutterstock.Penofoto)

German leaders miscalculated popular will for war spending

Europe

Recent polls show the center right Christian Democrats (CDU-CSU) headed by prospective chancellor Friedrich Merz losing ground against the populist right Alternative for Germany (AfD), even before the new government has been formed.

The obvious explanation is widespread popular dissatisfaction with last month’s vote pressed through the outgoing parliament by the CDU-CSU and presumptive coalition partner the SPD (with the Greens) to allow unlimited increases in defense spending. This entailed disabling the constitutional “debt brake” introduced in 2009 to curb deficits and public debt.

keep readingShow less
Bernie Sanders Chris Van Hollen
Top image credit: U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) speaks during a press conference regarding legislation that would block offensive U.S. weapons sales to Israel, at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, U.S., November 19, 2024. REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz
Will Senate vote signal a wider shift away from Israel?

Can Bernie stop billions in new US weapons going to Israel?

Middle East

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and National Security Advisor Mike Waltz have been roundly criticized for the security lapse that put journalist Jeffrey Goldberg into a Signal chat where administration officials discussed bombing Houthi forces in Yemen, to the point where some, like Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.) have called for their resignations.

But the focus on the process ignores the content of the conversation, and the far greater crime of continuing to provide weapons that are inflaming conflicts in the Middle East and enabling Israel’s war on Gaza, which has resulted in the deaths of over 50,000 Palestinians, most of them civilians.

keep readingShow less
Is US bombing Somalia just because it can?
Top Image Credit: The aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76), foreground, leads a formation of Carrier Strike Group Five ships as Air Force B-52 Stratofortress aircraft and Navy F/A-18 Hornet aircraft pass overhead for a photo exercise during Valiant Shield 2018 in the Philippine Sea Sept. 17, 2018. The biennial, U.S. only, field-training exercise focuses on integration of joint training among the U.S. Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps. This is the seventh exercise in the Valiant Shield series that began in 2006. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Erwin Miciano)

Is US bombing Somalia just because it can?

QiOSK

U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) conducted an airstrike in Somalia against ISIS targets on Saturday, killing “multiple ISIS-Somalia operatives.” It was the eighth such strike in the short time that Trump has been in office, reflecting a quiet, but deadly American campaign in a part, of the world that remains far below the public radar.

“AFRICOM, alongside the Federal Government of Somalia and Somali Armed Forces, continues to take action to degrade ISIS-Somalia's ability to plan and conduct attacks that threaten the U.S. homeland, our forces, and our civilians abroad,” a Sunday AFRICOM press release stated.

keep readingShow less

Trump transition

Latest

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.