Follow us on social

وزراء-الداخلية

Could COVID-19 help wind down the GCC crisis?

History has shown that GCC member-states move closer together in times of international/regional crisis, even if major underlying differences between them persist.

Analysis | Middle East

Since the Gulf crisis erupted in mid-2017, talks aimed at pushing the so-called Anti-Terror Quartet (ATQ)—made up of Bahrain, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE)—and Qatar toward reconciliation have proved futile. At the beginning of this year, most experts agreed that the prospects for renormalization of relations between the blockading states and Doha were dim. Yet amid the global coronavirus (a.k.a. COVID-19) pandemic, it is fair to ask whether this crisis could be a game-changer that pushes the two sides toward rapprochement.

Earlier this month, Qatar’s prime minister and minister of the interior attended a virtual Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) emergency meeting. At the risk of reading too much into this occasion, it suggested that the different parties in this nearly three-year-old Arabian feud were willing to, at least temporarily, put their differences and political problems with each other on the back burner in order to improve transnational efforts to cope with COVID-19. As May Nasrallah, the founder and executive chairman of deNovo Corporate Advisors, recently asserted, this global pandemic “extends an olive branch” in the GCC because all six member-states of the sub-regional institution have shared interests in curbing the spread of the virus.

While it is true that resolving the GCC crisis could help the Gulf region and, by extension, the greater Middle East and world at large deal with COVID-19, in practice it may not be so simple. In fact, there is much to be said about coronavirus and its potential to exacerbate the ATQ-Qatar rift. For example, there have been countless social media posts accusing Qatari authorities of “bringing the coronavirus to the region.”

As the Los Angeles Timesreported, many of these incendiary posts came from Saudi, Emirati, and Egyptian marketing firms. There is no doubt that such information warfare amid the COVID-19 pandemic only serves to fuel greater distrust between the two sides of the GCC crisis rather than rebuild bridges of confidence that would be essential for reconciliation between Qatar and the Saudi/UAE axis. Such attacks highlight the depth and extent of the GCC’s disunity.

It is still too early to tell how the COVID-19 pandemic, which recognizes no national boundaries or any ideological or tribal dispute, will impact the Gulf region’s geopolitical landscape. Although coronavirus is fueling (mis)information warfare in the GCC, one should also consider reasons to be optimistic about reconciliation if the pandemic can give the blockading states a new face-saving way to lift, or at least ease, their blockade of Qatar.

Since the coronavirus outbreak, actions by Abu Dhabi and Riyadh suggest that both capitals see the pandemic as a reason, or at least a pretext, for making some foreign policy adjustments that could bode well for future openings of dialogue between regional adversaries. For example, the UAE, despite being a traditional foe of the Islamic Republic of Iran, has stepped up as a country playing a critical role in terms of helping Tehran deal with COVID-19. Also, earlier this month, Saudi Arabia announced a unilateral ceasefire in its war against Yemen’s Houthi rebels as the Kingdom grapples with the challenge posed by the virus to its economic interests.

Cinzia Bianco, a senior advisor at Gulf State Analytics, emphasized that GCC members “want to prove that they are also active players in humanitarian cooperation with their enemies.” If this thinking prevails throughout all Arab Gulf capitals, there remains the possibility that COVID-19 could become the catalyst that prompts the renormalization of ATQ-Qatar relations. History has shown that GCC member-states move closer together in times of international/regional crises, even if major underlying differences between them persist. Just as the meteoric rise of Islamic State (ISIS or IS) in 2014 contributed to the resolution of that year’s GCC diplomatic spat, the global pandemic that has thus far resulted in more than 100,000 deaths could be another crisis that prompts all the Arabian monarchies to make GCC unity a higher priority than settling scores over ideological and tribal disputes. And given the UAE’s gestures toward Tehran, is it too much to hope for a larger regional détente that would bode well for longer-term stability in the Middle East, even after the development of a vaccine for coronavirus?

As May Nasrallah said, at this juncture, “everybody needs everybody else” in the Gulf region.


The GCC Interior Ministers discuss the Security Measures taken as Part of the Efforts to limit the spread of the Coronavirus
Analysis | Middle East
 israel attacks Iran
Top photo credit: Firefighters work at the scene of a damaged building in the aftermath of Israeli strikes, in Tehran, Iran, June 13, 2025. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS

Trump must condemn Israeli acts of illegal, naked aggression

Middle East

The Israeli attack on Iran is an act of naked aggression, in clear violation of international law as enshrined in the United Nations Charter and of anything that can labeled a rules-based international order.

The attack continues and expands Israel’s record of profligate use of military force throughout its region, including serial attacks on Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, and the Palestinian territories, including the devastation in the Gaza Strip that many informed and objective observers consider genocide. Israel has thrown its military weight around the Middle East far more than any other state and as such is the biggest destabilizing actor in the region.

keep readingShow less
Donald Trump
Top image credit: FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks prior to signing "phase one" of the U.S.-China trade agreement in the East Room of the White House in Washington, U.S., January 15, 2020. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo

What did the US and China just agree to exactly?

Asia-Pacific

Following talks in London on Sunday and Monday, the United States and China reached what President Trump called a “deal.” More precisely, as China’s trade representative Li Chenggang put it, the two sides agreed “in principle” to “a framework” that might actually “implement the agreements” the two sides reached last week and last month.

This caution among Chinese negotiators reflects the tortuous path they have traveled to simply begin discussions with the Trump administration. The lessons from that experience might now stabilize the course of U.S.–China diplomacy, but perilous obstacles remain.

keep readingShow less
Tehran Israel
Top image credit: www.youtube.com/@aljazeeraenglish

Trump knew about Israel attacks, already threatening 'next' ones

Middle East

This article has been updated as story develops.

Last night President Donald Trump acknowledged that his administration knew about the Israeli attacks on Iran. This morning on Truth Social he suggested that it was part of a plan to get Tehran to accept a nuclear deal and if they do not comply now, "it will only get worse."

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.