Follow us on social

Shutterstock_1157861293-scaled

Trump's Intelligence Community purge intensifies

The Senate has given Trump a green-light to do pretty much whatever he wants. He's now taking aim at the intel community.

Analysis | Washington Politics

Donald Trump’s post-impeachment purge surge has most recently taken direct aim at the intelligence community. Trump’s attacks will make it harder than ever for the community to avoid knuckling under even further to his personal and political agenda.

Acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire, approaching the end of his permitted six months as acting chief, has been jettisoned rather than nominated to become the permanent director. Trump had distrusted Maguire — a national security professional and retired Navy admiral — ever since Maguire did not somehow find a way, despite the requirements the law imposed on him, to quash the whistleblower complaint that triggered the House impeachment investigation.

Trump’s anger boiled over, according to the Washington Post’s reporting, when Maguire also did not quash an intelligence community briefing of the House intelligence committee on Russia’s continued attempts to interfere in U.S. elections, including the 2020 presidential election.

To replace Maguire, Trump not only resorted to yet another “acting” appointee but named for that job an ideologue and partisan fighter, Richard Grenell.  Grenell’s claims to fame in addition to his unquestioned political loyalty to Trump have been his conflict-laden relationship with the press when he was John Bolton’s spokesman at the U.S. mission to the United Nations, his trolling of Democrats during the 2016 election campaign, and his antagonizing of Europeans through his undiplomatic political behavior while U.S. ambassador to Germany.

The law governing senior level vacancies says that Grenell can remain as acting director only if Trump soon formally names a nominee for the job. Once such a nomination is made, Grenell can stay in his acting capacity for months as long as the confirmation process for the permanent nominee drags out. Trump thus has an incentive to nominate someone just as unqualified as Grenell is to be intelligence director. This factor may have been on Trump’s mind when he said he is considering nominating Rep. Doug Collins (R-Ga.), who was Trump’s principal defender on the House judiciary committee when it considered impeachment. (Collins, who is running for an open Senate seat, says he is not interested in the intelligence job.)

The replacement of professionals in the intelligence community with partisan warriors goes even further. Veteran CIA officer Andrew Hallman, who had been acting as deputy director of national intelligence, is out. In effect replacing him at the right-hand of the acting DNI is Kash Patel, who aided Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), ranking Republican and effectively Trump’s chief agent on the House intelligence committee, in endeavoring to discredit the investigation by intelligence and law enforcement agencies into the Russian election interference.

The recent intelligence community briefing to the House committee about the Russian activity — a necessary and proper happening, given the responsibilities of both the intelligence agencies and the congressional oversight committees — may have been the last diligent fulfillment of such responsibilities on such an important subject that we will see for a while. Trump is directly exerting pressure on the community to change its assessments about Russian interference — according to the Post’s reporting, he did so when he berated Maguire about the briefing. Trump also is determined to impede any provision of information on the subject to congressional committees. With his acolytes in place at the upper reaches of the intelligence community, he is likely to get his way.

With a foreign power reportedly gearing up to subvert the U.S. electoral process again and with the best U.S. intelligence on the subject likely to get either twisted or shoved out of sight, the damage from Trump’s politicization of intelligence will become even worse than before.


Donald Trump (Evan El-Amin / Shutterstock.com)
Analysis | Washington Politics
Warfare movie A24
Top photo credit: (official trailer for Warfare/A24)
'Warfare': Rare Iraq film that doesn't preach but packs truth

'Warfare': Rare Iraq War film that doesn't preach but packs punch

Media

Unlike Alex Garland’s Civil War, his Warfare, co-directed with war vet Ray Mendoza, is not just another attempt at a realistic portrayal of war, in all its blood and gore. Warfare, based on a true story, is really a parable about the overweening ambition and crushing failure of empire, a microcosm of America’s disastrous adventure in Iraq.

A Navy Seal mission reconnoiters a neighborhood in Ramadi. “I like this house,” says the team commander, reflecting the overconfidence of the empire at its unipolar moment. But it soon becomes clear that the mission has underestimated the enemy, that the whole neighborhood has, in fact, been tracking the Seals’ movements. Surprised and scared, the mission requests to be extricated. But extrication becomes a bloody, hellish experience despite the Seals’ technological edge in weapons, IT, and logistics, and it barely succeeds.

keep readingShow less
vietnam war memorial washington DC
Top photo credit: Washington, DC, May 24, 2024: A visitor reads the names of the fallen soldiers at the Vietnam Veterans Memorial at the National Mall ahead of Memorial Day. (A_Kiphayet/Shutterstock)

Veterans: What we would say to Trump on this Memorial Day

Military Industrial Complex

This Memorial Day comes a month after the 50th anniversary of the Fall of Saigon, which was largely used to recall the collapse of the entire American project in Vietnam. In short, the failure of the war is now viewed as both a rebuke of the American Exceptionalism myth and the rigid Cold War mentality that had Washington in a vice grip for much of the 20th Century.

“The leaders who mismanaged this debacle were never held accountable and remained leading players in the establishment for the rest of their lives,” noted author and professor Stephen Walt in a RS symposium on the war. “The country learned little from this bitter experience, and repeated these same errors in Iraq, Afghanistan, and several other places.”

keep readingShow less
Ukraine war
Top image credit: HC FOTOSTUDIO via shutterstock.com

Should a Russia-Ukraine peace leave territorial control for later?

Europe

Since the beginning of President Donald Trump’s second term, there have been ongoing diplomatic efforts to broker a peace settlement in the three-year-long war between Russia and Ukraine. So far, however, negotiations have failed to bridge the stark divide between the two sides.

Two of the key contentious issues have been post-war security guarantees for Ukraine and the political status of Ukrainian territory claimed or annexed by Russia. Specifically, regarding territorial sovereignty, Ukraine and Russia have rejected the United States' proposal to “freeze” the war along the current line of conflict as a de facto new border. Ukraine has refused to renounce its claims of sovereignty over territories occupied by Russia (including Crimea, which was annexed in 2014). Russia, in turn, has demanded Ukraine’s recognition of Russia’s territorial claim over the entirety of the four Ukrainian regions, which Russia annexed in 2022.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.