Follow us on social

google cta
Rep. Jim McGovern (D.-Mass.)

House unable to halt Venezuela war march

Two votes narrowly failed along party lines

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

Tonight the House of Representatives failed to pass a resolution to prevent the use of unauthorized military force against Venezuela, amid escalating hostilities against it.

Lawmakers narrowly voted to reject H. Con. Res. 64, sponsored by Rep. Jim McGovern (D.-Mass.) in a 211-213 vote. Republican representatives Thomas Massie (R.-Ky.), Marjorie Taylor Greene (Ga.) and Don Bacon (Ill.), and Democrats Joaquin Castro (Texas), Sarah Jacobs (Calif.), Ro Khanna (Calif.), and Sydney Kamlager-Dove (Ill.) co-sponsored that resolution.

Lawmakers also voted 216 to 210 to reject H. Con. Res. 61,introduced by Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.), which would block U.S. military action against “any presidentially designated terrorist organization in the Western Hemisphere,” amid ongoing U.S. strikes against so-called “narco-terrorists” around the Caribbean. Meeks’ resolution was co-sponsored by 40 other legislators, all Democrats.

Lawmakers voted primarily along party lines for both resolutions, where Republicans largely voted against both resolutions, and Democrats largely voted for them. Exceptions on the Republican side included Reps. Massie and Bacon, who voted for Res. 61; they and Green voted for Res. 64. On the Democratic side, Rep. Henry Cuellar (Texas) voted no for both resolutions while Rep. Vincente Gonzalez (Texas) joined him to vote no on 61.

Since early September, the U.S. has repeatedly struck boats near Venezuela it alleges are bringing illegal drugs to the U.S., as part of what it calls a "non-international armed conflict" with drug cartels it has designated as foreign terrorists.

That campaign comes as the U.S. has pursued a major military build-up in the Caribbean off the coast of Venezuela in what President Trump has called a pressure campaign against Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro.Trump said early this month that land operations against Caracas were possible “soon.” Trump announced a blockade yesterday on sanctioned oil tankers leaving and entering Venezuela.

Lawmakers have grown increasingly weary about the boat strikes and their legality, with some wondering whether the operation’s end game is to oust Maduro.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth gave a closed door briefing to House and Senate lawmakers on the strikes yesterday, to quell concerns about the legality of the strikes; many lawmakers left unconvinced.

On the floor before the votes, lawmakers said Congress must assert its authority to decide when to go to war.

“The constitution vests this body with authority over matters of war and peace. That power has too often been ceded to the executive branch,” Rep. Meeks said. “Congress must make clear to all of us that no president can unilaterally draw the United States into a conflict.”

Others warned against war with Venezuela altogether.

“It's easy to get into a war. It's hard as hell to get out of war,” Rep. McGovern said. “I've been around long enough to hear representatives of both parties talk about war as something simple, ‘You can get into it. We get out of it easy. No big deal.’ That's never happened!”

“Even the Pentagon says it will be very, very complicated to topple Maduro,” he said.

Previous votes in the Senate aimed at blocking possible U.S. military action against Venezuela, or the strikes against “narco-terrorists” near it, have also narrowly failed.

Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) and Jason Crow (D-Colo.) both introduced War Powers Resolutions this fall; they were not brought to vote.


Dear RS readers: It has been an extraordinary year and our editing team has been working overtime to make sure that we are covering the current conflicts with quality, fresh analysis that doesn’t cleave to the mainstream orthodoxy or take official Washington and the commentariat at face value. Our staff reporters, experts, and outside writers offer top-notch, independent work, daily. Please consider making a tax-exempt, year-end contribution to Responsible Statecraftso that we can continue this quality coverage — which you will find nowhere else — into 2026. Happy Holidays!

Top image credit: live.house.gov [screenshot]
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Cuba Miami Dade Florida
Top image credit: MIAMI, FL, UNITED STATES - JULY 13, 2021: Cubans protesters shut down part of the Palmetto Expressway as they show their support for the people in Cuba. Fernando Medina via shutterstock.com

South Florida: When local politics become rogue US foreign policy

Latin America

The passions of exile politics have long shaped South Florida. However, when local officials attempt to translate those passions into foreign policy, the result is not principled leadership — it is dangerous government overreach with significant national implications.

We see that in U.S. Cuba policy, and more urgently today, in Saturday's "take over" of Venezuela.

keep readingShow less
Is Greenland next? Denmark says, not so fast.
President Donald J. Trump participates in a pull-aside meeting with the Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Denmark Mette Frederiksen during the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) 70th anniversary meeting Wednesday, Dec. 4, 2019, in Watford, Hertfordshire outside London. (Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead)

Is Greenland next? Denmark says, not so fast.

North America

The Trump administration dramatically escalated its campaign to control Greenland in 2025. When President Trump first proposed buying Greenland in 2019, the world largely laughed it off. Now, the laughter has died down, and the mood has shifted from mockery to disbelief and anxiety.

Indeed, following Trump's military strike on Venezuela, analysts now warn that Trump's threats against Greenland should be taken seriously — especially after Katie Miller, wife of Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, posted a U.S. flag-draped map of Greenland captioned "SOON" just hours after American forces seized Nicolas Maduro.

keep readingShow less
Trump White House
Top photo credit: President Donald Trump Speaks During Roundtable With Business Leaders in the Roosevelt Room of the White House, Washington, DC on December 10, 2025 (Shutterstock/Lucas Parker)

When Trump's big Venezuela oil grab runs smack into reality

Latin America

Within hours of U.S. military strikes on Venezuela and the capture of its leader, Nicolas Maduro, President Trump proclaimed that “very large United States oil companies would go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure, and start making money for the country.”

Indeed, at no point during this exercise has there been any attempt to deny that control of Venezuela’s oil (or “our oil” as Trump once described it) is a major force motivating administration actions.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.