Follow us on social

google cta
Rep. Jim McGovern (D.-Mass.)

House unable to halt Venezuela war march

Two votes narrowly failed along party lines

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

Tonight the House of Representatives failed to pass a resolution to prevent the use of unauthorized military force against Venezuela, amid escalating hostilities against it.

Lawmakers narrowly voted to reject H. Con. Res. 64, sponsored by Rep. Jim McGovern (D.-Mass.) in a 211-213 vote. Republican representatives Thomas Massie (R.-Ky.), Marjorie Taylor Greene (Ga.) and Don Bacon (Ill.), and Democrats Joaquin Castro (Texas), Sarah Jacobs (Calif.), Ro Khanna (Calif.), and Sydney Kamlager-Dove (Ill.) co-sponsored that resolution.

Lawmakers also voted 216 to 210 to reject H. Con. Res. 61,introduced by Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.), which would block U.S. military action against “any presidentially designated terrorist organization in the Western Hemisphere,” amid ongoing U.S. strikes against so-called “narco-terrorists” around the Caribbean. Meeks’ resolution was co-sponsored by 40 other legislators, all Democrats.

Lawmakers voted primarily along party lines for both resolutions, where Republicans largely voted against both resolutions, and Democrats largely voted for them. Exceptions on the Republican side included Reps. Massie and Bacon, who voted for Res. 61; they and Green voted for Res. 64. On the Democratic side, Rep. Henry Cuellar (Texas) voted no for both resolutions while Rep. Vincente Gonzalez (Texas) joined him to vote no on 61.

Since early September, the U.S. has repeatedly struck boats near Venezuela it alleges are bringing illegal drugs to the U.S., as part of what it calls a "non-international armed conflict" with drug cartels it has designated as foreign terrorists.

That campaign comes as the U.S. has pursued a major military build-up in the Caribbean off the coast of Venezuela in what President Trump has called a pressure campaign against Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro.Trump said early this month that land operations against Caracas were possible “soon.” Trump announced a blockade yesterday on sanctioned oil tankers leaving and entering Venezuela.

Lawmakers have grown increasingly weary about the boat strikes and their legality, with some wondering whether the operation’s end game is to oust Maduro.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth gave a closed door briefing to House and Senate lawmakers on the strikes yesterday, to quell concerns about the legality of the strikes; many lawmakers left unconvinced.

On the floor before the votes, lawmakers said Congress must assert its authority to decide when to go to war.

“The constitution vests this body with authority over matters of war and peace. That power has too often been ceded to the executive branch,” Rep. Meeks said. “Congress must make clear to all of us that no president can unilaterally draw the United States into a conflict.”

Others warned against war with Venezuela altogether.

“It's easy to get into a war. It's hard as hell to get out of war,” Rep. McGovern said. “I've been around long enough to hear representatives of both parties talk about war as something simple, ‘You can get into it. We get out of it easy. No big deal.’ That's never happened!”

“Even the Pentagon says it will be very, very complicated to topple Maduro,” he said.

Previous votes in the Senate aimed at blocking possible U.S. military action against Venezuela, or the strikes against “narco-terrorists” near it, have also narrowly failed.

Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) and Jason Crow (D-Colo.) both introduced War Powers Resolutions this fall; they were not brought to vote.


Top image credit: live.house.gov [screenshot]
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Vice President JD Vance Azerbaijan Armenia
U.S. Vice President JD Vance gets out of a car before boarding Air Force Two upon departure for Azerbaijan, at Zvartnots International Airport in Yerevan, Armenia, February 10, 2026. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/Pool

VP Vance’s timely TRIPP to the South Caucasus

Washington Politics

Vice President JD Vance’s regional tour to Armenia and Azerbaijan this week — the highest level visit by an American official to the South Caucasus since Vice President Joe Biden went to Georgia in 2009 — demonstrates that Washington is not ignoring Yerevan and Baku and is taking an active role in their normalization process.

Vance’s stop in Armenia included an announcement that Yerevan has procured $11 million in U.S. defense systems — a first — in particular Shield AI’s V-BAT, an ISR unmanned aircraft system. It was also announced that the second stage of a groundbreaking AI supercomputer project led by Firebird, a U.S.-based AI cloud and infrastructure company, would commence after having secured American licensing for the sale and delivery of an additional 41,000 NVIDIA GB300 graphics processing units.

keep readingShow less
United Nations
Monitors at the United Nations General Assembly hall display the results of a vote on a resolution condemning the annexation of parts of Ukraine by Russia, amid Russia's invasion of Ukraine, at the United Nations Headquarters in New York City, New York, U.S., October 12, 2022. REUTERS/David 'Dee' Delgado||

We're burying the rules based order. But what's next?

Global Crises

In a Davos speech widely praised for its intellectual rigor and willingness to confront established truths, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney finally laid the fiction of the “rules-based international order” to rest.

The “rules-based order” — or RBIO — was never a neutral description of the post-World War II system of international law and multilateral institutions. Rather, it was a discourse born out of insecurity over the West’s decline and unwillingness to share power. Aimed at preserving the power structures of the past by shaping the norms and standards of the future, the RBIO was invariably something that needed to be “defended” against those who were accused of opposing it, rather than an inclusive system that governed relations between all states.

keep readingShow less
china trump
President Donald Trump announces the creation of a critical minerals reserve during an event in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, DC on Monday, February 2, 2026. Trump announced the creation of “Project Vault,” a rare earth stockpile to lower reliance on China for rare earths and other resources. Photo by Bonnie Cash/Pool/Sipa USA

Trump vs. his China hawks

Asia-Pacific

In the year since President Donald Trump returned to the White House, China hawks have started to panic. Leading lights on U.S. policy toward Beijing now warn that Trump is “barreling toward a bad bargain” with the Chinese Communist Party. Matthew Pottinger, a key architect of Trump’s China policy in his first term, argues that the president has put Beijing in a “sweet spot” through his “baffling” policy decisions.

Even some congressional Republicans have criticized Trump’s approach, particularly following his decision in December to allow the sale of powerful Nvidia AI chips to China. “The CCP will use these highly advanced chips to strengthen its military capabilities and totalitarian surveillance,” argued Rep. John Moolenaar (R-Mich.), who chairs the influential Select Committee on Competition with China.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.