Follow us on social

Hegseth Philippines

Major US-Philippine military drills kick off amid tensions with China

This is an annual event but with bigger and more lethal weapons on display, and close to the South China Sea

Analysis | QiOSK

The latest iteration of the most prominent of the U.S.-Philippine annual military exercises — Balikatan — kicked off today with 14,000 American and Filipino troops participating.

In addition to the two Pacific allies, Australian and Japanese militaries are actively involved in the exercises. In addition, observers have been sent from 19 nations including Canada, Colombia, Czech Republic, Germany, Poland, the United Kingdom, Vietnam and Poland.

Robust drills will take place in Palawan, adjacent to a portion of the South China Sea that an international tribunal at the Hague ruled in 2016 as being a part of the Philippine Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). China has recently stepped up its illegal intrusions and dangerous maneuvers within the Philippine EEZ, leading to clashes with the Philippine coast guard and navy, including a serious one on June 17, 2024 near Second Thomas Shoal.

This clash was followed by a limited agreement between Beijing and Manila on resupplying the small Philippine military contingent based on Second Thomas Shoal, but it did not ease the overall confrontation in the South China Sea.

This year’s Balikatan was preceded by U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth’s visit to the Philippines and Japan, during which he reiterated Washington’s “ironclad” commitment to the alliance. This signals major continuity with the first Trump and Biden terms in the region. It was President Biden who inaugurated the new US-Japan-Philippines trilateral, and the second Trump administration appears to be only deepening it.

The trilateral, with Australia also closely involved in what has been dubbed the “Squad,” has in many ways taken center stage in the U.S. strategy for countering China. This has relegated the Quad (the US-Japan-Australia-India grouping), also revived under the first Trump administration, to a lower profile. Unlike the Quad, the Squad has a clearhard security imprint.

Similar to 2024, Balikatan 2025 will feature major drills in the Batanes islands, located north of the main Philippine island of Luzon and only a few scores of miles from Taiwan. Washington is increasingly positioning the Philippines as a vital node in its Taiwan strategy, and the Batanes islands have become perhaps the most critical location in this node.

In 2024, the United States deployed a mid-range capability missile system, Typhon, in Luzon, triggering strong condemnation by China, which saw it as a direct threat. The Typhon system can launch SM–6 and Tomahawk cruise missiles, with ranges of 350 and 1000 miles respectively; the latter enabling strikes deep within the Chinese mainland.

This year, Washington has added the potent anti-ship Navy-Marine Expeditionary Ship Interdiction Systems (NMESIS) launchers on Batanes. The U.S. Indo-Pacific Command (INDOPACOM) has stated that the NMESIS provides “enhanced sea denial capability, deepens naval integration, and strengthens deterrence by extending the Joint Force’s ability to target and engage from both land and sea.”

Adding advanced U.S. war-fighting equipment on Philippine soil marks an escalation in the U.S.-China military rivalry in the Indo-Pacific. The Philippines under President Marcos Jr. is increasingly getting involved in this broader rivalry that goes well beyond the South China Sea. In this sense, Washington’s perceived vital interests and Manila’s — which are not really about Taiwan, but focused on Philippine sovereignty and maritime rights in the South China Sea — have reached an important waystation.

In any event, the American people would be well-served by a robust debate on how vital an interest Taiwan is to the United States. The question going forward will increasingly be whether the two allies can find a way to harmonize their core interests and defend them without provoking China

.


Top photo credit : Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, U.S. Ambassador to the Republic of the Philippines MaryKay Loss Carlson, and Filipino Secretary of National Defense Gilbert Teodoro sit in a briefing together at Camp Aguinaldo, Philippines, March 28, 2025. (DOD photo by U.S. Air Force Senior Airman Madelyn Keech)
Analysis | QiOSK
Eisenhower and Nasser
Top photo credit: President Eisenhower and Egyptian President Nasser on sidelines of UN General Assembly in Waldorf Astoria presidential suite, New York in 1960. (public domain)

If Israel goes it alone is it risking another 'Suez'?

Middle East

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wants to accelerate his war against Iran with direct, offensive assistance from Washington — at a moment when there is less support for it than ever among the American people.

Netanyahu must expect that Washington will be compelled to accommodate and, if necessary, implement Israel’s expansive war aims – notably the complete destruction of Iran’s nuclear program, its ballistic missile capabilities, and even regime change itself. U.S. assistance is widely considered to be critical to Israel’s success in this regard.

keep readingShow less
US Navy Taiwan Strait
TAIWAN STRAIT (August 23, 2019) – US Naval Officers scan the horizon from the bridge while standing watch, part of Commander, Amphibious Squadron 11, operating in the Indo-Pacific region to enhance interoperability with partners and serve as a ready-response force for any type of contingency. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Markus Castaneda)

Despite setbacks, trends still point to US foreign policy restraint

Military Industrial Complex

It’s been only a few days since Israel first struck Iranian nuclear and regime targets, but Washington’s remaining neoconservatives and long-time Iran hawks are already celebrating.

After more than a decade of calling for military action against Iran, they finally got their wish — sort of. The United States did not immediately join Israel’s campaign, but President Donald Trump acquiesced to Israel’s decision to use military force and has not meaningfully restrained Israel’s actions. For those hoping Trump would bring radical change to U.S. foreign policy, his failure to halt Israel’s preventative war is a disappointment and a betrayal of past promises.

keep readingShow less
iraqi protests iran israel
Top photo credit: Iraqi Shi'ite Muslims hold a cutout of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as they attend a protest against Israeli strikes on Iran, in Baghdad, Iraq, June 16, 2025. REUTERS/Ahmed Saad

Iraq on razor's edge between Iran and US interests in new war

Middle East

As Israeli jets and Iranian rockets streak across the Middle Eastern skies, Iraq finds itself caught squarely in the crossfire.

With regional titans clashing above its head, Iraq’s fragile and hard-won stability, painstakingly rebuilt over decades of conflict, now hangs precariously in the balance. Washington’s own tacit acknowledgement of Iraq’s vulnerable position was laid bare by its decision to partially evacuate embassy personnel in Iraq and allow military dependents to leave the region.

This withdrawal, prompted by intelligence indicating Israeli preparations for long-range strikes, highlighted that Iraq’s airspace would be an unwitting corridor for Israeli and Iranian operations.

Prime Minister Mohammed Shia’ al-Sudani is now caught in a complicated bind, attempting to uphold Iraq’s security partnership with the United States while simultaneously facing intense domestic pressure from powerful, Iran-aligned Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) factions. These groups, emboldened by the Israel-Iran clash, have intensified their calls for American troop withdrawal and threaten renewed attacks against U.S. personnel, viewing them as legitimate targets and enablers of Israeli aggression.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.