Follow us on social

Diplomacy Watch Putin Trump Zelenskyy Ukraine

Diplomacy Watch: Ukrainians don’t want to fight anymore

Years at war have taken a human toll

Reporting | QiOSK

After years of conflict, Ukrainians no longer want to fight.

Gallup polling published Thursday showed that Ukrainian support for the war effort has plummeted, where 69% of respondents want a negotiated end of the war as soon as possible. In contrast, only 24% said they want to continue fighting “until victory.”

The numbers contrast dramatically from Gallup polling taken at the start of the conflict in 2022, when 73% of Ukrainians said they supported fighting against Russia until victory was achieved.

The new Gallup polling, which surveyed Ukrainians last month, also suggests creeping pessimism, with 68% of respondents saying they found it unlikely that active fighting would end in the next year.

The new survey comes in the wake of the first major anti-government protests in Ukraine since the war began, with demonstrators signaling frustration with Zelensky over his now-nullified legislation that would have given Ukraine power over key anti-corruption agencies.

Broadly, Ukrainians have suffered tremendously since the war began in 2022. Tens of thousands of its troops have died and hundreds of thousands more have been injured fighting the Russian military. And frequent missile and drone attacks, especially in recent months, have caused heavy civilian casualties.

"There are thousands of young people dying, mostly soldiers, but also, you know, missiles being headed to Kiev and other places…it's a terrible situation,” President Trump said Wednesday, lamenting the heavy loss of life, especially experienced by young people.

To this end, independent activist and Quincy Institute non-resident fellow Almut Rochowanski told RS about her Ukrainian friends’ experience and what they have lost during the war.

Ukrainians “have lost so much they know they can never regain, especially if they have been displaced by occupation or because their beloved home towns have been wiped from the face of the earth. They cannot pass on their heritage, their community and traditions and identity, to the next generation. Millions of Ukrainians are now abroad, the most agile and productive among them, unlikely to ever return to live there,” Almut Rochowanski told RS.

“I've heard many of my Ukrainian friends speak about how they ask themselves whether this or that military gain would be worth the loss of their husband, brother, son or friend who is serving. Would any of us answer this question in the affirmative?,” she asked. “Over time, these thoughts and considerations have become more powerful and people also overcome the social desirability factor in public polls and will say what they really think.”

Rochowanski stressed that average Ukrainians’ views should be centered in negotiations toward peace.

In other Ukraine news this week:

Reuters reported Tuesday that Denmark, Norway and Sweden plan to provide about $500 million toward a NATO initiative that provided Ukraine with European-bought U.S. weapons, including Patriot missiles. These countries’ intended contribution is part of a $1 billion deal, where the Netherlands pledged the other $500 million.

On Sunday, The Hill reported that Trump claimed that nuclear submarines are "in the region" of Russia. The development follows a spat between Trump and former Russian president Medvedev last week, which led Trump to say he would send submarines there, but not specifying nuclear powered or nuclear armed, or where in the region they would go.

Trump hit India with 50% tariffs for buying Russian oil, where he slapped it with a 25% tariff Thursday after imposing a 25% tariff last week. On Tuesday, Trump told CNBC that India’s oil purchases from Russia are prolonging the conflict: "We settled on 25% [tariffs] but I think I'm going to raise that very substantially over the next 24 hours, because they're buying Russian oil. They're fueling the war machine."

Reuters reported that U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff met with Russian President Vladimir Putin for about three hours Wednesday. These talks have been considered productive; in their wake, a possible meeting between President Trump and Putin could take place as early as next week.

From State Department Press Briefing August 7

Asked about whether Trump would impose sanctions on Russia on Friday, State Department Deputy Spokesperson Tommy Pigott said: “A lot of speculation involved there, I’m not going to get involved from there.” Trump threatened sanctions on Russia if 10 days passed without meaningful progress toward a negotiated end to the conflict; that “deadline” passes on Friday.

“It is a credit to [Trump’s] leadership that we've seen the engagement we have seen,” Pigott said broadly of recent diplomatic engagements. “The parties come to the table when they have come to the table, and [that there is] further engagement to try to pursue peace here.”


Top Photo: Trump, Zelenskyy, and Putin with Ukraine graphic. Credit, Khody Akhavi
Diplomacy Watch: Are Kyiv protests pent-up anger against Zelensky?
Reporting | QiOSK
US Marines
Top image credit: U.S. Marines with Force Reconnaissance Platoon, Maritime Raid Force, 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, prepare to clear a room during a limited scale raid exercise at Sam Hill Airfield, Queensland, Australia, June 21, 2025. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Alora Finigan)

Cartels are bad but they're not 'terrorists.' This is mission creep.

Military Industrial Complex

There is a dangerous pattern on display by the Trump administration. The president and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth seem to hold the threat and use of military force as their go-to method of solving America’s problems and asserting state power.

The president’s reported authorization for the Pentagon to use U.S. military warfighting capacity to combat drug cartels — a domain that should remain within the realm of law enforcement — represents a significant escalation. This presents a concerning evolution and has serious implications for civil liberties — especially given the administration’s parallel moves with the deployment of troops to the southern border, the use of federal forces to quell protests in California, and the recent deployment of armed National Guard to the streets of our nation’s capital.

keep readingShow less
Howard Lutnick
Top photo credit: Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on CNBC, 8/26/25 (CNBC screengrab)

Is nationalizing the defense industry such a bad idea?

Military Industrial Complex

The U.S. arms industry is highly consolidated, specialized, and dependent on government contracts. Indeed, the largest U.S. military contractors are already effectively extensions of the state — and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is right to point that out.

His suggestion in a recent media appearance to partially nationalize the likes of Lockheed Martin is hardly novel. The economist John Kenneth Galbraith argued for the nationalization of the largest military contractors in 1969. More recently, various academics and policy analysts have advocated for partial or full nationalization of military firms in publications including The Nation, The American Conservative, The Middle East Research and Information Project (MERIP), and The Seattle Journal for Social Justice.

keep readingShow less
Modi Trump
Top image credit: White House, February 2025

Trump's India problem could become a Global South crisis

Asia-Pacific

As President Trump’s second term kicked off, all signs pointed to a continued upswing in U.S.-India relations. At a White House press conference in February, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke of his vision to “Make India Great Again” and how the United States under Trump would play a central role. “When it’s MAGA plus MIGA, it becomes a mega partnership for prosperity,” Modi said.

During Trump’s first term, the two populist leaders hosted rallies for each other in their respective countries and cultivated close personal ties. Aside from the Trump-Modi bromance, U.S.-Indian relations have been on a positive trajectory for over two decades, driven in part by mutual suspicion of China. But six months into his second term, Trump has taken several actions that have led to a dramatic downturn in U.S.-India relations, with India-China relations suddenly on the rise.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.