Follow us on social

google cta
ukraine soliders cemetery

US may push but Ukrainians balk at lowering draft age to 18

Washington voices keep asking for more.

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

In late November, a U.S. official insisted that Ukraine should consider lowering its conscription age from 25 to 18. Today, Ukrainians are balking at the idea.

In an interview with Al Jazeera, a 20-year-old Ukrainian serviceman named Vladislav said that lowering the military conscription age is a “bad idea.” He volunteered to join the army and believes that the option should be open for 18-year-olds to serve, but that it should not be compulsory.

“I would choose to be shot to death right here, in Kyiv instead of going to the frontline,” said 17-year-old Serhiy (Al Jazeera did not identify surnames).

“Our forefathers, Cossacks, didn’t allow a man who had no children, no heirs, to go to war,” he explained to Al Jazeera reporters. “I would have done the same. If there are no people, who the hell needs this land?”

Serhiy’s mother shared her son’s sentiment, adding that young people “aren’t developed mentally, they will jump on (enemy) weapons without thinking, without understanding.” She continued, “they don’t yet have a feeling of self-preservation, they are just flying into battle. This will be (the) destruction of the Ukrainian people.”

These sentiments are reflected in recent polling in Ukraine. Gallup found that over 50% of Ukrainians supported an end to the war, with a large amount supporting the possibility of territorial concessions.

The war has brought destruction, especially to Eastern Ukraine, and has depleted the population by at least 25%. According to the U.N. Population Fund, around 10 million people have been killed, or have left the country since 2014. Ukraine is also dealing with a demographic crisis. A study predicted that the working-age population in Ukraine will decline by a third by 2040.

Ukrainian military officials have reportedly not discussed lowering the conscription age, even as Washington seems to be pushing it. “The need right now is manpower,” an “an unnamed senior US official,” told reporters on Nov. 28. “Mobilization and more manpower could make a significant difference at this time, as we look at the battlefield today.”

Ukrainian President Zelenskyy lowered the conscription age from 27 to 25 back in April and had to resort to using patrols to gather up men who were avoiding conscription. This was shortly after U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham traveled to Ukraine in March and advocated for lowering the draft age. “I would hope that those eligible to serve in the Ukrainian military would join. I can’t believe it’s at 27. You’re in a fight for your life, so you should be serving,” he said, seemingly speaking to military-eligible Ukrainians during a press conference in Kyiv.

This mobilization drive largely failed according to Ukrainian officials, as desertion has become a larger problem for Kyiv, with more than 100,000 charged under the desertion laws since Russia invaded in February 2022, according to the Associated Press. One Ukrainian lawmaker has claimed that desertion numbers could be as high as 200,000.

An officer in the 72nd Brigade noted that desertion was a large part of why the city of Vuhledar was lost to the Russians in October, adding that “it is clear that now, frankly speaking, we have already squeezed the maximum out of our people.”

“It is difficult to imagine that Kyiv would drag its heels on lowering the conscription age unless it perceived serious and potentially severe domestic consequences,” said the Quincy Institute’s Mark Episkopos.

“This, coupled with polling showing that most Ukrainians favor reaching a peace settlement as soon as possible, thrusts into question the strength of President Zelensky's wartime mandate going into 2025,” he adds. “The opposition to this proposal from Zelensky's office, despite ongoing pressure from the US, suggests that popular discontent inside Ukraine may be approaching a tipping point.”

“Being quiet about a huge problem only harms our country,” Serhii Hnezdiliv, a soldier who was open about his choice to desert, told the AP. “If there’s no end term (to military service), it turns into a prison — it becomes psychologically hard to find reasons to defend this country.”


Top Photo: Fresh graves of Ukrainian soldiers died during defence against Russian invaders on cemetery of village Chervonohryhorivka, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast of Ukraine on May 14, 2023 (Shutterstock)
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
nuclear weapons
Top image credit: rawf8 via shutterstock.com

What will happen when there are no guardrails on nuclear weapons?

Global Crises

The New START Treaty — the last arms control agreement between the U.S. and Russia — is set to expire next week, unless President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin make a last minute decision to renew it. Letting the treaty expire would increase the risk of nuclear conflict and open the door to an accelerated nuclear arms race. A coalition of arms control and disarmament groups is pushing Congress and the president to pledge to continue to observe the New START limits on deployed, strategic nuclear weapons by the US and Russia.

New START matters. The treaty, which entered into force on February 5, 2011 after a successful effort by the Obama administration to win over enough Republican senators to achieve the required two-thirds majority to ratify the deal, capped deployed warheads to 1,550 for each side, and established verification procedures to ensure that both sides abided by the pact. New START was far from perfect, but it did put much needed guardrails on nuclear development that reduced the prospect of an all-out arms race.

keep readingShow less
Trump Hegseth Rubio
Top image credit: President Donald Trump, joined by Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Secretary of the Navy John Phelan, announces plans for a “Golden Fleet” of new U.S. Navy battleships, Monday, December 22, 2025, at the Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Trump's realist defense strategy with interventionist asterisks

Washington Politics

The Trump administration has released its National Defense Strategy, a document that in many ways marks a sharp break from the interventionist orthodoxies of the past 35 years, but possesses clear militaristic impulses in its own right.

Rhetorically quite compatible with realism and restraint, the report envisages a more focused U.S. grand strategy, shedding force posture dominance in all major theaters for a more concentrated role in the Western Hemisphere and Indo-Pacific. At the same time however, it retains a rather status quo Republican view of the Middle East, painting Iran as an intransigent aggressor and Israel as a model ally. Its muscular approach to the Western Hemisphere also may lend itself to the very interventionism that the report ostensibly opposes.

keep readingShow less
Alternative vs. legacy media
Top photo credit: Gemini AI

Ding dong the legacy media and its slavish war reporting is dead

Media

In a major development that must be frustrating to an establishment trying to sell their policies to an increasingly skeptical public, the rising popularity of independent media has made it impossible to create broad consensus for corporate-compliant narratives, and to casually denigrate, or even censor, those who disagree.

It’s been a long road.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.