Follow us on social

google cta
ukraine soliders cemetery

US may push but Ukrainians balk at lowering draft age to 18

Washington voices keep asking for more.

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

In late November, a U.S. official insisted that Ukraine should consider lowering its conscription age from 25 to 18. Today, Ukrainians are balking at the idea.

In an interview with Al Jazeera, a 20-year-old Ukrainian serviceman named Vladislav said that lowering the military conscription age is a “bad idea.” He volunteered to join the army and believes that the option should be open for 18-year-olds to serve, but that it should not be compulsory.

“I would choose to be shot to death right here, in Kyiv instead of going to the frontline,” said 17-year-old Serhiy (Al Jazeera did not identify surnames).

“Our forefathers, Cossacks, didn’t allow a man who had no children, no heirs, to go to war,” he explained to Al Jazeera reporters. “I would have done the same. If there are no people, who the hell needs this land?”

Serhiy’s mother shared her son’s sentiment, adding that young people “aren’t developed mentally, they will jump on (enemy) weapons without thinking, without understanding.” She continued, “they don’t yet have a feeling of self-preservation, they are just flying into battle. This will be (the) destruction of the Ukrainian people.”

These sentiments are reflected in recent polling in Ukraine. Gallup found that over 50% of Ukrainians supported an end to the war, with a large amount supporting the possibility of territorial concessions.

The war has brought destruction, especially to Eastern Ukraine, and has depleted the population by at least 25%. According to the U.N. Population Fund, around 10 million people have been killed, or have left the country since 2014. Ukraine is also dealing with a demographic crisis. A study predicted that the working-age population in Ukraine will decline by a third by 2040.

Ukrainian military officials have reportedly not discussed lowering the conscription age, even as Washington seems to be pushing it. “The need right now is manpower,” an “an unnamed senior US official,” told reporters on Nov. 28. “Mobilization and more manpower could make a significant difference at this time, as we look at the battlefield today.”

Ukrainian President Zelenskyy lowered the conscription age from 27 to 25 back in April and had to resort to using patrols to gather up men who were avoiding conscription. This was shortly after U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham traveled to Ukraine in March and advocated for lowering the draft age. “I would hope that those eligible to serve in the Ukrainian military would join. I can’t believe it’s at 27. You’re in a fight for your life, so you should be serving,” he said, seemingly speaking to military-eligible Ukrainians during a press conference in Kyiv.

This mobilization drive largely failed according to Ukrainian officials, as desertion has become a larger problem for Kyiv, with more than 100,000 charged under the desertion laws since Russia invaded in February 2022, according to the Associated Press. One Ukrainian lawmaker has claimed that desertion numbers could be as high as 200,000.

An officer in the 72nd Brigade noted that desertion was a large part of why the city of Vuhledar was lost to the Russians in October, adding that “it is clear that now, frankly speaking, we have already squeezed the maximum out of our people.”

“It is difficult to imagine that Kyiv would drag its heels on lowering the conscription age unless it perceived serious and potentially severe domestic consequences,” said the Quincy Institute’s Mark Episkopos.

“This, coupled with polling showing that most Ukrainians favor reaching a peace settlement as soon as possible, thrusts into question the strength of President Zelensky's wartime mandate going into 2025,” he adds. “The opposition to this proposal from Zelensky's office, despite ongoing pressure from the US, suggests that popular discontent inside Ukraine may be approaching a tipping point.”

“Being quiet about a huge problem only harms our country,” Serhii Hnezdiliv, a soldier who was open about his choice to desert, told the AP. “If there’s no end term (to military service), it turns into a prison — it becomes psychologically hard to find reasons to defend this country.”


Top Photo: Fresh graves of Ukrainian soldiers died during defence against Russian invaders on cemetery of village Chervonohryhorivka, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast of Ukraine on May 14, 2023 (Shutterstock)
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Mbs-mbz-scaled
UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan receives Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman at the Presidential Airport in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates November 27, 2019. WAM/Handout via REUTERS

Is the US goading Arab states to join war against Iran?

QiOSK

On Sunday, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Mike Waltz told ABC News that Arab Gulf states may soon step up their involvement in the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran. “I expect that you'll see additional diplomatic and possibly military action from them in the coming days and weeks,” Waltz said.

Then, on Monday morning, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) slammed Saudi Arabia for staying out of the war even as “Americans are dying and the U.S. is spending billions” of dollars to conduct regime change in Iran. “If you are not willing to use your military now, when are you willing to use it?” Graham asked. “Hopefully this changes soon. If not, consequences will follow.”

keep readingShow less
Why Tehran may have time on its side
Top image credit: Iranian army military personnel stand at attention under a banner featuring an image of an Iranian-made unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) during a military parade commemorating the anniversary of Army Day outside the Shrine of Iran's late leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in the south of Tehran, Iran, on April 18, 2025. (Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto)

Why Tehran may have time on its side

QiOSK

A provocative calculus by Anusar Farrouqui (“policytensor”) has been circulating on X and in more exhaustive form on the author’s Substack. It purports to demonstrate a sobering reality: in a high-intensity U.S.-Iran conflict, the United States may be unable to suppress Iranian drone production quickly enough to prevent a strategically consequential period of regional devastation.

The argument is framed through a quantitative lens, carrying the seductive appeal of mathematical precision. It arranges variables—such as U.S. sortie rates and degradation efficiency against Iranian repair cycles and rebuild speeds—to suggest a "sustainable firing rate." The implication is that Iran could maintain a persistent strike capability long enough to exhaust American political patience, forcing Washington toward a premature declaration of success or an unfavorable ceasefire.

keep readingShow less
Ignorance about war powers plays right into Trump's hands
Top image credit: US House Speaker Mike Johnson arrives for press briefing at Columbia University in New York on April 24, 2024. (Shutterstock/lev radin)

Ignorance about war powers plays right into Trump's hands

Washington Politics

This week efforts under the War Powers Act to check President Trump’s unconstitutional and unauthorized war in Iran failed on a mostly party line split in both the House and the Senate. The result isn’t all that surprising. The naivety, however, on the role of Congress in matters of war is staggering. Congress is in desperate need of a civics refresher.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.), in response to reporter questions on the application of the War Powers Act’s provisions to the president’s actions in Iran, said, “I think the president has the authority that he needs to conduct the activities. … As you know, there’s a lot of controversy around, questions around the War Powers Act, but I think the president is acting in the best interests of the nation.”

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.