Follow us on social

ukraine soliders cemetery

US may push but Ukrainians balk at lowering draft age to 18

Washington voices keep asking for more.

Reporting | QiOSK

In late November, a U.S. official insisted that Ukraine should consider lowering its conscription age from 25 to 18. Today, Ukrainians are balking at the idea.

In an interview with Al Jazeera, a 20-year-old Ukrainian serviceman named Vladislav said that lowering the military conscription age is a “bad idea.” He volunteered to join the army and believes that the option should be open for 18-year-olds to serve, but that it should not be compulsory.

“I would choose to be shot to death right here, in Kyiv instead of going to the frontline,” said 17-year-old Serhiy (Al Jazeera did not identify surnames).

“Our forefathers, Cossacks, didn’t allow a man who had no children, no heirs, to go to war,” he explained to Al Jazeera reporters. “I would have done the same. If there are no people, who the hell needs this land?”

Serhiy’s mother shared her son’s sentiment, adding that young people “aren’t developed mentally, they will jump on (enemy) weapons without thinking, without understanding.” She continued, “they don’t yet have a feeling of self-preservation, they are just flying into battle. This will be (the) destruction of the Ukrainian people.”

These sentiments are reflected in recent polling in Ukraine. Gallup found that over 50% of Ukrainians supported an end to the war, with a large amount supporting the possibility of territorial concessions.

The war has brought destruction, especially to Eastern Ukraine, and has depleted the population by at least 25%. According to the U.N. Population Fund, around 10 million people have been killed, or have left the country since 2014. Ukraine is also dealing with a demographic crisis. A study predicted that the working-age population in Ukraine will decline by a third by 2040.

Ukrainian military officials have reportedly not discussed lowering the conscription age, even as Washington seems to be pushing it. “The need right now is manpower,” an “an unnamed senior US official,” told reporters on Nov. 28. “Mobilization and more manpower could make a significant difference at this time, as we look at the battlefield today.”

Ukrainian President Zelenskyy lowered the conscription age from 27 to 25 back in April and had to resort to using patrols to gather up men who were avoiding conscription. This was shortly after U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham traveled to Ukraine in March and advocated for lowering the draft age. “I would hope that those eligible to serve in the Ukrainian military would join. I can’t believe it’s at 27. You’re in a fight for your life, so you should be serving,” he said, seemingly speaking to military-eligible Ukrainians during a press conference in Kyiv.

This mobilization drive largely failed according to Ukrainian officials, as desertion has become a larger problem for Kyiv, with more than 100,000 charged under the desertion laws since Russia invaded in February 2022, according to the Associated Press. One Ukrainian lawmaker has claimed that desertion numbers could be as high as 200,000.

An officer in the 72nd Brigade noted that desertion was a large part of why the city of Vuhledar was lost to the Russians in October, adding that “it is clear that now, frankly speaking, we have already squeezed the maximum out of our people.”

“It is difficult to imagine that Kyiv would drag its heels on lowering the conscription age unless it perceived serious and potentially severe domestic consequences,” said the Quincy Institute’s Mark Episkopos.

“This, coupled with polling showing that most Ukrainians favor reaching a peace settlement as soon as possible, thrusts into question the strength of President Zelensky's wartime mandate going into 2025,” he adds. “The opposition to this proposal from Zelensky's office, despite ongoing pressure from the US, suggests that popular discontent inside Ukraine may be approaching a tipping point.”

“Being quiet about a huge problem only harms our country,” Serhii Hnezdiliv, a soldier who was open about his choice to desert, told the AP. “If there’s no end term (to military service), it turns into a prison — it becomes psychologically hard to find reasons to defend this country.”

Thanks to our readers and supporters, Responsible Statecraft has had a tremendous year. A complete website overhaul made possible in part by generous contributions to RS, along with amazing writing by staff and outside contributors, has helped to increase our monthly page views by 133%! In continuing to provide independent and sharp analysis on the major conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, as well as the tumult of Washington politics, RS has become a go-to for readers looking for alternatives and change in the foreign policy conversation. 

 

We hope you will consider a tax-exempt donation to RS for your end-of-the-year giving, as we plan for new ways to expand our coverage and reach in 2025. Please enjoy your holidays, and here is to a dynamic year ahead!

Top Photo: Fresh graves of Ukrainian soldiers died during defence against Russian invaders on cemetery of village Chervonohryhorivka, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast of Ukraine on May 14, 2023 (Shutterstock)
Reporting | QiOSK
war profit
Top image credit: Andrew Angelov via shutterstock.com

War drives revenue increases for world's top arms dealers

QiOSK

Revenues at the world’s top 100 global arms and military services producing companies totaled $632 billion in 2023, a 4.2% increase over the prior year, according to new data released by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).

The largest increases were tied to ongoing conflicts, including a 40% increase in revenues for Russian companies involved in supplying Moscow’s war on Ukraine and record sales for Israeli firms producing weapons used in that nation’s brutal war on Gaza. Revenues for Turkey’s top arms producing companies also rose sharply — by 24% — on the strength of increased domestic defense spending plus exports tied to the war in Ukraine.

keep readingShow less
Tibilisi Georgia protests
Top photo credit: 11/28/24. An anti-government protester holds the European flag in front of a makeshift barricade on fire during the demonstration in Tibilisi, Georgia. Following a controversial election last month, ruling party "Georgian Dream" Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze announced earlier today that they will no longer pursue a European future until the end of 2028. (Jay Kogler / SOPA Images via Reuters Connect)

Streets on fire: Is Georgia opposition forming up a coup?

Europe

Events have taken an astonishing turn in the Republic of Georgia. On Thursday, newly re-appointed Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidzeannounced that Georgia would not “put the issue of opening negotiations with the European Union on the agenda until the end of 2028,” and not accept budget support from the EU until then, either.

In the three-decade history of EU enlargement into Eastern Europe and Eurasia, where the promise of membership and the capricious integration process have roiled societies, felled governments, raised and dashed hopes like no other political variable, this is unheard of. So is the treatment Georgia has received at the hands of the West.

keep readingShow less
Donald Trump Zelensky Putin
Top photo credit: Donald Trump (Anna Moneymaker/Shutterstock)Volodymyr Zelensky (miss.cabul/Shutterstock)and Vladimir Putin (paparazzza/Shuttterstock)

Ukraine’s best hope for peace looks a lot like Donald Trump

Europe

This article was updated by the author and republished with permission from the Nonzero Newsletter

Last week, people who fear a third world war got more reasons to worry. Ukraine, with permission from the White House, struck Russian territory with long-range missiles supplied by the United States. Russian President Vladimir Putin has long warned that such an attack would mean that NATO and Russia “are at war,” and he has raised the specter of nuclear retaliation. Granted, these threats could be bluffs, but last week Putin gave them some credibility by (a) loosening the conditions for Russia’s use of nuclear weapons, (b) firing a multiple-warhead, nuclear-capable missile at Ukraine for the first time in the war, and (c) declaring, in a speech after the strike, that Russia would be entitled to attack any nations that aid Ukraine’s strikes into Russian territory.

keep readingShow less

Election 2024

Latest

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.