Follow us on social

Diplomacy Watch Putin Trump Zelenskyy Ukraine

Diplomacy Watch: Ukraine takes risks with big attacks on Russia

Peace or even a short-term ceasefire is now much further away than they were last week


Reporting | QiOSK

Ukraine’s recent attacks on Russian air bases and the Kerch Bridge in Crimea may have complicated the peace process and appear to have provided Russian President Vladimir Putin with an excuse to escalate the conflict.

On June 1, just as both sides were preparing for direct peace talks the following day, Ukraine launched a large-scale drone attack, targeting four of Russia’s military airbases. Deemed "Operation Spiderweb," the attacks were aimed at air bases deep in Russian territory and successfully hit targets in two, with at least 41 destroyed or damaged aircraft.

The operation reportedly involved 18 months of planning and demobilized or destroyed a significant portion of Russia’s long-range bombers. Rather than flying drones from Ukraine into Russian territory, Ukrainian operatives smuggled around 150 small-to-medium-sized drones into Russia on cargo trucks. The drones were remotely operated and released close to their targets to avoid Moscow's multi-layered missile defense systems.

After this successful operation, Ukraine launched an attack on the bridge that connects Russian-occupied Crimea to mainland Russia across the Kerch Straight. According to the Russian defense ministry, the bridge weathered explosives that were triggered on multiple support pillars, but was not severely damaged. There were no reported casualties.

Russian President Vladimir Putin vowed to respond appropriately and called Kyiv a “terrorist regime.” Putin also expressed his need to respond to the attacks during a phone call with President Donald Trump.

These attacks further complicate an already shaky peace process. Kyiv insists on an immediate 30-day cease-fire that Moscow is not inclined to accept without concessions from Ukraine.

This week’s peace talks in Istanbul did not result in a truce or other significant progress. Both sides agreed to swap severely wounded POWs and return the bodies of thousands of killed soldiers. Neither side agreed to a new ceasefire. "Peace memos" were reported by both sides, detailing demands for each that were, as the Quincy Institute's Anatol Lieven described, "completely mutually incompatible; they suggest that at present neither side is in fact interested in an early peace."

Quincy Institute’s Mark Episkopos agreed. “Russian and Ukrainian views on war termination are still very far apart. Zelensky is backing an unconditional 30-day ceasefire in an apparent bid to freeze the war without having to accede to any of Russia’s demands,” and “Moscow is not inherently opposed to a ceasefire, but is unwilling to relinquish its battlefield leverage without progress on its core demands.”

Episkopos likened Ukraine’s recent attack inside Russia to the Tet Offensive in Vietnam, calling it “a symbolic and political step aimed at pressuring Russia into ending the war on Ukraine’s terms." However, "This effort will likely not just fail but generate a counterproductive effect.”

In other Ukraine War news:

Bloomberg reports on Russia’s economic challenges as Moscow continues to increase its defense spending, while other industries see limited growth or stagnation. Production output for military vehicles and aircraft surged by 32% during the first four months of this year, with most civilian manufacturing sectors lessening output. Additionally, inflation is almost double the central bank’s 4% target.

The Center for Strategic and International Studies released a report on Thursday, finding that Russia has suffered around 1 million soldiers killed or wounded thus far in its war with Ukraine. The report also details how Russian battlefield gains have considerably slowed and have come at the expense of heavy casualties. NBC News reports that Ukraine has suffered around 400,000 casualties.

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un announced that he will give “unconditional support” to Russia’s effort in its war with Ukraine. The Associated Press reports that Kim met with Russian Security Council Secretary Sergei Shoigu in Pyongyang this week, where both parties affirmed their partnership and discussed how to commemorate the efforts of North Korean troops in the war.

From this week’s State Department press briefing

A reporter asked department spokesperson Tammy Bruce if the United States believed Ukraine was slow-walking the peace process, referencing President Trump’s two-week deadline. Bruce responded that both sides are committed to ensuring the process doesn’t drag on for months. She also affirmed Trump’s insistence that meaningful progress will be made through negotiations directly between the two parties.


Top Photo: Trump, Zelenskyy, and Putin with Ukraine graphic. Credit, Khody Akhavi
Reporting | QiOSK
Trump ASEAN
Top photo credit: U.S. President Donald Trump looks at Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., next to Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim when posing for a family photo with leaders at the ASEAN Summit in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, October 26, 2025. Vincent Thian/Pool via REUTERS

‘America First’ meets ‘ASEAN Way’ in Kuala Lumpur

Asia-Pacific

The 2025 ASEAN and East Asia Summits in Kuala Lumpur beginning today are set to be consequential multilateral gatherings — defining not only ASEAN’s internal cohesion but also the shape of U.S.–China relations in the Indo-Pacific.

President Donald Trump’s participation will be the first by a U.S. president in an ASEAN-led summit since 2022. President Biden skipped the last two such summits in 2023 and 2024, sending then-Vice President Harris instead.

keep readingShow less
iran, china, russia
Top photo credit: Top image credit: Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov and and Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi shake hands as Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Ma Zhaoxu looks on during their meet with reporters after their meeting at Diaoyutai State Guest House on March 14, 2025 in Beijing, China. Lintao Zhang/Pool via REUTERS

'Annulled'! Russia won't abide snapback sanctions on Iran

Middle East

“A raider attack on the U.N. Security Council.” This was the explosive accusation leveled by Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov this week. His target was the U.N. Secretariat and Western powers, whom he blamed for what Russia sees as an illegitimate attempt to restore the nuclear-related international sanctions on Iran.

Beyond the fiery rhetoric, Ryabkov’s statement contained a message: Russia, he said, now considers all pre-2015 U.N. sanctions on Iran, snapped back by the European signatories of the 2015 nuclear deal (JCPOA) — the United Kingdom, France, Germany — “annulled.” Moscow will deepen its military-technical cooperation with Tehran accordingly, according to Ryabkov.

This is more than a diplomatic spat; it is the formal announcement of a split in international legal reality. The world’s major powers are now operating under two irreconcilable interpretations of international law. On one side, the United States, the United Kingdom, France, and Germany assert that the sanctions snapback mechanism of the JCPOA was legitimately triggered for Iran’s alleged violations. On the other, Iran, Russia, and China reject this as an illegitimate procedural act.

This schism was not inevitable, and its origin reveals a profound incongruence. The Western powers that most frequently appeal to the sanctity of the "rules-based international order" and international law have, in this instance, taken an action whose effects fundamentally undermine it. By pushing through a legal maneuver that a significant part of the Security Council considers illegitimate, they have ushered the world into a new and more dangerous state. The predictable, if imperfect, framework of universally recognized Security Council decisions is being replaced by a system where legal facts are determined by political interests espoused by competing power blocs.

This rupture followed a deliberate Western choice to reject compromises in a stand-off with Iran. While Iran was in a technical violation of the provisions of the JCPOA — by, notably, amassing a stockpile of highly enriched uranium (up to 60% as opposed to the 3.67% for a civilian use permissible under the JCPOA), there was a chance to avert the crisis. In the critical weeks leading to the snapback, Iran had signaled concessions in talks with the International Atomic Energy Agency in Cairo, in terms of renewing cooperation with the U.N. nuclear watchdog’s inspectors.

keep readingShow less
On Ukraine and Venezuela, Trump needs to dump the sycophants
Top Photo Credit: (Official White House Photo by Molly Riley)

On Ukraine and Venezuela, Trump needs to dump the sycophants

Europe

While diplomats labored to produce the Dayton Accords in 1995, then-Secretary of Defense Bill Perry advised, “No agreement is better than a bad agreement.” Given that Washington’s allies in London, Paris, Berlin and Warsaw are opposed to any outcome that might end the war in Ukraine, no agreement may be preferable. But for President Trump, there is no point in equating the illusion of peace in Ukraine with a meaningless ceasefire that settles nothing.

Today, Ukraine is mired in corruption, starting at the very highest levels of the administration in Kyiv. Sending $175 billion of borrowed money there "for however long it takes" has turned out to be worse than reckless. The U.S. national sovereign debt is surging to nearly $38 trillion and rising by $425 billion with each passing month. President Trump needs to turn his attention away from funding Joe Biden’s wars and instead focus on the faltering American economy.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.