Follow us on social

Diplomacy Watch Donald Trump Putin Zelensky

Diplomacy Watch: Zelenskyy-Trump Part II in DC?

Trump’s aid freeze appears to have opened up some diplomatic pathways

Reporting | QiOSK

French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy could all be at the White House by early next week to discuss a ceasefire with Russia, although French government spokespeople have denied such a meeting is in the works.

If the meeting does happen, it would be an unexpectedly quick return trip for Zelenskyy, who was last at the White House on Friday to sign a mineral exchange deal. The deal, of course, remained unsigned after a now infamous Oval Office exchange between Zelenskyy, President Trump, and Vice President J.D. Vance blew up its prospects.

Zelenskyy would definitely have to hustle, as it was also announced that he would be meeting with senior Trump officials in Riyadh next week, too.

The Trump administration this week sought to pressure Ukraine into coming back to the negotiating table by freezing all military assistance to the country, pausing intelligence coordination efforts, and halting the U.S. cyber offensive in Russia.

Some experts say that because Ukraine is less dependent on U.S. aid than it was at the beginning of the war, it could take a while before Trump’s aid freeze has real consequences on the battlefield. The intelligence pause, on the other hand, is expected to have a more immediate impact.

Ukraine is now cut off from its largest source of military aid since the war began and must scramble to make up the gap. After Trump’s military assistance pause, Macron said in a speech that Europe must be prepared to bolster Ukraine’s defense efforts without American support. “I want to believe that the U.S. will stand by our side, but we have to be ready for that not to be the case,” he said. However, it's unlikely that any European country will be able to supply Ukraine with the caliber of weapons Washington has.

For his part, after Trump paused U.S. aid to Ukraine, Zelenskyy said he is willing to negotiate a truce, writing on X, “None of us wants an endless war. Ukraine is ready to come to the negotiating table as soon as possible to bring lasting peace closer.” He also said he is willing to sign the rare earth mineral exchange deal that was left on the table last Friday.

During his joint address to Congress on Tuesday, Trump announced that he had just received a letter from Zelenskyy and read passages from the letter affirming the Ukrainian president’s commitment to negotiating a peace settlement. Trump, who in recent weeks has called Zelenskyy a “dictator” and accused him of wanting to start World War III, mirrored Zelenskyy’s conciliatory tone. “I appreciate that he sent this letter,” Trump said.

In other Ukraine War News this week:

According to the Guardian, a Russian drone attack in Odessa caused deep reaching water and power outages in Ukraine’s third most populous city on Tuesday.

In a Fox Business interview on Wednesday, CIA director John Ratcliffeimplied that the pause on intelligence coordination with Ukraine could soon resume pending upcoming talks with top Ukrainian officials.

Amnesty Internationalsaid this week that Russia’s treatment of detained Ukrainian POWs and civilians since 2022 could amount to crimes against humanity.

Macron said his country will consider extending its nuclear umbrella to cover a wider range of European allies — a proposal Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov characterized as “a threat against Russia”, according to Reuters.

From State Department Press Briefing on March 6

Asked about the prospects of a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia, spokesperson Tammy Bruce said, “It appears that President Zelenskyy understands what’s at stake, that we are here to help them, that there is one person who can bring those parties to the table and it is Donald Trump.”


Top Photo Credit: Diplomacy Watch (Khody Akhavi)
Reporting | QiOSK
Iran nuclear
Top image credit: Inspired by maps via shutterstock.com

How the US could use Iran's uranium enrichment to its own advantage

Middle East

Since mid-April, Iran and the United States held numerous rounds of nuclear negotiations that have made measured progress — until Washington abruptly stated that Iran had no right to enrich uranium. Moreover, 200 members of the U.S. Congress sent president Trump a letter opposing any deal that would allow Iran to retain uranium enrichment capability.

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei called U.S. demands “excessive and outrageous” and “nonsense.” Since the beginning of the Iranian nuclear crisis in 2003, Tehran has drawn a clear red line: the peaceful right to enrich uranium under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) is non-negotiable.

keep readingShow less
american military missiles
Top photo credit: Fogcatcher/Shutterstock

5 ways the military industrial complex is a killer

Latest 3

Congress is on track to finish work on the fiscal year 2025 Pentagon budget this week, and odds are that it will add $150 billion to its funding for the next few years beyond what the department even asked for. Meanwhile, President Trump has announced a goal of over $1 trillion for the Pentagon for fiscal year 2026.

With these immense sums flying out the door, it’s a good time to take a critical look at the Pentagon budget, from the rationales given to justify near record levels of spending to the impact of that spending in the real world. Here are five things you should know about the Pentagon budget and the military-industrial complex that keeps the churn going.

keep readingShow less
Sudan
Top image credit: A Sudanese army soldier stands next to a destroyed combat vehicle as Sudan's army retakes ground and some displaced residents return to ravaged capital in the state of Khartoum Sudan March 26, 2025. REUTERS/El Tayeb Siddig

Will Sudan attack the UAE?

Africa

Recent weeks events have dramatically cast the Sudanese civil war back into the international spotlight, drawing renewed scrutiny to the role of external actors, particularly the United Arab Emirates.

This shift has been driven by Sudan's accusations at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) against the UAE concerning violations of the Genocide Convention, alongside drone strikes on Port Sudan that Khartoum vociferously attributes to direct Emirati participation. Concurrently, Secretary of State Marco Rubio publicly reaffirmed the UAE's deep entanglement in the conflict at a Senate hearing last week.

From Washington, another significant and sudden development also surfaced last week: the imposition of U.S. sanctions on the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) for alleged chemical weapons use. This dramatic accusation was met by an immediate denial from Sudan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which vehemently dismissed the claims as "unfounded" and criticized the U.S. for bypassing the proper international mechanisms, specifically the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, despite Sudan's active membership on its Executive Council.

Despite the gravity of such an accusation, corroboration for the use of chemical agents in Sudan’s war remains conspicuously absent from public debate or reporting, save for a January 2025 New York Times article citing unnamed U.S. officials. That report itself contained a curious disclaimer: "Officials briefed on the intelligence said the information did not come from the United Arab Emirates, an American ally that is also a staunch supporter of the R.S.F."

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.