Follow us on social

google cta
Diplomacy Watch Donald Trump Putin Zelensky

Diplomacy Watch: Did Israel’s war on Iran help Russia?

Moscow stands to gain from the West redirecting attention and resources from Ukraine to the Middle East

Analysis | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

As an uneasy ceasefire holds between Israel and Iran, the side effects of their destructive “12 day war” might just prove beneficial to Russia’s bottom line in Ukraine.

Mark Episkopos, a research fellow in the Quincy Institute's Eurasia Program, told RS that Russia “will certainly benefit” from the Israel-Iran conflict’s throttling of oil prices. Episkopos emphasized that “the precise windfall is difficult to measure,” and analyst Alexander Motyl asserted that such a price spike’s benefit to Moscow “appears temporary.”

Meanwhile, Israel’s war on Iran may have diverted Western attention — and military aid — once bound for Ukraine to Israel instead, resulting in what Episkopos calls a “positive spillover effect” for Russia’s war effort. Indeed, analyst Nikita Smagin told Al Jazeera that Russian leadership “counts on this scenario.”

Trump’s comments on possibly providing Patriot air-defense missiles for Ukraine following the recent NATO summit, where Trump explained the U.S. is also supplying such missiles to Israel, suggest as much. The Biden administration previously promised Patriot missiles in a past agreement with Ukraine.

Ukraine wants “to have the ‘anti-missile’ missiles…the Patriots, and we're going to see if we can make some available,” Trump said at a press conference following the NATO Summit. “You know, they're very hard to get. We need them too. We were supplying them to Israel.”

Meanwhile, NATO summit’s heavy focus on Israel’s war on Iran showcased how the Ukraine war, a hot topic at previous summits, has slid onto the backburner.

And former British diplomat Ian Proud suggested the NATO summit’s other major focus area, ramping NATO countries’ defense spending up to to 5% of GDP, essentially translated into Trump “dumping” his Ukraine-war related responsibilities onto a remilitarizing Europe.

“With the fanfare of the NATO Summit starting to subside, the big question now is how much patience President Trump will have to push a peace agenda in Ukraine now that European allies have stepped up to spend more and buy American kit? My worry is, not much,” Proud surmised in RS.

Proud noted that a third round of direct talks between Russia and Ukraine might take place as early as next week. But even if Russia and Ukraine speak directly soon, Trump’s lack of patience may well spell doom for a diplomatic solution, given his administration’s centrality to the talks’ success.

“The bigger issue is that the Ukrainian and Russian positions remain far apart, partly because both Kyiv and Moscow think that time is on their side. These can only be bridged by the United States, but the Trump administration does not have the patience, bandwidth and expertise to see such a complex process through,” Zach Paikin, deputy director of the Quincy Institute’s Better Order Project and research fellow in its Grand Strategy program, told RS. “But ultimately, this doesn't change the fact that the negotiations were in trouble long before the Israel-Iran war broke out.”

Paikin also said that the U.S. involvement in Israel’s conflict with Iran, where the U.S. struck Iran’s nuclear facilities, “has increased doubts in the Kremlin over whether Donald Trump is a trustworthy interlocutor and whether the United States is capable of getting its allies on board for diplomatic settlements.”

But growing pessimism about the U.S. role in Ukraine war diplomacy, doesn’t necessarily mean that Russia is banking on reaping possible benefits of Israel’s conflict with Iran. Rather, Episkopos said that Russia might benefit by participating in diplomatic efforts related to the so-called 12 day war — if the U.S. is also on board.

“The Kremlin has also never closed the door to acting as a mediator or at least an intermediary between Iran, Israel, and the US, partly as a way of easing tensions with Washington and partly to support its complex regional balancing act between Iran, Israel, and the Arab states,” Episkopos said. “The extent to which the U.S. would welcome this kind of Russian role likely depends on the broader strategy the White House will pursue in possible negotiations with Iran.”

In other Ukraine war news this week

A Russian missile attack on Ukraine’s Dnipropetrovsk region Tuesday killed at least 19 and wounded another 280 people, according to Al Jazeera.

A Ukrainian drone hit an apartment building outside Moscow, which started a fire and injured two people, TASS news agency and Sky News reported.

Ukrainian Army head General Oleksandr Syrskyi claimed Thursday that Ukrainian troops have halted a Russian advance into Ukraine’s Sumy region, according to the BBC. AP reports that Syrskyi’s assertions cannot be independently verified.

In comments published Saturday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky requested that Western allies allocate 0.25% of their GDP to assist Ukraine’s efforts to ramp up its weapons production. According to the Guardian, he said that Ukraine is in talks with countries including Canada, the UK, Lithuania, and Norway to launch joint weapons production efforts, but provided no timeline for doing so.

From State Department Press Briefing June 24

“While in Minsk, the U.S. delegation, led by General Keith Kellogg, special presidential envoy for Ukraine, met with the leader of Belarus and his team,” State Department Spokesperson Tammy Bruce said of recent U.S.-Belarus talks regarding the war in Ukraine during the State Department Press Briefing on June 24.

“Special Envoy Kellogg discussed the Russia-Ukraine war and how President Trump is pushing hard to stop [the Ukraine] war and end the killing, and Deputy Special Envoy John Cole led the discussions on U.S.-Belarus bilateral relations, which resulted in the release of 14 long-held political prisoners from Estonia, Japan, Latvia, Poland, Sweden, and Belarus. And that is the result of what you can do with diplomacy, with envoys, and with a commitment to peace and freedom for people around the world.”


Top Photo Credit: Diplomacy Watch (Khody Akhavi)
google cta
Analysis | QiOSK
Trump Central Asia
Top image credit: U.S. President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, and Senator Jim Risch (R-ID) attend a dinner with the leaders of the C5+1Central Asian countries of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, in the East Room of the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., November 6, 2025. REUTERS/Nathan Howard

Central Asia doesn't need another great game

Asia-Pacific

The November 6 summit between President Donald Trump and the leaders of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan in Washington, D.C. represents a significant moment in U.S.-Central Asia relations (C5+1). It was the first time a U.S. president hosted the C5+1 group in the White House, marking a turning point for U.S. relations with Central Asia.

The summit signaled a clear shift toward economic engagement. Uzbekistan pledged $35 billion in U.S. investments over three years (potentially $100 billion over a decade) and Kazakhstan signed $17 billion in bilateral agreements and agreed to cooperate with the U.S. on critical minerals. Most controversially, Kazakhstan became the first country in Trump's second term to join the Abraham Accords.

keep readingShow less
POGO The Bunker
Top image credit: Project on Government Oversight

Golden Dome, mission impossible

Military Industrial Complex

The Bunker appears originally at the Project on Government Oversight and is republished here with permission.

keep readingShow less
Xi Jinping
Top image credit: Photo agency and Lev Radin via shutterstock.com

Why Texas should invite Xi Jinping to a rodeo

Asia-Pacific

Last year, Texas banned professional contact by state employees (including university professors) with mainland China, to “harden” itself against the influence of the Communist Party of China – an entity that has governed the country since 1949, and whose then-leader, Deng Xiaoping, attended a Texas rodeo in 1979.

Defending the policy, the new provost of the University of Texas, my colleague Will Inboden, writes in National Affairs that “the US government estimates that the CPC has purloined up to $600 billion worth of American technology each year – some of it from American companies but much of it from American universities.” US GDP is currently around $30 trillion, so $600 billion would represent 2% of that sum, or roughly 70% of the US defense budget ($880 billion). It also amounts to about one-third of all spending ($1.8 trillion) by all US colleges and universities, on all subjects and activities, every year. Make that 30 cents of every tuition dollar and a third of every federal research grant.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.