Follow us on social

Trump Zelensky

Why this 'megaphone diplomacy' isn’t helpful

Locker room language and hysteria won’t end Ukraine war any faster

Analysis | Latest

On ascending the throne in 1881, Tsar Alexander III of Russia proclaimed that “From henceforth, all matters of state will be discussed quietly between Ourselves and God.” Both parts of this statement contain excellent advice for contemporary leaders. If you have a direct line to God (and several obviously think that they do), you should use it. And whether talking to the Divinity or anyone else, international affairs should be discussed quietly.

This is probably pointless advice when offered to products of democratic political systems; and in the case of President Trump he would need to experience something like a lightning bolt on the road to Damascus to follow it. Nonetheless, recent days have, or should have, offered a lesson in the folly and dangers of megaphone “diplomacy.”

The initial U.S. proposal (or demand) to Ukraine for control of its mineral reserves was indeed completely illegitimate and utterly unacceptable to Kyiv or any independent and self-respecting government on the face of the planet. However, given the weakness of Ukraine’s position and the already fragile state of his relations with the Trump administration, it was very foolish of President Zelensky to allow his officials to say things like this in public.

All Zelensky had to say was something along the lines of “very interesting proposal with positive aspects which we will consider carefully,” etc., and then leave it to Ukrainian negotiators to take a firm line with their U.S. opposite numbers in private. He’s an actor! He must know how to murmur “rhubarb rhubarb rhubarb” before a public audience without actually saying anything.

Much more foolish, boorish, undignified, ill-considered, dangerous and plain wrong however was Trump’s response, calling Zelensky a “dictator” and a “modestly successful comedian,” giving an utterly false figure of his popularity ratings and demanding that Ukraine hold presidential elections. He then made this even worse by refusing to call Putin a dictator and instructing the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations to vote against a resolution including language blaming Russian aggression for the Ukraine War.

Incredibly enough, this put the U.S. in the same camp as Russia, voting against a huge majority of the U.N. General Assembly. Even China — China, for Heaven’s sake — abstained on the resolution. This kind of thing is bad for the Trump administration and dangerous for the peace process, because it allows opponents of Trump and enemies of the peace process to denounce it as “surrender” to Russia motivated by personal and ideological amity between Trump and Putin, rather than a necessary step to end a destructive war, eliminate grave dangers to the world and costs to the U.S., and respect the will of a large majority of the international community.

It is indeed crucial to moderate U.S. official rhetoric against Russia and create the necessary atmosphere for successful negotiations; but what Trump could have said calmly and reasonably is that the Biden administration’s habit of trying to negotiate with Russia and China while hurling public abuse at them was profoundly counter-productive; and that at a very delicate moment in the peace negotiations the U.S., while not necessarily disagreeing with the language of the U.N. resolution, therefore thought it better to abstain rather than risk undermining the talks. Much of the time, all leaders really need to say in public is something along the lines of, “We believe firmly in a world of universal peace and harmony and goodwill and suchlike.” Chinese diplomats used to be very good at that until they started imitating the public language of their American colleagues.

The one thing to be said for Trump is that his locker-room language seems to reflect a locker-room spirit. In other words, he hurls insults and mockery at people, but really does not seem to bear a long-term grudge if they reply in kind. However crude his language and ruthless his approach to negotiations, he is in the end interested in the actual deal — sometimes quite a reasonable one, as may turn out to be the case with the U.S.-Ukrainian agreement on minerals. And this seems to work quite well at home.

In international affairs however it can be disastrous. Not many world leaders are as pachydermous as Trump, who could give your average rhinoceros a run for its money in this regard; and above all, insults to them are very often seen as insults to their countries, which will not be so readily forgiven. Sometimes indeed Trump’s remarks are open — and utterly gratuitous — insults to countries, including some old and close allies. Trump may extract some reasonable concessions from Mexico and Canada through a mixture of negotiations and pressure. He will not do so by renaming the Gulf of Mexico and calling the Canadian prime minister the governor of the 51st U.S. state.

As to the European leaders! They remind me of Robert Burns’ mouse, when its plans for a secure and peaceful slumber were disturbed by the plough:

“Wee, sleekit, cowrin, tim’rous beasties,
O, what a panic’s in yer breasties!
Ye need na run tae Trump sae hasty,
Wi’ bickerin brattle!”

From the way they talk, anyone would think that the U.S. had already withdrawn from NATO, Russian troops were at the gates of Warsaw, and BlackRock (the former U.S. employer of the next German Chancellor Friedrich Merz) had taken away Merz’s pension.

None of this hysteria is warranted. The Trump administration will not allow further NATO expansion, but it has shown no sign whatsoever of withdrawing from NATO, which is far too important as a base for the projection of U.S. power in the Middle East and support for Israel, which the Trump administration has no intention of giving up. Article 5 remains in place. Europeans are talking about a return to Yalta and the Cold War; but during the Cold War, Soviet tanks were in the middle of Germany. Today Russian ones are in eastern Ukraine. Russia has neither the ability nor the desire to attack NATO within its existing borders, unless NATO intervenes in Ukraine. Trump’s threatened tariffs notwithstanding, the U.S. and European economies are very closely linked, and — as BlackRock itself demonstrates — their financial industries are virtually joined at the hip. Merz’s pension is entirely safe. There is plenty of time for European establishments to think carefully, soberly and privately about the future of European security; and while they are thinking, not to talk so much.


Top photo credit: Donald Trump (shutterstock/Evan El-Amin) and Volodymyr Zelensky (Review News/Shutterstock)
Analysis | Latest
Kim Jong Un
Top photo credit: North Korean leader Kim Jong Un visits the construction site of the Ragwon County Offshore Farm, North Korea July 13, 2025. KCNA via REUTERS

Kim Jong Un is nuking up and playing hard to get

Asia-Pacific

President Donald Trump’s second term has so far been a series of “shock and awe” campaigns both at home and abroad. But so far has left North Korea untouched even as it arms for the future.

The president dramatically broke with precedent during his first term, holding two summits as well as a brief meeting at the Demilitarized Zone with the North’s Supreme Leader Kim Jong-un. Unfortunately, engagement crashed and burned in Hanoi. The DPRK then pulled back, essentially severing contact with both the U.S. and South Korea.

keep readingShow less
Why new CENTCOM chief Brad Cooper is as wrong as the old one
Top photo credit: U.S. Navy Vice Admiral Brad Cooper speaks to guests at the IISS Manama Dialogue in Manama, Bahrain, November 17, 2023. REUTERS/Hamad I Mohammed

Why new CENTCOM chief Brad Cooper is as wrong as the old one

Middle East

If accounts of President Donald Trump’s decision to strike Iranian nuclear facilities this past month are to be believed, the president’s initial impulse to stay out of the Israel-Iran conflict failed to survive the prodding of hawkish advisers, chiefly U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) chief Michael Kurilla.

With Kurilla, an Iran hawk and staunch ally of both the Israeli government and erstwhile national security adviser Mike Waltz, set to leave office this summer, advocates of a more restrained foreign policy may understandably feel like they are out of the woods.

keep readingShow less
Putin Trump
Top photo credit: Vladimir Putin (Office of the President of the Russian Federation) and Donald Trump (US Southern Command photo)

How Trump's 50-day deadline threat against Putin will backfire

Europe

In the first six months of his second term, President Donald Trump has demonstrated his love for three things: deals, tariffs, and ultimatums.

He got to combine these passions during his Oval Office meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte on Monday. Only moments after the two leaders announced a new plan to get military aid to Ukraine, Trump issued an ominous 50-day deadline for Russian President Vladimir Putin to agree to a ceasefire. “We're going to be doing secondary tariffs if we don't have a deal within 50 days,” Trump told the assembled reporters.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.