Follow us on social

google cta
Diplomacy Watch

Diplomacy Watch: Zelensky’s week from hell

Trump called the Ukrainian president a dictator, demanded elections, and blamed him for Russia’s invasion

Analysis | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

Ukraine war negotiations are making remarkable strides as the conflict nears its third anniversary.

Indeed, American and Russian officials met at high-level talks in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, on Tuesday. Those present said the talks were productive.

"We did not just listen but heard each other, and I have reason to believe the American side has better understood our position," Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said after his talks with Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

“I really believe that we’re on the cusp of peace in Europe for the first time in three years,” U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance said on Thursday, regarding ongoing developments.

With the U.S. and Russia apparently proceeding full speed ahead diplomatically, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky fears being left out.

“You cannot make decisions without Ukraine on how to end the war in Ukraine, on any conditions,” Zelensky explained. “We want it to be fair and that no one decides anything behind our backs.”

Trump blasted Zelensky’s concerns. “[Ukrainians are] upset about not having a seat, well, they’ve had a seat for three years, and a long time before that,” Trump told reporters on Tuesday. “This could have been settled very easily.”

Trump went further Wednesday, calling the Ukrainian president “a Dictator” on Truth Social: “[Zelensky] refuses to have Elections, is very low in Ukrainian Polls, and the only thing he was good at was playing Biden ‘like a fiddle.’ A Dictator without Elections, Zelenskyy better move fast or he is not going to have a Country left.”

“Biden never tried, Europe has failed to bring Peace, and Zelenskyy probably wants to keep the “gravy train” going. I love Ukraine, but Zelenskyy has done a terrible job, his Country is shattered, and MILLIONS have unnecessarily died – And so it continues…..,” Trump wrote. (The WSJ reported about one million people were killed or wounded in the war back in September.)

Amid Trump’s jabs at Zelensky, his envoy, Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg (ret.) met with the Ukrainian president on Thursday in Kyiv. While a press conference had been scheduled to take place after the meeting, it was unexpectedly canceled because the U.S. side had not agreed to the format, according to a Ukrainian official.

Europe’s concerns about being shut out of the Ukraine war negotiations in Riyadh, meanwhile, have grown to a fever pitch, leading French President Emmanuel Macron to hold emergency meetings with myriad European nations, the UK, and Canada, to coordinate their responses to Washington’s engagement with Moscow.

After meetings held at the Elysee Palace in Paris Tuesday and Wednesday, Macron announced that the group he convened had established a “clear and united” position. According to the group, achieving any “long-lasting and solid peace” should meet three conditions: Ukraine’s direct involvement in peace talks;“robust and credible guarantees” to support a peace accord; and European security concerns must be taken fully into account..

Whether these conditions will be satisfied in upcoming diplomatic talks remains to be seen.

In other Ukraine war news this week:

Responding to the U.S. diplomatic pivot on Ukraine, European countries are bolstering their defense spending to counter the perceived Russia threat. According to Fortune, Denmark has announced a $7 billion rearmament plan, with Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, who has already clashed with Trump over Greenland, describing the political moment as “the most dangerous situation in our lifetime.”

Russian forces have retaken over 300 square miles in its Kursk region from Ukrainian forces, according to Reuters. That amounts to almost two-thirds of the territory Ukraine captured since its incursion there began last summer. The head of Russia’s General Staff, Col. Gen. Sergei Rudskoi, also claimed that Ukraine’s Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson regions are legally part of Russia and will not be returned to Kyiv as part of any peace agreement.

Reuters also reported that Russia would regard a plan floated by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer to deploy as many as 30,000 European troops, including a contingent from the UK, as peacekeepers to Ukraine as unacceptable. Lavrov has also said that any NATO-constituted force would be considered a “direct threat” to Russian security. At the Munich Security Conference, U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth likewise remarked that no U.S. troops would enter Ukraine, nor would they serve as a guarantee for EU troops there.

There were no State Department press briefings this week.



Top Photo Credit: Diplomacy Watch
google cta
Analysis | QiOSK
Colby: Israel is fighting a different war in Iran
Top image credit: Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby speaks at a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee. (Screengrab via armed-services.senate.gov)

Colby: Israel is fighting a different war in Iran

QiOSK

The U.S. is pursuing “scoped and reasonable objectives” in its military campaign against Iran and is not seeking regime change through force, argued Undersecretary of Defense Elbridge Colby in a Tuesday Senate hearing.

When pressed about why the campaign began with the killing of Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, Colby declined to comment directly. “I’m talking about the goals of the American military campaign,” he told the Senate Armed Services Committee. “Those are Israeli operations.”

keep readingShow less
US missiles
Top photo credit: . DoD photo by Staff Sgt. Vince Parker, U.S. Air Force.

Trump: We have 'unlimited' weapons to fight 'forever' war

QiOSK

In a startling Truth Social post overnight on Monday, President Donald Trump defied reality and claimed that U.S. weapons were "unlimited" and the U.S. could fight "forever" with "these supplies."


keep readingShow less
Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?
Top image credit: President Donald J. Trump holds a joint news conference at the White House with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Feb. 4, 2025. (Shutterstock/ Joshua Sukoff)

Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?

QiOSK

In the months that led up to the Iraq War, the Bush administration went to extraordinary lengths to convince the world of the need to oust Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. Leading officials laid out their case in public, sharing what they claimed was evidence that Iraq was moving rapidly toward the deployment of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. When U.S. tanks rolled across the border, everyone knew the justification: the U.S. was determined to thwart Iraq’s development of weapons of mass destruction, however fictitious that threat would later prove to be.

In the months that led up to the Iran War, the Trump administration took a different tack. President Trump spoke only occasionally of Iran, offering a smattering of justifications for growing U.S. tensions with the country. He claimed without evidence that Iran was rebuilding its nuclear program after the U.S.-Israeli attack last June and even developing missiles that could strike the United States. But he insisted that Tehran could make a deal with seven magic words: “we will never have a nuclear weapon.”

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.