Follow us on social

No, Tim Walz is not a Manchurian Candidate

No, Tim Walz is not a Manchurian Candidate

Freak-out over Kamala's running mate says more about the state of US politics than his middle-of-the-road positions on China

Analysis | Washington Politics

If you enter the fevered corners of the info-verse, you might hear that Tim Walz is a Manchurian Candidate. The governor of Minnesota, just selected by presidential candidate Kamala Harris to serve as her running mate, does indeed have a longstanding interest in China.

After graduating from college in Nebraska (where, among other things, he took classes in East Asian Studies), Walz spent the 1989-90 school year teaching English and American history in Foshan, Guangdong Province as part of Harvard’s WorldTeach program. The Chinese “are such kind, generous, capable people,” the 26-year old told a reporter after returning home. “They just gave and gave and gave to me. Going there was one of the best things I have ever done.”

Walz and his wife Gwen later honeymooned in China. And they launched a company, Educational Travel Adventures, that led student trips to Beijing, Shanghai and elsewhere in the PRC.

For some, this story might sound promising – a politician who actually knows something about the world’s second most powerful country. For others, though, it sounds suspicious. Maybe even downright scary.

Fox News proclaimed that Walz has a “bizarre infatuation” with China. The New York Post declared that the VP candidate “has fawned over Communist China.” Richard Grenell, director of national intelligence under former President Donald Trump, said on X that “no one is more pro-China than Marxist Walz.” Rogan O’Handley, a conservative influencer, called Harris’ Democratic Party running mate “a CCP puppet.”

What’s the evidence?

China hawks seem most exercised about a brief clip from a longer interview in 2016 with an agribusiness news outlet. Walz, then a member of Congress from a rural district in southern Minnesota, discusses legislation before the agriculture committee and then, more than six minutes into the conversation, his work on the bipartisan Congressional-Executive Commission on China. He tells the reporter that he doesn’t believe the U.S. must have an “adversarial” relationship with its then-leading trade partner. But he also goes on to challenge China’s increasingly aggressive behavior in the South China Sea — a statement excised from the clip shared by many on social media.

In fact, Walz has been openly critical of China’s human rights record, as well as its brutal authoritarianism. In 2009, while still in Congress, he co-sponsored a resolution blasting the PRC for arresting and detaining Liu Xiaobo, the pro-democracy activist who won a Nobel Peace Prize.

In 2016, he met the Dalai Lama, Tibet’s exiled leader who is viewed as a dangerous “splittist” by Beijing. In 2017, he was one of two House members to push the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act, which called for sanctions on Chinese officials responsible for “undermining fundamental freedoms and autonomy” there. The bill did not pass until 2019, when Walz took up his position as governor of Minnesota. But he still won praise from a human rights activist in Hong Kong: “The fact that he supported it when very few people did and that his support was sustained – that’s different and that’s who he is.”

Some critics also claim that Walz, as governor, has allowed China to infiltrate institutions throughout the state. They point specifically to Beijing-backed Confucius Institutes, which teach Chinese language and culture to college students in the United States. But the University of Minnesota shut down its institute after Walz took office, and St. Cloud State University has suspended its institute, pending a review.

Although the governor has called for engagement with China, especially on climate change and trade, he has not been afraid to also question its foreign policy. Last year, in an interview with a Japanese newspaper, he said he was “disappointed with China’s recent performance – on the Ukraine issue, they are on Russia’s side.”

None of this supports the claim that Walz is a Manchurian candidate.

In China, few are predicting that Walz, as vice president, would have a significant impact on Washington-Beijing relations. Zha Daojiong, an international relations scholar at Peking University, told the Washington Post that, on U.S. policy toward China, there is “a ready and rich template among the two political parties in America” that would not change much with a single election.

The political kerfuffle over Harris’ selection of Walz actually tells us a lot more about ourselves than about the veep wannabe. In the U.S. today, there is a bipartisan streak of unhinged fear and hostility toward the PRC. It runs so deep and so wide that a substantial segment of American punditry loses its mind over the emergence of a politician who has pleasant memories of living in and visiting China in more youthful days, a politician who has dared to advocate for engagement with Beijing, even as he criticizes much of its behavior today. And the rest of us, generally, respond as if this is pretty normal.


The 2024 American presidential election concept with the democratic representative Kamala Harris and potential future vice president Tim Walz in the background. (Bella1105/Shutterstock)

Analysis | Washington Politics
Trump ASEAN
Top photo credit: U.S. President Donald Trump looks at Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., next to Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim when posing for a family photo with leaders at the ASEAN Summit in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, October 26, 2025. Vincent Thian/Pool via REUTERS

‘America First’ meets ‘ASEAN Way’ in Kuala Lumpur

Asia-Pacific

The 2025 ASEAN and East Asia Summits in Kuala Lumpur beginning today are set to be consequential multilateral gatherings — defining not only ASEAN’s internal cohesion but also the shape of U.S.–China relations in the Indo-Pacific.

President Donald Trump’s participation will be the first by a U.S. president in an ASEAN-led summit since 2022. President Biden skipped the last two such summits in 2023 and 2024, sending then-Vice President Harris instead.

keep readingShow less
iran, china, russia
Top photo credit: Top image credit: Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov and and Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi shake hands as Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Ma Zhaoxu looks on during their meet with reporters after their meeting at Diaoyutai State Guest House on March 14, 2025 in Beijing, China. Lintao Zhang/Pool via REUTERS

'Annulled'! Russia won't abide snapback sanctions on Iran

Middle East

“A raider attack on the U.N. Security Council.” This was the explosive accusation leveled by Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov this week. His target was the U.N. Secretariat and Western powers, whom he blamed for what Russia sees as an illegitimate attempt to restore the nuclear-related international sanctions on Iran.

Beyond the fiery rhetoric, Ryabkov’s statement contained a message: Russia, he said, now considers all pre-2015 U.N. sanctions on Iran, snapped back by the European signatories of the 2015 nuclear deal (JCPOA) — the United Kingdom, France, Germany — “annulled.” Moscow will deepen its military-technical cooperation with Tehran accordingly, according to Ryabkov.

This is more than a diplomatic spat; it is the formal announcement of a split in international legal reality. The world’s major powers are now operating under two irreconcilable interpretations of international law. On one side, the United States, the United Kingdom, France, and Germany assert that the sanctions snapback mechanism of the JCPOA was legitimately triggered for Iran’s alleged violations. On the other, Iran, Russia, and China reject this as an illegitimate procedural act.

This schism was not inevitable, and its origin reveals a profound incongruence. The Western powers that most frequently appeal to the sanctity of the "rules-based international order" and international law have, in this instance, taken an action whose effects fundamentally undermine it. By pushing through a legal maneuver that a significant part of the Security Council considers illegitimate, they have ushered the world into a new and more dangerous state. The predictable, if imperfect, framework of universally recognized Security Council decisions is being replaced by a system where legal facts are determined by political interests espoused by competing power blocs.

This rupture followed a deliberate Western choice to reject compromises in a stand-off with Iran. While Iran was in a technical violation of the provisions of the JCPOA — by, notably, amassing a stockpile of highly enriched uranium (up to 60% as opposed to the 3.67% for a civilian use permissible under the JCPOA), there was a chance to avert the crisis. In the critical weeks leading to the snapback, Iran had signaled concessions in talks with the International Atomic Energy Agency in Cairo, in terms of renewing cooperation with the U.N. nuclear watchdog’s inspectors.

keep readingShow less
On Ukraine and Venezuela, Trump needs to dump the sycophants
Top Photo Credit: (Official White House Photo by Molly Riley)

On Ukraine and Venezuela, Trump needs to dump the sycophants

Europe

While diplomats labored to produce the Dayton Accords in 1995, then-Secretary of Defense Bill Perry advised, “No agreement is better than a bad agreement.” Given that Washington’s allies in London, Paris, Berlin and Warsaw are opposed to any outcome that might end the war in Ukraine, no agreement may be preferable. But for President Trump, there is no point in equating the illusion of peace in Ukraine with a meaningless ceasefire that settles nothing.

Today, Ukraine is mired in corruption, starting at the very highest levels of the administration in Kyiv. Sending $175 billion of borrowed money there "for however long it takes" has turned out to be worse than reckless. The U.S. national sovereign debt is surging to nearly $38 trillion and rising by $425 billion with each passing month. President Trump needs to turn his attention away from funding Joe Biden’s wars and instead focus on the faltering American economy.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.