Follow us on social

US soldiers injured in raid during 'non-combat' mission in Iraq

US soldiers injured in raid during 'non-combat' mission in Iraq

More evidence that America is at war without saying it's at war, in the Middle East

Reporting | QiOSK

Seven U.S. soldiers were injured raiding a suspected ISIS hideout in Western Iraq on Thursday, according to a Centcom press release late Friday.

According to U.S. Central Command, 15 ISIS fighters were killed in the raid, which was "partnered" by U.S. and Iraqi forces. The ISIS fighters, according to Centcom, were holed up with "numerous weapons, grenades, and explosive 'suicide” belts'" in the early morning hours of Aug. 29 when the raid occurred.

Officials said there were no civilian casualties. In an X post, a spokesman for the Iraqi Ministry of Defense said the raid happened in the "Anbar desert in the Al-Hazimi area east of Wadi Al-Ghadaf."

According to the Associated Press, a U.S. defense official, speaking on condition of anonymity "to discuss details of the operation yet to be made public," said that five American troops were wounded in the raid, while two others suffered injuries from falls during the operation. One who suffered a fall was transported 'out of the region' while one of the wounded was evacuated for further treatment, the official said," according to the wire service.

The U.S. has some 2500 troops still in Iraq and their presence, since the Iraq War officially ended in 2011, continues to be a constant source of debate. And while they are supposedly there in an "advise and assist" capacity, it is clear when we hear about these raids, that they are still fighting a war, albeit a low grade one that runs far beneath the American people's radar.

The raid reported Friday "shows that ISIS remains a latent albeit manageable threat in less populated areas of Iraq," said Adam Weinstein, a Middle East fellow for the Quincy Institute, who published research in April with colleague Stephen Simon entitled "Troops in Peril: The Risks of Keeping U.S. Troops in Iraq and Syria." 

“But it also demonstrates that the US advisory mission in Iraq isn’t entirely advisory — U.S. troops are still involved in combat here and there,” he added.

In December 2021 the Pentagon announced that Operation Inherent Resolve was successfully transitioning from a combat role against ISIS to an "advise, assist, and enable" mission. "According to the agreement, there would be no U.S. forces with a combat role in Iraq by December 31, 2021. Iraqi forces, operating on Iraqi bases, protect Coalition personnel who are invited guests. While Coalition personnel do not have a combat role, they maintain the inherent right of self-defense," the Pentagon said.

Those words have become fairly fungible as the U.S. has had to engage its own missile defense capabilities to combat militant attacks at U.S.-occupied basis in Iraq consistently since 2020, and conduct intermittent ground raids by U.S. and Iraq forces (as well as more frequently reported ones by U.S. troops against ISIS in Syria).

“It’s important that jargon not get in the way of reality. Direct combat isn’t exactly an advisory mission," noted Weinstein.

The two governments came together in Washington to talk about an agreement for withdrawal this summer but did not come to any conclusions at the end of the summit. Meanwhile, voices here in the U.S. continue to question whether a) the anti-ISIS is still worth putting U.S. service members in harm's way on the ground, and b) whether they will get swept up in broader violent currents in the Middle East generated by the Israeli war in Gaza.

"The continued U.S. presence in Iraq and Syria needlessly risks Americans lives in pursuit of objectives not tied to America's national interest while raising the likelihood that the U.S. will get dragged into a larger regional war," Dan Caldwell, Public Policy Advisor for Defense Priorities, who is also a U.S. veteran who served in the same region as Thursday's raid, told RS.

"The reality is that the scattered remnants of ISIS pose a greater threat to Iran and its proxies than the U.S. Therefore, it is pointless to risk American lives pursuing them in the most desolate parts of the Anbar desert."


Photo credit: Marines disembark from a V-22 Osprey at Al Asad Air Base in Iraq in 2018 (Cpl. Jered T. Stone/ Marine Corps)
US strikes in Iraq show risk of escalation to wider war
Reporting | QiOSK
Kim Jong Un
Top photo credit: North Korean leader Kim Jong Un visits the construction site of the Ragwon County Offshore Farm, North Korea July 13, 2025. KCNA via REUTERS

Kim Jong Un is nuking up and playing hard to get

Asia-Pacific

President Donald Trump’s second term has so far been a series of “shock and awe” campaigns both at home and abroad. But so far has left North Korea untouched even as it arms for the future.

The president dramatically broke with precedent during his first term, holding two summits as well as a brief meeting at the Demilitarized Zone with the North’s Supreme Leader Kim Jong-un. Unfortunately, engagement crashed and burned in Hanoi. The DPRK then pulled back, essentially severing contact with both the U.S. and South Korea.

keep readingShow less
Why new CENTCOM chief Brad Cooper is as wrong as the old one
Top photo credit: U.S. Navy Vice Admiral Brad Cooper speaks to guests at the IISS Manama Dialogue in Manama, Bahrain, November 17, 2023. REUTERS/Hamad I Mohammed

Why new CENTCOM chief Brad Cooper is as wrong as the old one

Middle East

If accounts of President Donald Trump’s decision to strike Iranian nuclear facilities this past month are to be believed, the president’s initial impulse to stay out of the Israel-Iran conflict failed to survive the prodding of hawkish advisers, chiefly U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) chief Michael Kurilla.

With Kurilla, an Iran hawk and staunch ally of both the Israeli government and erstwhile national security adviser Mike Waltz, set to leave office this summer, advocates of a more restrained foreign policy may understandably feel like they are out of the woods.

keep readingShow less
Putin Trump
Top photo credit: Vladimir Putin (Office of the President of the Russian Federation) and Donald Trump (US Southern Command photo)

How Trump's 50-day deadline threat against Putin will backfire

Europe

In the first six months of his second term, President Donald Trump has demonstrated his love for three things: deals, tariffs, and ultimatums.

He got to combine these passions during his Oval Office meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte on Monday. Only moments after the two leaders announced a new plan to get military aid to Ukraine, Trump issued an ominous 50-day deadline for Russian President Vladimir Putin to agree to a ceasefire. “We're going to be doing secondary tariffs if we don't have a deal within 50 days,” Trump told the assembled reporters.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.