Follow us on social

US soldiers injured in raid during 'non-combat' mission in Iraq

US soldiers injured in raid during 'non-combat' mission in Iraq

More evidence that America is at war without saying it's at war, in the Middle East

Reporting | QiOSK

Seven U.S. soldiers were injured raiding a suspected ISIS hideout in Western Iraq on Thursday, according to a Centcom press release late Friday.

According to U.S. Central Command, 15 ISIS fighters were killed in the raid, which was "partnered" by U.S. and Iraqi forces. The ISIS fighters, according to Centcom, were holed up with "numerous weapons, grenades, and explosive 'suicide” belts'" in the early morning hours of Aug. 29 when the raid occurred.

Officials said there were no civilian casualties. In an X post, a spokesman for the Iraqi Ministry of Defense said the raid happened in the "Anbar desert in the Al-Hazimi area east of Wadi Al-Ghadaf."

According to the Associated Press, a U.S. defense official, speaking on condition of anonymity "to discuss details of the operation yet to be made public," said that five American troops were wounded in the raid, while two others suffered injuries from falls during the operation. One who suffered a fall was transported 'out of the region' while one of the wounded was evacuated for further treatment, the official said," according to the wire service.

The U.S. has some 2500 troops still in Iraq and their presence, since the Iraq War officially ended in 2011, continues to be a constant source of debate. And while they are supposedly there in an "advise and assist" capacity, it is clear when we hear about these raids, that they are still fighting a war, albeit a low grade one that runs far beneath the American people's radar.

The raid reported Friday "shows that ISIS remains a latent albeit manageable threat in less populated areas of Iraq," said Adam Weinstein, a Middle East fellow for the Quincy Institute, who published research in April with colleague Stephen Simon entitled "Troops in Peril: The Risks of Keeping U.S. Troops in Iraq and Syria." 

“But it also demonstrates that the US advisory mission in Iraq isn’t entirely advisory — U.S. troops are still involved in combat here and there,” he added.

In December 2021 the Pentagon announced that Operation Inherent Resolve was successfully transitioning from a combat role against ISIS to an "advise, assist, and enable" mission. "According to the agreement, there would be no U.S. forces with a combat role in Iraq by December 31, 2021. Iraqi forces, operating on Iraqi bases, protect Coalition personnel who are invited guests. While Coalition personnel do not have a combat role, they maintain the inherent right of self-defense," the Pentagon said.

Those words have become fairly fungible as the U.S. has had to engage its own missile defense capabilities to combat militant attacks at U.S.-occupied basis in Iraq consistently since 2020, and conduct intermittent ground raids by U.S. and Iraq forces (as well as more frequently reported ones by U.S. troops against ISIS in Syria).

“It’s important that jargon not get in the way of reality. Direct combat isn’t exactly an advisory mission," noted Weinstein.

The two governments came together in Washington to talk about an agreement for withdrawal this summer but did not come to any conclusions at the end of the summit. Meanwhile, voices here in the U.S. continue to question whether a) the anti-ISIS is still worth putting U.S. service members in harm's way on the ground, and b) whether they will get swept up in broader violent currents in the Middle East generated by the Israeli war in Gaza.

"The continued U.S. presence in Iraq and Syria needlessly risks Americans lives in pursuit of objectives not tied to America's national interest while raising the likelihood that the U.S. will get dragged into a larger regional war," Dan Caldwell, Public Policy Advisor for Defense Priorities, who is also a U.S. veteran who served in the same region as Thursday's raid, told RS.

"The reality is that the scattered remnants of ISIS pose a greater threat to Iran and its proxies than the U.S. Therefore, it is pointless to risk American lives pursuing them in the most desolate parts of the Anbar desert."


Photo credit: Marines disembark from a V-22 Osprey at Al Asad Air Base in Iraq in 2018 (Cpl. Jered T. Stone/ Marine Corps)
US strikes in Iraq show risk of escalation to wider war
Reporting | QiOSK
Trump and Keith Kellogg
Top photo credit: U.S. President Donald Trump and Keith Kellogg (now Trump's Ukraine envoy) in 2017. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY

Trump's silence on loss of Ukraine lithium territory speaks volumes

Europe

Last week, Russian military forces seized a valuable lithium field in the Donetsk region of Ukraine, the latest success of Moscow’s grinding summer offensive.

The lithium deposit in question is considered rather small by industry analysts, but is said to be a desirable prize nonetheless due to the concentration and high-quality of its ore. In other words, it is just the kind of asset that the Trump administration seemed eager to exploit when it signed its much heralded minerals agreement with Ukraine earlier this year.

keep readingShow less
Is the US now funding the bloodbath at Gaza aid centers?
Top photo credit: Palestinians walk to collect aid supplies from the U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, in Khan Younis, in the southern Gaza Strip, May 29, 2025. REUTERS/Hatem Khaled/File Photo

Is the US now funding the bloodbath at Gaza aid centers?

Middle East

Many human rights organizations say it should shut down. The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) have killed hundreds of Palestinians at or around its aid centers. And yet, the U.S. has committed no less than $30 million toward the controversial, Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF).

As famine-like conditions grip Gaza, the GHF says it has given over 50 million meals to Palestinians at its four aid centers in central and southern Gaza Strip since late May. These centers are operated by armed U.S. private contractors, and secured by IDF forces present at or near them.

keep readingShow less
mali
Heads of state of Mali, Assimi Goita, Niger, General Abdourahamane Tiani and Burkina Faso, Captain Ibrahim Traore, pose for photographs during the first ordinary summit of heads of state and governments of the Alliance of Sahel States (AES) in Niamey, Niger July 6, 2024. REUTERS/Mahamadou Hamidou//File Photo

Post-coup juntas across the Sahel face serious crises

Africa

In Mali, General Assimi Goïta, who took power in a 2020 coup, now plans to remain in power through at least the end of this decade, as do his counterparts in neighboring Burkina Faso and Niger. As long-ruling juntas consolidate power in national capitals, much of the Sahelian terrain remains out of government control.

Recent attacks on government security forces in Djibo (Burkina Faso), Timbuktu (Mali), and Eknewane (Niger) have all underscored the depth of the insecurity. The Sahelian governments face a powerful threat from jihadist forces in two organizations, Jama‘at Nusrat al-Islam wa-l-Muslimin (the Group for Supporting Islam and Muslims, JNIM, which is part of al-Qaida) and the Islamic State Sahel Province (ISSP). The Sahelian governments also face conventional rebel challengers and interact, sometimes in cooperation and sometimes in tension, with various vigilantes and community-based armed groups.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.