Follow us on social

Menendez's corruption is just the tip of the iceberg

Menendez's corruption is just the tip of the iceberg

Worst of all is that most of it's legal

Analysis | QiOSK

Today, Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) became the first U.S. senator ever to be convicted of acting as an unregistered foreign agent. While serving as chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Menendez ghost-wrote a letter and approved arms sales on behalf of the Egyptian regime in exchange for bribes, among other crimes on behalf of foreign powers in a sweeping corruption case. An Egyptian businessman even referred to Menendez in a text to a military official as “our man.”

In a statement, U.S. Attorney Damian Williams said Menendez was engaging in politics for profit. "Because Senator Menendez has now been found guilty, his years of selling his office to the highest bidder have finally come to an end,” he said.

Menendez was convicted of all 16 criminal charges he faced, including wire fraud, bribery, and extortion. While he could technically serve out his Senate term, some Democrats including Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) have already called on Menendez to resign. Currently, Menendez still serves on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and could continue to be privy to classified intelligence. In response to the conviction, the Senate Ethics Committee announced it would consider “the full range of disciplinary actions.”

Menendez’s acts of corruption for several years while serving on a powerful foreign policy-making committee have some wanting the Department of Justice to investigate further illicit influence operations. "Senator Menendez's conviction today is an important step in accountability, but our government must do much more to investigate, root out and punish these naked acts of corruption and undue influence by Middle East dictatorships that are rotting our democratic institutions," said Sarah Leah Whitson, executive director of Democracy for the Arab World Now.

Menendez himself seemed to imply that other members of Congress may be engaging in similar acts, saying the jury’s verdict would put “at risk every member of the United States Senate in terms of what they think a foreign agent is.”

In addition to highlighting the need for rooting out illicit influence operations, the Menendez conviction should serve as a reminder that the legal foreign influence industry in the U.S. is thriving. Since 2016, foreign powers have spent more than $5 billion on perfectly legal influence operations reported under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), according to OpenSecrets. There are currently more than 2,300 registered foreign agents working in the U.S. right now, according to FARA records. And, they are sometimes working towards the exact same ends as these illegal operations.

Egypt’s influence efforts in the U.S., for example, extend well beyond Menendez and have been aided by high-powered lobbying and public relations firms that are legally registered to do this work. As Menendez was working to greenlight a $2.5 billion arms sale to Egypt Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, the firm representing Egypt’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, was working to defeat an effort from Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) to prohibit the arms sale to Egypt. As we discussed in a recently published Quincy Institute brief, FARA records show that Brownstein exchanged several emails and phone calls with congressional staffers regarding “Rand Paul resolutions on Egypt.” When the vote failed, Brownstein then helped coordinate an op-ed in Newsweek on behalf of Egypt’s ambassador which praised Congress for “aircraft and military hardware that will allow Egypt and the U.S. to undertake missions in the interests of both countries.”

Similarly, Azerbaijan’s illicit influence operations in the U.S. have been working towards many of the same ends as the country’s legal lobbying and influence efforts. Representative Henry Cuellar (D-Texas) was indicted in May for allegedly taking at least $360,000 in bribes from companies connected to the government of Azerbaijan in exchange for pushing U.S. foreign policy in Azerbaijan’s favor.

According to the indictment, “Cuellar agreed, among other things, to influence a series of legislative measures relating to Azerbaijan’s conflict with neighboring Armenia.” Meanwhile, Azerbaijan’s lobbyists regularly distribute letters and talking points and, generally, work feverishly to maintain the flow of U.S. military assistance to Azerbaijan. According to FARA records, they’ve been in regular contact with Cuellar’s office to pursue these and other ends on behalf of Azerbaijan.

Cuellar’s trial is slated to begin in the spring of 2025.

While the conviction of Menendez is undoubtedly shocking, the gold bars, luxury cars, and outright bribes in this story shouldn’t blind us to the fact that there is a perfectly legal foreign influence industry in the U.S. that is working, every day, to bend U.S. foreign policy to the whims of foreign powers. Our research has found that those foreign powers are usually authoritarian regimes, like Egypt, and they’re usually pushing U.S. foreign policy in decidedly militarized directions — promoting arms sales, U.S. military bases abroad, and direct U.S. military involvement in foreign conflicts. That should alarm us as much as any senator illegally on the take.


U.S. Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ) looks on, following his bribery trial in connection with an alleged corrupt relationship with three New Jersey businessmen, in New York City, U.S., July 16, 2024. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

Analysis | QiOSK
US Marines
Top image credit: U.S. Marines with Force Reconnaissance Platoon, Maritime Raid Force, 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, prepare to clear a room during a limited scale raid exercise at Sam Hill Airfield, Queensland, Australia, June 21, 2025. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Alora Finigan)

Cartels are bad but they're not 'terrorists.' This is mission creep.

Military Industrial Complex

There is a dangerous pattern on display by the Trump administration. The president and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth seem to hold the threat and use of military force as their go-to method of solving America’s problems and asserting state power.

The president’s reported authorization for the Pentagon to use U.S. military warfighting capacity to combat drug cartels — a domain that should remain within the realm of law enforcement — represents a significant escalation. This presents a concerning evolution and has serious implications for civil liberties — especially given the administration’s parallel moves with the deployment of troops to the southern border, the use of federal forces to quell protests in California, and the recent deployment of armed National Guard to the streets of our nation’s capital.

keep readingShow less
Howard Lutnick
Top photo credit: Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on CNBC, 8/26/25 (CNBC screengrab)

Is nationalizing the defense industry such a bad idea?

Military Industrial Complex

The U.S. arms industry is highly consolidated, specialized, and dependent on government contracts. Indeed, the largest U.S. military contractors are already effectively extensions of the state — and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is right to point that out.

His suggestion in a recent media appearance to partially nationalize the likes of Lockheed Martin is hardly novel. The economist John Kenneth Galbraith argued for the nationalization of the largest military contractors in 1969. More recently, various academics and policy analysts have advocated for partial or full nationalization of military firms in publications including The Nation, The American Conservative, The Middle East Research and Information Project (MERIP), and The Seattle Journal for Social Justice.

keep readingShow less
Modi Trump
Top image credit: White House, February 2025

Trump's India problem could become a Global South crisis

Asia-Pacific

As President Trump’s second term kicked off, all signs pointed to a continued upswing in U.S.-India relations. At a White House press conference in February, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke of his vision to “Make India Great Again” and how the United States under Trump would play a central role. “When it’s MAGA plus MIGA, it becomes a mega partnership for prosperity,” Modi said.

During Trump’s first term, the two populist leaders hosted rallies for each other in their respective countries and cultivated close personal ties. Aside from the Trump-Modi bromance, U.S.-Indian relations have been on a positive trajectory for over two decades, driven in part by mutual suspicion of China. But six months into his second term, Trump has taken several actions that have led to a dramatic downturn in U.S.-India relations, with India-China relations suddenly on the rise.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.