Follow us on social

Was the prisoner swap purely transactional?

Was the prisoner swap purely transactional?

Or was this the first step in a more delicate dance towards diplomacy in Ukraine?

Analysis | Europe

Amid high tensions between the United States and Russia, a complex, multinational prisoner exchange took place on August 1. Eight Russians, imprisoned in the U.S. and European countries on charges including cybercrimes, espionage and murder, were released in exchange for 16 Americans, Russians and Europeans held in Russian jails.

The latter included prominent Russian opposition leaders, such as Vladimir Kara-Murza and Ilya Yashin, and a number of Americans, notably Wall Street Journal correspondent Evan Gershkovich and former U.S. Marine Paul Whelan, who were both held on espionage charges. A German citizen sentenced to death in Belarus was also released.

The exchange, the culmination of intricate diplomacy involving at least six countries that began in January 2022, as recounted in rich detail by Masha Gessen in The New York Times, has a number of significant implications and raises important questions.

First, the deal is a domestic political win for all sides. For President Joe Biden, it marks a major diplomatic achievement from which the Democratic presidential candidate in November’s elections, Vice President Kamala Harris, stands to benefit. Democrats will likely use the fact that Paul Whelan was arrested in 2018, when Donald Trump was president, and then released on Biden’s watch despite Trump’s boasts that only he could conduct effective diplomacy with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

As for Putin, he obtained the release of convicted Russian spies and cybercriminals. Putin made the point of offering a red carpet and flowers to the Russians at the airport in Moscow where he delivered a speech lauding their “loyalty to the oath, duty and homeland.”

Many Russians may have shuddered at the sight of their president hugging a convicted murderer when Russian soldiers are used as cannon fodder on Ukrainian battlefields. Yet such rhetoric goes down well with that segment of Russian society that supports a hardline approach to the West and local “traitors.”

His main prize was Vadim Krasikov, who was sentenced to life in prison in Germany for assassinating a Chechen militant in Berlin in 2019. Krasikov’s importance to Putin is underscored by the fact that he dragged out the negotiations specifically to secure Krasikov’s release and even agreed to release Kara-Murza, probably Russia's most prominent opposition leader (and himself the target of two alleged poisoning attempts) after the death in prison in February of Alexei Navalny.

Putin also agreed on a deal that is numerically far more favorable to the West than to Russia in contrast to the strict parity as had been the custom in previous exchanges.

The situation is more fraught for the exchange’s third most important protagonist, Germany, where Krasikov was convicted and imprisoned, and whose government’s agreement was essential for his release. There, the swap’s politics exposed rifts within the ruling coalition. The Social Democratic chancellor, Olaf Scholz, was happy to help Biden in getting the Americans out of Russia. To make Krasikov’s release politically palatable, Scholz, in coordination with the Americans, insisted that the two Russian political prisoners were included in the exchange.

According to the German newspaper Die Zeit, however, German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock of the Green party was vehemently opposed to any deal with Russia, as it would reward Moscow’s “hostage diplomacy.” As a result, the deal was brokered by the German chancellery rather than the foreign ministry, giving Scholz bragging rights as he faces a tough reelection battle next year.

A second major implication of the exchange relates to the rising role of the hedgers — middle-sized powers navigating their way between the West and its adversaries. According to German media, the first meeting of American and German intelligence officers with their Russian counterparts to discuss the swap took place in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The Turkish intelligence service MIT also played a pivotal mediation role between the U.S., Germany and Russia, and the exchange itself took place in Ankara.

Turkey is a NATO member but has refused to join Western sanctions against Russia, a move that earned it a modicum of trust in Moscow. On the one hand, that poses a challenge to Washington as Turkey’s booming trade with Russia includes dual-use items that could have military applications. On the other hand, Washington needs to tread carefully as Turkey and its president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, was instrumental not only in securing the prisoner exchange but, previously, in brokering the trilateral Russia-Ukraine-Turkey deal that permitted uninterrupted grain exports from Ukraine to world markets via the Black Sea.

Turkey could also play a key role in any future negotiations to end the war in Ukraine.

And that brings us to the most intriguing question: was the prisoner exchange strictly transactional or might it herald a revival of U.S.–Russia diplomacy to help bring about an end to the war in Ukraine and resolve broader issues between the West and Russia?

Historically, prisoner exchanges often served as a prelude to negotiations on key areas of conflict. In 1962, the first-ever such exchange between the U.S. and the USSR (immortalized on the screen by Steven Spielberg and Tom Hanks in “Bridge of Spies”) augured a policy of détente pursued by the John Kennedy and Nikita Khruschev administrations.

More recently, U.S. prisoner swaps with another accomplished practitioner of hostage diplomacy, Iran, – led to de-escalation in the nuclear stand-off between the two countries.

Any immediate diplomatic breakthroughs on Ukraine may look unlikely. However, subtle shifts may point in that direction: a recent poll by the Kyiv International Institute for Sociology showed that a majority of Ukrainians now favor talks with Russia. President Zelensky himself signaled openness to talk to Russia in a “new peace summit.”

Since the default position of the West was that nothing may be done without the consent of the Ukrainians, the time may be ripening for Washington and its allies to reframe their objectives from a maximalist and ill-defined Ukrainian victory to ensuring Kyiv is in a stronger position for negotiations.

The recent prisoner exchange may have nothing to do with Ukraine, but it shows that channels of communications with Moscow are open and may lead to concrete results given sufficient political will. They should be expanded to bring the war to an end.

Thanks to our readers and supporters, Responsible Statecraft has had a tremendous year. A complete website overhaul made possible in part by generous contributions to RS, along with amazing writing by staff and outside contributors, has helped to increase our monthly page views by 133%! In continuing to provide independent and sharp analysis on the major conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, as well as the tumult of Washington politics, RS has become a go-to for readers looking for alternatives and change in the foreign policy conversation. 

 

We hope you will consider a tax-exempt donation to RS for your end-of-the-year giving, as we plan for new ways to expand our coverage and reach in 2025. Please enjoy your holidays, and here is to a dynamic year ahead!

United States President Joe Biden and United States Vice President Kamala Harris greet released Russian prisoner Evan Gershkovich, a Wall Street Journal reporter who was among those traded during a prisoner swap with Russia, at Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland Featuring: Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Evan Gershkovich Where: Camp Springs, Maryland, United States When: 01 Aug 2024 Credit: CNP/INSTARimages

Analysis | Europe
Russia Putin
Russia's President Vladimir Putin speaks during a session of the Valdai Discussion Club in Sochi, Russia October 19, 2017. REUTERS/Alexander Zemlianichenko/Pool

Peace denied? Russian budget jacks up wartime economy

Europe

On December 1, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed the budget law for 2025-2027. The Duma had earlier approved the law on November 21, and the Federation Council rubber stamped it on November 27.

The main takeaway from the budget is that Russia is planning for the long haul in its war with NATO-backed Ukraine and makes clear that Russia intends to double down on defense spending no matter what the cost. While the increased budget does not shed light on expectations for a speedy resolution to the war, it is indicative that Moscow continues to prepare for conflict with both Ukraine and NATO.

keep readingShow less
Committee Hearing: The Imperative to Strengthen America's Defense Industrial Base and Workforce
Top Image Credit: Senate Committee Hearing: The Imperative to Strengthen America's Defense Industrial Base and Workforce (YouTube/Screenshot)

Industry: War with China may be imminent, but we're not ready

Military Industrial Complex

Military industry mainstays and lawmakers alike are warning of imminent conflict with China in an effort to push support for controversial deep tech, especially controversial autonomous and AI-backed systems.

The conversation, which presupposed a war with Beijing sometime in the near future, took place Wednesday on Capitol Hill at a hearing of the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) entitled, “The Imperative to Strengthen America's Defense Industrial Base and Workforce.”

keep readingShow less
Diplomacy Watch: Still tap dancing around NATO for Kyiv

Diplomacy Watch: Still tap dancing around NATO for Kyiv

QiOSK

Kyiv and Moscow both hinted this week at their shifting expectations and preparations for a potentially approaching conclusion to the Ukraine War, amid a frantic push from the Biden administration to “put Ukraine in the strongest possible position” ahead of President-elect Trump’s inauguration in January.

National security adviser Jake Sullivan reiterated this goal as part of a Dec. 2 White House announcement of $725 million in additional security assistance for Ukraine, which will include substantial artillery, rockets, drones, and land mines and will be delivered “rapidly” to Ukraine’s front lines. The Kremlin said on Tuesday that the new package shows that the Biden administration aims to “throw oil on the fire” of the war before exiting office.

keep readingShow less

Election 2024

Latest

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.