Follow us on social

google cta
Pope Francis

On Christmas, Pope doubles down, slamming Israel 'cruelty'

This coincides with more evidence that IDF forces are deliberately killing civilians, including children

QiOSK
google cta
google cta

Roman Catholic Pope Francis drew the ire of the Israeli government on the eve of Christmas week by calling the bombing and killing of children "cruelty."

On Saturday Francis responded to an Israeli airstrike that killed 25 Palestinians in Jabalia, including 12 members of one family, seven of them children. The airstrikes, particularly on Gaza's remaining hospitals and tent encampments housing displaced people, have been a daily occurrence.

“Yesterday children were bombed. This is cruelty, this is not war,” the pope told members of the government of the Holy See.

After his Saturday comments, Israel's foreign ministry shot back calling the Pope's remarks “particularly disappointing as they are disconnected from the true and factual context of Israel’s fight against jihadist terrorism — a multi-front war that was forced upon it starting on October 7.”

So the pope doubled down, remarking Sunday:

“And with pain, I think of Gaza, of so much cruelty, of the children being machine-gunned, of the bombings of schools and hospitals. What cruelty,” the pope said after his weekly Angelus prayer. He also called for a "ceasefire on all fronts, in Ukraine, in the Holy Land, throughout the Middle East and throughout the world."

Interestingly, there are still news organizations that will coyly pretend they do not know what Francis is talking about. From The Times of Israel report, which was bylined by staff and wire services: "It was unclear which specific alleged incidents he was referring to. Israel has long said it only targets terrorists, and that Hamas hides among civilian populations to protect itself."

Aside from a monthlong string of recorded incidents in which hospitals and shelters have been bombed by Israel in Gaza, two devastating reports immediately come to mind as a retort. One, the dozens of doctors and nurses who have returned from Gaza and testify to what they saw. Just one quote:

“One day, while in the E.R., I saw a 3-year-old and 5-year-old, each with a single bullet hole to their head. When asked what happened, their father and brother said they had been told that Israel was backing out of Khan Younis. So they returned to see if anything was left of their house. There was, they said, a sniper waiting who shot both children.”

Another:

“I saw many children. In my experience the gunshot wound was often to the head. Many had non-curable, permanent brain damage. It was almost a daily occurrence to have children arrive at the hospital with gunshot wounds to the head.”

Another:

“Nearly all new children admitted during my time died. Almost all of these deaths would not have happened if we had proper nutrition, infection control abilities (as simple as soap and hand sanitizer) and adequate supplies.”

The other report came out in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz this week. It quoted soldiers from the Israeli Defense Forces who admitted and described killing innocent civilians at the Netzarim corridor separating north from south Gaza. A quote from a "recently discharged Division 252 officer":

"We're killing civilians there who are then counted as terrorists...The IDF spokesperson's announcements about casualty numbers have turned this into a competition between units. If Division 99 kills 150 [people], the next unit aims for 200."

And another from a "veteran fighter from Division 252":

"One time, guards spotted someone approaching from the south. We responded as if it was a large militant raid. We took positions and just opened fire. I'm talking about dozens of bullets, maybe more. For about a minute or two, we just kept shooting at the body. People around me were shooting and laughing."

But the incident didn't end there. "We approached the blood-covered body, photographed it, and took the phone. He was just a boy, maybe 16." An intelligence officer collected the items, and hours later, the fighters learned the boy wasn't a Hamas operative – but just a civilian.

These are just two reports of many, anecdotal and institutional, about the "cruelty" of the Israel's war on Gaza, which has now claimed more than 45,000 lives and injured more than 107,000 over the last 14 months. Pope Francis has a pulpit and Christmas may be his best time to use it, given that the holiday's origins are in the West Bank, in the town of Bethlehem. But until governments outside the Vatican start taking these calls for ending war more seriously, the meek will hardly inherit the earth ; they will continue to suffer.


Top photo credit: Pope Francis holds an audience to deliver a Christmas message to Vatican workers in Paul VI Hall at the Vatican, December 21, 2024. REUTERS/Ciro De Luca
google cta
QiOSK
Dan Caine
Top photo credit: Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff U.S. Air Force Gen. Dan Caine conduct a press briefing on Operation Epic Fury at the Pentagon, Washington, D.C., March 4, 2026. (DoW photo by U.S. Navy Petty Officer 1st Class Alexander Kubitza)

Did Caine just announce the Morgenthau option for Iran?

QiOSK

Gen. Dan Caine’s formulation of American war aims in Iran is remarkable not because it is bellicose, but because it is strategically incoherent.

In a press conference Tuesday morning, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff did not describe a limited campaign to suppress missile fire, blunt Iran’s naval threat, or even impose a severe but bounded setback on Tehran’s coercive instruments. He described a campaign against Iran’s “military and industrial base” designed to prevent the regime from attacking Americans, U.S. interests, and regional partners “for years to come.” In an earlier briefing he put the objective similarly: to prevent Iran from projecting power outside its borders. Rather than the language of a discrete coercive operation, this describes a war against a state’s capacity to regenerate power.

keep readingShow less
Mbs-mbz-scaled
UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan receives Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman at the Presidential Airport in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates November 27, 2019. WAM/Handout via REUTERS

Is the US goading Arab states to join war against Iran?

QiOSK

On Sunday, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Mike Waltz told ABC News that Arab Gulf states may soon step up their involvement in the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran. “I expect that you'll see additional diplomatic and possibly military action from them in the coming days and weeks,” Waltz said.

Then, on Monday morning, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) slammed Saudi Arabia for staying out of the war even as “Americans are dying and the U.S. is spending billions” of dollars to conduct regime change in Iran. “If you are not willing to use your military now, when are you willing to use it?” Graham asked. “Hopefully this changes soon. If not, consequences will follow.”

keep readingShow less
Why Tehran may have time on its side
Top image credit: Iranian army military personnel stand at attention under a banner featuring an image of an Iranian-made unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) during a military parade commemorating the anniversary of Army Day outside the Shrine of Iran's late leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in the south of Tehran, Iran, on April 18, 2025. (Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto)

Why Tehran may have time on its side

QiOSK

A provocative calculus by Anusar Farrouqui (“policytensor”) has been circulating on X and in more exhaustive form on the author’s Substack. It purports to demonstrate a sobering reality: in a high-intensity U.S.-Iran conflict, the United States may be unable to suppress Iranian drone production quickly enough to prevent a strategically consequential period of regional devastation.

The argument is framed through a quantitative lens, carrying the seductive appeal of mathematical precision. It arranges variables—such as U.S. sortie rates and degradation efficiency against Iranian repair cycles and rebuild speeds—to suggest a "sustainable firing rate." The implication is that Iran could maintain a persistent strike capability long enough to exhaust American political patience, forcing Washington toward a premature declaration of success or an unfavorable ceasefire.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.