Follow us on social

google cta
Protests in New Caledonia get a boost from ... Azerbaijan?

Protests in New Caledonia get a boost from ... Azerbaijan?

Riots by indigenous Kanaks against the ruling French government have drawn support from an unlikely source

Analysis | Asia-Pacific
google cta
google cta

The recent violence in New Caledonia erupted following a bill approved by the National Assembly in Paris that would expand voting rights to people who have lived on the islands for 10 or more years. If approved, this would mark a significant change from the current law and one that could marginalize the indigenous Kanak population’s voice in local politics.

This fear builds upon recent tensions (and a much older struggle for independence) in New Caledonia’s relationship with Paris. French president Emmanuel Macron is now traveling to the archipelago to “set up a mission,” without yet explaining what that would entail.

The indigenous Kanaks make up around 40% of the 270,000 or so inhabitants, with the remainder constituted by descendents of white European colonialists (whom the locals call Caldoches) and more recently arrived people from mainland France (many of whom often only spend part of the year on the archipelago). This change would overturn the previously (and constitutionally) agreed measure by allowing some 25,000 out of around 42,000 new voters into electoral rolls, thus likely weakening any future movements for independence.

New Caledonia is a set of islands off the eastern coast of Australia in the Pacific Ocean. The territory has been granted generally broad political rights as a French territory, however, the movement for full independence had increased in recent years. Following a landmark agreement in 1988, the Nouméa Accord, the French government restricted voting rights in such a way that was designed to give greater voice to indigenous peoples and those with a deep connection to the territory.

The Accord also stipulated the holding of three independence referendums, which took place in 2018, 2020, and 2021. he last of which was boycotted by pro-independence parties and turnout only reached 41%. Those who abstained cited the unfair conditions which the referendum was held under due to a high number of COVID cases at the time. Nevertheless, all three referendums resulted in a majority favoring the maintenance of their current status, and the French government says the issue is now resolved.

The recent violence has left six dead and hundreds more injured. French forces have launched an operation, vowing to end the unrest.

Further complicating matters, disputes of the far away Armenia and Azerbaijan have had some effect on these recent developments in New Caledonia.

France has been part of the negotiations over the Nagorno-Karabakh dispute between Armenia and Azerbaijan since the 1990s as a member of the OSCE’s Minsk Group Co-Chairs alongside the U.S. and Russia. Given France’s large Armenian diaspora and Paris’ general sympathies with Armenia, Azerbaijan had long criticized France’s role in that negotiating process. Since Azerbaijan’s war for Nagorno-Karabakh in 2020, tensions between Baku and Paris have exacerbated greatly.

Pointing to the presence of Azerbaijani flags and other placards at protests in New Caledonia, the French interior minister, Gerald Darmanin, stressed that “this isn’t a fantasy. It’s a reality,” when asked if Azerbaijan (and China and Russia) were interfering in New Caledonia. He went on to say, “I regret that some of the Caledonian pro-independence leaders have made a deal with Azerbaijan.” He stressed that, “It’s indisputable.”

“We completely reject the baseless accusations,” Azerbaijan’s foreign ministry spokesman said, adding, “we refute any connection between the leaders of the struggle for freedom in Caledonia and Azerbaijan.”

However, the connection between Azerbaijan and certain groups in Caledonia and other French overseas territories and dependencies has been increasingly visible in recent years.

The Baku Initiative Group is an organization established in 2023, amidst Azerbaijan’s blockade of the over 100,000 Armenians living in Nagorno-Karabakh, that “supports peoples fighting against colonialism.” The group organized a video conference last Thursday, which was attended by pro-independence movements in New Caledonia, French Polynesia, French Guiana, Martinique, Guadeloupe, and Corsica. The joint statement issued following the conference strongly condemned French actions and expressed their solidarity with “our Kanak friends and support their fair struggle.”

While the French view their increasing support for Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians and Armenia itself as justified in the face of ethnic cleansing, persecution, and continued military threats by Azerbaijan, Baku is working to show Paris that its action in the South Caucasus will have repercussions. As France licks its wounds from geopolitical setbacks in its former colonies across the Sahel, Azerbaijan is working to keep the pressure up by rather cynically exploiting France’s colonial past and its occasional present hypocrisy for its own political gains.


New Caledonians (Kanaks) of Toulouse are taking to the streets in protest against the constitutional revision of the French Constitution by French President Macron to expand the electorate who can vote in local elections. Kanaks are saying they are already outnumbered by French people coming from the metropole and that the widening launched by Macron will be catastrophic for them. They are explaining this is plain colonialism. Since the vote on the law to widen the electorate, riots are happening in New Caledonia and the French government is sending riot police and military to quell the insurrection there. Five people have already died. In Toulouse, France, on May 18, 2024. (Photo by Alain Pitton/NurPhoto)

google cta
Analysis | Asia-Pacific
Will Democrats pop Trump's $50 billion trial balloon for war?
Top image credit: Sens. Andy Kim (D-N.J.), Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) and Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) sit look on during a congressional hearing in January, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call/Sipa USA)

Will Democrats pop Trump's $50 billion trial balloon for war?

Washington Politics

On Wednesday, Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) told CNN that he would support new funding for the U.S. war with Iran — but only if Israel and Arab Gulf states help pay for it.

“We’re using our taxpayer money to protect those countries,” Gallego said. “We’re using our men to protect these countries. They need to throw in and have skin in the game too.”

keep readingShow less
Polymarket Iran War
Top photo credit: Polymarket logo (Shutterstock/PJ McDonald) and Scene following an airstrike on an Iranian police centre damaging residential buildings around it in Niloofar square in central Tehran on march 1, 2026. (Hamid Vakili/Parspix/ABACAPRESS.COM)

Prediction markets are a national security threat

Latest

Hours before an Israeli attack in Tehran killed Ayatollah Khamenei, an account on the prediction market Polymarket made over half a million dollars wagering that Iran’s Supreme Leader would vacate office before 3/31. That account, named “Magamyman,” was not the only one to cash in on the attacks.

Half a dozen Polymarket accounts made over $1.2M betting that the U.S. “strikes Iran by February 28, 2026.” Those accounts were allegedly paid for through cryptocurrency wallets that had previously not been funded prior to Feb. 27. Overall, prediction market users bet over $255M on markets related to the attacks in Iran on the prediction markets Kalshi and Polymarket alone.

keep readingShow less
Indonesia stock exchange
Top photo credit: (Shutterstock/Triawanda Tirta Aditya)

Trump's ‘move fast and break things’ war slams into economy

Middle East

The launch of joint U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran could lead to economic and financial disruptions that ripple across the countries of the Global South with devastating effects. And while a quick end to the war could dampen these effects, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has acknowledged that the war could even last up to 8 weeks, and Israel is now reportedly expecting a "weeks-long" war with Iran.

The fundamental issue here seems to be an increasingly expansive vision of American — and particularly Israeli — war aims. These have now gone well beyond Iran’s offer of substantial denuclearization to regime change, and some quarters have even more extreme visions like the potential Balkanization of Iran into multiple statelets. Such mission creep on the part of the U.S. and Israel has in turn changed incentive structures in Iran towards an expansion of the conflict to target both the Gulf States and global oil markets, a dynamic that threatens to broaden the conflict and extend it, with profound impacts on the global economy.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.