Follow us on social

Protests in New Caledonia get a boost from ... Azerbaijan?

Protests in New Caledonia get a boost from ... Azerbaijan?

Riots by indigenous Kanaks against the ruling French government have drawn support from an unlikely source

Analysis | Asia-Pacific

The recent violence in New Caledonia erupted following a bill approved by the National Assembly in Paris that would expand voting rights to people who have lived on the islands for 10 or more years. If approved, this would mark a significant change from the current law and one that could marginalize the indigenous Kanak population’s voice in local politics.

This fear builds upon recent tensions (and a much older struggle for independence) in New Caledonia’s relationship with Paris. French president Emmanuel Macron is now traveling to the archipelago to “set up a mission,” without yet explaining what that would entail.

The indigenous Kanaks make up around 40% of the 270,000 or so inhabitants, with the remainder constituted by descendents of white European colonialists (whom the locals call Caldoches) and more recently arrived people from mainland France (many of whom often only spend part of the year on the archipelago). This change would overturn the previously (and constitutionally) agreed measure by allowing some 25,000 out of around 42,000 new voters into electoral rolls, thus likely weakening any future movements for independence.

New Caledonia is a set of islands off the eastern coast of Australia in the Pacific Ocean. The territory has been granted generally broad political rights as a French territory, however, the movement for full independence had increased in recent years. Following a landmark agreement in 1988, the Nouméa Accord, the French government restricted voting rights in such a way that was designed to give greater voice to indigenous peoples and those with a deep connection to the territory.

The Accord also stipulated the holding of three independence referendums, which took place in 2018, 2020, and 2021. he last of which was boycotted by pro-independence parties and turnout only reached 41%. Those who abstained cited the unfair conditions which the referendum was held under due to a high number of COVID cases at the time. Nevertheless, all three referendums resulted in a majority favoring the maintenance of their current status, and the French government says the issue is now resolved.

The recent violence has left six dead and hundreds more injured. French forces have launched an operation, vowing to end the unrest.

Further complicating matters, disputes of the far away Armenia and Azerbaijan have had some effect on these recent developments in New Caledonia.

France has been part of the negotiations over the Nagorno-Karabakh dispute between Armenia and Azerbaijan since the 1990s as a member of the OSCE’s Minsk Group Co-Chairs alongside the U.S. and Russia. Given France’s large Armenian diaspora and Paris’ general sympathies with Armenia, Azerbaijan had long criticized France’s role in that negotiating process. Since Azerbaijan’s war for Nagorno-Karabakh in 2020, tensions between Baku and Paris have exacerbated greatly.

Pointing to the presence of Azerbaijani flags and other placards at protests in New Caledonia, the French interior minister, Gerald Darmanin, stressed that “this isn’t a fantasy. It’s a reality,” when asked if Azerbaijan (and China and Russia) were interfering in New Caledonia. He went on to say, “I regret that some of the Caledonian pro-independence leaders have made a deal with Azerbaijan.” He stressed that, “It’s indisputable.”

“We completely reject the baseless accusations,” Azerbaijan’s foreign ministry spokesman said, adding, “we refute any connection between the leaders of the struggle for freedom in Caledonia and Azerbaijan.”

However, the connection between Azerbaijan and certain groups in Caledonia and other French overseas territories and dependencies has been increasingly visible in recent years.

The Baku Initiative Group is an organization established in 2023, amidst Azerbaijan’s blockade of the over 100,000 Armenians living in Nagorno-Karabakh, that “supports peoples fighting against colonialism.” The group organized a video conference last Thursday, which was attended by pro-independence movements in New Caledonia, French Polynesia, French Guiana, Martinique, Guadeloupe, and Corsica. The joint statement issued following the conference strongly condemned French actions and expressed their solidarity with “our Kanak friends and support their fair struggle.”

While the French view their increasing support for Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians and Armenia itself as justified in the face of ethnic cleansing, persecution, and continued military threats by Azerbaijan, Baku is working to show Paris that its action in the South Caucasus will have repercussions. As France licks its wounds from geopolitical setbacks in its former colonies across the Sahel, Azerbaijan is working to keep the pressure up by rather cynically exploiting France’s colonial past and its occasional present hypocrisy for its own political gains.


New Caledonians (Kanaks) of Toulouse are taking to the streets in protest against the constitutional revision of the French Constitution by French President Macron to expand the electorate who can vote in local elections. Kanaks are saying they are already outnumbered by French people coming from the metropole and that the widening launched by Macron will be catastrophic for them. They are explaining this is plain colonialism. Since the vote on the law to widen the electorate, riots are happening in New Caledonia and the French government is sending riot police and military to quell the insurrection there. Five people have already died. In Toulouse, France, on May 18, 2024. (Photo by Alain Pitton/NurPhoto)

Analysis | Asia-Pacific
POGO
Top image credit: Project on Government Oversight

The non-empires strike back

Military Industrial Complex

The Bunker appears originally at the Project on Government Oversight and is republished here with permission.

keep readingShow less
JFK wanted to splinter CIA ‘into a thousand pieces.’ Why didn't he?
Top photo credit: Unredacted memo by Arthur Schlesinger (JFK files) and President John F. Kennedy, 1962 (public domain/Donald Cooksey)

JFK wanted to splinter CIA ‘into a thousand pieces.’ Why didn't he?

Washington Politics

When the final, declassified records from the John F. Kennedy assassination files were posted on the National Archives’ website last week, the first document researchers and reporters searched for was White House adviser Arthur Schlesinger Jr.’s June 1961 memorandum to the president titled “CIA Reorganization.”

ABC News led its initial coverage on the release of the JFK papers with that document, quoting Schlesinger’s now unredacted, dramatic, statistics that showed that the "CIA today has nearly as many people under official cover overseas as [the] State [Department].” The New York Times also featured that document with a headline “A Kennedy aide worried that the C.I.A. threatened the State Department’s power.”

keep readingShow less
zelensky EU
Top photo credit: Leaders of EU, Western Balkans and Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky arrives to pose for a family photo in the Maximos Mansion in Athens, Greece on Aug. 21, 2023. (shutterstock/Alexandros Michailidis)

Will EU stand in the way of Russia-Ukraine ceasefire?

QiOSK

The EU appears to have put a stick in the spokes of a beleaguered Black Sea ceasefire agreement between Russia and the U.S.

U.S. and Russian negotiators, after 12-hour long talks in Riyadh, coalesced on Tuesday around an expanded partial ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine covering the Black Sea and energy infrastructure. The Kremlin indicated that the deal is contingent on removal of sanctions on Rosselkhozbank, a key agricultural bank, and its reconnection to the Swift international messaging system.

keep readingShow less

Trump transition

Latest

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.