Follow us on social

google cta
Chuck Schumer

Activists demand Schumer delete Trump-Iran 'TACO' post

More than two dozen groups called on the NY Democrat to delete a video attacking the president for 'folding' on the talks

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

More than two-dozen national and New York-based organizations on Wednesday urged Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) to retract a social media video that took aim at President Trump over his negotiations with Iran.

In the video, posted on June 2, Schumer attacked Trump for purportedly not being tough enough with Tehran and accusing the administration of negotiating “side deals” out of public view that are allegedly less favorable to the United States.

“If TACO Trump is already folding on Iran, the American people need to know about it. No side deals,” Schumer said, referring to the moniker “Trump Always Chickens Out,” a term lobbed at the president intending to criticize his tariff policies. “When it comes to negotiating with the terrorist government of Iran, Trump’s all over the lot. One day he sounds tough, the next day he’s backing off. And now, all of a sudden, we find out that [special envoy Steve] Witkoff and [Secretary of State Marco] Rubio are negotiating a secret side deal with Iran.”

The groups — including Brooklyn for Peace, Peace Action New York State, Demand Progress, National Iranian American Council Action, and the Quincy Institute, which publishes RS — sent a letter to Schumer on Wednesday singling out the social media post and accusing the Minority Leader of acting “profoundly reckless” on Iran.

“[We] expect that you will treat weighty issues of war and peace as a statesman and with the serious gravity that it deserves,” they wrote. “Unfortunately, your recent social media video seeking to out-hawk President Trump’s negotiations with Iran fails that test.”

They said there are valid reasons to challenge the president, yet “negotiations aimed at ensuring Iran can’t weaponize its nuclear program and preventing war deserve support, not political attacks.”

The letter adds, “We urge you to retract your video and to move in line with the vast majority of Americans who support a deal with Iran and oppose a disastrous war.”

Emily Rubino, Executive Director of Peace Action New York State, said that her organization has been urging Schumer to champion diplomacy over war regardless of who occupies the Oval Office, but “his recent inflammatory comments on Iran do just the opposite.”

Schumer, Rubino added, “should be using his leadership to ensure that transparent and meaningful negotiations are taking place between the U.S. and Iran towards a deal, not to continue stoking the tensions of war.”

“Lives are hanging in the balance as the U.S. and Iran seek to resolve the nuclear crisis at the negotiating table,” said NIAC’s Ryan Costello. “Yet instead of emphasizing the importance of resolving this crisis through diplomacy and not war, Sen. Schumer took a page from Tom Cotton and Mike Pompeo's efforts to sabotage Obama's diplomacy ten years ago, baselessly attacking the negotiations and seeking to goad Trump into maintaining hardline positions that risk war.”

Talks are set to resume this week and Trump himself has recently signaled pessimism about any favorable outcome.

"Iran is acting much differently in negotiations than it did just days ago," Trump said during an interview with Fox News on Tuesday. "Much more aggressive. It’s surprising to me. It’s disappointing, but we are set to meet again tomorrow – we’ll see."

Meanwhile, amid an increasingly bitter dispute between Trump’s more loyal supporters and neoconservatives agitating against a nuclear agreement and pushing for war, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) will reportedly introduce a resolution in the coming days calling for the dismantling of Iran’s nuclear program as the only acceptable outcome of the negotiations, an outcome similar to what Sen. Schumer was advocating in his social media video and one that the president’s supporters, and the groups criticizing Schumer, say is likely to lead to war.


Top image credit: U.S. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) attends a press conference following the U.S. Senate Democrats' weekly policy luncheon on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 10, 2025. REUTERS/Kent Nishimura
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Arlington cemetery
Top photo credit: Autumn time in Arlington National cemetery in Arlington County, Virginia, across the Potomac River from Washington DC. (Shutterstock/Orhan Cam)

America First? For DC swamp, it's always 'War First'

Military Industrial Complex

The Washington establishment’s long war against reality has led our country into one disastrous foreign intervention after another.

From Afghanistan to Iraq, Libya to Syria, and now potentially Venezuela, the formula is always the same. They tell us that a country is a threat to America, or more broadly, a threat to American democratic principles. Thus, they say the mission to topple a foreign government is a noble quest to protect security at home while spreading freedom and prosperity to foreign lands. The warmongers will even insist it’s not a choice, but that it’s imperative to wage war.

keep readingShow less
Trump Maduro Cheney
Top image credit: Brian Jason, StringerAL, Joseph Sohm via shutterstock.com

Dick Cheney's ghost has a playbook for war in Venezuela

Latin America

Former Vice President Richard Cheney, who died a few days ago at the age of 84, gave a speech to a convention of the Veterans of Foreign Wars in August 2002 in which the most noteworthy line was, “There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction.”

The speech was essentially the kickoff of the intense campaign by the George W. Bush administration to sell a war in Iraq, which it would launch the following March. The campaign had to be intense, because it was selling a war of aggression — the first major offensive war that the United States would initiate in over a century. That war will forever be a major part of Cheney’s legacy.

keep readingShow less
Panama invasion 1989
Top photo credit: One of approximately 100 Panamanian demonstrators in favor of the Vatican handing over General Noriega to the US, waves a Panamanian and US flag. December 28, 1989 REUTERS/Zoraida Diaz

Invading Panama and deposing Noriega in 1989 was easy, right?

Latin America

On Dec. 20, 1989, the U.S. military launched “Operation Just Cause” in Panama. The target: dictator, drug trafficker, and former CIA informant Manuel Noriega.

Citing the protection of U.S. citizens living in Panama, the lack of democracy, and illegal drug flows, the George H.W. Bush administration said Noriega must go. Within days of the invasion, he was captured, bound up and sent back to the United States to face racketeering and drug trafficking charges. U.S. forces fought on in Panama for several weeks before mopping up the operation and handing the keys back to a new president, Noriega opposition leader Guillermo Endar, who international observers said had won the 1989 election that Noriega later annulled. He was sworn in with the help of U.S. forces hours after the invasion.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.