Follow us on social

Chuck Schumer

Activists demand Schumer delete Trump-Iran 'TACO' post

More than two dozen groups called on the NY Democrat to delete a video attacking the president for 'folding' on the talks

Reporting | QiOSK

More than two-dozen national and New York-based organizations on Wednesday urged Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) to retract a social media video that took aim at President Trump over his negotiations with Iran.

In the video, posted on June 2, Schumer attacked Trump for purportedly not being tough enough with Tehran and accusing the administration of negotiating “side deals” out of public view that are allegedly less favorable to the United States.

“If TACO Trump is already folding on Iran, the American people need to know about it. No side deals,” Schumer said, referring to the moniker “Trump Always Chickens Out,” a term lobbed at the president intending to criticize his tariff policies. “When it comes to negotiating with the terrorist government of Iran, Trump’s all over the lot. One day he sounds tough, the next day he’s backing off. And now, all of a sudden, we find out that [special envoy Steve] Witkoff and [Secretary of State Marco] Rubio are negotiating a secret side deal with Iran.”

The groups — including Brooklyn for Peace, Peace Action New York State, Demand Progress, National Iranian American Council Action, and the Quincy Institute, which publishes RS — sent a letter to Schumer on Wednesday singling out the social media post and accusing the Minority Leader of acting “profoundly reckless” on Iran.

“[We] expect that you will treat weighty issues of war and peace as a statesman and with the serious gravity that it deserves,” they wrote. “Unfortunately, your recent social media video seeking to out-hawk President Trump’s negotiations with Iran fails that test.”

They said there are valid reasons to challenge the president, yet “negotiations aimed at ensuring Iran can’t weaponize its nuclear program and preventing war deserve support, not political attacks.”

The letter adds, “We urge you to retract your video and to move in line with the vast majority of Americans who support a deal with Iran and oppose a disastrous war.”

Emily Rubino, Executive Director of Peace Action New York State, said that her organization has been urging Schumer to champion diplomacy over war regardless of who occupies the Oval Office, but “his recent inflammatory comments on Iran do just the opposite.”

Schumer, Rubino added, “should be using his leadership to ensure that transparent and meaningful negotiations are taking place between the U.S. and Iran towards a deal, not to continue stoking the tensions of war.”

“Lives are hanging in the balance as the U.S. and Iran seek to resolve the nuclear crisis at the negotiating table,” said NIAC’s Ryan Costello. “Yet instead of emphasizing the importance of resolving this crisis through diplomacy and not war, Sen. Schumer took a page from Tom Cotton and Mike Pompeo's efforts to sabotage Obama's diplomacy ten years ago, baselessly attacking the negotiations and seeking to goad Trump into maintaining hardline positions that risk war.”

Talks are set to resume this week and Trump himself has recently signaled pessimism about any favorable outcome.

"Iran is acting much differently in negotiations than it did just days ago," Trump said during an interview with Fox News on Tuesday. "Much more aggressive. It’s surprising to me. It’s disappointing, but we are set to meet again tomorrow – we’ll see."

Meanwhile, amid an increasingly bitter dispute between Trump’s more loyal supporters and neoconservatives agitating against a nuclear agreement and pushing for war, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) will reportedly introduce a resolution in the coming days calling for the dismantling of Iran’s nuclear program as the only acceptable outcome of the negotiations, an outcome similar to what Sen. Schumer was advocating in his social media video and one that the president’s supporters, and the groups criticizing Schumer, say is likely to lead to war.


Top image credit: U.S. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) attends a press conference following the U.S. Senate Democrats' weekly policy luncheon on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 10, 2025. REUTERS/Kent Nishimura
Reporting | QiOSK
Ratcliffe Gabbard
Top image credit: Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and CIA director John Ratcliffe join a meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump and his intelligence team in the Situation Room at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S. June 21, 2025. The White House/Handout via REUTERS

Trump's use and misuse of Iran intel

Middle East

President Donald Trump has twice, within the space of a week, been at odds with U.S. intelligence agencies on issues involving Iran’s nuclear program. In each instance, Trump was pushing his preferred narrative, but the substantive differences in the two cases were in opposite directions.

Before the United States joined Israel’s attack on Iran, Trump dismissed earlier testimony by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, in which she presented the intelligence community’s judgment that “Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khamanei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003.” Questioned about this testimony, Trump said, “she’s wrong.”

keep readingShow less
Mohammad Bin Salman Trump Ayatollah Khomenei
Top photo credit: Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad Bin Salman (President of the Russian Federation/Wikimedia Commons); U.S. President Donald Trump (Gage Skidmore/Flickr) and Iran’s Ayatollah Khamenei (Wikimedia Commons)

Let's make a deal: Enrichment path that both Iran, US can agree on

Middle East

The recent conflict, a direct confrontation that pitted Iran against Israel and drew in U.S. B-2 bombers, has likely rendered the previous diplomatic playbook for Tehran's nuclear program obsolete.

The zero-sum debates concerning uranium enrichment that once defined that framework now represent an increasingly unworkable approach.

Although a regional nuclear consortium had been previously advanced as a theoretical alternative, the collapse of talks as a result of military action against Iran now positions it as the most compelling path forward for all parties.

Before the war, Iran was already suggesting a joint uranium enrichment facility with Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) on Iranian soil. For Iran, this framework could achieve its primary goal: the preservation of a domestic nuclear program and, crucially, its demand to maintain some enrichment on its own territory. The added benefit is that it embeds Iran within a regional security architecture that provides a buffer against unilateral attack.

For Gulf actors, it offers unprecedented transparency and a degree of control over their rival-turned-friend’s nuclear activities, a far better outcome than a possible covert Iranian breakout. For a Trump administration focused on deals, it offers a tangible, multilateral framework that can be sold as a blueprint for regional stability.

keep readingShow less
Trump Netanyahu
Top image credit: White House April 7, 2025

Polls: Americans don't support Trump's war on Iran

Military Industrial Complex

While there are serious doubts about the accuracy of President Donald Trump’s claims about the effectiveness of his attacks on Iranian nuclear sites, the U.S./Israeli war on Iran has provided fresh and abundant evidence of widespread opposition to war in the United States.

With a tenuous ceasefire currently holding, several nationwide surveys suggest Trump’s attack, which plunged the country into yet another offensive war in the Middle East, has been broadly unpopular across the country.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.