Follow us on social

Iran Israel ceasefire

Accusations already test Trump brokered Iran-Israel ceasefire

While Israel's war aims appear unfinished, US President nonetheless declares that peace is better than long war in the Middle East

Reporting | QiOSK

A fragile ceasefire that was brokered by President Trump late Monday and went into effect early Tuesday could serve to end the violence between Israel and Iran, which has been responsible for the loss of hundreds of lives and no doubt billions of dollars of damage in both countries.

The fighting began when Israel launched a surprise missile attack against Iran on June 13, striking its nuclear facilities and assassinating scores of its military leaders and scientists in their beds, their families and nearby civilians also falling victim to attacks over the course of several days. Iran launched its own retaliatory attacks, killing upwards of 30 and injuring thousands across Israel, according to Israel's Health Ministry, as missiles repeatedly broke through the nation's vaunted missile defense shields. According the Washington-based Human Rights Activists, Iranian deaths range over 974 and injuries over 3400.

It was not clear until overnight Eastern Time that all sides had agreed to the ceasefire, but as of this morning, Israel was already accusing Iran of breaking it by launching missiles in violation. Israel responded by ordering "intense strikes" on Tehran. Iran denied launching the missiles. Trump weighed in and said he was "not happy" with Israel's move to strike Iran and reportedly asked them to turn their planes back. According to Barak Ravid of Axios, Israel "scaled back" its operation accordingly.

"We have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f--k they are doing," he said to reporters in what was probably the first presidential f-bomb made during in a press gaggle, on camera, in history.

The day leading up to the ceasefire at 4 a.m. Middle East-time was a violent one. Iran reportedly killed four people in Beersheba in a missile blast, destroying an apartment building and severely damaging surrounding structures. For its part, Israel killed several IRGC members in strikes on Iranian bases Monday. In the meantime, Iran also launched limited retaliatory strikes against the U.S. base in Qatar.

The ceasefire announcement, made on Trump's Truth Social, reportedly came as a surprise to even top officials in the White House. It came days after the Trump administration launched its own attacks on the Iranian nuclear program. In the aftermath it is clear that the program had not been "obliterated" as Trump said on Saturday, but to Trump, the goals of the operation appeared to have been met and it was better to stop the fighting than get into "a War that could have gone on for years and destroyed the entire Middle East."


This puts the Israelis in an interesting situation. Reports indicated that their missile defenses were being taxed at home and needed the help from the U.S. to deal the necessary blows to the nuclear program in Tehran. However, Iran is likely already reconstituting what was lost in Saturday's attacks. It is not clear Israel will accept a job halfway done after making Iran out to be a threat to its existence.

“Having decided to hitch the Israeli horse to the Trump wagon, Netanyahu had no choice,” Israeli-based commentator Ori Goldberg told Al Jazeera. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, for his part, claimed overnight that the nation's goals had been achieved, with the “immediate” nuclear threat removed, as well as the threat to Israel from Iranian ballistic missiles.

“Netanyahu decided to gamble on Trump coming to his rescue. Trump did, and Netanyahu is therefore obligated to assist in Trump’s goal, which was and still is ultimately securing the regional deal and not launching a regional war.”


Top photo credit: une 24, 2025, Tehran, Iran: Members of the Iranian Red Crescent rescue teams during an Israeli attack in Tehran. Iran's Red Crescent said an Israeli strike hit near its building in northern Tehran on June 23, as fighting between Iran and Israel raged for the 11th day. (Credit Image: © Ircs via ZUMA Press Wire)
Reporting | QiOSK
Afghanistan withdrawal
Lloyd Austin, Kenneth McKenzie, and Mark Milley in 2021. (MSNBC screengrab)

Turns out leaving Afghanistan did not unleash terror on US or region

Military Industrial Complex

It will be four years since the U.S. withdrew from Afghanistan on Aug. 30, 2021, ending a nearly 20-year occupation that could serve as a poster child for mission creep.

What began in October 2001 as a narrow intervention to destroy al-Qaeda, the terrorist group that perpetrated the 9/11 attacks, and topple the Taliban government for refusing to hand over al-Qaeda’s leader, Osama bin Laden, morphed into an open-ended nation-building operation that killed 2,334 U.S. military personnel and wounded over 20,000 more.

keep readingShow less
Francois Bayrou Emmanuel Macron
Top image credit: France's Prime Minister Francois Bayrou arrives to hear France's President Emmanuel Macron deliver a speech to army leaders at l'Hotel de Brienne in Paris on July 13, 2025, on the eve of the annual Bastille Day Parade in the French capital. LUDOVIC MARIN/Pool via REUTERS

Europe facing revolts, promising more guns with no money

Europe

If you wanted to create a classic recipe for political crisis, you could well choose a mixture of a stagnant economy, a huge and growing public debt, a perceived need radically to increase military spending, an immigration crisis, a deeply unpopular president, a government without a majority in parliament, and growing radical parties on the right and left.

In other words, France today. And France’s crisis is only one part of the growing crisis of Western Europe as a whole, with serious implications for the future of transatlantic relations.

keep readingShow less
Starmer Macron Merz
Top image credit: France's President Emmanuel Macron, Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz arrive at Kyiv railway station on May 10, 2025, ahead of a gathering of European leaders in the Ukrainian capital. LUDOVIC MARIN/Pool via REUTERS

Europe's snapback gamble risks killing diplomacy with Iran

Middle East

Europe appears set to move from threats to action. According to reports, the E3 — Britain, France, and Germany — will likely trigger the United Nations “snapback” process this week. Created under the 2015 Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA), this mechanism allows any participant to restore pre-2015 U.N. sanctions if Iran is judged to be in violation of its commitments.

The mechanism contains a twist that makes it so potent. Normally, the Security Council operates on the assumption that sanctions need affirmative consensus to pass. But under snapback, the logic is reversed. Once invoked, a 30-day clock begins. Sanctions automatically return unless the Security Council votes to keep them suspended, meaning any permanent member can force their reimposition with a single veto.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.