Follow us on social

google cta
Iran Israel ceasefire

Accusations already test Trump brokered Iran-Israel ceasefire

While Israel's war aims appear unfinished, US President nonetheless declares that peace is better than long war in the Middle East

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

A fragile ceasefire that was brokered by President Trump late Monday and went into effect early Tuesday could serve to end the violence between Israel and Iran, which has been responsible for the loss of hundreds of lives and no doubt billions of dollars of damage in both countries.

The fighting began when Israel launched a surprise missile attack against Iran on June 13, striking its nuclear facilities and assassinating scores of its military leaders and scientists in their beds, their families and nearby civilians also falling victim to attacks over the course of several days. Iran launched its own retaliatory attacks, killing upwards of 30 and injuring thousands across Israel, according to Israel's Health Ministry, as missiles repeatedly broke through the nation's vaunted missile defense shields. According the Washington-based Human Rights Activists, Iranian deaths range over 974 and injuries over 3400.

It was not clear until overnight Eastern Time that all sides had agreed to the ceasefire, but as of this morning, Israel was already accusing Iran of breaking it by launching missiles in violation. Israel responded by ordering "intense strikes" on Tehran. Iran denied launching the missiles. Trump weighed in and said he was "not happy" with Israel's move to strike Iran and reportedly asked them to turn their planes back. According to Barak Ravid of Axios, Israel "scaled back" its operation accordingly.

"We have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f--k they are doing," he said to reporters in what was probably the first presidential f-bomb made during in a press gaggle, on camera, in history.

The day leading up to the ceasefire at 4 a.m. Middle East-time was a violent one. Iran reportedly killed four people in Beersheba in a missile blast, destroying an apartment building and severely damaging surrounding structures. For its part, Israel killed several IRGC members in strikes on Iranian bases Monday. In the meantime, Iran also launched limited retaliatory strikes against the U.S. base in Qatar.

The ceasefire announcement, made on Trump's Truth Social, reportedly came as a surprise to even top officials in the White House. It came days after the Trump administration launched its own attacks on the Iranian nuclear program. In the aftermath it is clear that the program had not been "obliterated" as Trump said on Saturday, but to Trump, the goals of the operation appeared to have been met and it was better to stop the fighting than get into "a War that could have gone on for years and destroyed the entire Middle East."


This puts the Israelis in an interesting situation. Reports indicated that their missile defenses were being taxed at home and needed the help from the U.S. to deal the necessary blows to the nuclear program in Tehran. However, Iran is likely already reconstituting what was lost in Saturday's attacks. It is not clear Israel will accept a job halfway done after making Iran out to be a threat to its existence.

“Having decided to hitch the Israeli horse to the Trump wagon, Netanyahu had no choice,” Israeli-based commentator Ori Goldberg told Al Jazeera. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, for his part, claimed overnight that the nation's goals had been achieved, with the “immediate” nuclear threat removed, as well as the threat to Israel from Iranian ballistic missiles.

“Netanyahu decided to gamble on Trump coming to his rescue. Trump did, and Netanyahu is therefore obligated to assist in Trump’s goal, which was and still is ultimately securing the regional deal and not launching a regional war.”


Top photo credit: une 24, 2025, Tehran, Iran: Members of the Iranian Red Crescent rescue teams during an Israeli attack in Tehran. Iran's Red Crescent said an Israeli strike hit near its building in northern Tehran on June 23, as fighting between Iran and Israel raged for the 11th day. (Credit Image: © Ircs via ZUMA Press Wire)
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Dan Caine
Top photo credit: Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff U.S. Air Force Gen. Dan Caine conduct a press briefing on Operation Epic Fury at the Pentagon, Washington, D.C., March 4, 2026. (DoW photo by U.S. Navy Petty Officer 1st Class Alexander Kubitza)

Did Caine just announce the Morgenthau option for Iran?

QiOSK

Gen. Dan Caine’s formulation of American war aims in Iran is remarkable not because it is bellicose, but because it is strategically incoherent.

In a press conference Tuesday morning, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff did not describe a limited campaign to suppress missile fire, blunt Iran’s naval threat, or even impose a severe but bounded setback on Tehran’s coercive instruments. He described a campaign against Iran’s “military and industrial base” designed to prevent the regime from attacking Americans, U.S. interests, and regional partners “for years to come.” In an earlier briefing he put the objective similarly: to prevent Iran from projecting power outside its borders. Rather than the language of a discrete coercive operation, this describes a war against a state’s capacity to regenerate power.

keep readingShow less
Mbs-mbz-scaled
UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan receives Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman at the Presidential Airport in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates November 27, 2019. WAM/Handout via REUTERS

Is the US goading Arab states to join war against Iran?

QiOSK

On Sunday, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Mike Waltz told ABC News that Arab Gulf states may soon step up their involvement in the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran. “I expect that you'll see additional diplomatic and possibly military action from them in the coming days and weeks,” Waltz said.

Then, on Monday morning, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) slammed Saudi Arabia for staying out of the war even as “Americans are dying and the U.S. is spending billions” of dollars to conduct regime change in Iran. “If you are not willing to use your military now, when are you willing to use it?” Graham asked. “Hopefully this changes soon. If not, consequences will follow.”

keep readingShow less
Why Tehran may have time on its side
Top image credit: Iranian army military personnel stand at attention under a banner featuring an image of an Iranian-made unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) during a military parade commemorating the anniversary of Army Day outside the Shrine of Iran's late leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in the south of Tehran, Iran, on April 18, 2025. (Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto)

Why Tehran may have time on its side

QiOSK

A provocative calculus by Anusar Farrouqui (“policytensor”) has been circulating on X and in more exhaustive form on the author’s Substack. It purports to demonstrate a sobering reality: in a high-intensity U.S.-Iran conflict, the United States may be unable to suppress Iranian drone production quickly enough to prevent a strategically consequential period of regional devastation.

The argument is framed through a quantitative lens, carrying the seductive appeal of mathematical precision. It arranges variables—such as U.S. sortie rates and degradation efficiency against Iranian repair cycles and rebuild speeds—to suggest a "sustainable firing rate." The implication is that Iran could maintain a persistent strike capability long enough to exhaust American political patience, forcing Washington toward a premature declaration of success or an unfavorable ceasefire.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.