Follow us on social

Israelis demonstrate against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government and call for the release of hostages in Gaza, amid the Israel-Hamas conflict, in Tel Aviv, Israel, August 10, 2024

Have Americans held by Hamas become an afterthought?

Perhaps we aren't pressuring Biden enough to do all he can to ensure US citizens return home

Analysis | Middle East

As Israel waits for Iran and Hezbollah to retaliate after it assassinated Hamas’ political chief in Tehran, and the U.S. presidential race dominates domestic attention spans, a crucial issue risks fading from view: American hostages are still held by Hamas in Gaza.

Just yesterday, Hamas’ military wing claimed that an Israeli hostage was killed and two others injured in an Israeli airstrike.

While the U.S. has shown its resolve in securing the release of Americans unjustly detained abroad — most recently in high-profile prisoner swaps with Russia — six Americans remain captive in Gaza. The Biden administration is making a final push to prevent regional war and secure the release of hostages, while Hamas refuses to attend talks and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government is more intransigent than ever.

However, it’s Netanyahu’s government that Washington has the most leverage over, making it critical for President Biden to prioritize the hostage issue.

A White House readout of President Biden’s call with Netanyahu two weeks ago mentioned support for Israel against threats from Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran but made no mention of the hostages. While readouts are often vague and hostage negotiations typically occur behind the scenes — and there can be reasons to keep them out of the spotlight — one cannot help but wonder if the hostages’ fate has become an afterthought in Washington.

It is certainly an afterthought for Netanyahu, who has shown little concern for the hostages, whether they are Israeli or from the other two dozen nations where Hamas’ captives hail from.

On October 7, Hamas took 10 Americans hostage. Three of them — Itay Chen, Gadi Haggai, and Judith Weinstein Haggai — were killed that same day.

Two others, a mother and daughter from Illinois, Judith and Natalie Raanan, were visiting family in Israel when they were abducted by Hamas. They were later released after negotiations between the U.S., Israel, Qatar, and Hamas. During this early phase of the war, before most of Gaza was destroyed and before the death toll soared to nearly 40,000, there was hope that this release would be the start of more diplomacy and possibly a ceasefire. That didn’t happen.

It is believed that six U.S. hostages remain in Gaza. Israel also has a responsibility to these hostages, who either lived in Israel or held dual Israeli citizenship. However, an American is an American, regardless of their second passport or where they choose to live. These hostages have been abandoned by two countries at once.

In November, President Biden vowed, “I will not stop until they are all released.” In December, after learning of Gad Haggai’s death and again on the 100th day of captivity in mid-January, he renewed this pledge. During the State of the Union in March, he promised the hostages’ families, “We will not rest until we bring their loved ones home.”

In May, Biden proposed a three-phase ceasefire plan, with the release of hostages as a key part of the first phase lasting six weeks, stating, “There are American hostages who would be released at this stage, and we want them home.”

Over 10 weeks have passed since that proposal, and Israel is further from a ceasefire than ever. Netanyahu has repeatedly ignored U.S. red lines, rejected calls for less deadly “surgical operations,” and resisted allowing aid into Gaza or pursuing a ceasefire in good faith. He and his far right-wing cabinet members remain committed to “total victory” against Hamas, which even his own military deems unrealistic.

The recent Israeli assassination of Hamas political chief Ismail Haniyeh in Iran has made diplomacy between Israel and Hamas even more distant. Achieving a ceasefire in Gaza remains the best chance to begin bringing all the hostages, including Americans, home. But Netanyahu has shown little interest in ending the war, and the release of the hostages is clearly not a priority for him. In fact, he may view it as counterproductive, as it could undermine his goal of prolonging the war.

Hamas and its supporters also have agency. They chose to take hostages and commit murder, which ignited the conflict, and they hold the power to release the hostages. However, they are unlikely to do so without receiving something substantial in return. Securing the release of U.S. hostages is always a fraught task. Russia detained journalists, a world-class athlete, and private citizens, demanding the release of arms dealers, fraudsters, and assassins in exchange.

Despite this stark moral disparity, it is the president’s duty to ensure that Americans held hostage are brought home. In the case of Gaza, a ceasefire — a step toward peace — would not only secure the hostages’ release but also save many more Palestinian and Israeli lives.

President Biden must recognize that the current strategy toward Netanyahu’s government is failing. He should hold Netanyahu accountable for jeopardizing the stability of the region and U.S. citizens’ lives. With his remaining months in office, Biden should press the Israeli government to negotiate a ceasefire and initiate, if not already in place, direct negotiations with Hamas to secure the release of American hostages. They have been held long enough.


Israelis demonstrate against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government and call for the release of hostages in Gaza, amid the Israel-Hamas conflict, in Tel Aviv, Israel, August 10, 2024. REUTERS/Ricardo Moraes

Analysis | Middle East
Reza Pahlavi, Crown Prince of Ira
Top photo credit: Reza Pahlavi, Crown Prince of Iran speaking at an event hosted by the Center for Political Thought & Leadership at Arizona State University in Tempe, Arizona. (Gage Skidmore/Flickr)

Israeli-fueled fantasy to bring back Shah has absolutely no juice

Middle East

The Middle East is a region where history rarely repeats itself exactly, but often rhymes in ways that are both tragic and absurd.

Nowhere is this more apparent than in the current Israeli campaign against Iran. A campaign that, beneath its stated aims of dismantling Iran's nuclear and defense capabilities, harbors a deeper, more outlandish ambition: the hope that toppling the regime could install a friendly government under Reza Pahlavi, the exiled son of Iran's last Shah. Perhaps even paving the way for a monarchical restoration.

This is not a policy officially declared in Jerusalem or Washington, but it lingers in the background of Israel’s actions and its overt calls for Iranians to “stand up” to the Islamic Republic. In April 2023, Pahlavi was hosted in Israel by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Isaac Herzog.

During the carefully choreographed visit, he prayed at the Western Wall, while avoiding the Al-Aqsa Mosque on the Temple Mount just above and made no effort to meet with Palestinian leaders. An analysis from the Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs described the trip as a message that Israel recognizes Pahlavi as "the main leader of the Iranian opposition."

Figures like Gila Gamliel, a former minister of intelligence in the Israeli government, have openly called for regime change, declaring last year that a "window of opportunity has opened to overthrow the regime."

What might have been dismissed as a diplomatic gambit has, in the context of the current air war, been elevated into a strategic bet that military pressure can create the conditions for a political outcome of Israel's choosing.

The irony is hard to overstate. It was foreign intervention that set the stage for the current enmity. In 1953, a CIA/MI6 coup overthrew Mohammad Mossadegh, Iran’s last democratically elected leader. While the plot was triggered by his nationalization of the British-controlled Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, the United States joined out of Cold War paranoia, fearing the crisis would allow Iran's powerful communist party to seize power and align the country with the Soviet Union.

keep readingShow less
Emmanuel Macron,  Keir Starmer, Friedrich Merz
Top image credit: TIRANA, ALBANIA - MAY 16: France's President Emmanuel Macron, Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz speak during a Ukraine security meeting at the 6th European Political Community summit on May 16, 2025 at Skanderbeg Square in Tirana, Albania. Leon Neal/Pool via REUTERS

The EU's pathetic response to Trump's Iran attack

Middle East

The European Union’s response to the U.S. strikes on Iran Saturday has exposed more than just hypocrisy — it has revealed a vassalization so profound that the European capitals now willingly undermine both international law and their own strategic interests.

The statement by the E3, signed by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, and French President Emmanuel Macron, following similar statements by the president of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen, and its high representative for foreign affairs Kaja Kallas, perfectly encapsulates this surrender.

keep readingShow less
iran war tehran
Top photo credit:A man reads a newspaper at a newsstand, amid the Israel-Iran conflict, in Tehran, Iran, June 22, 2025. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS

Israel and US have chosen war, unleashing fresh economic pain

Middle East

The United States has finally entered Israel’s escalating war against Iran, launching targeted strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities to obliterate Tehran’s nuclear threat, a goal once more effectively achieved through the 2015 Iran deal.

President Trump warned Iran that there will be peace or a tragedy far greater than what Iran has witnessed in recent days, signaling that there were “other targets” if Iran wished to escalate.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.