Follow us on social

google cta
Israelis demonstrate against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government and call for the release of hostages in Gaza, amid the Israel-Hamas conflict, in Tel Aviv, Israel, August 10, 2024

Have Americans held by Hamas become an afterthought?

Perhaps we aren't pressuring Biden enough to do all he can to ensure US citizens return home

Analysis | Middle East
google cta
google cta

As Israel waits for Iran and Hezbollah to retaliate after it assassinated Hamas’ political chief in Tehran, and the U.S. presidential race dominates domestic attention spans, a crucial issue risks fading from view: American hostages are still held by Hamas in Gaza.

Just yesterday, Hamas’ military wing claimed that an Israeli hostage was killed and two others injured in an Israeli airstrike.

While the U.S. has shown its resolve in securing the release of Americans unjustly detained abroad — most recently in high-profile prisoner swaps with Russia — six Americans remain captive in Gaza. The Biden administration is making a final push to prevent regional war and secure the release of hostages, while Hamas refuses to attend talks and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government is more intransigent than ever.

However, it’s Netanyahu’s government that Washington has the most leverage over, making it critical for President Biden to prioritize the hostage issue.

A White House readout of President Biden’s call with Netanyahu two weeks ago mentioned support for Israel against threats from Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran but made no mention of the hostages. While readouts are often vague and hostage negotiations typically occur behind the scenes — and there can be reasons to keep them out of the spotlight — one cannot help but wonder if the hostages’ fate has become an afterthought in Washington.

It is certainly an afterthought for Netanyahu, who has shown little concern for the hostages, whether they are Israeli or from the other two dozen nations where Hamas’ captives hail from.

On October 7, Hamas took 10 Americans hostage. Three of them — Itay Chen, Gadi Haggai, and Judith Weinstein Haggai — were killed that same day.

Two others, a mother and daughter from Illinois, Judith and Natalie Raanan, were visiting family in Israel when they were abducted by Hamas. They were later released after negotiations between the U.S., Israel, Qatar, and Hamas. During this early phase of the war, before most of Gaza was destroyed and before the death toll soared to nearly 40,000, there was hope that this release would be the start of more diplomacy and possibly a ceasefire. That didn’t happen.

It is believed that six U.S. hostages remain in Gaza. Israel also has a responsibility to these hostages, who either lived in Israel or held dual Israeli citizenship. However, an American is an American, regardless of their second passport or where they choose to live. These hostages have been abandoned by two countries at once.

In November, President Biden vowed, “I will not stop until they are all released.” In December, after learning of Gad Haggai’s death and again on the 100th day of captivity in mid-January, he renewed this pledge. During the State of the Union in March, he promised the hostages’ families, “We will not rest until we bring their loved ones home.”

In May, Biden proposed a three-phase ceasefire plan, with the release of hostages as a key part of the first phase lasting six weeks, stating, “There are American hostages who would be released at this stage, and we want them home.”

Over 10 weeks have passed since that proposal, and Israel is further from a ceasefire than ever. Netanyahu has repeatedly ignored U.S. red lines, rejected calls for less deadly “surgical operations,” and resisted allowing aid into Gaza or pursuing a ceasefire in good faith. He and his far right-wing cabinet members remain committed to “total victory” against Hamas, which even his own military deems unrealistic.

The recent Israeli assassination of Hamas political chief Ismail Haniyeh in Iran has made diplomacy between Israel and Hamas even more distant. Achieving a ceasefire in Gaza remains the best chance to begin bringing all the hostages, including Americans, home. But Netanyahu has shown little interest in ending the war, and the release of the hostages is clearly not a priority for him. In fact, he may view it as counterproductive, as it could undermine his goal of prolonging the war.

Hamas and its supporters also have agency. They chose to take hostages and commit murder, which ignited the conflict, and they hold the power to release the hostages. However, they are unlikely to do so without receiving something substantial in return. Securing the release of U.S. hostages is always a fraught task. Russia detained journalists, a world-class athlete, and private citizens, demanding the release of arms dealers, fraudsters, and assassins in exchange.

Despite this stark moral disparity, it is the president’s duty to ensure that Americans held hostage are brought home. In the case of Gaza, a ceasefire — a step toward peace — would not only secure the hostages’ release but also save many more Palestinian and Israeli lives.

President Biden must recognize that the current strategy toward Netanyahu’s government is failing. He should hold Netanyahu accountable for jeopardizing the stability of the region and U.S. citizens’ lives. With his remaining months in office, Biden should press the Israeli government to negotiate a ceasefire and initiate, if not already in place, direct negotiations with Hamas to secure the release of American hostages. They have been held long enough.


Israelis demonstrate against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government and call for the release of hostages in Gaza, amid the Israel-Hamas conflict, in Tel Aviv, Israel, August 10, 2024. REUTERS/Ricardo Moraes

google cta
Analysis | Middle East
Trump Venezuela
Top image credit: President Donald Trump monitors U.S. military operations in Venezuela, from Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida, on Saturday, January 3, 2026. (Official White House Photo by Molly Riley)

Geo-kleptocracy and the rise of 'global mafia politics'

Global Crises

“As everyone knows, the oil business in Venezuela has been a bust, a total bust, for a long period of time. … We're going to have our very large United States oil companies, the biggest anywhere in the world, go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure, the oil infrastructure, and start making money for the country,” said President Donald Trump the morning after U.S. forces invaded Caracas and carried off the indicted autocrat Nicolàs Maduro.

The invasion of Venezuela on Jan. 3 did not result in regime change but rather a deal coerced at the barrel of a gun. Maduro’s underlings may stay in power as long as they open the country’s moribund petroleum industry to American oil majors. Government repression still rules the day, simply without Maduro.

keep readingShow less
Russian icebreakers
Top photo credit: Russian nuclear powered Icebreaker Yamal during removal of manned drifting station North Pole-36. August 2009. (Wikimedia Commmons)

Trump's Greenland, Canada threats reflect angst over Russia shipping

North America

Like it or not, Russia is the biggest polar bear in the arctic, which helps to explain President Trump’s moves on Greenland.

However, the Biden administration focused on it too. And it isn’t only about access to resources and military positioning, but also about shipping. And there, the Russians are some way ahead.

keep readingShow less
Iran nuclear
Top image credit: An Iranian cleric and a young girl stand next to scale models of Iran-made ballistic missiles and centrifuges after participating in an anti-U.S. and anti-Israeli rally marking the anniversary of the U.S. embassy occupation in downtown Tehran, Iran, on November 4, 2025.(Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto via REUTERS CONNECT)

Want Iran to get the bomb? Try regime change

Middle East

Washington is once again flirting with a familiar temptation: the belief that enough pressure, and if necessary, military force, can bend Iran to its will. The Trump administration appears ready to move beyond containment toward forcing collapse. Before treating Iran as the next candidate for forced transformation, policymakers should ask a question they have consistently failed to answer in the Middle East: “what follows regime change?”

The record is sobering. In the past two decades, regime change in the region has yielded state fragmentation, authoritarian restoration, or prolonged conflict. Iraq remains fractured despite two decades of U.S. investment. Egypt’s democratic opening collapsed within a year. Libya, Syria, and Yemen spiraled into civil wars whose spillover persists. In each case, removing a regime proved far easier than constructing a viable successor. Iran would not be the exception. It would be the rule — at a scale that dwarfs anything the region has experienced.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.