Follow us on social

Lobbyists win: Bondi memo guts foreign meddling law

Lobbyists win: Bondi memo guts foreign meddling law

The fear of getting caught violating FARA is all but gone, leaving it open season for shadowy influences in our policy and politics.

Washington Politics

Buried within a flurry of memos from the Department of Justice Wednesday was a clear and concise invitation for foreign actors and lobbyists to secretly meddle in America.

When it comes to the nation’s preeminent law for regulating foreign influence in the U.S., the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), the DOJ is henceforth only going to bring criminal charges in “instances of alleged conduct similar to more traditional espionage by foreign government actors,” according to a memo sent late Wednesday from Attorney General Pam Bondi.

“These changes are an invitation to foreign actors to interfere in American affairs,” Aaron Zelinsky, a former DOJ national security prosecutor, told Bloomberg Law, which first reported this news. “Even worse, it’s an invitation to Americans to help them do it.”

Bondi knows all of this better than most, as she was previously a registered foreign agent working for Ballard Partners, a Florida-based firm with close ties to President Trump. She provided “advocacy services relative to U.S.-Qatar bilateral relations” on a contract worth $115,000 a month.

Firms representing foreign governments, like Ballard and others covered by FARA are required to disclose certain information about who they are working for, who they are contacting, and the size of their contracts. But, with Bondi’s announcement, fear of punishment for flauting the these disclosure requirements will disappear along with the transparency they afforded to the American people. This is music to the ears of foreign government officials looking to covertly influence American politics and lobbyists looking to avoid disclosure — such as Bondi’s colleague Kash Patel, Trump's nominee for head of the FBI, who came under fire this week for his undisclosed work for Qatar.

Citing concerns of “risks of further weaponization and abuses of prosecutorial discretion,” Bondi also disbanded the Foreign Influence Task Force, which was set up to identify covert foreign influence operations. For all of the talk of the weaponization of FARA, the DOJ has only brought 13 FARA cases in the past three years.

And several of those Biden-era FARA cases — and closely related foreign influence statutes — involved high-level Democrats, not Republicans. That list includes New York City mayor Eric Adams, Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-Texas), and, of course, former Democratic Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chair Bob Menendez, who just last week was sentenced to 11 years in prison for taking bribes — including piles of cash and gold bars — from the Egyptian government. It’s unclear if corruption cases short of espionage, such as these, would be pursued under Bondi’s new DOJ guidelines.

Josh Rosenstein, a partner at Sandler Reiff Lamb Rosenstein & Birkenstock, which advises clients on FARA compliance, explained via email that he is concerned that “a wide swath of foreign influence operations would go undisclosed” under the new guidelines. For instance, Azerbaijan’s Deputy Foreign Minister scared off several Washington lobbyists last year after asking them to avoid FARA disclosure. Amidst the Trump Administration’s foreign influence fire sale, he might find it easier to shop around for a new contract off the books.

With criminal charges much less likely, Bondi claims that FARA will still be able to focus on “civil enforcement.” Good luck with that; FARA does not have civil investigation authority or even the ability to issue civil fines, rendering this concession all but useless. There are no speeding tickets for minor FARA violations, which is a glaring weakness that multiple FARA reform bills have sought to remedy.

In response to a series of questions seeking clarity on the threshold for criminal charges and how they plan to enforce civil fines, DOJ spokesperson Peter Carr declined to comment beyond the memo.

Relying on these toothless tools will cripple America’s ability to fight malign foreign influence in the U.S. Authoritarian countries stand to benefit most from this lack of enforcement. Not only do they lead the way in lobbying activities, but some of the biggest spenders on foreign influence under FARA are regimes like China, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar. And, that’s just the funding that’s been reported. Under Bondi’s new guidelines, firms worried about the reputational risks of working with an abusive despotic client — like the firms that cut ties with Saudi Arabia after the murder of Jamal Khashoggi — will now have a perverse incentive to simply avoid registering altogether. Bondi’s guidance effectively gives them the green light to keep all their influence off the books.

If the Trump administration wants to live up to its slogan of putting “America First” the very least it can do is defend America from foreign meddling. President Trump and Attorney General Bondi should rescind this guidance and put America first by defending it from covert foreign influence.


Top photo credit: Pam Bondi speaks on the day of her swearing in ceremony as U.S. Attorney General, at the White House in Washington, U.S., February 5, 2025. REUTERS/Kent Nishimura
Washington Politics
US Marines
Top image credit: U.S. Marines with Force Reconnaissance Platoon, Maritime Raid Force, 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, prepare to clear a room during a limited scale raid exercise at Sam Hill Airfield, Queensland, Australia, June 21, 2025. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Alora Finigan)

Cartels are bad but they're not 'terrorists.' This is mission creep.

Military Industrial Complex

There is a dangerous pattern on display by the Trump administration. The president and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth seem to hold the threat and use of military force as their go-to method of solving America’s problems and asserting state power.

The president’s reported authorization for the Pentagon to use U.S. military warfighting capacity to combat drug cartels — a domain that should remain within the realm of law enforcement — represents a significant escalation. This presents a concerning evolution and has serious implications for civil liberties — especially given the administration’s parallel moves with the deployment of troops to the southern border, the use of federal forces to quell protests in California, and the recent deployment of armed National Guard to the streets of our nation’s capital.

keep readingShow less
Howard Lutnick
Top photo credit: Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on CNBC, 8/26/25 (CNBC screengrab)

Is nationalizing the defense industry such a bad idea?

Military Industrial Complex

The U.S. arms industry is highly consolidated, specialized, and dependent on government contracts. Indeed, the largest U.S. military contractors are already effectively extensions of the state — and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is right to point that out.

His suggestion in a recent media appearance to partially nationalize the likes of Lockheed Martin is hardly novel. The economist John Kenneth Galbraith argued for the nationalization of the largest military contractors in 1969. More recently, various academics and policy analysts have advocated for partial or full nationalization of military firms in publications including The Nation, The American Conservative, The Middle East Research and Information Project (MERIP), and The Seattle Journal for Social Justice.

keep readingShow less
Modi Trump
Top image credit: White House, February 2025

Trump's India problem could become a Global South crisis

Asia-Pacific

As President Trump’s second term kicked off, all signs pointed to a continued upswing in U.S.-India relations. At a White House press conference in February, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke of his vision to “Make India Great Again” and how the United States under Trump would play a central role. “When it’s MAGA plus MIGA, it becomes a mega partnership for prosperity,” Modi said.

During Trump’s first term, the two populist leaders hosted rallies for each other in their respective countries and cultivated close personal ties. Aside from the Trump-Modi bromance, U.S.-Indian relations have been on a positive trajectory for over two decades, driven in part by mutual suspicion of China. But six months into his second term, Trump has taken several actions that have led to a dramatic downturn in U.S.-India relations, with India-China relations suddenly on the rise.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.