Follow us on social

google cta
35450047340_f414c7609d_o Donald Trump Xi Jinping United States China

Poll: Most Chinese don't like US — but want ties anyway

Those surveyed were also wary of going to war over Taiwan

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

Chinese citizens, while largely maintaining an unfavorable view of the United States, mostly support friendly and peaceful relations and are wary of using military force to reunify with Taiwan, according to a new survey.

The Carter Center’s China Focus Initiative, in collaboration with faculty from Emory University, polled almost 2,500 Chinese respondents in late summer 2024. Their study offers a rare look into Chinese public opinion on foreign policy.

The poll found that despite fewer than 25% having a favorable view of the United States, 69% of those surveyed said they support friendly ties with the U.S. While a majority opposed a forceful reunification with Taiwan, a plurality (33.5%) indicated in a separate question that if force were necessary, it should be utilized in the next 5 years.

While a plurality (33.1%) of Chinese respondents held an unfavorable opinion of the United States, a Pew Research poll from May 2024 found that a much higher percentage — 81% — of Americans have an unfavorable view of China. Only 6% of Americans consider Beijing an economic partner, according to Pew Research, while the overwhelming majority of Americans view the world’s second-largest economy as a rival or enemy.

When it comes to Beijing’s relationship with Moscow, the Carter Center poll found that Chinese respondents were very favorable, with 80% saying they trusted Russian President Vladimir Putin to respect China’s interests. Additionally, 66% agreed that "it remains in China's national interest to support Russia's operation in Ukraine,” although 58% of this group supported a diplomatic end to the conflict, and only 8% supported supplying Russia with weaponry.

Most respondents supported Beijing’s assertive influence in Asia. In April, for example, Chinese and Filipino troops placed flags on a disputed cluster of sand banks, called Sandy Cay, in the South China Sea. According to the poll, 81% of the Chinese public believes that the Philippines (and Vietnam) should cease such activities that challenge Chinese regional sovereignty.

Additionally, a plurality (36%) said China should “intervene militarily” when asked how Beijing should respond to Japan potentially “changing the country's post-World War II 'pacifist' constitution to allow for offensive military actions.”


When asked how China should respond to South Korea developing its own nuclear weapons, 26% supported diplomatic protest, while the same number, 26%, favored military intervention. When it comes to China’s border disputes with India, 80% of those polled were in favor of aggressively holding its border claims, despite Beijing and New Delhi signing a tension-easing deal in late 2024.


President Donald J. Trump and President Xi Jinping | July 8, 2017 (Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead)
President Donald J. Trump and President Xi Jinping | July 8, 2017 (Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead)
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?
Top image credit: President Donald J. Trump holds a joint news conference at the White House with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Feb. 4, 2025. (Shutterstock/ Joshua Sukoff)

Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?

QiOSK

In the months that led up to the Iraq War, the Bush administration went to extraordinary lengths to convince the world of the need to oust Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. Leading officials laid out their case in public, sharing what they claimed was evidence that Iraq was moving rapidly toward the deployment of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. When U.S. tanks rolled across the border, everyone knew the justification: the U.S. was determined to thwart Iraq’s development of weapons of mass destruction, however fictitious that threat would later prove to be.

In the months that led up to the Iran War, the Trump administration took a different tack. President Trump spoke only occasionally of Iran, offering a smattering of justifications for growing U.S. tensions with the country. He claimed without evidence that Iran was rebuilding its nuclear program after the U.S.-Israeli attack last June and even developing missiles that could strike the United States. But he insisted that Tehran could make a deal with seven magic words: “we will never have a nuclear weapon.”

keep readingShow less
Iran says ‘no ship is allowed to pass’ Strait of Hormuz: Reports
Top image credit: A large oil tanker transits the Strait of Hormuz. (Shutterstock/ Clare Louise Jackson)

Iran says ‘no ship is allowed to pass’ Strait of Hormuz: Reports

QiOSK

Hours after the U.S. and Israel launched a campaign of airstrikes across Iran, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps is warning vessels in the Persian Gulf via radio that “no ship is allowed to pass the Strait of Hormuz,” according to a report from Reuters.

The news suggests that Iran is ready to pull out all the stops in its response to the U.S.-Israeli barrage, which President Donald Trump says is aimed at toppling the Iranian regime. A full shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz would cause an international crisis given that 20% of the world’s oil passes through the narrow channel. Financial analysts estimate that even one day of a full blockade could cause global oil prices to double from $66 per barrel to more than $120.

keep readingShow less
What Pakistan's 'open war' on Taliban in Afghanistan really means
Top image credit: FILE PHOTO: Afghan Taliban fighters patrol near the Afghanistan-Pakistan border in Spin Boldak, Kandahar Province, following exchanges of fire between Pakistani and Afghan forces in Afghanistan, October 15, 2025. REUTERS/Stringer

What Pakistan's 'open war' on Taliban in Afghanistan really means

QiOSK

Pakistan’s airstrikes on Kabul and Kandahar over the last 24 hours are nothing new. Islamabad has carried out strikes inside Afghanistan several times since the Taliban’s return to power. Pakistan claimed that the Afghan Taliban used drones to conduct strikes in Pakistan.

What distinguishes this latest episode is the rhetorical escalation, with Pakistani officials openly referring to the action as “open war.” While the language grabbed international headlines, it is best understood as part of a managed escalation designed to signal resolve without crossing red lines that would make de-escalation impossible.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.