Follow us on social

BRICS Rio 2025 July

BRICS takes aim at Israel as it wades into geopolitical conflicts

Trump threatens members with 10% additional tariffs as Rio summit kicks off with its biggest convocation yet

Reporting | QiOSK

The BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil has issued its leaders’ declaration, with a significant section on geopolitics and security and particular criticism of Israel’s recent bombing of one of its newest members — Iran — and its war on Gaza.

The Rio summit represented the BRICS at its biggest so far: 10 full members, and 10 partner countries. Indonesia was this year's new member. In a world of increasing tensions and conflict, BRICS decided to wade deeper into questions of geopolitics and hard security but managed to forge an impressive consensus on these questions.

BRICS is not a formal organization but rather a loose coalition of what I have called the “global east” (Russia and China) and several global south states. Following its first leaders’ summit in 2009 as BRIC (Brazil-Russia-India-China), South Africa joined to make it BRICS. Post-2023, five new members have been added (Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates), and 10 partner countries have been announced at a lower tier of participation.

BRICS' original mandate of addressing global economic and collective action challenges and strengthening the multilateral order expectedly remained the biggest focus of this year’s declaration, including substantial paragraphs devoted to development finance, health, trade, and climate change, among others.

BRICS has traditionally been focused on economic coordination but has increasingly been wading into fraught geopolitical/hard security questions since the Russia-Ukraine war in 2022. This is an unsurprising effect of the international system turning more conflictual, with more major wars of late than we have seen for a long time. But as this summit showed, BRICS is showing a notable ability to forge consensus on these challenging questions. The Middle East, Africa and South Asia were a bigger focus this year than Ukraine.

In the Middle East context, the U.S. was not mentioned or criticized by name in the declaration, but there were seven critical references to Israel. Israel is criticized implicitly and explicitly on its occupation of Palestinian land, "denial or obstruction of humanitarian access and the targeting of humanitarian personnel," "the use of starvation as a method of warfare," violations of sovereignty and continuing occupation in Lebanon, and the International Court of Justice case lodged by South Africa in 2023.

However, Hamas is not mentioned, nor is the Oct 7, 2023, terrorist attack on Israel. But the "release of all hostages and detainees" is demanded.

Notably, Israel and the United States were not mentioned explicitly in context of the recent war on Iran. But the attacks on Iran were condemned, representing stronger language than the joint statement specifically on this conflict issued by BRICS just two weeks prior to the 2025 summit. The UN Security Council was also invoked in this regard.

On other security fronts, the Pahalgam terror attack on April 22 in Kashmir, India was condemned explicitly, as were attacks on civilian targets in Kursk in Russia. The roles of Pakistan and Ukraine were not mentioned by name in these contexts. The declaration contained significant text on combating terrorism in the specific contexts of India, Syria, and Sudan, and more broadly. Conflicts in Sudan, Syria and Haiti got dedicated paragraphs. The Great Lakes region and Horn of Africa were also mentioned in the security context.

Most of the declaration is taken up, as expected, with a host of non-security issues, including development finance (NDB), food, health, science/space, and education. Climate, a top Brazilian priority, gets a major section, linked to development. The declaration rejected the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism as protectionist. The declaration also criticized recent U.S. trade policies by expressing “serious concerns about the rise of unilateral tariff and non-tariff measures which distort trade and are inconsistent with WTO rules."

Finally, BRICS sees the world as already multipolar. Multipolarity was both recognized as a reality and encouraged in the document. The text mentions "the context of the contemporary realities of the multipolar world." and supports "fostering (a) multipolar world" in the G20 context. It also states that "multipolarity can expand opportunities for emerging markets and developing countries to develop their constructive potential"

In response Sunday, President Donald Trump declared on his Truth Social that any country that aligned with BRICS policies would get slapped with an additional 10% tariff. Countries are awaiting final tariff news as the July 9 "liberation day" deadline looms.


Top photo credit: Leaders take part in a photo session for the annual BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro on July 6, 2025. (Kyodo for Reuters Connect)
Reporting | QiOSK
POGO The Bunker
Top image credit: Project on Government Oversight

Top admiral resigns amid Venezuela ops: Who’s got the scoop?

Washington Politics

The Bunker appears originally at the Project on Government Oversight and is republished here with permission.

keep readingShow less
Ken Vogel Devils' Advocates
Top photo credit: deskjacket for "Devil's Advocates/William Morrow and stock photo (Shutterstock/Lightfield Studios

The Cowboy lobbyist who claimed he fixed an election

Media

“Did I help fix an election? Yes.”

Or so claims foreign lobbyist Robert Stryk in “Devils’ Advocates: The Hidden Story of Rudy Giuliani, Hunter Biden, and the Washington Insiders on the Payrolls of Corrupt Foreign Interests,” a new book by New York Times reporter Kenneth Vogel about the inner workings of American lobbyists working for foreign governments.

keep readingShow less
 Badr Abdelatty, Abbas Araghchi, Rafael Grossi
Top image credit: Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty meets with Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Rafael Grossi in Cairo, Egypt, September 9, 2025. REUTERS/Mohamed Abd El Ghany

Can Egypt really stop Israel from attacking Iran again?

Middle East

The telephone lines out of Cairo have been humming. In a series of carefully choreographed calls, Badr Abdelatty, Egypt’s foreign minister, has been shuttling between his Iranian counterpart, Abbas Araghchi, America’s Middle East Envoy, Steve Witkoff, and the head of the U.N.’s nuclear watchdog, all in a bid to pull Iran, America, and Israel back from the brink.

Just months ago, Cairo’s influence was at a low-point, overshadowed by the oil-fuelled wealth of the Gulf states. While President Donald Trump was brokering mega-deals in the gilded boardrooms of Riyadh and Abu Dhabi, America's ties with its old ally Egypt had become decidedly awkward. The relationship grew so strained that President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi pointedly declined an invitation to the White House. The sticking point was Trump's audacious plan to permanently resettle Gaza’s more than 2 million Palestinians, turning the war-ravaged strip into a "Riviera of the Middle East."

But on the back of a torturous, yet ultimately successful, mediation that produced a fragile ceasefire in Gaza, Egypt has arguably re-emerged as the region’s essential interlocutor. Having co-hosted the Sharm el-Sheikh peace summit with Trump and being tapped to lead a planned global stabilization force in Gaza, Sisi is enjoying a diplomatic comeback. Even Israel's opposition leader, Yair Lapid, now sees Cairo as the linchpin, stating, “What Gaza needs is Egyptian control.”

Now, Cairo is attempting a far more audacious feat: bridging the chasm between Washington, its Israeli ally, and Tehran. The task is gargantuan. The 12-day war in June, which saw American and Israeli bombers strike Iranian nuclear and military sites, left diplomacy in tatters. This has not stopped Trump, fresh from his Gaza triumph, from casting his eye towards a bigger prize. In a speech to the Israeli Knesset, he mused, "you know what would be great? if we made a peace deal with them [Iran]... Wouldn’t it be nice?"

This deal-making optimism is radiating from the White House. "Doing a peace deal is becoming infectious," enthused Witkoff, in a recent interview. He hinted at a broader diplomatic offensive, adding, "we're getting calls from the Iranians. We're there to, you know, hopefully have a long-term diplomatic solution with Iran."

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.