Follow us on social

In blistering remarks, Biden commits aid, intel, and military assets to Israel

In blistering remarks, Biden commits aid, intel, and military assets to Israel

He said the response to Hamas must be 'swift, decisive, and overwhelming.'

Reporting | Middle East

The United States has committed support to the Israeli effort to rescue its hostages in Gaza, according to President Joe Biden in televised remarks to the nation on Tuesday afternoon.

In an emotional speech, the president said there were 14 Americans dead and a number of American hostages among the 150 reported taken by Hamas in the attacks.

“I'm directing my team to share intelligence and deploy additional experts from across the United States government to consult with and advise Israeli counterparts, hostage recovery, and recovery efforts,” he said. “Because as president, I have no higher priority than the safety of Americans being held hostage around the world.”

In an earlier report, Sky News said it had confirmed that the Pentagon was sending “hostage rescue support” to Israel. It would be “intelligence support, it will be logistical support,” but “at a distance.” No boots on the ground, said SkyNews reporter Mark Stone early Tuesday afternoon before Biden’s remarks.

Earlier Tuesday, when talking to CNN about the hostage-taking, Israel’s Minister for Strategic Affairs Ron Dermer said “there’s also American hostages as part of that number as well.” An exact number has yet to be confirmed.

In his remarks, Biden also said it would be “surging additional military assistance including ammunition and interceptors to replenish Iron Dome. We're going to make sure that Israel does not run out of his critical assets to defend its cities and its citizens.”

On Monday, the Washington Post reported that the administration may try to roll Israel aid in with the Ukraine aid it wants Congress to pass by the end of the year. He did not provide any details about the level of aid or how he would present it to Congress in his remarks, however.

Where he was light on details, he was strong in affirming his disgust with the wave of Hamas attacks, which began over the weekend. Though numbers are still unverified, reports said Tuesday afternoon that the death toll was nearing 1,008 Israelis and 770 Palestinians.

“The blood thirstiness brings to mind the worst rampages of ISIS,” Biden said. “This is terrorism. But sadly for the Jewish people, it's not new. This attack is brought to the surface painful memories and the scars left by a millennia of anti-semitism and genocide, the Jewish people in this moment, we must be crystal clear. We stand with Israel. We stand with Israel.”

Hamas, Biden added, “does not stand for the Palestinian people's right to dignity and self determination.”

“This is what they mean by human tragedy — atrocity on an appalling scale. We're going to continue to stand united supporting the people of Israel who are suffering unspeakable losses, and opposing the hatred and violence of terrorism.”

Israel has called up 300,000 reservists and appears to be readying for a ground invasion of Gaza, which has been slammed by Israeli retaliatory missile strikes against Hamas over the last 72 hours, with nearly 200,000 residents displaced as of Tuesday, according to the UN. Israel's defense minister ordered a cut-off of all food, water and electricity to Gaza, which is already under a blockade. According to ABC News, more than 73,000 people were sheltering in schools as of Tuesday morning, while Gaza's main hospital, Beit Hanoun Hospital, was damaged and is now out of service.

Biden did not mention the unfolding civilian crisis in Gaza, but emphasized the assistance to Israel in its war against Hamas in Gaza moving forward. He said, too, that his administration is addressing any potential for domestic threats. “The Department of Homeland Security, Federal Bureau of Investigation are working closely with state local law enforcement and Jewish community partners to identify and disrupt any domestic threat that could emerge in connection with these horrific attacks,” he said.

Biden did not mention Iran, or what role it might have played in resourcing Hamas’s attacks. But he did note the deployment of the USS Gerald R. Ford Carrier group to the Eastern Mediterranean, which was announced Monday. Observers say this is not only a show of commitment to Israel’s security, but a show of force in the region, with a particular nod to Iran. “We stand ready to move in additional assets as needed,” Biden added.


Photo credit: US President Joe Biden, with Vice President Kamala Harris and Secretary of State Antony Blinken, delivers remarks on the terrorist attacks in Israel from the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington, DC, USA, 10 October 2023. (Reuters)
Reporting | Middle East
Trump ASEAN
Top photo credit: U.S. President Donald Trump looks at Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., next to Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim when posing for a family photo with leaders at the ASEAN Summit in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, October 26, 2025. Vincent Thian/Pool via REUTERS

‘America First’ meets ‘ASEAN Way’ in Kuala Lumpur

Asia-Pacific

The 2025 ASEAN and East Asia Summits in Kuala Lumpur beginning today are set to be consequential multilateral gatherings — defining not only ASEAN’s internal cohesion but also the shape of U.S.–China relations in the Indo-Pacific.

President Donald Trump’s participation will be the first by a U.S. president in an ASEAN-led summit since 2022. President Biden skipped the last two such summits in 2023 and 2024, sending then-Vice President Harris instead.

keep readingShow less
iran, china, russia
Top photo credit: Top image credit: Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov and and Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi shake hands as Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Ma Zhaoxu looks on during their meet with reporters after their meeting at Diaoyutai State Guest House on March 14, 2025 in Beijing, China. Lintao Zhang/Pool via REUTERS

'Annulled'! Russia won't abide snapback sanctions on Iran

Middle East

“A raider attack on the U.N. Security Council.” This was the explosive accusation leveled by Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov this week. His target was the U.N. Secretariat and Western powers, whom he blamed for what Russia sees as an illegitimate attempt to restore the nuclear-related international sanctions on Iran.

Beyond the fiery rhetoric, Ryabkov’s statement contained a message: Russia, he said, now considers all pre-2015 U.N. sanctions on Iran, snapped back by the European signatories of the 2015 nuclear deal (JCPOA) — the United Kingdom, France, Germany — “annulled.” Moscow will deepen its military-technical cooperation with Tehran accordingly, according to Ryabkov.

This is more than a diplomatic spat; it is the formal announcement of a split in international legal reality. The world’s major powers are now operating under two irreconcilable interpretations of international law. On one side, the United States, the United Kingdom, France, and Germany assert that the sanctions snapback mechanism of the JCPOA was legitimately triggered for Iran’s alleged violations. On the other, Iran, Russia, and China reject this as an illegitimate procedural act.

This schism was not inevitable, and its origin reveals a profound incongruence. The Western powers that most frequently appeal to the sanctity of the "rules-based international order" and international law have, in this instance, taken an action whose effects fundamentally undermine it. By pushing through a legal maneuver that a significant part of the Security Council considers illegitimate, they have ushered the world into a new and more dangerous state. The predictable, if imperfect, framework of universally recognized Security Council decisions is being replaced by a system where legal facts are determined by political interests espoused by competing power blocs.

This rupture followed a deliberate Western choice to reject compromises in a stand-off with Iran. While Iran was in a technical violation of the provisions of the JCPOA — by, notably, amassing a stockpile of highly enriched uranium (up to 60% as opposed to the 3.67% for a civilian use permissible under the JCPOA), there was a chance to avert the crisis. In the critical weeks leading to the snapback, Iran had signaled concessions in talks with the International Atomic Energy Agency in Cairo, in terms of renewing cooperation with the U.N. nuclear watchdog’s inspectors.

keep readingShow less
On Ukraine and Venezuela, Trump needs to dump the sycophants
Top Photo Credit: (Official White House Photo by Molly Riley)

On Ukraine and Venezuela, Trump needs to dump the sycophants

Europe

While diplomats labored to produce the Dayton Accords in 1995, then-Secretary of Defense Bill Perry advised, “No agreement is better than a bad agreement.” Given that Washington’s allies in London, Paris, Berlin and Warsaw are opposed to any outcome that might end the war in Ukraine, no agreement may be preferable. But for President Trump, there is no point in equating the illusion of peace in Ukraine with a meaningless ceasefire that settles nothing.

Today, Ukraine is mired in corruption, starting at the very highest levels of the administration in Kyiv. Sending $175 billion of borrowed money there "for however long it takes" has turned out to be worse than reckless. The U.S. national sovereign debt is surging to nearly $38 trillion and rising by $425 billion with each passing month. President Trump needs to turn his attention away from funding Joe Biden’s wars and instead focus on the faltering American economy.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.