Follow us on social

google cta
In blistering remarks, Biden commits aid, intel, and military assets to Israel

In blistering remarks, Biden commits aid, intel, and military assets to Israel

He said the response to Hamas must be 'swift, decisive, and overwhelming.'

Reporting | Middle East
google cta
google cta

The United States has committed support to the Israeli effort to rescue its hostages in Gaza, according to President Joe Biden in televised remarks to the nation on Tuesday afternoon.

In an emotional speech, the president said there were 14 Americans dead and a number of American hostages among the 150 reported taken by Hamas in the attacks.

“I'm directing my team to share intelligence and deploy additional experts from across the United States government to consult with and advise Israeli counterparts, hostage recovery, and recovery efforts,” he said. “Because as president, I have no higher priority than the safety of Americans being held hostage around the world.”

In an earlier report, Sky News said it had confirmed that the Pentagon was sending “hostage rescue support” to Israel. It would be “intelligence support, it will be logistical support,” but “at a distance.” No boots on the ground, said SkyNews reporter Mark Stone early Tuesday afternoon before Biden’s remarks.

Earlier Tuesday, when talking to CNN about the hostage-taking, Israel’s Minister for Strategic Affairs Ron Dermer said “there’s also American hostages as part of that number as well.” An exact number has yet to be confirmed.

In his remarks, Biden also said it would be “surging additional military assistance including ammunition and interceptors to replenish Iron Dome. We're going to make sure that Israel does not run out of his critical assets to defend its cities and its citizens.”

On Monday, the Washington Post reported that the administration may try to roll Israel aid in with the Ukraine aid it wants Congress to pass by the end of the year. He did not provide any details about the level of aid or how he would present it to Congress in his remarks, however.

Where he was light on details, he was strong in affirming his disgust with the wave of Hamas attacks, which began over the weekend. Though numbers are still unverified, reports said Tuesday afternoon that the death toll was nearing 1,008 Israelis and 770 Palestinians.

“The blood thirstiness brings to mind the worst rampages of ISIS,” Biden said. “This is terrorism. But sadly for the Jewish people, it's not new. This attack is brought to the surface painful memories and the scars left by a millennia of anti-semitism and genocide, the Jewish people in this moment, we must be crystal clear. We stand with Israel. We stand with Israel.”

Hamas, Biden added, “does not stand for the Palestinian people's right to dignity and self determination.”

“This is what they mean by human tragedy — atrocity on an appalling scale. We're going to continue to stand united supporting the people of Israel who are suffering unspeakable losses, and opposing the hatred and violence of terrorism.”

Israel has called up 300,000 reservists and appears to be readying for a ground invasion of Gaza, which has been slammed by Israeli retaliatory missile strikes against Hamas over the last 72 hours, with nearly 200,000 residents displaced as of Tuesday, according to the UN. Israel's defense minister ordered a cut-off of all food, water and electricity to Gaza, which is already under a blockade. According to ABC News, more than 73,000 people were sheltering in schools as of Tuesday morning, while Gaza's main hospital, Beit Hanoun Hospital, was damaged and is now out of service.

Biden did not mention the unfolding civilian crisis in Gaza, but emphasized the assistance to Israel in its war against Hamas in Gaza moving forward. He said, too, that his administration is addressing any potential for domestic threats. “The Department of Homeland Security, Federal Bureau of Investigation are working closely with state local law enforcement and Jewish community partners to identify and disrupt any domestic threat that could emerge in connection with these horrific attacks,” he said.

Biden did not mention Iran, or what role it might have played in resourcing Hamas’s attacks. But he did note the deployment of the USS Gerald R. Ford Carrier group to the Eastern Mediterranean, which was announced Monday. Observers say this is not only a show of commitment to Israel’s security, but a show of force in the region, with a particular nod to Iran. “We stand ready to move in additional assets as needed,” Biden added.


Photo credit: US President Joe Biden, with Vice President Kamala Harris and Secretary of State Antony Blinken, delivers remarks on the terrorist attacks in Israel from the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington, DC, USA, 10 October 2023. (Reuters)
google cta
Reporting | Middle East
Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?
Top image credit: President Donald J. Trump holds a joint news conference at the White House with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Feb. 4, 2025. (Shutterstock/ Joshua Sukoff)

Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?

QiOSK

In the months that led up to the Iraq War, the Bush administration went to extraordinary lengths to convince the world of the need to oust Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. Leading officials laid out their case in public, sharing what they claimed was evidence that Iraq was moving rapidly toward the deployment of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. When U.S. tanks rolled across the border, everyone knew the justification: the U.S. was determined to thwart Iraq’s development of weapons of mass destruction, however fictitious that threat would later prove to be.

In the months that led up to the Iran War, the Trump administration took a different tack. President Trump spoke only occasionally of Iran, offering a smattering of justifications for growing U.S. tensions with the country. He claimed without evidence that Iran was rebuilding its nuclear program after the U.S.-Israeli attack last June and even developing missiles that could strike the United States. But he insisted that Tehran could make a deal with seven magic words: “we will never have a nuclear weapon.”

keep readingShow less
Starmer Macron Merz
Top image credit: France's President Emmanuel Macron, Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz arrive at Kyiv railway station on May 10, 2025, ahead of a gathering of European leaders in the Ukrainian capital. LUDOVIC MARIN/Pool via REUTERS
Europe's snapback gamble risks killing diplomacy with Iran

Craven Europeans give US and Israel a blank check for illegal war

Middle East

In the aftermath of the new U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran, the transatlantic alliance has offered a response that confirmed what many both in the West and outside knew all along: that for London, Paris, Berlin, and Brussels, the "rules-based international order" has been reduced to a simple, brutal premise: might makes right, provided the might is Western.

The joint statement from the E3 — France, Germany, and the United Kingdom — is a master class in evasion. "We did not participate in these strikes, but are in close contact with our international partners, including the United States and Israel," they declared. The text also lists all the references and rationalizations used by Iran hawks — “nuclear program, ballistic missile program, regional destabilization and repression against its own people.”

keep readingShow less
Trump Iran
Top image credit: Hundreds of people attend a pro-democracy demonstration against U.S. President Donald Trump in Washington, D.C., U.S., on February 28, 2026. Demonstrators cited a number of reasons for their opposition to Trump, including his involvement with sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, ICE raids, authoritarian policies, and today’s bombing of Iran. (Photo by Allison Bailey/NurPhoto) via REUTERS CONNECT

How does this war with Iran end? Or does it?

QiOSK

Now that President Trump has launched an illegal, unprovoked war of choice on Iran, the next question inevitably becomes: how does this end? Or, what are some off ramps Trump can take to end it before the situation turns out of control?

There are three broad scenarios; the first and most likely is that Trump continues this until he gets some sort of regime implosion and then declares victory, while also washing his hands of whatever follows.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.