Follow us on social

google cta
Record breaking amount of aid sent to Israel

Record breaking amount of aid sent to Israel

Report claims at least $17.9 billion sent since October 7th, 2023

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

On Monday, Brown University’s Costs of War project released a report detailing America’s monetary commitment to Israel since October 7, 2023, which concludes that The United States has approved at least $17.9 billion on military aid to Israel, the highest given in a single year since the U.S. began giving Israel aid in 1959. Israel is also the biggest recipient of aid from the United States since World War II, and has multiple unique arms and aid agreements with the United States, although notably no formal defense treaty.

In addition to direct aid to Israel, the United States has increased its military footprint in the region to around 43,000 ever since the Hamas attacks in October 2023. The Associated Press, which covered the COW report, estimated that an additional $4.86 billion has been spent on this increase in military operations.


The increased military presence has included President Biden sending additional troops to the region, striking Iran-aligned Houthi targets in Yemen, sending two carrier strike groups to the Mediterranean, and assisting Israel in intercepting Iranian launched missiles. The report does not include any additional assistance that may be given to Israel after its invasion of southern Lebanon in late September.

Israel has been receiving billions every year since it signed the Camp David Accords in 1978, with President Obama setting the annual aid amount to $3.8 billion through 2028.

The report also states the uniqueness of Israel’s aid situation with the United States: “Israel receives favorable financing arrangements related to U.S. military aid. For example, U.S. aid is provided on a ‘cash flow’ basis, which means that Israel is able to finance multi-year purchases from the U.S. based on future commitments, before the funds have been officially appropriated by Congress.” The report also points out that “unlike any other country in the world, Israel is allowed to spend 25% of its routine annual military aid from the United States on its own arms industry.”

Besides the increased financial cost of participating in Israel’s escalations, the human toll must be accounted for. Hamas fighters killed around 1,200 people in Israel on October 7, and Israel has killed at least 42,000 people in Gaza since. Additionally, almost 700 Palestinians have been killed in the West Bank since October 7, 2023, as well as 1,400 people in Lebanon (Hezbollah fighters and civilians alike).

American soldiers have also been placed in a position of higher vulnerability. The roughly 3,500 soldiers spread out across Iraq and Syria have been subject to increased attacks from Iranian-backed militia groups since October of 2023, and could serve as a tripwire for a larger conflict.

The United States is almost certain to further involve itself in this conflict. To assist Israel in its response to Iran’s missile barrage, the American CENTCOM chief was sent to meet with Israeli defense officials on Sunday. Messaging around supporting Israel has been consistent as well. In a State Department briefing from October 3, spokesperson Matthew Miller said, “We have made clear from the start that we are committed to the defense of Israel and that we will remain committed to the defense of Israel.” He added, “our security partnership with them dates back decades, and we expect it to continue well into the future. We are also having conversations with them about the shape of that campaign [against Iran], the scope of that campaign, what their targets are going to be, but I don’t want to get into it beyond that.”


In half a century of public life, U.S. President Joe Biden has demonstrated unwavering support for Israel. In this photo Biden is welcomed by Israeli Prime Minster Benjamin Netanyahu, as he visits Israel amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, in Tel Aviv, Israel, October 18, 2023. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein/File Photo
In half a century of public life, U.S. President Joe Biden has demonstrated unwavering support for Israel. In this photo Biden is welcomed by Israeli Prime Minster Benjamin Netanyahu, as he visits Israel amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, in Tel Aviv, Israel, October 18, 2023. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein/File Photo
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?
Top image credit: President Donald J. Trump holds a joint news conference at the White House with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Feb. 4, 2025. (Shutterstock/ Joshua Sukoff)

Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?

QiOSK

In the months that led up to the Iraq War, the Bush administration went to extraordinary lengths to convince the world of the need to oust Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. Leading officials laid out their case in public, sharing what they claimed was evidence that Iraq was moving rapidly toward the deployment of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. When U.S. tanks rolled across the border, everyone knew the justification: the U.S. was determined to thwart Iraq’s development of weapons of mass destruction, however fictitious that threat would later prove to be.

In the months that led up to the Iran War, the Trump administration took a different tack. President Trump spoke only occasionally of Iran, offering a smattering of justifications for growing U.S. tensions with the country. He claimed without evidence that Iran was rebuilding its nuclear program after the U.S.-Israeli attack last June and even developing missiles that could strike the United States. But he insisted that Tehran could make a deal with seven magic words: “we will never have a nuclear weapon.”

keep readingShow less
Iran says ‘no ship is allowed to pass’ Strait of Hormuz: Reports
Top image credit: A large oil tanker transits the Strait of Hormuz. (Shutterstock/ Clare Louise Jackson)

Iran says ‘no ship is allowed to pass’ Strait of Hormuz: Reports

QiOSK

Hours after the U.S. and Israel launched a campaign of airstrikes across Iran, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps is warning vessels in the Persian Gulf via radio that “no ship is allowed to pass the Strait of Hormuz,” according to a report from Reuters.

The news suggests that Iran is ready to pull out all the stops in its response to the U.S.-Israeli barrage, which President Donald Trump says is aimed at toppling the Iranian regime. A full shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz would cause an international crisis given that 20% of the world’s oil passes through the narrow channel. Financial analysts estimate that even one day of a full blockade could cause global oil prices to double from $66 per barrel to more than $120.

keep readingShow less
What Pakistan's 'open war' on Taliban in Afghanistan really means
Top image credit: FILE PHOTO: Afghan Taliban fighters patrol near the Afghanistan-Pakistan border in Spin Boldak, Kandahar Province, following exchanges of fire between Pakistani and Afghan forces in Afghanistan, October 15, 2025. REUTERS/Stringer

What Pakistan's 'open war' on Taliban in Afghanistan really means

QiOSK

Pakistan’s airstrikes on Kabul and Kandahar over the last 24 hours are nothing new. Islamabad has carried out strikes inside Afghanistan several times since the Taliban’s return to power. Pakistan claimed that the Afghan Taliban used drones to conduct strikes in Pakistan.

What distinguishes this latest episode is the rhetorical escalation, with Pakistani officials openly referring to the action as “open war.” While the language grabbed international headlines, it is best understood as part of a managed escalation designed to signal resolve without crossing red lines that would make de-escalation impossible.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.