Follow us on social

google cta
Diplomacy Watch: China looms large at Ukraine ‘peace summit’

Diplomacy Watch: China looms large at Ukraine ‘peace summit’

High-level US and Chinese officials met on the sidelines of international talks aimed at bolstering Kyiv’s negotiating position.

Europe
google cta
google cta

China’s Ukraine peace envoy met with American officials in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, over the weekend amid a summit aimed at building an international consensus on how to end the war in Ukraine, according to the State Department.

Chinese diplomat Li Hui, who previously served as ambassador to Russia, met with acting Deputy Secretary of State Victoria Nuland in a rare, high-level U.S.-China meeting on the sidelines of the summit, which did not include any Russian representatives. China’s participation in the weekend’s meetings earned equally rare (if limited) praise from U.S. officials.

“We do believe it was productive that China attended,” State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said Monday. “It would be productive for China to play a role here, again, if that role respects Ukraine’s territorial integrity and its sovereignty.”

Li’s team “appeared constructive” and “keen to show that [it] is not Russia” throughout the weekend of talks, according to an unnamed European diplomat who spoke with the Financial Times.

China’s foreign ministry played down the differences between Chinese and Russian foreign policy following a Monday call between each country’s foreign minister. Beijing’s readout of the discussion reiterated its commitment to “uphold an independent and impartial stance” on the war while encouraging peace talks.

Russia, for its part, said the summit was “doomed to fail,” while Ukraine argued that the event dealt a “huge blow” to the Kremlin. The only concrete outcome was an agreement to meet again within the next six weeks, but Kyiv and its backers hope the meetings will help build support for Ukraine’s 10-point peace plan.

Russia asked its partners in BRICS — a grouping that also includes Brazil, India, China and South Africa — to share their evaluation of the talks, according to Moscow’s foreign ministry.

These “fence-sitting” countries have avoided taking a distinct side in the conflict, providing opportunities to act as go-betweens for the warring parties. As Happymon Jacob recently argued in Foreign Affairs, states like India are now well-positioned to “help limit and blunt the devastation of the war and its knock-on effects for the global economy.”

“Initiatives backed by Western countries that are Ukraine’s close allies and supporters or by Russia’s benefactor China will inevitably be greeted with suspicion,” Jacob wrote. “India has a unique opportunity to get involved precisely because it has not condemned Russia and continues to maintain ties with Moscow.”

India’s next big opportunity to push for peace talks will come early next month, when world leaders are set to gather in New Delhi for the G-20 Leaders’ Summit. Russian President Vladimir Putin is reportedly considering attending the meeting in person after skipping last year’s event. If Putin does come to New Delhi, it will be the first time that he and U.S. President Joe Biden will have been in a room together since before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

In other diplomatic news related to the war in Ukraine:

— Fallout from Russia’s decision to pull out of the Black Sea grain deal continued this week as Ukraine attacked a Russian tanker and declared Russian ports in the region a “war risk area,” according to Politico. “Everything the Russians are moving back and forth on the Black Sea are our valid military targets,” said Oleg Ustenko, an adviser to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. The news, which threatens to paralyze Russian shipping in the region, came after weeks of Russian attacks on Ukrainian shipping infrastructure. Ukraine’s strong stance could raise concerns from Europe, which imported 32 million barrels of crude oil from Russia via the Black Sea last month.

— Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva told reporters last week that, while he still hopes to help negotiate peace in Ukraine, he doesn’t see an opportunity for talks in the near future, according to the New York Times. “For the time being, both of them are in that phase that ‘I will win, I will win, I will win,’” Lula said. Celso Amorim — Lula’s top foreign policy adviser and informal peace envoy — remotely attended the Jeddah meetings over the weekend.

— Poland plans to send upwards of 10,000 soldiers to bolster its border with Belarus amid claims that members of the Wagner Group — now based in Belarus following an abortive mutiny in Russia — could attempt to sneak across the frontier to stage attacks, according to the New York Times. Meanwhile, diplomatic tensions continued to rise between Poland and Ukraine due in part to a dramatic increase in Polish imports of Ukrainian foodstuffs, which farmers say has driven down prices and hurt their bottom line. The spat heated up last week when a top official in Warsaw chided Kyiv for not “appreciating the role Poland has played for Ukraine in recent months and years.” Ukraine then summoned Poland’s ambassador over the comments, a move that drew sharp criticism from Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki. “Given the enormity of the support Poland has given Ukraine, such mistakes should not happen,” Morawiecki said.

— It is “extremely, highly unlikely” that Ukraine will make significant progress in its counteroffensive, according to an anonymous “senior western diplomat” who spoke with CNN. The diplomat’s dismal prediction comes amid growing fears that the war will remain a bloody stalemate for the foreseeable future.

U.S. State Department news:

In a Tuesday press conference, State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller suggested that the U.S. is not opposed to Russian President Vladimir Putin visiting Turkey so long as such a move could help revive the Black Sea grain deal. Turkish officials “continue to play a productive role” in efforts to revive the agreement, Miller said. “We think it’s useful that they play that role. I don’t have any comment on a potential visit other than we do support Türkiye continuing to press Russia to re-enter that initiative because it’s so important.”


google cta
Europe
NATO Summit 2025
Top photo credit: NATO Summit, the Hague, June 25, 2025. (Republic of Slovenia/Daniel Novakovič/STA/flickr)

Will NATO survive Trump?

Europe

Over the weekend, President Donald Trump threatened to place new punitive tariffs on European allies until they acquiesce to his designs on Greenland, an escalation of his ongoing attempts to acquire the large Arctic island for the United States.

Critics loudly decried the move as devastating for the transatlantic relationship, echoing Denmark’s Prime Minister Mette Fredericksen’s earlier warning that a coercive U.S. seizure of the semi-autonomous Danish territory would mean the end of NATO.

keep readingShow less
Tony Blair Gaza
Top photo credit: Britain's former Prime Minister Tony Blair attends a world leaders' summit on ending the Gaza war, amid a U.S.-brokered prisoner-hostage swap and ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas, in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, October 13, 2025. REUTERS/Suzanne Plunkett/Pool/File Photo

Phase farce: No way 'Board of Peace' replaces reality in Gaza

Middle East

The Trump administration’s announcements about the Gaza Strip would lead one to believe that implementation of President Trump’s 20-point peace plan, later largely incorporated into a United Nations Security Council resolution, is progressing quite smoothly.

As such, Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff announced this month on social media the “launch of Phase Two” of the plan, “moving from ceasefire to demilitarization, technocratic governance, and reconstruction.” But examination of even just a couple of Witkoff’s assertions in his announcement shows that "smooth" or even "implementation" are bitter overstatements.

keep readingShow less
Trump Polk
Top image credit: Samuele Wikipediano 1348 via wikimedia commons/lev radin via shutterstock.com

On Greenland, Trump wants to be like Polk

Washington Politics

Any hopes that Wednesday’s meeting of Greenland and Denmark’s foreign ministers with Vice President Vance and Secretary Rubio might point toward an end of the Trump administration’s attempts to annex the semiautonomous arctic territory were swiftly disappointed. “Fundamental disagreement” remains, according to Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen.

That these talks would yield no hint of a resolution should not be surprising. Much of Trump’s stated rationale for seeking ownership of Greenland — the need for an increased U.S. military presence, the ability to access the island’s critical mineral deposits, or the alleged imperative to keep the Chinese and Russians at bay — is eminently negotiable and even achievable under the status quo. If these were the president’s real goals he likely could have reached an agreement with Denmark months ago. That this standoff persists is a testament to Trump’s true motive: ownership for its own sake.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.