Follow us on social

Diplomacy Watch: How is the West responding to Prigozhin’s abandoned revolt?

Diplomacy Watch: How is the West responding to Prigozhin’s abandoned revolt?

Some are urging Kyiv to take advantage of chaos in Russia to ramp up its counteroffensive

Europe

Yevgeny Prigozhin’s short-lived mutiny last weekend has, perhaps not surprisingly, overshadowed any other news concerning the Russia-Ukraine war in recent days. 

In public, Western officials have said very little about how they are interpreting what unfolded over the weekend. But privately, there have been wide-ranging discussions about how the revolt will affect the future of the war — and the conclusion is uncertain, according to a number of reports from this week. 

On one hand, some hope that domestic distractions and in-fighting in Moscow can boost Kyiv’s counteroffensive, which has so far struggled to gain ground. “As the United States and its European allies work to make sense of last weekend’s chaos in the Kremlin, they’re urging Kyiv to seize a ‘window’ of opportunity that could help its counteroffensive push through Russian positions,” reported Politico. “It’s best to hit an enemy while it’s down, and Kyiv would be hard-pressed to find a more wounded Russia, militarily and politically, than it is right now.”

In the U.S. Congress, these dynamics have increased hopes that it will be easier to pass the next aid package for Kyiv. Talks had reportedly stagnated in the aftermath of the debt ceiling deal and Republican opposition to sending more funds. “I would hope what [the mutiny] does is reinforce to members of Congress, particularly some of my Republican colleagues, who were talking about not continuing funding Ukraine, that this is why it is important to make sure that we are funding Ukraine to push forward,” Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.), the ranking member on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, told MSNBC on Monday. 

On the other hand, Western governments are worried about the potential consequences of chaos in Russia, including questions about what would happen to Moscow’s nuclear weapons if Vladimir Putin’s regime became unstable, according to the Financial Times.

“[The weekend’s events] made clear that we are not in agreement on the outcomes of what will happen if Ukraine wins this war and what that will do to Russia,” an anonymous western official told FT. Some G7 governments are urging Kyiv against decisions that could further escalate the war, including moves like  “launching attacks on Russian territory with the aim of increasing instability,” according to the report. 

The FT also suggested that congressional supporters of providing Ukraine with long-range missiles, including ATACMS, were concerned that the short-lived rebellion would make it more difficult to convince the White House to agree out of fear that such artillery could further destabilize Russia. But the Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday that Ukrainian officials believed they “had received positive signs in recent weeks that the U.S. had come around on the ATACMS system.”  

In other diplomatic news related to the war in Ukraine:

— An administration official confirmed to Politico that the Biden administration communicated with Putin’s government during the weekend to tell Moscow that U.S. officials viewed the mutiny as an internal issue. “Everything was done to ensure that Russia didn’t see an American hand in all this,” Ian Bremmer, the president of the Eurasia Group, who first wrote about the backchannel communication, told Politico. “From a U.S. perspective, that was actually quite useful, being able to communicate to Moscow that America’s policy is to defend Ukraine and help them get their land back but that it’s not regime change or destroying Russia.”

— Pope Francis sent a peace envoy, Cardinal Matteo Zuppi, to Moscow this week. "The main purpose of the initiative is to encourage humanitarian gestures, which can contribute to facilitating a solution to the current tragic situation and find ways to achieve a just peace," the Vatican said in a statement. The envoy reportedly met with Putin adviser and former Russian ambassador to Washington Yuri Ushakov, but not with Putin himself. Zuppi, who helped mediate an end to Mozambique’s civil war in 1992, also met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Kyiv early June. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said Moscow "highly appreciates the efforts and initiatives of the Vatican to find a peaceful solution to the Ukrainian crisis.”

— Jens Stoltenberg will serve as NATO’s chief for another year, according to Politico. “Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has played a major role in the decision with a number of capitals preferring to maintain the experienced politician, known for his careful rhetoric, during a politically sensitive time for the alliance,” report Lili Bayer and Alexander Ward.

U.S. State Department news:

In a press briefing on Wednesday, State Department spokesman Vedant Patel remained tight-lipped about Washington’s reaction to the Prigozhin’s mutiny. “We continue to monitor the situation and will continue to be in close coordination with our allies and partners. As we’ve said before, this is an internal Russian matter, and it’s too soon to know the impacts, both for the immediate region, but to your other question about potential impacts in other parts of the world. The one thing I will just make clear is that our support for Ukraine will continue,” he said. 


Europe
Trump ASEAN
Top photo credit: U.S. President Donald Trump looks at Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., next to Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim when posing for a family photo with leaders at the ASEAN Summit in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, October 26, 2025. Vincent Thian/Pool via REUTERS

‘America First’ meets ‘ASEAN Way’ in Kuala Lumpur

Asia-Pacific

The 2025 ASEAN and East Asia Summits in Kuala Lumpur beginning today are set to be consequential multilateral gatherings — defining not only ASEAN’s internal cohesion but also the shape of U.S.–China relations in the Indo-Pacific.

President Donald Trump’s participation will be the first by a U.S. president in an ASEAN-led summit since 2022. President Biden skipped the last two such summits in 2023 and 2024, sending then-Vice President Harris instead.

keep readingShow less
iran, china, russia
Top photo credit: Top image credit: Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov and and Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi shake hands as Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Ma Zhaoxu looks on during their meet with reporters after their meeting at Diaoyutai State Guest House on March 14, 2025 in Beijing, China. Lintao Zhang/Pool via REUTERS

'Annulled'! Russia won't abide snapback sanctions on Iran

Middle East

“A raider attack on the U.N. Security Council.” This was the explosive accusation leveled by Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov this week. His target was the U.N. Secretariat and Western powers, whom he blamed for what Russia sees as an illegitimate attempt to restore the nuclear-related international sanctions on Iran.

Beyond the fiery rhetoric, Ryabkov’s statement contained a message: Russia, he said, now considers all pre-2015 U.N. sanctions on Iran, snapped back by the European signatories of the 2015 nuclear deal (JCPOA) — the United Kingdom, France, Germany — “annulled.” Moscow will deepen its military-technical cooperation with Tehran accordingly, according to Ryabkov.

This is more than a diplomatic spat; it is the formal announcement of a split in international legal reality. The world’s major powers are now operating under two irreconcilable interpretations of international law. On one side, the United States, the United Kingdom, France, and Germany assert that the sanctions snapback mechanism of the JCPOA was legitimately triggered for Iran’s alleged violations. On the other, Iran, Russia, and China reject this as an illegitimate procedural act.

This schism was not inevitable, and its origin reveals a profound incongruence. The Western powers that most frequently appeal to the sanctity of the "rules-based international order" and international law have, in this instance, taken an action whose effects fundamentally undermine it. By pushing through a legal maneuver that a significant part of the Security Council considers illegitimate, they have ushered the world into a new and more dangerous state. The predictable, if imperfect, framework of universally recognized Security Council decisions is being replaced by a system where legal facts are determined by political interests espoused by competing power blocs.

This rupture followed a deliberate Western choice to reject compromises in a stand-off with Iran. While Iran was in a technical violation of the provisions of the JCPOA — by, notably, amassing a stockpile of highly enriched uranium (up to 60% as opposed to the 3.67% for a civilian use permissible under the JCPOA), there was a chance to avert the crisis. In the critical weeks leading to the snapback, Iran had signaled concessions in talks with the International Atomic Energy Agency in Cairo, in terms of renewing cooperation with the U.N. nuclear watchdog’s inspectors.

keep readingShow less
On Ukraine and Venezuela, Trump needs to dump the sycophants
Top Photo Credit: (Official White House Photo by Molly Riley)

On Ukraine and Venezuela, Trump needs to dump the sycophants

Europe

While diplomats labored to produce the Dayton Accords in 1995, then-Secretary of Defense Bill Perry advised, “No agreement is better than a bad agreement.” Given that Washington’s allies in London, Paris, Berlin and Warsaw are opposed to any outcome that might end the war in Ukraine, no agreement may be preferable. But for President Trump, there is no point in equating the illusion of peace in Ukraine with a meaningless ceasefire that settles nothing.

Today, Ukraine is mired in corruption, starting at the very highest levels of the administration in Kyiv. Sending $175 billion of borrowed money there "for however long it takes" has turned out to be worse than reckless. The U.S. national sovereign debt is surging to nearly $38 trillion and rising by $425 billion with each passing month. President Trump needs to turn his attention away from funding Joe Biden’s wars and instead focus on the faltering American economy.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.