Follow us on social

2022-07-15t161833z_263984144_rc2gcv9a9tiq_rtrmadp_3_usa-saudi

'Acceptable' versus 'unacceptable' foreign meddling in US affairs

It all seems to depend on whether the offending nation is an ally or adversary. China and Russia, watch out.

Analysis | Reporting | Washington Politics

Foreign meddling in the U.S. is all the rage. In just the past two weeks the Justice Department has issued multiple indictments and won a conviction related to the foreign influence campaigns of America’s adversaries. 

While these are deeply troubling allegations of meddling in America by, in these cases, Russian and Chinese agents, America's authoritarian "friends" — including Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the U.A.E. — have also been orchestrating illicit influence operations in the U.S. But, unlike Russia and China, they’ve faced little punishment for meddling in America.

On Wednesday, former Fugees rapper, Prakazrel “Pras” Michel, was convicted of orchestrating an elaborate influence operation on behalf of Malaysian financier Jho Low and attempting to extradite a Chinese government critic. 

On April 17, 40 Chinese officials were charged with running a transnational repression scheme targeting Chinese dissidents in the U.S. and two Chinese operatives were arrested for allegedly acting as agents of the Chinese government and running a secret police station in New York City — just one of more than a hundred secret police stations the Chinese government allegedly operates in foreign countries. The very next day, on April 18, Russia was in the Justice Department’s crosshairs when four U.S. citizens and three Russian intelligence officers were accused of conducting an illicit foreign influence operation in the United States since 2015 that sought to “divide Americans and interfere in elections in the United States.”

The allegations in these indictments are deeply troubling and, unfortunately, are just the latest installments in ongoing campaigns by the Russian and Chinese governments to interfere in U.S. politics and elections. While the illicit influence campaigns of America’s adversaries have, rightly, drawn the ire of Congress, America’s “friends” — including authoritarian governments in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the UAE — have repeatedly been caught engaging in similar acts yet, unlike America’s adversaries, they’re meddling in America with near impunity. In some cases, former members of Congress and high ranking members of the military are even working for them.

On Wednesday the Senate held a hearing on the revolving door from the Department of Defense to defense contractors and foreign governments. In anticipation of the hearing, Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass) and Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) released data on DoD’s granting of waivers for former high-ranking U.S. military personnel seeking work with foreign governments.

As Responsible Statecraft reported, more than half of all these waivers were for work with just one country — the United Arab Emirates. While the Pentagon was granting these high-ranking officials — which included eight former generals and Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis  — approval to work with the UAE, the Emiratis were hard at work repeatedly meddling in American politics and elections. 

In fact, UAE meddling in America has risen to the level of a national security challenge. Last fall, members of Congress were briefed on a report compiled by the National Intelligence Council that documented the UAE’s myriad efforts to meddle in U.S. politics and steer U.S. foreign policy in its favor. All while DoD was unflinchingly sending the UAE our top military minds and former members of Congress, like Ileane Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.), Lamar Smith (R-Tex), and Congressional staff were becoming lobbyists in the UAE’s massive legal influence operation

Not to be outdone by their friends in the UAE, the governments of Saudi Arabia and Egypt have also been meddling in America, and going to extraordinary lengths to suppress dissidents on U.S. soil. On April 17, the same day the mainstream media was laser focused on revelations of Chinese influence in America, the non-profit Freedom Initiative released a report documenting appalling Saudi and Egyptian transnational repression efforts in the U.S., “including threats of physical harm, surveilling activists and communities, hacking into phones of dissidents, and online harassment,” as well as dissidents' family members being taken hostage in Egypt and Saudi Arabia.

This follows repeated attempts by the Saudi government to interfere in U.S. elections, hiring agents at Twitter to spy on dissidents, and the Saudi embassy’s complicity in helping Saudi citizens accused of crimes in the U.S. — including murder, rape, and possession of child pornography — flee the country.

Like the UAE, Saudi Arabia has also been offering huge paychecks to former top defense officials and members of Congress willing to do the Kingdom’s bidding. Last week the Washington Post reported that retired General Keith Alexander, who also previously led the National Security Agency, received a $700,000 contract to advise Saudi Arabia on cybersecurity. 

DoD records released to Sens. Warren and Grassley, reveal that Alexander was just one of eleven former U.S. military generals that were approved to work for Saudi Arabia. Former members of Congress and their staff have also been a key part of Saudi Arabia’s legal influence operations. Most notably, former Sen. Norm Coleman (R-Minn.) has been a registered Saudi lobbyist since 2014 and is one of the top fundraisers in the Republican Party, as my colleague Eli Clifton chronicled in Responsible Statecraft.

All told, the tools different foreign governments use to meddle in America are similar, but the U.S. responses to them are not. While Chinese provocations have helped to push the U.S. towards a war-footing with China, UAE, Saudi, and Egyptian misdeeds have been rewarded with weapons of war. In fact, they’re some of the very top recipients of U.S. foreign military sales.

This unwillingness to hold America's supposed "friends" accountable for illegal meddling leaves the U.S. vulnerable to influence attacks from all authoritarian actors, whether friend or foe. To truly defend democracy in the U.S. we must punish any malign foreign actor that seeks to meddle in America.


Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman fist bumps U.S. President Joe Biden upon his arrival at Al Salman Palace, in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, July 15, 2022. Bandar Algaloud/Courtesy of Saudi Royal Court/Handout via REUTERS ATTENTION EDITORS - THIS PICTURE WAS PROVIDED BY A THIRD PARTY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY
Analysis | Reporting | Washington Politics
American Special Operations
Top image credit: (shutterstock/FabrikaSimf)

American cult: Why our special ops need a reset

Military Industrial Complex

This article is the latest installment in our Quincy Institute/Responsible Statecraft project series highlighting the writing and reporting of U.S. military veterans. Click here for more information.

America’s post-9/11 conflicts have left indelible imprints on our society and our military. In some cases, these changes were so gradual that few noticed the change, except as snapshots in time.

keep readingShow less
Recep Tayyip Erdogan Benjamin Netanyahu
Top photo credit: President of Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdogan (Shutterstock/ Mustafa Kirazli) and Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu (Salty View/Shutterstock)
Is Turkey's big break with Israel for real?

Why Israel is now turning its sights on Turkey

Middle East

As the distribution of power shifts in the region, with Iran losing relative power and Israel and Turkey emerging on top, an intensified rivalry between Tel Aviv and Ankara is not a question of if, but how. It is not a question of whether they choose the rivalry, but how they choose to react to it: through confrontation or peaceful management.

As I describe in Treacherous Alliance, a similar situation emerged after the end of the Cold War: The collapse of the Soviet Union dramatically changed the global distribution of power, and the defeat of Saddam's Iraq in the Persian Gulf War reshuffled the regional geopolitical deck. A nascent bipolar regional structure took shape with Iran and Israel emerging as the two main powers with no effective buffer between them (since Iraq had been defeated). The Israelis acted on this first, inverting the strategy that had guided them for the previous decades: The Doctrine of the Periphery. According to this doctrine, Israel would build alliances with the non-Arab states in its periphery (Iran, Turkey, and Ethiopia) to balance the Arab powers in its vicinity (Iraq, Syria, and Egypt, respectively).

keep readingShow less
Havana, Cuba
Top Image Credit: Havana, Cuba, 2019. (CLWphoto/Shutterstock)

Trump lifted sanctions on Syria. Now do Cuba.

North America

President Trump’s new National Security Presidential Memorandum (NSPM) on Cuba, announced on June 30, reaffirms the policy of sanctions and hostility he articulated at the start of his first term in office. In fact, the new NSPM is almost identical to the old one.

The policy’s stated purpose is to “improve human rights, encourage the rule of law, foster free markets and free enterprise, and promote democracy” by restricting financial flows to the Cuban government. It reaffirms Trump’s support for the 1996 Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act, which explicitly requires regime change — that Cuba become a multiparty democracy with a free market economy (among other conditions) before the U.S. embargo will be lifted.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.