Follow us on social

Shutterstock_732504547-scaled-e1648755059685

Dem, GOP lawmakers want to cut the DOD budget if it can’t pass an audit

The Defense Department is only federal agency to have never successfully passed financial health test and many in Congress now seek consequences.

Military Industrial Complex

Since the early 1990s, all federal agencies have been required to undergo regular, independent financial audits. The Pentagon is the only government agency to have never passed one, most recently failing for the fifth consecutive time in November 2022, when it accounted for just 39 percent of its $3.5 trillion in assets.

On Thursday, a bipartisan group of lawmakers — Reps. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.), Michael Burgess (R-Texas), Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), and Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.)— introduced a bill aiming to change that. The Audit the Pentagon Act would require any office of the Department of Defense that does not pass a clean audit to forfeit part of its budget. If passed, the legislation would administer a 0.5 percent cut to the budget in the first year without a successful audit, then increase to 1 percent in subsequent years.  

In the 2022 audit, only seven of the 27 investigated areas earned a clean bill of financial health.

"It's really not acceptable for just a collective shrug of the shoulders and say, ‘Well, we just couldn’t do it'," Burgess told Fox Business. "This is important. Other work they [the DoD] do is important. In no way does this diminish the importance of what is perhaps our most profound requirement of the Constitution, and that is to provide for the defense of our nation, but you also need to do so responsibly. And the Pentagon does need to be able to account for the money it's getting and how it's being spent." 

Despite its repeated inability to pass an audit, the Pentagon budget has continued to grow substantially. The DOD’s request for Fiscal Year 2024 came in at $842 billion. As Quincy Institute research fellow William Hartung noted when the request was released in March, Congress will likely add a substantial amount to the Pentagon’s request. “That’s no way to craft a budget — or defend a country,” Hartung wrote. “When it comes to defense, Congress should engage in careful oversight, not special interest politics.” 

Lee and Pocan have led on a number of issues related to Pentagon budgets. Earlier this year, they reintroduced the People over Pentagon Act, which would have cut the budget by $100 billion, representing the largest single-year DoD budget cut. 

“We cannot justify continuing to increase the Pentagon budget when the agency cannot even successfully pass an audit,” said Pocan in a press release. “This bill will provide a powerful incentive to Pentagon leaders to get their fiscal house in order. DoD has a history of little accountability while pouring billions into weapons systems that just don’t work properly. It's past time to rein in spending on ineffective programs and restore fiscal discipline to the Pentagon.”


Image: Artem Avetisyan via shutterstock.com
Military Industrial Complex
Elbridge Colby
Top image credit: Elbridge Colby is seen at Senate Committee on Armed Services Hearings to examine his nomination to be Under Secretary of Defense for Policy in the Dirksen Senate office building in Washington, DC, on Tuesday, March 4, 2025. (Photo by Mattie Neretin/Sipa USA).

Elbridge Colby: I won't be 'cavalier' with U.S. forces

QiOSK

In his senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday, Elbridge Colby, nominee for Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, stood out as one of the few people auditioning for a Pentagon job who say they may want to deploy fewer U.S. troops across the globe, not more.

“If we’re going to put American forces into action, we’re gonna have a clear goal. It’s going to have a clear exit strategy when plausible,” he told the Senate Armed Services Committee.

keep readingShow less
Trump Zelensky
Top image credit: Joshua Sukoff / Shutterstock.com

Ukraine aid freeze: Trump's diplomatic tightrope path to peace

Europe

Transatlanticism’s sternest critics all too often fail to reckon with the paradox that this ideology has commanded fervent devotion since the mid-20th century not because it correctly reflects the substance of U.S.-European relations or U.S. grand strategy but precisely because it exists in a permanent state of unreality.

We were told that America’s alliances have “never been stronger” even as the Ukraine war stretched them to a breaking point. Meanwhile, Europeans gladly, if not jubilantly, accepted the fact that Europe has been rendered poorer and less safe than at any time since the end of WWII as the price of “stopping Putin,” telling themselves and their American counterparts that Russia’s military or economic collapse is just around the corner if only we keep the war going for one more year, month, week, or day.

keep readingShow less
Nigerian soldier Boko Haram
Top Image Credit: A Nigerien soldier walks out of a house that residents say a Boko Haram militant had forcefully seized and occupied in Damasak March 24, 2015 (Reuters/Joe Penny)

Nigeria’s war on Boko Haram has more than a USAID problem

Africa

Insinuations by a U.S. member of Congress that American taxpayers’ money may have been used to fund terrorist groups around the world, including Boko Haram, have prompted Nigeria’s federal lawmakers to order a probe into the activities of USAID in the country’s North East.

Despite assurances by the U.S. Ambassador to Nigeria, Richard Mills, who said in a statement that “there was no evidence that the United States Agency for International Development, USAID, was funding Boko Haram or any terrorist group in Nigeria,” Nigeria’s lawmakers appear intent on investigating.

keep readingShow less

Trump transition

Latest

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.