Follow us on social

Diplomacy Watch: Laying the groundwork for a peace deal in Ukraine

Diplomacy Watch: Laying the groundwork for a peace deal in Ukraine

Kyiv and Moscow still seem determined to fight, but that shouldn’t stop the West from planning for a way to end the war.

Europe

As the war in Ukraine drags on, neither side has made any indication that they are ready to find a diplomatic solution to this conflict. But this does not mean that the United States — and other countries that may play a part in facilitating a future agreement — should not already be laying the groundwork for eventual negotiations, argues former U.S. diplomat Tom Pickering in a recent essay published in Foreign Affairs.

Pickering lays out in detail the necessary steps that would put Washington, Moscow, and Kyiv in the best position to find an acceptable solution. “All parties to the conflict have made clear that they believe it is too soon for diplomacy,” writes Pickering, who served for more than four decades as diplomat, including as Ambassador to Russia in the mid-1990s. “But at some point, the time will come for negotiations, and it is essential that the United States plans carefully for that day.”

“Failure to do so will condemn Washington to a hurried and poorly thought-through approach to ending the war — a mistake the United States has made in every serious conflict it has become embroiled in since 1945. No war ends without political consequences. Either the United States engages to shape those consequences to serve its interests, or others will shape the consequences in its stead.” 

Pickering defines three important phases to any diplomatic solution: prior preparations, in which the various sides resolve internal differences and begin to open communication with the other parties; pre-negotiations, in which the sides agree to, among other things, where the negotiations will take place and who will participate; and finally the diplomatic talk themselves. 

“Like battle plans, peace plans may not survive first contact with the enemy, but the groundwork laid in advance of negotiations will still inform decision-making and improve the odds of a favorable outcome,” he writes.  

Each of these stages will require confronting difficult questions. At this stage, from Washington’s point of view, beginning the process of prior preparations is most important.

“It is not yet clear when progress toward the next phase of peacemaking—pre-negotiations—will be possible. World leaders have intensified their calls for peace, and Washington and other third parties have begun informal and confidential contacts with the other parties to gauge their attitudes about diplomacy. But the road to pre-negotiations is sometimes circuitous. Efforts to get internal houses in order are extremely useful for preparing strategies, but they are also challenging, unpredictable, and constantly subject to change,” Pickering writes. 

Throughout the rest of the piece, Pickering suggests possible answers for many of the other central issues, while acknowledging that none will be straightforward to resolve. 

“Russia and Ukraine are not yet ready for direct talks. But with care and confidentiality, the leaders of the United States and other important third parties should accelerate their prior preparations and begin pre-negotiations,” he concludes. “Otherwise, Russia and Ukraine could fall into a vicious cycle of self-deception, denial of diplomacy, and endless war.” 

In other diplomatic news related to the war in Ukraine:

— Chinese President Xi Jinping plans to call Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky next week for the first time since the Russian invasion, according to the Wall Street Journal. The move, which comes just three weeks after China released a “position paper” on how to end the conflict, highlights Xi’s interest in acting as a mediator between the warring parties. Xi is also expected to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow.

— Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan hinted Wednesday that he may sign off on Finland’s bid to join NATO, according to AP News. Finland has previously insisted that it would only enter the alliance along with Sweden, but Erdogan has shown no signs of budging in his opposition to Stockholm’s NATO bid.

— An American drone crashed over the Black Sea Tuesday following a collision with a Russian fighter jet, according to Al Jazeera. A Pentagon video of the incident shows Russian planes flying near the drone in an apparent effort to knock it off course. The clip cuts out around the moment of the collision before showing that one of the drone's propellor blades had been damaged. Top military officials from each country have spoken over the phone in recent days in an effort to reduce tensions.

— Secretary of State Antony Blinken visited Ethiopia and Niger this week as part of the Biden administration’s efforts to counter Russian and Chinese influence in Africa, according to the Wall Street Journal. Vice President Kamala Harris has a trip of her own planned for later this month, with stops scheduled in Ghana, Tanzania, and Zambia. 

U.S. State Department news:

In a Tuesday press conference, State Department spokesperson Ned Price lashed out at alleged Russian disinformation campaigns, including Moscow’s claim that Kyiv maintained a secret, U.S.-led biological weapons program prior to the war. “Russia has a history of accusing others of doing what it is itself doing, and its recent biological weapons claims related to Ukraine are no different,” Price said. “The United States assesses that Russia continues to maintain an offensive biological weapons program in violation of its obligations under the Biological Weapons Convention.”


Europe
Hezbollah
Top photo credit: Flags of Hezbollah in Southern Lebanon (Shutterstock/crop media)
Flags of Hezbollah in Southern Lebanon (Shutterstock/crop media)

Hezbollah to US: It's not in your interest to support Israeli attacks

Middle East

The Secretary-General of the Lebanese Hezbollah movement, Sheikh Naim Qassem, recently asserted that continued instability in Lebanon does not serve U.S. interests.

Qassem made the remarks following an Israeli airstrike on Beirut’s southern suburbs which Israel claimed had targeted a Hezbollah weapons depot.

keep readingShow less
ukraine military
UKRAINE MARCH 22, 2023: Ukrainian military practice assault tactics at the training ground before counteroffensive operation during Russo-Ukrainian War (Shutterstock/Dymtro Larin)
Ukraine War at 3: The victory we demanded and the attrition we got

Ukraine’s battlefield position is deteriorating fast

Europe

The election of U.S. President Donald Trump changed U.S. policy toward Ukraine from “as long as it takes” to seeking a negotiated peace settlement. These negotiations will be driven by the battlefield reality. The side holding the biggest advantage gets to dictate the terms. This gets more complicated if there is no ceasefire during the negotiations and the battlefield remains dynamic. Belligerents may conduct offensive operations while negotiations are progressing to improve their bargaining position. Historically in many conflicts, peace negotiations lasted years, even as the war raged on, such as during the Korean and Vietnam wars. Thus, the balance of power, measured in resources, losses and quality of strategic leadership are critical to the outcome of negotiations.

For Western powers, this carries serious consequences. They have staked their reputation on this conflict and with it, the fate of the rules-based world order. The Global South and the multipolar world order is waiting in the wings to take over. Failure to achieve victory has the potential to fatally undermine that order and remove the West from global leadership, which it has enjoyed for the last several centuries.

keep readingShow less
Russia Navy United Kingdom Putin Starmer
Top Photo: Russian small missile ships Sovetsk and Grad sail along the Neva river during a rehearsal for the Navy Day parade, in Saint Petersburg, Russia July 21, 2024. REUTERS/Anton Vaganov

How Russia’s naval rearmament has gone unnoticed

Europe

Today, there are only three global naval powers: the United States, China, and Russia. The British Royal Navy is, sadly, reduced to a small regional naval power, able occasionally to deploy further afield. If Donald Trump wants European states to look after their own collective security, Britain might be better off keeping its handful of ships in the Atlantic.

European politicians and journalists talk constantly about the huge challenge in countering an apparently imminent Russian invasion, should the U.S. back away from NATO under President Trump. With Russia’s Black Sea fleet largely confined to the eastern Black Sea during the war, although still able to inflict severe damage on Ukraine, few people talk about the real Russian naval capacity to challenge Western dominance. Or, indeed, how this will increasingly come up against U.S. naval interests in the Pacific and, potentially, in the Arctic.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.