Follow us on social

google cta
2023-01-30t171455z_269846990_rc2do98pzutz_rtrmadp_3_israel-usa-blinken-netanyahu-scaled

A game of Snakes & Ladders: Blinken takes US back to square one in Israel

Several complex strategies are in play and the Secretary of State knows this — much to the disadvantage of the 'pawns' on the ground.

Analysis | Middle East
google cta
google cta

Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Israel on a formal visit Sunday amidst spiking bloodshed between Palestinians and Israelis. Yet the main topic driving the visit was not local Israeli politics but the Iran threat. 

Although Blinken was the highest profile U.S. official in Jerusalem, his arrival came hard on the heels of two other significant American visits last week: national security adviser Jake Sullivan, the first senior administration official to visit since Prime Minister Netanyahu took office, and CIA Director Bill Burns, who arrived 24-hours after Sullivan. Why so many heavy-hitters in Jerusalem at the same time?

Meanwhile, Blinken touched down just hours after an explosion at an Iranian defense complex in Isfahan which U.S. officials said Israel had engineered. Simultaneously, a fire erupted in an oil production unit in Iran’s eastern province of Azerbaijan, though the Iranian government denied it was due to foreign attack.  

Not to be left out of the game, Mykhailo Polodyak, adviser to Ukrainian President Volodymir Zelenski, tweeted Sunday morning: “Explosive night in Iran — [Ukraine] did warn you,” prompting the Iranian Foreign Affairs Ministry to summon the Ukrainian charge d'affaires to clarify that Ukraine was not behind the attack. 

Several complex strategies are in play connecting different foreign policy goals on a single game board. There are many players in each strategy, with the United States, Israel, and Russia the biggest pieces, and the rest are pawns. 

Game 1: The Abraham Accords

The first strategy involves Israel, Iran, the Palestinians, the United States, and Saudi Arabia. Blinken’s state visit to see Netanyahu was a key photo op to show the Biden administration’s support for Israel, and comes days after both had engaged in one of the largest military exercises ever, Operation Juniper Oak, in preparation for a possible future attack on Iran. Washington and Jerusalem are in full agreement that Iran is a threat. But they don’t agree on steps to contain it. 

Washington is hoping that building up the Abraham Accords, a deal that has warmed relations between Israel and several Gulf States over the past four years, can be expanded to put more pressure on Iran. That means bringing Saudi Arabia into the Accords. But as long as Israel isn’t offering a peace agreement to the Palestinians, Saudi Arabia won’t budge. 

The rising violence between Palestinians and Israelis therefore couldn’t have come at a worse moment for Blinken’s visit. Smiling next to Netanyahu at their press conference, Blinken spoke of peace and a two-state solution; Netanyahu, also smiling, spoke of a “workable solution,” a difference in language those in Riyadh surely have noted, scuppering any chance Saudi Arabia will join the Accords and formalize its alliance with Israel. 

This means the U.S. plan for a grand Middle East pact against Iran has slipped down a snake and must wait — perhaps until Netanyahu visits Washington. Blinken just issued the invitation as part of his visit, hoping this will lead to a ladder. 

Game 2: The Ukraine Twist

The second strategy involves Israel, the United States, Russia, Iran, Ukraine, and Syria. The willingness, and the speed, of U.S. officials to pronounce the Isfahan explosion the work of Israel points to a possible agreement between Sullivan and Netanyahu on continuing the shadow war that Tehran and Jerusalem have been waging over the past few years. Having taken a break during the Lapid government, Netanyahu’s reprise of the premiership has sent it back up the ladder. 

So, where does Ukraine fit into this? One of Biden’s policy positions has been to pressure Israel into taking a stronger stand in support of Ukraine. But Israel has balked, and for a very good reason. It has a deal with Russia that is critical to its Iran containment game. When Israel attacks Iran’s installations in Syria, which it does regularly, the deal is, Moscow looks the other way. Israel has not wanted to alienate Russia, therefore, by openly supporting Ukraine in the war.

The question for Israel has been  how to get up the ladder in support of American aims without upsetting Russia? The answer: attack Iran’s arms manufacturing installations, so it can’t send drones to Russia (though it is not clear at this time whether drone manufacturing was targeted at all). 

Delighted, Polodyak's tweet revealed Ukraine knew the state of play. That sent Iran up a ladder, as it will manufacture more drones underground from now on, to avoid further Israeli attack. But, Israel’s up a ladder too, since it avoided Russian wrath while helping Ukraine.The concert of U.S. visits to Israel comes out a draw. The game board meanwhile is crowded with players, more like Risk, than Snakes and Ladders, but vividly shows how much the Middle East is now part of the Ukraine War.


L-R: U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu shake hands after their meeting at the Prime Minister's Office in Jerusalem, on Monday, January 30, 2023. DEBBIE HILL/Pool via REUTERS
google cta
Analysis | Middle East
Mbs-mbz-scaled
UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan receives Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman at the Presidential Airport in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates November 27, 2019. WAM/Handout via REUTERS

Is the US goading Arab states to join war against Iran?

QiOSK

On Sunday, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Mike Waltz told ABC News that Arab Gulf states may soon step up their involvement in the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran. “I expect that you'll see additional diplomatic and possibly military action from them in the coming days and weeks,” Waltz said.

Then, on Monday morning, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) slammed Saudi Arabia for staying out of the war even as “Americans are dying and the U.S. is spending billions” of dollars to conduct regime change in Iran. “If you are not willing to use your military now, when are you willing to use it?” Graham asked. “Hopefully this changes soon. If not, consequences will follow.”

keep readingShow less
Why Tehran may have time on its side
Top image credit: Iranian army military personnel stand at attention under a banner featuring an image of an Iranian-made unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) during a military parade commemorating the anniversary of Army Day outside the Shrine of Iran's late leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in the south of Tehran, Iran, on April 18, 2025. (Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto)

Why Tehran may have time on its side

QiOSK

A provocative calculus by Anusar Farrouqui (“policytensor”) has been circulating on X and in more exhaustive form on the author’s Substack. It purports to demonstrate a sobering reality: in a high-intensity U.S.-Iran conflict, the United States may be unable to suppress Iranian drone production quickly enough to prevent a strategically consequential period of regional devastation.

The argument is framed through a quantitative lens, carrying the seductive appeal of mathematical precision. It arranges variables—such as U.S. sortie rates and degradation efficiency against Iranian repair cycles and rebuild speeds—to suggest a "sustainable firing rate." The implication is that Iran could maintain a persistent strike capability long enough to exhaust American political patience, forcing Washington toward a premature declaration of success or an unfavorable ceasefire.

keep readingShow less
Ignorance about war powers plays right into Trump's hands
Top image credit: US House Speaker Mike Johnson arrives for press briefing at Columbia University in New York on April 24, 2024. (Shutterstock/lev radin)

Ignorance about war powers plays right into Trump's hands

Washington Politics

This week efforts under the War Powers Act to check President Trump’s unconstitutional and unauthorized war in Iran failed on a mostly party line split in both the House and the Senate. The result isn’t all that surprising. The naivety, however, on the role of Congress in matters of war is staggering. Congress is in desperate need of a civics refresher.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.), in response to reporter questions on the application of the War Powers Act’s provisions to the president’s actions in Iran, said, “I think the president has the authority that he needs to conduct the activities. … As you know, there’s a lot of controversy around, questions around the War Powers Act, but I think the president is acting in the best interests of the nation.”

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.