Follow us on social

google cta
2023-01-30t171455z_269846990_rc2do98pzutz_rtrmadp_3_israel-usa-blinken-netanyahu-scaled

A game of Snakes & Ladders: Blinken takes US back to square one in Israel

Several complex strategies are in play and the Secretary of State knows this — much to the disadvantage of the 'pawns' on the ground.

Analysis | Middle East
google cta
google cta

Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Israel on a formal visit Sunday amidst spiking bloodshed between Palestinians and Israelis. Yet the main topic driving the visit was not local Israeli politics but the Iran threat. 

Although Blinken was the highest profile U.S. official in Jerusalem, his arrival came hard on the heels of two other significant American visits last week: national security adviser Jake Sullivan, the first senior administration official to visit since Prime Minister Netanyahu took office, and CIA Director Bill Burns, who arrived 24-hours after Sullivan. Why so many heavy-hitters in Jerusalem at the same time?

Meanwhile, Blinken touched down just hours after an explosion at an Iranian defense complex in Isfahan which U.S. officials said Israel had engineered. Simultaneously, a fire erupted in an oil production unit in Iran’s eastern province of Azerbaijan, though the Iranian government denied it was due to foreign attack.  

Not to be left out of the game, Mykhailo Polodyak, adviser to Ukrainian President Volodymir Zelenski, tweeted Sunday morning: “Explosive night in Iran — [Ukraine] did warn you,” prompting the Iranian Foreign Affairs Ministry to summon the Ukrainian charge d'affaires to clarify that Ukraine was not behind the attack. 

Several complex strategies are in play connecting different foreign policy goals on a single game board. There are many players in each strategy, with the United States, Israel, and Russia the biggest pieces, and the rest are pawns. 

Game 1: The Abraham Accords

The first strategy involves Israel, Iran, the Palestinians, the United States, and Saudi Arabia. Blinken’s state visit to see Netanyahu was a key photo op to show the Biden administration’s support for Israel, and comes days after both had engaged in one of the largest military exercises ever, Operation Juniper Oak, in preparation for a possible future attack on Iran. Washington and Jerusalem are in full agreement that Iran is a threat. But they don’t agree on steps to contain it. 

Washington is hoping that building up the Abraham Accords, a deal that has warmed relations between Israel and several Gulf States over the past four years, can be expanded to put more pressure on Iran. That means bringing Saudi Arabia into the Accords. But as long as Israel isn’t offering a peace agreement to the Palestinians, Saudi Arabia won’t budge. 

The rising violence between Palestinians and Israelis therefore couldn’t have come at a worse moment for Blinken’s visit. Smiling next to Netanyahu at their press conference, Blinken spoke of peace and a two-state solution; Netanyahu, also smiling, spoke of a “workable solution,” a difference in language those in Riyadh surely have noted, scuppering any chance Saudi Arabia will join the Accords and formalize its alliance with Israel. 

This means the U.S. plan for a grand Middle East pact against Iran has slipped down a snake and must wait — perhaps until Netanyahu visits Washington. Blinken just issued the invitation as part of his visit, hoping this will lead to a ladder. 

Game 2: The Ukraine Twist

The second strategy involves Israel, the United States, Russia, Iran, Ukraine, and Syria. The willingness, and the speed, of U.S. officials to pronounce the Isfahan explosion the work of Israel points to a possible agreement between Sullivan and Netanyahu on continuing the shadow war that Tehran and Jerusalem have been waging over the past few years. Having taken a break during the Lapid government, Netanyahu’s reprise of the premiership has sent it back up the ladder. 

So, where does Ukraine fit into this? One of Biden’s policy positions has been to pressure Israel into taking a stronger stand in support of Ukraine. But Israel has balked, and for a very good reason. It has a deal with Russia that is critical to its Iran containment game. When Israel attacks Iran’s installations in Syria, which it does regularly, the deal is, Moscow looks the other way. Israel has not wanted to alienate Russia, therefore, by openly supporting Ukraine in the war.

The question for Israel has been  how to get up the ladder in support of American aims without upsetting Russia? The answer: attack Iran’s arms manufacturing installations, so it can’t send drones to Russia (though it is not clear at this time whether drone manufacturing was targeted at all). 

Delighted, Polodyak's tweet revealed Ukraine knew the state of play. That sent Iran up a ladder, as it will manufacture more drones underground from now on, to avoid further Israeli attack. But, Israel’s up a ladder too, since it avoided Russian wrath while helping Ukraine.The concert of U.S. visits to Israel comes out a draw. The game board meanwhile is crowded with players, more like Risk, than Snakes and Ladders, but vividly shows how much the Middle East is now part of the Ukraine War.


L-R: U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu shake hands after their meeting at the Prime Minister's Office in Jerusalem, on Monday, January 30, 2023. DEBBIE HILL/Pool via REUTERS
google cta
Analysis | Middle East
Meet Trump’s man in Greenland
Top image credit: American investor Thomas Emanuel Dans poses in Nuuk's old harbor, Greenland, February 6, 2025. (REUTERS/Sarah Meyssonnier)

Meet Trump’s man in Greenland

Washington Politics

In March of last year, when public outrage prevented Second Lady Usha Vance from attending a dogsled race in Greenland, Thomas Dans took it personally.

“As a sponsor and supporter of this event I encouraged and invited the Second Lady and other senior Administration officials to attend this monumental race,” Dans wrote on X at the time, above a photo of him posing with sled dogs and an American flag. He expressed disappointment at “the negative and hostile reaction — fanned by often false press reports — to the United States supporting Greenland.”

keep readingShow less
Trump
Top image credit: President Donald Trump delivers remarks at a press conference at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida, following Operation Absolute Resolve in Venezuela leading to the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, Saturday, January 3, 2026. (Official White House Photo by Molly Riley)

The new Trump Doctrine: Strategic domination and denial

Global Crises

The new year started with a flurry of strategic signals, as on January 3 the Trump administration launched the opening salvos of what appears to be a decisive new campaign to reclaim its influence in Latin America, demarcate its areas of political interests, and create new spheres of military and economic denial vis-à-vis China and Russia.

In its relatively more assertive approach to global competition, the United States has thus far put less premium on demarcating elements of ideological influence and more on what might be perceived as calculated spheres of strategic disruption and denial.

keep readingShow less
NPT
Top image credit: Milos Ruzicka via shutterstock.com

We are sleepwalking into nuclear catastrophe

Global Crises

In May of his first year as president, John F. Kennedy met with Israeli President David Ben-Gurion to discuss Israel’s nuclear program and the new nuclear power plant at Dimona.

Writing about the so-called “nuclear summit” in “A State at Any Cost: The Life of David Ben-Gurion,” Israeli historian Tom Segev states that during this meeting, “Ben-Gurion did not get much from the president, who left no doubt that he would not permit Israel to develop nuclear weapons.”

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.