Follow us on social

google cta
010-himars-in-jordan-dvids

US weapons makers report ‘all-time record orders’ since Russian invasion

As the war in Ukraine rages on, defense contractors are seeing major new demand for their wares.

Reporting | Military Industrial Complex
google cta
google cta

Several of America’s largest defense companies reported record jumps in new contracts this week as the war in Ukraine continues to stoke a massive increase in demand for weapons.

Lockheed Martin CEO Jim Taiclet told investors in a Wednesday earnings call that his company’s backlog of weapons contracts grew to $150 billion from $135 billion in 2021, a jump that was “driven by all-time record orders.” Lockheed produces multiple weapons that have been in high demand since Russia’s brutal invasion, including Javelin missiles and High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS).

General Dynamics, which makes Abrams tanks and Stryker armored vehicles, announced that its backlog of contracts reached an “all-time high” of $91.1 billion, a four percent increase from 2021. Raytheon Technologies’ missile and defense sector earned a “record backlog” of $34 billion in 2022, and Raytheon’s total defense backlog hit $70 billion in the fourth quarter, a 10 percent jump from last year.

“Our products and technologies have been instrumental in helping the people of Ukraine defend itself,” argued Raytheon CEO Greg Hayes in a Tuesday earnings call. Chris Calio — Raytheon’s chief operating officer — noted later in the call that “our backlog is expected to continue to grow, given the heightened and increasingly complex threat environment.”

The boost in new contracts comes in part from orders to refill the stockpiles of the United States and its NATO allies, which have contributed tens of billions of dollars worth of weapons to Ukraine since last year. Hayes said Wednesday that only $6 billion of replenishment contracts have been doled out so far, a number that will likely grow next year given that Congress has allocated over $30 billion for efforts to arm Ukraine and rebuild U.S. stockpiles.

And, as the Washington Post editorial board recently noted, the Pentagon’s latest budget will “do far more than replenish U.S. stockpiles.”

“It lays the foundation for a vastly revitalized defense industrial base — and does so with one eye on the People’s Republic of China,” the Post wrote.

Notably, the three companies, which largely rely on taxpayer-funded government contracts, also boasted large stock dividends and buybacks in 2022. In total, the contractors gave $19.6 billion to shareholders, with Lockheed alone spending $11 billion, as Eli Clifton reported Wednesday in RS.


The M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS), much like the ones being sent to Ukraine. (US Army photo)
google cta
Reporting | Military Industrial Complex
Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?
Top image credit: President Donald J. Trump holds a joint news conference at the White House with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Feb. 4, 2025. (Shutterstock/ Joshua Sukoff)

Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?

QiOSK

In the months that led up to the Iraq War, the Bush administration went to extraordinary lengths to convince the world of the need to oust Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. Leading officials laid out their case in public, sharing what they claimed was evidence that Iraq was moving rapidly toward the deployment of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. When U.S. tanks rolled across the border, everyone knew the justification: the U.S. was determined to thwart Iraq’s development of weapons of mass destruction, however fictitious that threat would later prove to be.

In the months that led up to the Iran War, the Trump administration took a different tack. President Trump spoke only occasionally of Iran, offering a smattering of justifications for growing U.S. tensions with the country. He claimed without evidence that Iran was rebuilding its nuclear program after the U.S.-Israeli attack last June and even developing missiles that could strike the United States. But he insisted that Tehran could make a deal with seven magic words: “we will never have a nuclear weapon.”

keep readingShow less
Starmer Macron Merz
Top image credit: France's President Emmanuel Macron, Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz arrive at Kyiv railway station on May 10, 2025, ahead of a gathering of European leaders in the Ukrainian capital. LUDOVIC MARIN/Pool via REUTERS
Europe's snapback gamble risks killing diplomacy with Iran

Craven Europeans give US and Israel a blank check for illegal war

Middle East

In the aftermath of the new U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran, the transatlantic alliance has offered a response that confirmed what many both in the West and outside knew all along: that for London, Paris, Berlin, and Brussels, the "rules-based international order" has been reduced to a simple, brutal premise: might makes right, provided the might is Western.

The joint statement from the E3 — France, Germany, and the United Kingdom — is a master class in evasion. "We did not participate in these strikes, but are in close contact with our international partners, including the United States and Israel," they declared. The text also lists all the references and rationalizations used by Iran hawks — “nuclear program, ballistic missile program, regional destabilization and repression against its own people.”

keep readingShow less
Trump Iran
Top image credit: Hundreds of people attend a pro-democracy demonstration against U.S. President Donald Trump in Washington, D.C., U.S., on February 28, 2026. Demonstrators cited a number of reasons for their opposition to Trump, including his involvement with sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, ICE raids, authoritarian policies, and today’s bombing of Iran. (Photo by Allison Bailey/NurPhoto) via REUTERS CONNECT

How does this war with Iran end? Or does it?

QiOSK

Now that President Trump has launched an illegal, unprovoked war of choice on Iran, the next question inevitably becomes: how does this end? Or, what are some off ramps Trump can take to end it before the situation turns out of control?

There are three broad scenarios; the first and most likely is that Trump continues this until he gets some sort of regime implosion and then declares victory, while also washing his hands of whatever follows.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.