Follow us on social

010-himars-in-jordan-dvids

US weapons makers report ‘all-time record orders’ since Russian invasion

As the war in Ukraine rages on, defense contractors are seeing major new demand for their wares.

Reporting | Military Industrial Complex

Several of America’s largest defense companies reported record jumps in new contracts this week as the war in Ukraine continues to stoke a massive increase in demand for weapons.

Lockheed Martin CEO Jim Taiclet told investors in a Wednesday earnings call that his company’s backlog of weapons contracts grew to $150 billion from $135 billion in 2021, a jump that was “driven by all-time record orders.” Lockheed produces multiple weapons that have been in high demand since Russia’s brutal invasion, including Javelin missiles and High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS).

General Dynamics, which makes Abrams tanks and Stryker armored vehicles, announced that its backlog of contracts reached an “all-time high” of $91.1 billion, a four percent increase from 2021. Raytheon Technologies’ missile and defense sector earned a “record backlog” of $34 billion in 2022, and Raytheon’s total defense backlog hit $70 billion in the fourth quarter, a 10 percent jump from last year.

“Our products and technologies have been instrumental in helping the people of Ukraine defend itself,” argued Raytheon CEO Greg Hayes in a Tuesday earnings call. Chris Calio — Raytheon’s chief operating officer — noted later in the call that “our backlog is expected to continue to grow, given the heightened and increasingly complex threat environment.”

The boost in new contracts comes in part from orders to refill the stockpiles of the United States and its NATO allies, which have contributed tens of billions of dollars worth of weapons to Ukraine since last year. Hayes said Wednesday that only $6 billion of replenishment contracts have been doled out so far, a number that will likely grow next year given that Congress has allocated over $30 billion for efforts to arm Ukraine and rebuild U.S. stockpiles.

And, as the Washington Post editorial board recently noted, the Pentagon’s latest budget will “do far more than replenish U.S. stockpiles.”

“It lays the foundation for a vastly revitalized defense industrial base — and does so with one eye on the People’s Republic of China,” the Post wrote.

Notably, the three companies, which largely rely on taxpayer-funded government contracts, also boasted large stock dividends and buybacks in 2022. In total, the contractors gave $19.6 billion to shareholders, with Lockheed alone spending $11 billion, as Eli Clifton reported Wednesday in RS.


The M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS), much like the ones being sent to Ukraine. (US Army photo)
Reporting | Military Industrial Complex
iraqi protests iran israel
Top photo credit: Iraqi Shi'ite Muslims hold a cutout of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as they attend a protest against Israeli strikes on Iran, in Baghdad, Iraq, June 16, 2025. REUTERS/Ahmed Saad

Iraq on razor's edge between Iran and US interests in new war

Middle East

As Israeli jets and Iranian rockets streak across the Middle Eastern skies, Iraq finds itself caught squarely in the crossfire.

With regional titans clashing above its head, Iraq’s fragile and hard-won stability, painstakingly rebuilt over decades of conflict, now hangs precariously in the balance. Washington’s own tacit acknowledgement of Iraq’s vulnerable position was laid bare by its decision to partially evacuate embassy personnel in Iraq and allow military dependents to leave the region.

This withdrawal, prompted by intelligence indicating Israeli preparations for long-range strikes, highlighted that Iraq’s airspace would be an unwitting corridor for Israeli and Iranian operations.

Prime Minister Mohammed Shia’ al-Sudani is now caught in a complicated bind, attempting to uphold Iraq’s security partnership with the United States while simultaneously facing intense domestic pressure from powerful, Iran-aligned Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) factions. These groups, emboldened by the Israel-Iran clash, have intensified their calls for American troop withdrawal and threaten renewed attacks against U.S. personnel, viewing them as legitimate targets and enablers of Israeli aggression.

keep readingShow less
George Bush mission accomplished
This file photo shows Bush delivering a speech to crew aboard the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln, as the carrier steamed toward San Diego, California on May 1, 2003. via REUTERS

Déjà coup: Iran war activates regime change dead-enders

Washington Politics

By now you’ve likely seen the viral video of an Iranian television reporter fleeing off-screen as Israel bombed the TV station where she was recording live. As the Quincy Institute’s Adam Weinstein quickly pointed out, Israel's attack on the broadcasting facility is directly out of the regime change playbook, “meant to shake public confidence in the Iranian government's ability to protect itself” and by implication, Iran’s citizenry.

Indeed, in the United States there is a steady drumbeat of media figures and legislators who have been loudly championing Israel’s apparent desire to overthrow the regime of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

keep readingShow less
Ukraine NATO
Top photo credit: August 2024 -- Led by the United Kingdom and involving trainers from 12 other countries, Operation Interflex gives Ukrainian recruits a five-week crash course in everything from infantry tactics to combat first aid, preparing them to defend their homeland. . (NATO/Flickr)

How NATO military doctrine failed Ukraine on the battlefield

Europe

The war in Ukraine has raged for over three years. As ceasefire talks loom, major European NATO members including Germany, UK, France and Denmark are planning to protect any future armistice by sending their troops as peacekeepers in a “Coalition of the Willing.”

Their goal is to deter the Russians from restarting the war. Unfortunately, deterrence comes from combat capability. Without it there is no deterrence at all. That capability is in question. NATO equipment and doctrine was developed for the Cold War and tested in the mountains of Afghanistan. It has not been tested in conventional war and needs to absorb lessons from the Ukraine war to offer a military option to the European elites, independent of the United States.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.