Follow us on social

Incredibly shrinking defense industry is a boon for the fat cats

Incredibly shrinking defense industry is a boon for the fat cats

L3Harris’ plan to acquire Aerojet Rocketdyne means more market consolidation, less competition.

Analysis | Military Industrial Complex

Defense contractor L3Harris announced Sunday that it plans to acquire Aerojet Rocketdyne for $4.7 billion in a move that would cement the firm as one of America’s leading arms makers.

It’s unclear if the deal will go through, especially given that the Federal Trade Commission recently torpedoed Lockheed Martin’s attempt to purchase Aerojet Rocketdyne on antitrust grounds. Due to potential national security concerns, the Pentagon will also have a chance to block the move.

But, assuming it does clear these bureaucratic obstacles, the deal will represent a significant step in the decades-long consolidation of the defense industry — a trend that risks driving up the military budget while slowing innovation, experts say.

As the Pentagon recently noted, the number of defense prime contractors has plummeted from 51 to five since the 1990s. And nearly 20,000 small businesses have been pushed out of the defense market in the last decade alone, according to the Government Accountability Office.

With fewer companies competing for contracts, observers worry that defense firms will engage in price gouging, leaving taxpayers to foot the bill. (Some companies, like Boeing and Transdigm Group, have already been caught overcharging for parts.) Rapid consolidation can also discourage companies from investing in the types of innovative technologies that the United States will need to defend itself from future threats, according to military analyst Mark Thompson of the Project on Government Oversight.

“Innovation requires the levers of competition to work,” Thompson wrote in 2019 following Raytheon’s merger with the defense division of United Technologies Corp. “Competition drives the perpetual quest to get more bang for the buck by harnessing new technologies.”

In some ways, the Aerojet deal is a perfect illustration of the ever-shrinking defense industry. L3Harris has ridden a wave of mergers and acquisitions to become the sixth largest weapons contractor in the United States and the 13th in the world, according to a recent report from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

This process began back in 1997, when a group of defense industry veterans teamed up with Lehman Brothers to found L-3 Communications. Their first move was to acquire a few divisions of Lockheed Martin, which had only recently formed as the result of a merger between Lockheed Corporation and Martin Marietta. 

L-3 Communications then went on something of a shopping spree, buying as many as 30 companies between 1997 and 2017. Given this ever-expanding portfolio of businesses, the firm’s leadership decided in 2016 to change its name to L3 Technologies.

But all of this was the prologue for L3’s most ambitious decision: its 2018 merger with Harris Corporation, a leading surveillance and electronic warfare company. Following that deal, newly-minted L3Harris quickly rose to its current spot as one of the biggest defense contractors in the world.

Meanwhile, Aerojet and Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne, both of which made rocket propulsion systems, came together in 2013 to create Aerojet Rocketdyne. The company is now one of only two U.S.-based firms that produce rocket motors at large scales, leaving little competition for a crucial component in many weapons. (Northrop Grumman, the world’s fourth largest weapons maker, bought the other leading rocket propulsion company in 2017.)

Notably, the Aerojet acquisition is not the only big move that L3Harris has trumpeted in recent months. In October, the company announced that it planned to purchase Viasat’s military communications unit for a cool $2 billion in a deal that is set to close next year.

In an interview with the Wall Street Journal, L3Harris CEO Chris Kubasik described the recent moves as an attempt to shake up the defense industry. “We want to be the disrupter,” Kubasik said.

For all this talk of disruption, L3Harris has grown thanks to the same playbook as its peers: namely, buying up companies until the government feels the need to yell “Stop!” Now, it’s up to regulators to decide whether that moment has come.

Thanks to our readers and supporters, Responsible Statecraft has had a tremendous year. A complete website overhaul made possible in part by generous contributions to RS, along with amazing writing by staff and outside contributors, has helped to increase our monthly page views by 133%! In continuing to provide independent and sharp analysis on the major conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, as well as the tumult of Washington politics, RS has become a go-to for readers looking for alternatives and change in the foreign policy conversation. 

 

We hope you will consider a tax-exempt donation to RS for your end-of-the-year giving, as we plan for new ways to expand our coverage and reach in 2025. Please enjoy your holidays, and here is to a dynamic year ahead!

“The Bosses of the Senate,” by Joseph Keppler. Originally published in Puck on Jan. 23, 1889.|“The Bosses of the Senate,” by Joseph Keppler. Originally published in Puck on Jan. 23, 1889.
Analysis | Military Industrial Complex
F35
Top image credit: Brian G. Rhodes / Shutterstock.com

The low hanging DOGE fruit at the Pentagon for Elon and Vivek

Military Industrial Complex

Any effort to suggest what Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy’s Department of Government Efficiency should put forward for cuts must begin with a rather large caveat: should a major government contractor with billions riding on government spending priorities be in charge of setting the tone for the debate on federal budget priorities?

Musk’s SpaceX earns substantial sums from launching U.S. government military satellites, and his company stands to make billions producing military versions of his Starlink communications system. He is a sworn opponent of government regulation, and is likely, among other things, to recommend reductions of government oversight of emerging military technologies.

keep readingShow less
war profit
Top image credit: Andrew Angelov via shutterstock.com

War drives revenue increases for world's top arms dealers

QiOSK

Revenues at the world’s top 100 global arms and military services producing companies totaled $632 billion in 2023, a 4.2% increase over the prior year, according to new data released by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).

The largest increases were tied to ongoing conflicts, including a 40% increase in revenues for Russian companies involved in supplying Moscow’s war on Ukraine and record sales for Israeli firms producing weapons used in that nation’s brutal war on Gaza. Revenues for Turkey’s top arms producing companies also rose sharply — by 24% — on the strength of increased domestic defense spending plus exports tied to the war in Ukraine.

keep readingShow less
Tibilisi Georgia protests
Top photo credit: 11/28/24. An anti-government protester holds the European flag in front of a makeshift barricade on fire during the demonstration in Tibilisi, Georgia. Following a controversial election last month, ruling party "Georgian Dream" Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze announced earlier today that they will no longer pursue a European future until the end of 2028. (Jay Kogler / SOPA Images via Reuters Connect)

Streets on fire: Is Georgia opposition forming up a coup?

Europe

Events have taken an astonishing turn in the Republic of Georgia. On Thursday, newly re-appointed Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidzeannounced that Georgia would not “put the issue of opening negotiations with the European Union on the agenda until the end of 2028,” and not accept budget support from the EU until then, either.

In the three-decade history of EU enlargement into Eastern Europe and Eurasia, where the promise of membership and the capricious integration process have roiled societies, felled governments, raised and dashed hopes like no other political variable, this is unheard of. So is the treatment Georgia has received at the hands of the West.

keep readingShow less

Election 2024

Latest

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.