Follow us on social

Imran-khan-speech-e1667492592979

Imran Khan murder attempt the latest in Pakistan's bloody political history

Without changes in security protocols it is a matter of when — not if —another major national figure is assassinated.

Analysis | Middle East

Today’s attempted assassination of former Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan comes at a time of heightened political division and violence. It is likely to only rally support around Khan and increase suspicion towards the country’s military establishment and PMLN-led government. 

Some protests against the military have already begun. Khan, 70, was shot in the leg, and has been transferred to a hospital in Lahore for treatment.

Assassination attempts against Pakistani leaders are nothing new, and today’s adds to a dark history of political violence. In 1951, Pakistan's first Prime Minister, Liaqat Ali Khan, was shot and killed while addressing supporters in a park that was renamed Liaqat Bagh. In October 2007, twin bomb blasts targeted former prime minister Benazir Bhutto’s procession, sparing her, but killing approximately 200 bystanders. She was killed two months later when gunmen and bomb blasts targeted her rally in Rawalpindi. 

A thorough investigation into Bhutto’s assassination was seemingly prevented, and many observers blame former military dictator Pervez Musharraf for her death. But it is worth noting that Musharraf himself faced several assassination attempts. More recently, former governor of Punjab Salman Taseer was killed by his own police bodyguard when he took up the case of a Pakistani Christian woman accused of blasphemy. 

Some observers in the United States may be inclined to view today’s events as exceptional or indicative of political breakdown in Pakistan. President Biden himself recently sparked controversy due to his remarks that the country was particularly dangerous since it possesses "nuclear weapons without any cohesion." 

But the U.S. has its own history of assassinations and violent political events ranging from the murder of JFK all the way to the January 6th riots. What makes Pakistan exceptional may be how little security still exists at high profile political demonstrations despite the looming threat of violence. When I attended one of then Prime Minister Imran Khan’s rallies in late March, I was surprised at the lax security measures which allowed crowds to filter in through an obviously defective metal detector, climb over barriers and up surrounding structures, and block egress routes. 

Without changes in security protocols it is a matter of when, not if a political assassination is successful. Of course, this would still fail to prevent insider attacks such as the one that led to Governor Taseer’s demise.

This assassination attempt comes at a time when Pakistan’s party politics are particularly divided and Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party is (at least publicly) at odds with the country’s military establishment. It also comes on the heels of the mysterious murder of self-exiled Pakistani journalist Arshad Sharif in Kenya.

The truth behind Khan's attempted assassin's motive may come out shortly or never at all. He could be an individual acting alone out of a personal grudge or political belief, extremist sympathizer, or be part of a conspiracy within Pakistan’s political system.

Nobody knows, and in some ways the actual truth is less consequential than the perceived explanations that will now flood Pakistan’s national discussion. It will assuredly radicalize and divide the country’s politics further at a time when Pakistan is still reeling from unprecedented flooding and economic dysfunction.


An Imran Khan rally in Islamabad, Pakistan, March, 27, 2022 (photo by Adam Weinstein)
Analysis | Middle East
Kim Jong Un
Top photo credit: North Korean leader Kim Jong Un visits the construction site of the Ragwon County Offshore Farm, North Korea July 13, 2025. KCNA via REUTERS

Kim Jong Un is nuking up and playing hard to get

Asia-Pacific

President Donald Trump’s second term has so far been a series of “shock and awe” campaigns both at home and abroad. But so far has left North Korea untouched even as it arms for the future.

The president dramatically broke with precedent during his first term, holding two summits as well as a brief meeting at the Demilitarized Zone with the North’s Supreme Leader Kim Jong-un. Unfortunately, engagement crashed and burned in Hanoi. The DPRK then pulled back, essentially severing contact with both the U.S. and South Korea.

keep readingShow less
Why new CENTCOM chief Brad Cooper is as wrong as the old one
Top photo credit: U.S. Navy Vice Admiral Brad Cooper speaks to guests at the IISS Manama Dialogue in Manama, Bahrain, November 17, 2023. REUTERS/Hamad I Mohammed

Why new CENTCOM chief Brad Cooper is as wrong as the old one

Middle East

If accounts of President Donald Trump’s decision to strike Iranian nuclear facilities this past month are to be believed, the president’s initial impulse to stay out of the Israel-Iran conflict failed to survive the prodding of hawkish advisers, chiefly U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) chief Michael Kurilla.

With Kurilla, an Iran hawk and staunch ally of both the Israeli government and erstwhile national security adviser Mike Waltz, set to leave office this summer, advocates of a more restrained foreign policy may understandably feel like they are out of the woods.

keep readingShow less
Putin Trump
Top photo credit: Vladimir Putin (Office of the President of the Russian Federation) and Donald Trump (US Southern Command photo)

How Trump's 50-day deadline threat against Putin will backfire

Europe

In the first six months of his second term, President Donald Trump has demonstrated his love for three things: deals, tariffs, and ultimatums.

He got to combine these passions during his Oval Office meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte on Monday. Only moments after the two leaders announced a new plan to get military aid to Ukraine, Trump issued an ominous 50-day deadline for Russian President Vladimir Putin to agree to a ceasefire. “We're going to be doing secondary tariffs if we don't have a deal within 50 days,” Trump told the assembled reporters.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.