Follow us on social

Diplomacy Watch: Could Lula be a force for peace in Ukraine?

Diplomacy Watch: Could Lula be a force for peace in Ukraine?

If he wins back the presidency later this month, the left-wing firebrand is ready to help bring Russia’s brutal war to an end.

Analysis | Asia-Pacific

Left-wing firebrand Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva is ready to help with peace talks if he defeats President Jair Bolsonaro in Brazilian elections later this month, according to one of the former president’s top aides.

Celso Amorim, who serves as Lula’s main foreign policy advisor, told Reuters that his boss has the background and skills “to take part in a negotiating effort.” Amorim also noted that Brazil has a voice that “resonates in the developing world” and said that BRICS — a multinational forum made up of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa — could play a role in talks.

Lula helped found BRICS, whose members account for over 40 percent of the world’s population, during his previous tenure as president, and his commitment to non-alignment could make him a credible mediator.

But, as Amorim himself noted, the Brazilian leader can only exert limited influence over the conflict as long as other international power players continue to balk at calls for negotiations. For any efforts to succeed, they must “be led by the European Union and United States, but with the participation of China,” Amorim argued.

Unfortunately, contacts between the West and Russia have reached a nadir, according to Financial Times foreign policy columnist Gideon Rachman. “Although some might assume there is more secret diplomacy going on than meets the eye, those who should know suggest there are few channels open with the Kremlin,” Rachman wrote in a recent column.

Rachman argues that this is a serious mistake. As he notes, diplomacy need not come at the expense of strong military support for Ukraine. Rather, the two should go hand in hand as part of a broader strategy to end the war and roll back Russia’s gains.

He continues:

“Some western military leaders are frustrated that their efforts in Ukraine are not being supported by simultaneous diplomacy. As one senior military source puts it: ‘Military action is ineffective on its own. It’s only truly effective when it’s combined with economic and diplomatic efforts. And we’re not seeing enough diplomacy.’”

And the dangers go far beyond extending the war. Without these conversations, the risk of miscalculation — and, by extension, nuclear escalation — rises. But, as Ishaan Tharoor wrote in the Washington Post, European leaders are privately saying that “their visibility into the Kremlin’s thinking is more limited now than it has ever been.”

“Putin may be bunkered and warmongering in isolation, but the sense of uncertainty and danger surrounding the war is only deepening,” Tharoor wrote.

In other diplomatic news related to the war in Ukraine:

— Russia continued to bombard cities and infrastructure across Ukraine, forcing Kyiv to restrict electricity supplies across the country, according to Reuters. As the wider Russian assault drags on, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky tweeted that there is “[n]o space left for negotiations with [Russian President Vladimir] Putin's regime.”

— A Kremlin spokesperson said Tuesday that Russia would consider the use of nuclear weapons to protect areas of eastern Ukraine that Moscow attempted to annex last month, according to Reuters. “All these territories are inalienable parts of the Russian Federation, and they are all protected,” the spokesperson said.

— As the midterms draw near, Biden and his allies have become increasingly concerned that a Republican-led Congress could block future efforts to send large amounts of aid to Ukraine, according to Politico. Though many Republicans support the aid, some prominent GOP leaders — including Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy — have suggested that the U.S. should cut back on support for Kyiv’s war effort. Meanwhile, Axiosreported that Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.), who chairs the right-wing House Freedom Caucus, wants to investigate Biden’s approach to diplomacy in Ukraine, with a focus on whether his conversations with Zelensky ever “included the proposition of an end to Russian occupation in exchange for Ukraine not joining NATO.”

— Former Italian President Silvio Berlusconi, who will play a central part in Italy’s incoming government, blamed Ukraine for Russia’s invasion and said he was still in contact with Putin in remarks that leaked on Wednesday, according to the New York Times. The comments have reignited fears that Rome’s new, far-right leadership will break with its EU allies on the war in Ukraine, potentially undermining the West’s united front against Moscow. Giorgia Meloni, who is set to lead Italy's next government, tried to assuage those concerns by saying that Rome "will never be the weak link in the West" and that "anyone who does not agree with this cornerstone cannot be part of the government."

— Israel rejected a Ukrainian request for missile defense systems to protect from Russia’s ongoing attacks on cities, according to The Hill. Tel Aviv has so far avoided going all-in on supporting Kyiv because of its sensitive relationship with Moscow, but pressure has mounted for Israel to send weapons following reports that the Kremlin is using Iranian drones in its attacks. In an apparent attempt to split the difference, Israel is now considering giving Ukraine access to non-weaponized “early-warning systems” to help detect incoming attacks, according to the Times of Israel.

U.S. State Department News:In a Wednesday press conference, State Department spokesperson Vidant Patel condemned Russia’s announcement that it will impose martial laws in areas of eastern Ukraine that it claims to have annexed. “No matter what the Kremlin says or does, no matter what they try to enact via decree, via paper or otherwise, Crimea, Donetsk, Kherson, Luhansk, and Zaporizhzhia are Ukrainian sovereign territory,” Patel said. “Any claim that Russia makes over these territories is illegitimate.”

Thanks to our readers and supporters, Responsible Statecraft has had a tremendous year. A complete website overhaul made possible in part by generous contributions to RS, along with amazing writing by staff and outside contributors, has helped to increase our monthly page views by 133%! In continuing to provide independent and sharp analysis on the major conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, as well as the tumult of Washington politics, RS has become a go-to for readers looking for alternatives and change in the foreign policy conversation. 

 

We hope you will consider a tax-exempt donation to RS for your end-of-the-year giving, as we plan for new ways to expand our coverage and reach in 2025. Please enjoy your holidays, and here is to a dynamic year ahead!

Analysis | Asia-Pacific
Amnesty International calls Israel's actions in Gaza genocide
Top Photo: Palestinians inspect their destroyed homes after an Israeli air strike on a house belonging to the Hassan family, in the Nuseirat camp in the central Gaza Strip, on May 19, 2024. Anas-Mohammed / Shutterstock.com

Amnesty International calls Israel's actions in Gaza genocide

QiOSK

Today, Amnesty International became the first major human rights organization to accuse Israel of carrying out a genocide in Gaza, releasing a detailed report to substantiate this claim.

“Our research reveals that, for months, Israel has persisted in committing genocidal acts, fully aware of the irreparable harm it was inflicting on Palestinians in Gaza,” says Agnès Callamard, Secretary General of Amnesty International. “It continued to do so in defiance of countless warnings about the catastrophic humanitarian situation and of legally binding decisions from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ordering Israel to take immediate measures to enable the provision of humanitarian assistance to civilians in Gaza.”

keep readingShow less
Diego Garcia
Top image credit: DIEGO GARCIA, British Indian Ocean Territory – Sailors assigned to U.S. Navy Support Facility Diego Garcia watch as HMS Tamar (P233), the fourth of the five Batch 2 River-class offshore patrol vessels operated by the Royal Navy, arrives in Diego Garcia for a scheduled port visit Feb. 15, 2023. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Jesus O. Aguiar)

No, Mauritius isn't planning to 'give' US base at Diego Garcia to China

Asia-Pacific

Anti-China fearmongers on both sides of the Atlantic are pushing U.S. President-elect Donald Trump to overturn the rule of international law and a surprising recent victory for diplomacy — rather than military might — to resolve international disputes.

Backed by conservative and other news outlets, a campaign of disinformation, smears, and falsehoods is escalating to get Trump to try to tank a historic deal announced in October that actually gives the U.S. military exactly what it wants: control of its base on the secretive Indian Ocean island of Diego Garcia for 99 years or more.

keep readingShow less
Syria conflict
Top photo credit: Puppeteer Walid Rashed performs a puppet show for Syrian children amidst the rubble of damaged buildings. (Dpa photographer Anas Alkharboutli who took this picture was later killed in the renewed fighting in Syria.) (Reuters)

Turkey and Israel are reaping rewards from the chaos in Syria

Middle East

The surprise offensive by Syrian rebels led by a radical Islamist group with roots in Al Qaeda dramatizes the enormous regional repercussions set off by Israel’s war against Lebanon’s Hezbollah.

Badly battered by Israel’s air strikes and ground campaign in southern Lebanon, Hezbollah’s inability, at least for now, to be a prominent player in defense of the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad is a real game-changer, as evidenced by the ease and speed with which the insurgents advanced on the ground after launching their campaign on Nov 27.

keep readingShow less

Election 2024

Latest

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.