Follow us on social

Shutterstock_1409414732-scaled-e1647619139362

Modi: 'we have to make India a developed nation in our lifetime'

The PM knows his legitimacy as a leader rests not only on getting his country out of recession but millions out of crushing poverty.

Analysis | Asia-Pacific

In a speech on Monday commemorating the 75th anniversary of India’s independence, Prime Minister Narendra Modi pledged to turn India into a developed nation in 25 years.

“We have to make India a developed nation within our lifetime,” Modi said. Addressing the young twenty-something members of the audience, he added that “when India will celebrate 100 years of independence you will be aged 50 to 55, which means the golden period of your life — the 20 to 25 years of your life — is the time to make the dreams of India come true.”

Speaking ahead of the 2024 general elections, we see Modi’s attempt to revitalize the pro-business and growth-centric platform that got him elected in 2014. His handling of the Covid-19 pandemic hit the country hard, as mismanagement of lockdown measures caused the economy to fall into an unprecedented recession in 2020. Thus, whether or not he can keep the economy back on track in the long run will likely determine his re-election chances.

While India has built one of the fastest growing economies since independence, it is still very much considered a developing nation today; it is currently classified as a “lower middle income” economy by the World Bank. Millions of Indians continue to experience poverty as a daily reality while per capita income remains below the global average. Additionally, Indian exports account for only 2 percent of the global total, compared to 13 percent for neighboring China. 

As India’s population is predicted to surpass that of China’s as the world’s largest by next year, the country now more than ever will need to find ways to accelerate economic growth for managing such a responsibility.

Historically, India is estimated to have had one of the largest economies in the world — from around the 1st Century AD to the beginning of British rule in the subcontinent. However, by the time the British left, the country was impoverished with a GDP of only $20 billion, according to scholars. The chaotic partition of the territory into Hindu-majority India and Muslim-majority Pakistan added to the hardship by displacing more than 15 million people and causing the deaths of one to two million. 

Despite all odds though, the Indian economy has grown remarkably since independence, particularly following the economic reforms of the 1990s under Prime Minister PV Narasimha Rao, which opened the country up to large-scale foreign investment. Today, India’s over $3 trillion economy stands as the world’s fifth largest.

As the Indian economy continues to rapidly grow, the country’s geopolitical importance has become recognized. Despite maintaining a lukewarm relationship with the United States during the Cold War as a result of India’s non-alignment policy, the relationship has warmed considerably in the 21st century. While India has not formally abandoned nonalignment, the two countries have found common ground in balancing the rise of China, leading to their partnership in the Quad, an active security grouping in the Indo-Pacific, along with Japan and Australia. 

India has also earned a spot for itself as a key member state in numerous important global institutions and multilateral groupings, such as the G20, Shanghai Cooperation Organization, and BRICS. Free trade agreements have been forged with ASEAN and the European Union, though India’s refusal to join the RCEP — the world’s largest trade bloc — has been met with accusations of economic protectionism that undermine Modi’s image as a pro-business leader.

It is clear that India has a lot of work to do if it is to become a developed country anytime in the near future, not to mention in the next 25 years. The progress the country has made since independence should not be dismissed, yet ample room for improvement remains, particularly in further opening the Indian economy and utilizing the country’s population to its full potential. As Western companies today look for new labor sources and consumer markets to lessen their dependence on China, India could provide a much needed solution.

Modi has signaled an ambitious yet important vision for the future of the world’s soon-to-be most populous nation. Perhaps reaching developed country status in 25 years seems like somewhat of a reach, but India’s desire for a greater role in the global economy and international order is apparent. Should Modi follow up his words with concrete action, it will be time for other countries to pay attention and realize the mutual benefits of taking India up on this initiative.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi (Madhuram Paliwal / Shutterstock.com)
Analysis | Asia-Pacific
space weapon

Marko Aliaksandr via shutterstock.com

How the US made space more dangerous

Global Crises

The past year has witnessed a growing chorus of alarm in Washington regarding the military utility of space. From the proliferation of space debris to the hastened tempo of anti-satellite (ASAT) weapons development by China and Russia, there is a fear that U.S. space assets are held in peril by the threat of direct attack and the destruction of orbital usability. In November of last year, Chief of Space Operations General Chance Saltzman went as far as to designate China’s adoption of ASATs in 2007 as a key moment of inflection in the militarization of space.

These worries have a legitimate basis — scientists have posited that space debris has the potential to render certain orbital clouds such as low earth orbit (LEO) unusable through cascading collisions. ASATs only compound this risk, as even individual tests can generate thousands of pieces of debris. Further, LEO and other orbits are a vital terrain for U.S. military satellites, whose uses range from communication to positioning systems and intelligence collection. This led the Biden administration to adopt a unilateral moratorium on ASAT testing in 2022.

keep readingShow less
Nuland fuels theory that Western powers killed 2022 peace deal

Victoria Nuland in interview with Mikhail Zygar (You Tube)

Nuland fuels theory that Western powers killed 2022 peace deal

QiOSK

Victoria Nuland, former Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs and one of the principal architects of the Biden administration’s Russia policy, has now opined on what is perhaps the foggiest episode in a war distinguished by a nearly impenetrable kind of diplomatic opacity: the April 2022 Istanbul peace talks between Russia and Ukraine.

Furthermore she acknowledges that there was a deal on the table and that Western powers didn’t like conditions that would have limited Ukraine's military arsenal, lending credence to the theory that Ukraine’s supporters had a hand in ultimately scuttling it.

keep readingShow less
Trump Harris

bella1105 / Shutterstock.com

What Harris and Trump should say about Iran

Middle East

The Biden administration entered office in 2021 with a clear mandate on Iran: Joe Biden had run in opposition to the Trump administration’s scuttling of the 2015 nuclear deal struck under Barack Obama, and vowed to restore the agreement.

While President Biden made good on other campaign pledges to reverse harmful Trump policies, including to repeal the Muslim ban and rejoin the Paris Climate Accord, on Iran, Biden’s pledge fell flat. By failing to move decisively to rejoin the deal, the political space for a restoration of the accord evaporated, all while Iran’s nuclear program advanced, Iran’s government grew even more repressive and regional tensions accelerated.

keep readingShow less

Election 2024

Latest

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.