Follow us on social

Pelosi Taiwan visit

Pelosi defends Taiwan visit amid Chinese show of force

The speaker said her trip “in no way contradicts” long-standing US policy. But experts aren’t so sure.


After weeks of speculation, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi landed today in Taiwan, where she is expected to meet with President Tsai Ing-wen tomorrow morning.

Following through on claims that its military would “not sit idly by” during Pelosi’s trip, Beijing announced that it will conduct “live-fire exercises” in the waters around Taiwan starting on Thursday. Commentators said the move is a notable escalation, but the timing of the exercises — starting a day after the speaker is set to leave Taipei — could indicate the limits of how far China is willing to go in order to express its dissatisfaction with the trip.

Pelosi defended her controversial visit in an op-ed in the Washington Post. Among other things, Pelosi cited Beijing’s 2019 crackdown on Hong Kong and the Pentagon’s recent assessment that China is “likely preparing for a contingency to unify Taiwan with the PRC by force.”

“Our visit — one of several congressional delegations to the island — in no way contradicts the long-standing one-China policy, guided by the Taiwan Relations Act of 1979, the U.S.-China Joint Communiques and the Six Assurances,” she wrote. “The United States continues to oppose unilateral efforts to change the status quo.”

Michael Swaine, an East Asia expert at the Quincy Institute, pushed back on the idea that Pelosi’s visit is simply an extension of previous U.S. policy. “Anyone who says that this visit will not provoke a major crisis with Beijing or is ‘nothing unusual’ understands neither Beijing nor the history of the relationship,” Swaine said, adding that the trip is “nothing short of reckless and stupid.”

“This situation has the potential to become an even worse version of the 1995-96 Taiwan crisis, given the fraught state of current U.S.-China relations, and China’s vastly improved military capabilities,” he added.

Pelosi also argued that her trip is meant to fight back against creeping autocracy, echoing the Biden administration’s oft-stated policy of democracy promotion. “Indeed, we take this trip at a time when the world faces a choice between autocracy and democracy,” she wrote. “As Russia wages its premeditated, illegal war against Ukraine, killing thousands of innocents — even children — it is essential that America and our allies make clear that we never give in to autocrats.”

Some observers argued that this framing, while attractive on paper, has little practical value when it comes to the intricacies of geopolitics.

“A theory that United States must ‘never give in to autocrats’ is not a strategy for handling multiple ongoing security threats in a multipolar world,” tweeted Ross Douthat, a conservative columnist for the New York Times.

In addition to the military exercises near Taiwan, China is expected to impose economic sanctions on Taipei, possibly accompanied by a series of cyber operations. Any of Beijing’s potential moves will be geared toward showing the people of Taiwan that “there are risks and consequences for relying on [the U.S.] instead of working with Beijing,” according to Ryan Hass of the Brookings Institution.

As the situation develops, there is one question on everyone’s mind: How can officials stop the crisis from getting out of hand? For Swaine, the answer is straightforward.

“Washington and Beijing must now pivot to defusing the coming crisis by activating trusted interlocutors, offering clear signals of intent and deescalation, and recognizing that both sides have contributed in various ways to this crisis—and so both sides must contribute to its resolution,” he said.

(shutterstock/ Al Teich)
Ukraine-Poland row exposes history, limits of devotion
Credit: Polish President Andrzej Duda (Shutterstock/BikerBarakuss) and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky (Shutterstock/Oleksandr Osipov)

Ukraine-Poland row exposes history, limits of devotion


The vitriolic dispute between Poland and Ukraine brings out some aspects of the West’s approach to the war in Ukraine that the Ukrainian government would do well to study carefully.

The dispute originated in charges by Poland and other central European governments that Ukraine’s greatly increased grain exports to Europe — a consequence of the Russian closure of the Black Sea to Ukrainian maritime trade — were flooding European markets and depressing prices for Polish and other farmers.

keep readingShow less
Rep. Gerry Connolly

Rep. Gerry Connolly, screengrab via

How members of Congress can take on Iran hawks

Middle East

During a recent House hearing on “Iran’s escalating threats,” a Democratic lawmaker completely dismantled all the myths opponents of diplomacy peddle about Iran and its nuclear program.

The hearing was dominated by hawkish voices on Iran, who urged for increasing pressure and spurned any diplomatic engagement. The only exception was Suzanne Maloney from the Brookings Institute, who took a more moderate stance.

keep readingShow less
Brazil is showing us how to avoid a new cold war

President Joe Biden and Brazilian President Lula. photo: White House

Brazil is showing us how to avoid a new cold war

Latin America

When the BRICS grouping held its annual summit in late August, it was widely covered as a portentous affair that signaled a ripening challenge to the U.S.-led global order.

For the first time, the group expanded considerably, reflecting a growing ambition not necessarily shared by each original member. It was reasonable to wonder whether a robust challenge to U.S. hegemony was imminent.

keep readingShow less

Ukraine War Crisis