Follow us on social

google cta
2022-07-07t134531z_939835114_rc207v9dv6me_rtrmadp_3_afghanistan-airport-scaled

Is the ice beginning to thaw between US and Taliban?

Washington has still not recognized the new government of Afghanistan, but was on hand in major talks about frozen funds and aid.

Analysis | Asia-Pacific
google cta
google cta

Two meetings occurred this week to address the Taliban’s relations with the world. The first occurred in Tashkent, Uzbekistan between international envoys (including the U.S.) to Afghanistan and various Taliban officials. The second was a meeting between a delegation headed by a leading Islamic scholar from Pakistan and the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan, which is sometimes popularly referred to as the ‘Pakistani Taliban.’

The meetings in Tashkent were supposed to be followed by planned, direct talks Wednesday between the Taliban and U.S. delegates "to address the economic challenges faced by the Afghan people,” according to a U.S. statement reported by Voice of America.

The first meeting focused on the need for Afghan girls to be permitted to attend secondary school, other human rights abuses, Afghanistan’s foreign exchange reserves which remain frozen in the United States and Europe, and the overall economic development of the country. The United States is the largest provider of aid to Afghanistan which has continued throughout Taliban rule with over $775 million in aid sent to the people of Afghanistan since last summer. 

But an aid-dependent Afghanistan is not sustainable indefinitely and therefore steps must be taken to normalize the economy. On several occasions U.S. special representative for Afghanistan Thomas West has expressed an ultimate desire to return Afghanistan’s frozen foreign exchange reserves to the country’s central bank and rejected rumors that the funds would be used for aid. The U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has also issued seven general licenses which act as exemptions to U.S. sanctions on the Taliban. However, the chilling effect of these sanctions remains. The Taliban have also failed to take basic actions that would reassure the international community such as providing clear policies against terrorist financing and money laundering or removing sanctioned individuals from leadership positions at the central bank.

It is also necessary to understand that Afghanistan’s economy would remain in dire straits even if sanctions were lifted tomorrow and the frozen foreign exchange reserves returned in full. This is because Afghanistan is a landlocked country with a majority rural population in which dried fruit, coal, and rugs make up the majority of exports. An artificial economy ballooned for two decades as a result of the U.S.-led war in Afghanistan which fostered war-related industries such as bulk fuel transport and led to a parallel aid economy. Afghanistan’s future growth is likely to remain slow at best as it now faces the constraints of its geography, infrastructure, and Taliban governance. 

Security also remains a significant concern for the United States and region. ISKP — an offshoot of the Islamic State —continues to target Afghanistan’s minorities, particularly the Hazara community. It also carries out targeted attacks on Taliban checkpoints. Across the border in Pakistan the TTP carried out a renewed offensive over the last spring and is currently in negotiations with the Pakistani government. The Afghan Taliban is mediating talks between the Pakistani military and the TTP but the Taliban’s refusal to otherwise rein in their TTP partners is a point of frustration in Islamabad. Pakistan’s most recent negotiating strategy is to send a delegation led by the prominent Karachi-based Deobandi cleric Taqi Usmani to speak with the TTP.

Washington and Afghanistan’s neighbors continue the difficult but necessary process of dialogue with an increasingly stubborn Taliban, but actual progress on the issues remains slow.


FILE PHOTO: Taliban soldiers stand in front of a sign at the international airport in Kabul, Afghanistan, September 9, 2021. WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS ATTENTION EDITORS - THIS IMAGE HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A THIRD PARTY./File Photo
google cta
Analysis | Asia-Pacific
NPT
Top image credit: Milos Ruzicka via shutterstock.com

We are sleepwalking into nuclear catastrophe

Global Crises

In May of his first year as president, John F. Kennedy met with Israeli President David Ben-Gurion to discuss Israel’s nuclear program and the new nuclear power plant at Dimona.

Writing about the so-called “nuclear summit” in “A State at Any Cost: The Life of David Ben-Gurion,” Israeli historian Tom Segev states that during this meeting, “Ben-Gurion did not get much from the president, who left no doubt that he would not permit Israel to develop nuclear weapons.”

keep readingShow less
Ambassador Robert Hunter
Top photo credit: Former NATO Ambassador Robert Hunter at the American Academy of Diplomacy's 17th Annual Awards Luncheon, 12/14/2006. (Reuters)

RIP Amb. Robert Hunter, who warned about NATO expansion

Europe

The world of foreign policy restraint is poorer today with the passing of Robert Hunter, an American diplomat, who was the U.S. ambassador to NATO in 1993-1998. He also served as a senior official on both the Western Europe and Middle East desks in President Jimmy Carter’s National Security Council.

For decades, Hunter was a prominent, sober, and necessary voice of restraint in Washington. To readers of Responsible Statecraft, he was an occasional author who shared his insights, particularly on Europe. To those of us who knew Robert personally, he was a mentor and a friend whose tremendous knowledge was matched only by his generosity in sharing it.

keep readingShow less
NATO Summit 2025
Top photo credit: NATO Summit, the Hague, June 25, 2025. (Republic of Slovenia/Daniel Novakovič/STA/flickr)

Will NATO survive Trump?

Europe

Over the weekend, President Donald Trump threatened to place new punitive tariffs on European allies until they acquiesce to his designs on Greenland, an escalation of his ongoing attempts to acquire the large Arctic island for the United States.

Critics loudly decried the move as devastating for the transatlantic relationship, echoing Denmark’s Prime Minister Mette Fredericksen’s earlier warning that a coercive U.S. seizure of the semi-autonomous Danish territory would mean the end of NATO.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.