Follow us on social

google cta
President_joe_biden_speaks_with_secretary_antony_blinken_secretary_lloyd_austin_and_national_security_advisor_jake_sullivan-scaled

Biden's Iran policy has been a total failure

Time is running out to restore the nuclear deal and prevent the potential for another devastating war in the Middle East.

Analysis | Middle East
google cta
google cta

Former Trump administration official Mike Pompeo yesterday falsely accused President Biden of going back to “old policies” that purportedly empower the Iranian government. It is rich, coming from one of the officials most responsible for unraveling hard-fought international restraints on Iran’s nuclear program, and when all of the sanctions that Pompeo pushed and authorized remain in place under Biden.  

Perhaps the former secretary of state has failed to keep up with current events. Biden did campaign on breaking with former President Trump's Middle East strategy — pledging to make Saudi Arabia a pariah for the murder of Jamal Khashoggi and to restore the Iran nuclear agreement that Trump abandoned. Yet now, as his administration scrambles to bring down soaring oil prices in the wake of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the president's advisers are reportedly pushing for Biden to reverse his commitments and bend the knee to the Saudi Crown Prince while allowing the window to close on restoring the Iran deal for fear of political blowback. 

As a result of Biden continuing Trump and Pompeo's approach, Iran is on the verge of becoming a nuclear threshold power. In the absence of a restored nuclear agreement, Iran has now produced a “significant quantity” of uranium enriched to the 60 percent threshold. If Iran decides to enrich that stockpile further, it would soon have enough weapons grade material for a nuclear weapon. Likewise, Iran has already responded to the passage of an IAEA Board of Governors censure resolution over Iran's stonewalling of questions into its past nuclear work by shutting off the agency's cameras at some nuclear sites. Adding to concerns, Israel's Air Force recently conducted a massive war game with over 100 aircraft simulating a potential strike on Iran's nuclear facilities.  

The United States and Iran are lurching into an entirely avoidable crisis. But it didn't have to be this way.

Trump's decision to wantonly violate and abandon the Iran deal was a demonstrable failure that Biden rightly condemned. Restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program ended, regional security drastically deteriorated, and the United States and Iran moved to the brink of war — all for zero security gains. Coming into office, there was a window for Biden to decisively break from his predecessor's failed approach and signal that Washington was serious about upholding its international commitments. Biden did so with other Trump policies by terminating the Muslim Ban and re-entering the Paris Climate Accords. But despite ample room for a 180-degree policy reversal on Iran, Biden dithered.

Instead of moving swiftly to restore the deal early in 2021, Biden's cabinet nominees began implying that Iran must first return to its commitments — which it began abrogating one year after Trump pulled out of the accord — and suggesting that the United States would consult with partners around the region and seek a "longer and stronger" deal. While talks to restore the agreement did finally get underway in April 2021, they did not reach the finish line before Iran's June presidential elections produced a new hardline administration that was deeply skeptical of negotiations with the United States. While talks with the new Iranian leaders finally picked up again late last year, they have snagged on the Biden administration's unwillingness to lift poison-pill sanctions that the Trump team imposed for the explicit purpose of creating political hurdles for Biden to restore the agreement.

As bad as Trump’s approach was, Biden’s failure to course correct is now the more consequential decision.

While it is still theoretically possible for Biden to snatch diplomatic victory from the jaws of defeat, Biden has ruled out the symbolic concession that would be most likely to break the months-long diplomatic impasse. Biden has reportedly said he will not lift the Foreign Terrorist Organization designation on Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, seemingly under any circumstance. The designation, quite literally planned to undermine Biden’s diplomacy, gains the United Statesnothing as Biden officials themselves have argued. But they have allowed it block a restoration of the agreement, regardless.

The end result has been predictable. Iran has filled up Bibi Netanyahu’s old cartoon bomb with 60 percent enriched uranium, a stone’s throw away from weapons grade enrichment. Ordinary Iranians have suffered tremendously for 17 additional months under the maximum pressure sanctions Biden once condemned. Congressional allies have been left befuddled as to why Biden took so long to act. 

Unfortunately, without restoring the nuclear accord there are no good options on Iran for Biden. Calls from hawks to impose more sanctions would do nothing to slow Iran's nuclear advances, and would likely prompt more Iranian escalation. The move to censure Iran at this week's IAEA Board of Governors meeting could only yield a limited Iranian response, at best, and could backfire significantly, at worst. Then there is the so-called military option, which could result in a devastating regional war, would incentivize Iranian proliferation, and cause oil prices to skyrocket. Biden would be wise to avoid it at all costs.

Particularly given the horrible alternatives, the lack of diplomatic resolve from the Biden administration has been surprising and disappointing. To be clear, the Iranians have made major missteps as well. Supreme Leader Khamenei appears to have blocked Rouhani from finalizing a deal in the waning days of his term as president.Current president Ebrahim Raisi’s government was too slow to pick talks back up and has likewise dug in on the FTO designation. 

But given that it was the United States, not Iran, that broke the deal and there are legitimate doubts about America's ability to uphold a renewed deal beyond 2024, Biden needed to approach the negotiations with resolve to overcome the damage of his predecessor and restore the agreement. Instead he is still digging the hole he found himself in even deeper.

Despite the fact that Donald Trump did a lot of damage on Iran policy over four years, Joe Biden and his advisers miraculously still had the option for a wide open lay-up in a swift return to the nuclear deal. But they missed it. 

Now, with midterms fast approaching, it will take a major reversal of fortune to revive the JCPOA or any deal with Iran that rolls back its nuclear program. A tentative stalemate may hold for a time, avoiding an escalation toward full-blown war or Iranian proliferation. But if Biden continues to be more afraid of success than failure, he will soon pay the costs of diplomatic collapse and reap the seeds of conflict that Donald Trump sowed.


Dear RS readers: It has been an extraordinary year and our editing team has been working overtime to make sure that we are covering the current conflicts with quality, fresh analysis that doesn’t cleave to the mainstream orthodoxy or take official Washington and the commentariat at face value. Our staff reporters, experts, and outside writers offer top-notch, independent work, daily. Please consider making a tax-exempt, year-end contribution to Responsible Statecraftso that we can continue this quality coverage — which you will find nowhere else — into 2026. Happy Holidays!

President Joe Biden spoke with Secretary Antony Blinken, Secretary Lloyd Austin, and National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan about the ongoing efforts to safely drawdown the civilian footprint in Afghanistan, Aug 2021 [Photo: White House]
google cta
Analysis | Middle East
Trump
Top image credit: President Donald Trump addresses the nation, Wednesday, December 17, 2025, from the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Trump national security logic: rare earths and fossil fuels

Washington Politics

The new National Security Strategy of the United States seeks “strategic stability” with Russia. It declares that China is merely a competitor, that the Middle East is not central to American security, that Latin America is “our hemisphere,” and that Europe faces “civilizational erasure.”

India, the world's largest country by population, barely rates a mention — one might say, as Neville Chamberlain did of Czechoslovakia in 1938, it’s “a faraway country... of which we know nothing.” Well, so much the better for India, which can take care of itself.

keep readingShow less
Experts at oil & weapons-funded think tank: 'Go big' in Venezuela
Top image credit: LightField Studios via shutterstock.com

Experts at oil & weapons-funded think tank: 'Go big' in Venezuela

Military Industrial Complex

As the U.S. threatens to take “oil, land and other assets” from Venezuela, staffers at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a think tank funded in part by defense contractors and oil companies, are eager to help make the public case for regime change and investment. “The U.S. should go big” in Venezuela, write CSIS experts Ryan Berg and Kimberly Breier.

Both America’s Quarterly, which published the essay, and the authors’ employer happen to be funded by the likes of Lockheed Martin and ExxonMobil, a fact that is not disclosed in the article.

keep readingShow less
ukraine military
UKRAINE MARCH 22, 2023: Ukrainian military practice assault tactics at the training ground before counteroffensive operation during Russo-Ukrainian War (Shutterstock/Dymtro Larin)

Ukraine's own pragmatism demands 'armed un-alignment'

Europe

Eleven months after returning to the White House, the Trump administration believes it has finally found a way to resolve the four-year old war in Ukraine. Its formula is seemingly simple: land for security guarantees.

Under the current plan—or what is publicly known about it—Ukraine would cede the 20 percent of Donetsk that it currently controls to Russia in return for a package of security guarantees including an “Article 5-style” commitment from the United States, a European “reassurance force” inside post-war Ukraine, and peacetime Ukrainian military of 800,000 personnel.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.