Follow us on social

Mq-1c-gray-eagle_1-scaled

Report: White House wants to sell our killer drones to Ukraine

Biden tells us we are not enabling Ukraine to strike outside its borders, but we seem to be giving it every opportunity to do so.

Analysis | Europe

It was literally only yesterday that President Biden assured the country in a New York Times op-ed that we would not provide weapons to Ukraine that could penetrate deep inside Russia, risking an escalation to a wider war with Moscow. Now reports are emerging that the White House may be readying to sell Kyiv some of our best killer drones which have the capability of doing just that.

According to an exclusive Reuters report this afternoon, three people close to the situation say the White House has plans to sell Ukraine four MQ-1C Gray Eagle drones that can be armed with Hellfire missiles. The unmanned vehicles are made by General Atomics and are currently used by the U.S. Army, seeing service in Iraq and Afghanistan. We also know it’s been used in the AFRICOM area of operation as recently as 2021, because of an emergency landing that had gone public in northern Niger. At the time, Aviationist writer David Cenciotti described the Gray Eagle this way:

It can fly Reconnaissance, Surveillance, and Target Acquisition (RSTA); convoy protection; Improvised Explosive Device (IED) detection as well as providing live aerial imagery to ground patrols carrying also PGMs (Precision Guided Munitions): in other words, it can support a wide variety of missions including attack, assault, reconnaissance, infiltration and exfiltration, and any kind of known or unknown special operations you may imagine.

It can also fly for 30 hours or more without resting and can carry heavier payloads than the Turkish drones that the Ukrainians are using today. In fact, the Reuters piece calls it “a leap in technology” that “is significant because it puts an advanced reusable U.S. system capable of multiple deep strikes on the battlefield against Russia for the first time.”

In his op-ed in the New York Times Tuesday, Biden assured, “We are not encouraging or enabling Ukraine to strike beyond its borders. We do not want to prolong the war just to inflict pain on Russia.”

Yet the Pentagon announced a new $700 million package just yesterday that includes advanced rocket systems with a range of up to 50 miles, which has the potential of hitting targets within Russia. U.S. officials insisted, however, that they received “assurances” from Ukrainian leaders that they would not be used against Russian territory. The delivery systems, by the way, can be outfitted with longer range missiles down the road.

According to Reuters, the sale of the killer drones would have to go before Congress so it could be scuttled. The White House said at this point there “was nothing to announce,” but the sources for the story said plans were already in motion to train Ukrainians on the sophisticated unmanned system.

Ukrainian president Zelensky has increasingly asked for more sophisticated offensive weapons. Biden tells us that we are only giving Ukraine enough “so it can fight on the battlefield and be in the strongest possible position at the negotiating table.” But this drip-drip of weapons deliveries feels like a slow-moving escalation, and one that may end up going way beyond fueling Ukraine’s capability to fight its own battles on home turf. (Remember the story about the anti-ship missiles? Turns out that conveniently, Denmark is supplying the American-made Harpoons to Ukraine.) What we can look forward to tomorrow is anyone’s guess.


The MQ-1C Gray Eagle Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) (US Army photo)
Analysis | Europe
Trump Netanyahu
Top image credit: White House April 7, 2025

Polls: Americans don't support Trump's war on Iran

Military Industrial Complex

While there are serious doubts about the accuracy of President Donald Trump’s claims about the effectiveness of his attacks on Iranian nuclear sites, the U.S./Israeli war on Iran has provided fresh and abundant evidence of widespread opposition to war in the United States.

With a tenuous ceasefire currently holding, several nationwide surveys suggest Trump’s attack, which plunged the country into yet another offensive war in the Middle East, has been broadly unpopular across the country.

keep readingShow less
Could Trump's Congo-Rwanda mineral deals actually save lives?
Top photo credit: Foreign Minister of the Democratic Republic of the Congo Thérèse Kayikwamba Wagner, left, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, center, and Foreign Minister of Rwanda Olivier Nduhungirehe, right, during ceremony to sign a Declaration of Principles between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda, at the State Department, in Washington, D.C., on Friday, April 25, 2025. (Graeme Sloan/Sipa USA)

Could Trump's Congo-Rwanda mineral deals actually save lives?

Africa

There may be a light at the end of the tunnel as representatives from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Rwanda are hoping to end the violence between them by signing a peace deal in a joint signing ceremony in Washington today.

This comes after the United States and Qatar have been working for months to mediate an end to the conflict roiling the eastern DRC for years.

keep readingShow less
Trump steve Bannon
Top photo credit: President Donald Trump (White House/Flickr) and Steve Bannon (Gage Skidmore/Flickr)

Don't read the funeral rites for MAGA restraint yet

Washington Politics

On the same night President Donald Trump ordered U.S. airstrikes against Iran, POLITICO reported, “MAGA largely falls in line on Trump’s Iran strikes.”

The report cited “Charlie Kirk, a conservative activist and critic of GOP war hawks,” who posted on X, “Iran gave President Trump no choice.” It noted that former Republican Congressman Matt Gaetz, a longtime Trump supporter, “said on X that the president’s strike didn’t necessarily portend a larger conflict.” Gaetz said. “Trump the Peacemaker!”

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.