Follow us on social

google cta
Recent arms sales contradict Biden promise on Middle East pivot

Recent arms sales contradict Biden promise on Middle East pivot

While all eyes have been on Ukraine, the US approved massive foreign military deals to Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Jordan, and Kuwait.

Analysis | Military Industrial Complex
google cta
google cta

In February, the State Department approved almost $26 billion in foreign military sales. While escalating conflict in Ukraine forced difficult decisions, including the $6 billion sale of tanks to Poland, the lion’s share of these sales have nothing to do with the current crisis.

The State Department has approved more foreign military sales this month than in any month since November 2020. More than $5 billion of February’s arms sales went to the Middle East, contradicting the administration’s stated intention to pivot away from the region.

Publicly, Biden maintains an image of diverting U.S. attention from the Middle East. Yet, these quiet arms sales suggest Biden’s Middle East policy is more of a continuation of the same. Before taking office, Secretary of State Antony Blinken said that he “envisioned a Biden presidency would do ‘less not more’ in the region.” The interim national security guidelines released early in the Biden presidency laid out a similar vision, claiming that "we will not give our partners in the Middle East a blank check to pursue policies at odds with American interests." A close Biden adviser said early in his presidency that “If you are going to list the regions Biden sees as a priority, the Middle East is not in the top three…It’s Asia-Pacific, then Europe, and then the Western Hemisphere.”

This week’s arms sales, however, include the construction of a $1 billion defense headquarters for the Kuwait Ministry of Defense. According to the Defense Security Cooperation Agency, the proposed sale will support U.S. national security objectives by “helping to improve the infrastructure of a Major Non-NATO ally that has been an important force for political stability and economic progress in the Middle East.” The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will oversee the creation of the project, which is estimated to take up to seven years. If the Middle East is truly not a top priority, the United States would not tie itself to a defense industrial complex project for the better part of a decade.

Troubling missile sales and maintenance support to Saudi Arabia also contradict the Biden administration's supposed human rights-based foreign policy and stated goal to pivot away from the Middle East. According to its 2020 World Report, Human Rights Watch documented at least 90 alleged unlawful Saudi-led airstrikes that deliberately killed civilians and targeted civilian objects, in flagrant violation of international law. One of Biden’s key foreign policy promises was to end U.S. support for the Saudi-led war in Yemen, as he explained during the November 2019 presidential debate:

“And I would make it very clear we were not going to, in fact, sell more weapons to them, we were going to, in fact, make them pay the price and make them, in fact, the pariah that they are. [...] And I would also, as pointed out, I would end -- end subsidies that we have, end the sale of material to the Saudis where they're going in and murdering children, and they're murdering innocent people. And so they have to be held accountable.”

Yet here we are, a year later, with at least three approved major weapons sales to the Kingdom and no accountability for its role in the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Yemen. In September, the State Department approved continued maintenance support for the Saudi Royal Air Force, ensuring its fleets can continue unlawful airstrikes against civilians. Escalating U.S. involvement in the war, the State Department approved the sale of $650 million worth of air-to-air missiles in November. This sale appears to have emboldened Saudi Arabia to go on the offensive in Yemen, and brings the United States closer to the country Biden once decried as a pariah.

Despite congressional efforts to halt the sale of weapons to the Kingdom this fall, the State Department approved the sale of $24 million worth of Multifunctional Information Distribution System-Low Volume Terminals for Saudi Arabia on February 3. The press releases justify these sales on the grounds that they “will support U.S. foreign policy and national security objectives by helping to improve the security of a friendly country that continues to be an important force for political stability and economic growth in the Middle East.” This is the exact same language that was used to justify arms sales to Saudi Arabia in the Trump-era, word-for- word. These terminals will enable the Saudis to continue their relentless blockade in Yemen, and many more hundred of thousands of Yemenis will suffer as a result. 

These arms sales don’t enhance our national security, but they do inflate the pockets of defense contractors. Lockheed Martin, for example, will rake in more than $4.2 billion for 12 F-16 C Block 70 aircraft, four F-16 D Block 70 aircraft, and related equipment in a sale to Jordan approved February 3. Last month, the State Department also approved a $2.2 billion sale to Egypt for twelve of Lockheed Martin’s military transport aircrafts, C-130J-30 Super Hercules Aircraft. In total, the Biden administration has approved almost $10 billion in foreign military sales that will put profits directly into the pockets of defense contractors and further entrench the United States in Middle East conflicts for years to come.

Defense industry CEOs both openly cast deteriorating global security as a boon for employees and investors during recent earnings calls. In January 2022, Raytheon’s CEO told investors that rising tensions are “opportunities for international sales,” including a drone attack in the UAE claimed by Yemen’s Houthi rebels last month. Those opportunities for international sales have come to fruition, and the administration’s decision to quietly approve these sales while all eyes are on Ukraine deeply contradicts their stated foreign policy. 

The massive influx of arms and approved seven-year commitments actively undermines claims of national security by diverting resources to further entrench our military involvement in the Middle East. The true winners will be the coffers of weapons suppliers and bad actors who continue to avoid accountability unless the Biden administration makes good on its promise to end these arms sales.


Dear RS readers: It has been an extraordinary year and our editing team has been working overtime to make sure that we are covering the current conflicts with quality, fresh analysis that doesn’t cleave to the mainstream orthodoxy or take official Washington and the commentariat at face value. Our staff reporters, experts, and outside writers offer top-notch, independent work, daily. Please consider making a tax-exempt, year-end contribution to Responsible Statecraftso that we can continue this quality coverage — which you will find nowhere else — into 2026. Happy Holidays!

Kuwait army Col. Nawaf Jandoul Al-Dousari, left, North Military Medical Complex director, alongside Col. Courtney Finkbeiner, 386th EMDG commander during a tour of the clinic at Ali Al Salem Air Base, Kuwait, Oct. 16, 2019. The U.S. just signed a $1 Billion sale with Kuwait to help build them a new headquarters for the their ministry of defense, a likely seven-year project. (U.S. Air Force photo by Tech. Sgt. Daniel Martinez)|Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken meets with the Foreign Ministers of the Gulf Cooperation Council Nations on the margins of the 76th session of the UN General Assembly (UNGA 76) in New York, New York, on September 23, 2021. Additional U.S. participants include: Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland, Acting Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Yael Lempert, Counselor of the Department of State Derek Chollet, Director of Policy Planning Salman Ahmed, Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy Tom Sullivan, Coordinator for the Middle East and North Africa at the National Security Council Brett McGurk, Special Envoy for Iran Robert Malley. GCC participants include Secretary-General Nayef Al-Hajraf, Bahrain's Foreign Minister Abdullatif bin Rashid al-Zayani, Kuwait's Foreign Minister Sheikh Ahmed Nasser Al-Mohammed Al-Sabah, Oman's Permanent Representative to the United Nations Mohamed Al Hassan, Qatar's Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al-Thani, Saudi Arabia's Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud, and United Arab Emirates' Minister of State Khalifa Almarar. [State Department photo by Ron Przysucha]
google cta
Analysis | Military Industrial Complex
Trump
Top image credit: President Donald Trump addresses the nation, Wednesday, December 17, 2025, from the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Trump national security logic: rare earths and fossil fuels

Washington Politics

The new National Security Strategy of the United States seeks “strategic stability” with Russia. It declares that China is merely a competitor, that the Middle East is not central to American security, that Latin America is “our hemisphere,” and that Europe faces “civilizational erasure.”

India, the world's largest country by population, barely rates a mention — one might say, as Neville Chamberlain did of Czechoslovakia in 1938, it’s “a faraway country... of which we know nothing.” Well, so much the better for India, which can take care of itself.

keep readingShow less
Experts at oil & weapons-funded think tank: 'Go big' in Venezuela
Top image credit: LightField Studios via shutterstock.com

Experts at oil & weapons-funded think tank: 'Go big' in Venezuela

Military Industrial Complex

As the U.S. threatens to take “oil, land and other assets” from Venezuela, staffers at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a think tank funded in part by defense contractors and oil companies, are eager to help make the public case for regime change and investment. “The U.S. should go big” in Venezuela, write CSIS experts Ryan Berg and Kimberly Breier.

Both America’s Quarterly, which published the essay, and the authors’ employer happen to be funded by the likes of Lockheed Martin and ExxonMobil, a fact that is not disclosed in the article.

keep readingShow less
ukraine military
UKRAINE MARCH 22, 2023: Ukrainian military practice assault tactics at the training ground before counteroffensive operation during Russo-Ukrainian War (Shutterstock/Dymtro Larin)

Ukraine's own pragmatism demands 'armed un-alignment'

Europe

Eleven months after returning to the White House, the Trump administration believes it has finally found a way to resolve the four-year old war in Ukraine. Its formula is seemingly simple: land for security guarantees.

Under the current plan—or what is publicly known about it—Ukraine would cede the 20 percent of Donetsk that it currently controls to Russia in return for a package of security guarantees including an “Article 5-style” commitment from the United States, a European “reassurance force” inside post-war Ukraine, and peacetime Ukrainian military of 800,000 personnel.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.