Follow us on social

google cta
Recent arms sales contradict Biden promise on Middle East pivot

Recent arms sales contradict Biden promise on Middle East pivot

While all eyes have been on Ukraine, the US approved massive foreign military deals to Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Jordan, and Kuwait.

Analysis | Military Industrial Complex
google cta
google cta

In February, the State Department approved almost $26 billion in foreign military sales. While escalating conflict in Ukraine forced difficult decisions, including the $6 billion sale of tanks to Poland, the lion’s share of these sales have nothing to do with the current crisis.

The State Department has approved more foreign military sales this month than in any month since November 2020. More than $5 billion of February’s arms sales went to the Middle East, contradicting the administration’s stated intention to pivot away from the region.

Publicly, Biden maintains an image of diverting U.S. attention from the Middle East. Yet, these quiet arms sales suggest Biden’s Middle East policy is more of a continuation of the same. Before taking office, Secretary of State Antony Blinken said that he “envisioned a Biden presidency would do ‘less not more’ in the region.” The interim national security guidelines released early in the Biden presidency laid out a similar vision, claiming that "we will not give our partners in the Middle East a blank check to pursue policies at odds with American interests." A close Biden adviser said early in his presidency that “If you are going to list the regions Biden sees as a priority, the Middle East is not in the top three…It’s Asia-Pacific, then Europe, and then the Western Hemisphere.”

This week’s arms sales, however, include the construction of a $1 billion defense headquarters for the Kuwait Ministry of Defense. According to the Defense Security Cooperation Agency, the proposed sale will support U.S. national security objectives by “helping to improve the infrastructure of a Major Non-NATO ally that has been an important force for political stability and economic progress in the Middle East.” The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will oversee the creation of the project, which is estimated to take up to seven years. If the Middle East is truly not a top priority, the United States would not tie itself to a defense industrial complex project for the better part of a decade.

Troubling missile sales and maintenance support to Saudi Arabia also contradict the Biden administration's supposed human rights-based foreign policy and stated goal to pivot away from the Middle East. According to its 2020 World Report, Human Rights Watch documented at least 90 alleged unlawful Saudi-led airstrikes that deliberately killed civilians and targeted civilian objects, in flagrant violation of international law. One of Biden’s key foreign policy promises was to end U.S. support for the Saudi-led war in Yemen, as he explained during the November 2019 presidential debate:

“And I would make it very clear we were not going to, in fact, sell more weapons to them, we were going to, in fact, make them pay the price and make them, in fact, the pariah that they are. [...] And I would also, as pointed out, I would end -- end subsidies that we have, end the sale of material to the Saudis where they're going in and murdering children, and they're murdering innocent people. And so they have to be held accountable.”

Yet here we are, a year later, with at least three approved major weapons sales to the Kingdom and no accountability for its role in the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Yemen. In September, the State Department approved continued maintenance support for the Saudi Royal Air Force, ensuring its fleets can continue unlawful airstrikes against civilians. Escalating U.S. involvement in the war, the State Department approved the sale of $650 million worth of air-to-air missiles in November. This sale appears to have emboldened Saudi Arabia to go on the offensive in Yemen, and brings the United States closer to the country Biden once decried as a pariah.

Despite congressional efforts to halt the sale of weapons to the Kingdom this fall, the State Department approved the sale of $24 million worth of Multifunctional Information Distribution System-Low Volume Terminals for Saudi Arabia on February 3. The press releases justify these sales on the grounds that they “will support U.S. foreign policy and national security objectives by helping to improve the security of a friendly country that continues to be an important force for political stability and economic growth in the Middle East.” This is the exact same language that was used to justify arms sales to Saudi Arabia in the Trump-era, word-for- word. These terminals will enable the Saudis to continue their relentless blockade in Yemen, and many more hundred of thousands of Yemenis will suffer as a result. 

These arms sales don’t enhance our national security, but they do inflate the pockets of defense contractors. Lockheed Martin, for example, will rake in more than $4.2 billion for 12 F-16 C Block 70 aircraft, four F-16 D Block 70 aircraft, and related equipment in a sale to Jordan approved February 3. Last month, the State Department also approved a $2.2 billion sale to Egypt for twelve of Lockheed Martin’s military transport aircrafts, C-130J-30 Super Hercules Aircraft. In total, the Biden administration has approved almost $10 billion in foreign military sales that will put profits directly into the pockets of defense contractors and further entrench the United States in Middle East conflicts for years to come.

Defense industry CEOs both openly cast deteriorating global security as a boon for employees and investors during recent earnings calls. In January 2022, Raytheon’s CEO told investors that rising tensions are “opportunities for international sales,” including a drone attack in the UAE claimed by Yemen’s Houthi rebels last month. Those opportunities for international sales have come to fruition, and the administration’s decision to quietly approve these sales while all eyes are on Ukraine deeply contradicts their stated foreign policy. 

The massive influx of arms and approved seven-year commitments actively undermines claims of national security by diverting resources to further entrench our military involvement in the Middle East. The true winners will be the coffers of weapons suppliers and bad actors who continue to avoid accountability unless the Biden administration makes good on its promise to end these arms sales.


Dear RS readers: It has been an extraordinary year and our editing team has been working overtime to make sure that we are covering the current conflicts with quality, fresh analysis that doesn’t cleave to the mainstream orthodoxy or take official Washington and the commentariat at face value. Our staff reporters, experts, and outside writers offer top-notch, independent work, daily. Please consider making a tax-exempt, year-end contribution to Responsible Statecraftso that we can continue this quality coverage — which you will find nowhere else — into 2026. Happy Holidays!

Kuwait army Col. Nawaf Jandoul Al-Dousari, left, North Military Medical Complex director, alongside Col. Courtney Finkbeiner, 386th EMDG commander during a tour of the clinic at Ali Al Salem Air Base, Kuwait, Oct. 16, 2019. The U.S. just signed a $1 Billion sale with Kuwait to help build them a new headquarters for the their ministry of defense, a likely seven-year project. (U.S. Air Force photo by Tech. Sgt. Daniel Martinez)|Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken meets with the Foreign Ministers of the Gulf Cooperation Council Nations on the margins of the 76th session of the UN General Assembly (UNGA 76) in New York, New York, on September 23, 2021. Additional U.S. participants include: Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland, Acting Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Yael Lempert, Counselor of the Department of State Derek Chollet, Director of Policy Planning Salman Ahmed, Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy Tom Sullivan, Coordinator for the Middle East and North Africa at the National Security Council Brett McGurk, Special Envoy for Iran Robert Malley. GCC participants include Secretary-General Nayef Al-Hajraf, Bahrain's Foreign Minister Abdullatif bin Rashid al-Zayani, Kuwait's Foreign Minister Sheikh Ahmed Nasser Al-Mohammed Al-Sabah, Oman's Permanent Representative to the United Nations Mohamed Al Hassan, Qatar's Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al-Thani, Saudi Arabia's Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud, and United Arab Emirates' Minister of State Khalifa Almarar. [State Department photo by Ron Przysucha]
google cta
Analysis | Military Industrial Complex
Bart De Wever
Top image credit: Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever holds a press conference after a summit of Heads of State and Government of the European Union (18-19 December), in Brussels, on Thursday 18 December 2025. BELGA PHOTO NICOLAS MAETERLINCK via REUTERS CONNECT

EU avoids risky precedent in Ukraine aid deal

Europe

The European Union’s leaders began their crucial summit on Thursday aimed at converging around the Commission’s proposal to use Russian funds frozen in Europe to guarantee a “reparations loan” to Ukraine. In the early hours on Friday, they opted instead to extend a loan of €90 billion backed only by the EU’s own budget. The attempt to leverage the Russian assets opened a breach within the EU that could not be overcome. As the meeting opened, seven members — Belgium, Italy, Hungary, Slovakia, Czechia, Bulgaria and Malta — had opposed the proposal. Germany, Poland, Sweden, Finland, Denmark and the three Baltic countries were its main supporters.

Proponents of the reparations loan — above all Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz — argued that approval would make the EU indispensable to any diplomatic settlement of the war in Ukraine. The EU as a whole recognized that Ukraine’s war effort and governmental operations require substantial new financing no later than the first quarter of 2026.

keep readingShow less
090127-f-7383p-001-scaled
MQ-9 Reaper Drone. Photo Credit: U.S. Air Force

Military contractors reap big profits in war-to-homeland pipeline

Military Industrial Complex

By leveraging the dual-use nature of many of their products, where defense technologies can be integrated into the commercial sector and vice versa, Pentagon contractors like Palantir, Skydio, and General Atomics have gained ground at home for surveillance technologies — especially drones — proliferating war-tested military tech within the domestic sphere.

keep readingShow less
Paradoxically, 'Donroe Doctrine' could put US interests at risk

Paradoxically, 'Donroe Doctrine' could put US interests at risk

Latin America

The Trump administration’s new National Security Strategy (NSS) not only spends significantly more space discussing and developing an approach to the Western Hemisphere than any recent administration, but it also elevates the Americas as the primary focus for the administration — a view U.S. Secretary of State and national security adviser Marco Rubio iterated shortly prior to his first international trip to Central America.

The NSS lays out a specific vision of how to approach the Americas described as “Enlist and Expand” — by “enlisting regional champions that can help create tolerable stability … [and] expand our network in the region… [while] (through various means) discourag[ing] their collaboration with others.”

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.