Follow us on social

google cta
Destroyer

Sending warship, fighter jets to UAE, Biden digs deeper into Yemen fight

For a president who pledged to start reducing the U.S. footprint in the Middle East, he sure is doing his best to stay hooked.

Analysis | Middle East
google cta
google cta

On Wednesday, U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin announced that the United States would send the USS Cole, a guided missile destroyer, as well as 5th Generation fighter aircraft, to assist in shooting down missiles and drones fired at the UAE by Yemen’s Houthi rebels. 

The announcement comes as the Biden administration considers whether or not to re-designate the Houthis a foreign terrorist organization after Houthi missiles killed three people in Abu Dhabi on January 17, and additional attacks aimed at the U.S. Air Force base al-Dhafra were deflected by U.S. Patriot anti-missile defenses on January 24.

The Biden administration has stated its commitment to assisting the UAE, as well as Saudi Arabia, to defend against Houthi attacks. The UAE, as well as Saudi Arabia, would like the U.S. to do this by re-designating the Houthis as terrorists. Sending additional U.S. military assets to assist the UAE instead may reflect Biden’s unwillingness to re-impose the terrorist designation. 

The Houthis’ designation was one of the final acts of the out-going Trump administration. It drew significant criticism from humanitarian organizations, diplomats, and some members of Congress, based on the devastating humanitarian impact of preventing the distribution of aid to Yemenis living under Houthi control. Lifting it was one of Biden’s first decisions as president.

Yet with Houthi attacks now threatening U.S. troops stationed at al-Dhafra, Biden may reimpose the designation, although it is not clear if that would deter the Houthis. What is clear is that 25 million of Yemen’s 30 million inhabitants would lose access not only to food aid, but to any semblance of a functioning economy. The designation would place responsibility for the starvation of Yemenis squarely on the shoulders of the U.S., absolving the Houthis of their significant role in contributing to Yemen’s misery. The move could even bolster the group’s credibility, which they seek to establish on the basis of defending Yemen against Saudi, Emirati, and American aggression.

Wisely unwilling, so far, to reverse his position on the designation of the Houthis, Biden has turned instead to increasing the U.S. military’s role in defending the UAE. Yet by doing so, the president has put more U.S. military personnel and assets into harm's way. Although air defenses have thus far been able to prevent the majority of Houthi drones and missiles fired at the UAE and at Saudi Arabia from causing more significant casualties, these systems are not perfect. 

If a U.S. service-member is killed by a Houthi attack, would Biden escalate to a full-blown war against the Houthis? This would directly contradict Biden’s stated intent to withdraw from unnecessary conflicts in the Middle East such as Afghanistan, and refocus the U.S. military’s attention on more pressing security threats. For the Biden administration, such threats include China and Russia, although arguably climate change and COVID-19 more directly threaten Americans’ security and way of life.

Unfortunately, the Biden administration appears to have concluded that in order to combat the perceived threat of China’s expansion, the U.S. must maintain and even enhance relations with American security partners in the Middle East. As a result, the preferences of Saudi Arabia and the UAE are more likely to dictate U.S. policy than American interests, embroiling the U.S. more firmly in a region where most Americans are eager to avoid unnecessary military engagement following two decades of failed wars.

In an interesting bit of irony, the Naval destroyer the U.S. is deploying to the UAE, the USS Cole, is the same ship that Al-Qaeda attacked off the coast of Yemen in October 2000. 17 sailors died and 37 were injured in the most significant attack Al-Qaeda carried out on an American target prior to 9/11. 

U.S. policy in Yemen was once dictated by efforts to combat Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP). According to Brian Jenkins of RAND, the Houthi insurgency has been AQAP’s “most determined and effective foe.” For that reason, the U.S. might wish to strengthen Houthi efforts to combat Al-Qaeda rather than become further involved in a conflict that contributes to the destruction of Yemen, creating additional opportunities for Al-Qaeda to reconvene. Instead, the deployment of the same ship Al-Qaeda attacked symbolizes the tortured logic of U.S. policy in the Middle East.


The missile guided destroyer the USS Cole is headed to the Gulf to assist the UAE according to the Secretary of Defense. (US Navy photo)
google cta
Analysis | Middle East
Vice President JD Vance Azerbaijan Armenia
U.S. Vice President JD Vance gets out of a car before boarding Air Force Two upon departure for Azerbaijan, at Zvartnots International Airport in Yerevan, Armenia, February 10, 2026. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/Pool

VP Vance’s timely TRIPP to the South Caucasus

Washington Politics

Vice President JD Vance’s regional tour to Armenia and Azerbaijan this week — the highest level visit by an American official to the South Caucasus since Vice President Joe Biden went to Georgia in 2009 — demonstrates that Washington is not ignoring Yerevan and Baku and is taking an active role in their normalization process.

Vance’s stop in Armenia included an announcement that Yerevan has procured $11 million in U.S. defense systems — a first — in particular Shield AI’s V-BAT, an ISR unmanned aircraft system. It was also announced that the second stage of a groundbreaking AI supercomputer project led by Firebird, a U.S.-based AI cloud and infrastructure company, would commence after having secured American licensing for the sale and delivery of an additional 41,000 NVIDIA GB300 graphics processing units.

keep readingShow less
United Nations
Monitors at the United Nations General Assembly hall display the results of a vote on a resolution condemning the annexation of parts of Ukraine by Russia, amid Russia's invasion of Ukraine, at the United Nations Headquarters in New York City, New York, U.S., October 12, 2022. REUTERS/David 'Dee' Delgado||

We're burying the rules based order. But what's next?

Global Crises

In a Davos speech widely praised for its intellectual rigor and willingness to confront established truths, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney finally laid the fiction of the “rules-based international order” to rest.

The “rules-based order” — or RBIO — was never a neutral description of the post-World War II system of international law and multilateral institutions. Rather, it was a discourse born out of insecurity over the West’s decline and unwillingness to share power. Aimed at preserving the power structures of the past by shaping the norms and standards of the future, the RBIO was invariably something that needed to be “defended” against those who were accused of opposing it, rather than an inclusive system that governed relations between all states.

keep readingShow less
china trump
President Donald Trump announces the creation of a critical minerals reserve during an event in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, DC on Monday, February 2, 2026. Trump announced the creation of “Project Vault,” a rare earth stockpile to lower reliance on China for rare earths and other resources. Photo by Bonnie Cash/Pool/Sipa USA

Trump vs. his China hawks

Asia-Pacific

In the year since President Donald Trump returned to the White House, China hawks have started to panic. Leading lights on U.S. policy toward Beijing now warn that Trump is “barreling toward a bad bargain” with the Chinese Communist Party. Matthew Pottinger, a key architect of Trump’s China policy in his first term, argues that the president has put Beijing in a “sweet spot” through his “baffling” policy decisions.

Even some congressional Republicans have criticized Trump’s approach, particularly following his decision in December to allow the sale of powerful Nvidia AI chips to China. “The CCP will use these highly advanced chips to strengthen its military capabilities and totalitarian surveillance,” argued Rep. John Moolenaar (R-Mich.), who chairs the influential Select Committee on Competition with China.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.